Flat Earth

[Roman_1991]

Look up and out into the universe, see how many flat objects you see out there compared to how many round ones.

[1715053465]

1715053465

[1715053465]

1715053465

[1715053465]

1715053465

[1715053465]

1715053465

[BADecker]

Bible says earth is flat. In gospel of luke bible says that if you stand on any highest thing so you can see the everything of the world.
This is only possible if the world is flat then you can see the everything of the world.

The world isn't flat. Luke in the Bible, "says that if you stand on any highest thing so you can see the everything of the world," which means that there are some very high places on the earth, and very low places. "High" means that there is no flat. It means that there is low as well. The earth is absolutely not flat. From subatomic to microscopic to mountain tops there are hills and valleys of all kinds. Nothing is flat... especially not the earth.

[Roman_1991]

Just a test post. Sorry for this, guys)

You could always delete it.   

Already removed) Sorry)

[BADecker]

Just a test post. Sorry for this, guys)

You could always delete it.   

Already removed) Sorry)

You don't have to be sorry, but you can if you want.   

[Astargath]

Bible says earth is flat. In gospel of luke bible says that if you stand on any highest thing so you can see the everything of the world.
This is only possible if the world is flat then you can see the everything of the world.

The world isn't flat. Luke in the Bible, "says that if you stand on any highest thing so you can see the everything of the world," which means that there are some very high places on the earth, and very low places. "High" means that there is no flat. It means that there is low as well. The earth is absolutely not flat. From subatomic to microscopic to mountain tops there are hills and valleys of all kinds. Nothing is flat... especially not the earth.

BLASPHEMY!!!!!! The bible does say the earth is flat:

http://reflectionofmind.org/60-bible-verses-describing-flat-earth-inside-dome/

You are going to hell badecker!!!!!!!!!!

[notbatman]

How do I know its false?

You take binoculars and spend a nice day at the seaside.

Even a reasonably large lake would work.

You mean like this, here's a video of a day at the lake:



Flat Earth PROOF !! Lake Ponchartrain -- https://youtu.be/d3_umFGu_gc

With Standard Refraction 7/6*r, radius = 4618.83 Miles (24387440 Feet)
Refracted Horizon = 7.24 Miles (38252.42 Feet)
Refracted Drop= 185.19 Feet (2222.28 Inches)
Refracted Hidden= 66.12 Feet (793.4 Inches)
Refracted Dip = 0.090 Degrees, (0.0016 Radians)

source: https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

Ball Earth says the horizon is 7 miles out with 66' missing yet we can see the shore on the other side at 18 miles. Game over man.

[Astargath]

How do I know its false?

You take binoculars and spend a nice day at the seaside.

Even a reasonably large lake would work.

You mean like this, here's a video of a day at the lake:



Flat Earth PROOF !! Lake Ponchartrain -- https://youtu.be/d3_umFGu_gc

With Standard Refraction 7/6*r, radius = 4618.83 Miles (24387440 Feet)
Refracted Horizon = 7.24 Miles (38252.42 Feet)
Refracted Drop= 185.19 Feet (2222.28 Inches)
Refracted Hidden= 66.12 Feet (793.4 Inches)
Refracted Dip = 0.090 Degrees, (0.0016 Radians)

source: https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

Is there any flat earth ''proof'' that is not a youtube video?

[TooQik]

How do I know its false?

You take binoculars and spend a nice day at the seaside.

Even a reasonably large lake would work.

You mean like this, here's a video of a day at the lake:



Flat Earth PROOF !! Lake Ponchartrain -- https://youtu.be/d3_umFGu_gc

With Standard Refraction 7/6*r, radius = 4618.83 Miles (24387440 Feet)
Refracted Horizon = 7.24 Miles (38252.42 Feet)
Refracted Drop= 185.19 Feet (2222.28 Inches)
Refracted Hidden= 66.12 Feet (793.4 Inches)
Refracted Dip = 0.090 Degrees, (0.0016 Radians)

source: https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

Is there any flat earth ''proof'' that is not a youtube video?

Of course not, as that would mean flat Earthers would actually have to venture outside into the real world. It's much easier to create your own reality from the comfort of home / basement / padded cell. 

[notbatman]

^^^ I never thought these levels of cognitive dissonance could be possible.


Literally claiming a video of somebody documenting evidence is "create your own reality".

[JayJuanGee]

^^^ I never thought these levels of cognitive dissonance could be possible.


Literally claiming a video of somebody documenting evidence is "create your own reality".

hahahahahahahaha


As if you are some kind of expert about what constitutes good evidence?  


NOT


Just your topical conclusion in this thread, and your three year 536 page persistence in this nonsensical theme seems to establish that you are a contra-indicator to what constitutes good evidence.  

[Whtwabbit]

What evidence do you have to offer that the world is a globe spinning through "space"

[suchmoon]

How do I know its false?

You take binoculars and spend a nice day at the seaside.

Even a reasonably large lake would work.

You mean like this, here's a video of a day at the lake:



Flat Earth PROOF !! Lake Ponchartrain -- https://youtu.be/d3_umFGu_gc

With Standard Refraction 7/6*r, radius = 4618.83 Miles (24387440 Feet)
Refracted Horizon = 7.24 Miles (38252.42 Feet)
Refracted Drop= 185.19 Feet (2222.28 Inches)
Refracted Hidden= 66.12 Feet (793.4 Inches)
Refracted Dip = 0.090 Degrees, (0.0016 Radians)

source: https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

Ball Earth says the horizon is 7 miles out with 66' missing yet we can see the shore on the other side at 18 miles. Game over man.

So if a youtube video is proof, then these "proofs" should be sufficient to convince you:

https://www.metabunk.org/soundly-proving-the-curvature-of-the-earth-at-lake-pontchartrain.t8939/

[Whtwabbit]

How do I know its false?

You take binoculars and spend a nice day at the seaside.

Even a reasonably large lake would work.

You mean like this, here's a video of a day at the lake:



Flat Earth PROOF !! Lake Ponchartrain -- https://youtu.be/d3_umFGu_gc

With Standard Refraction 7/6*r, radius = 4618.83 Miles (24387440 Feet)
Refracted Horizon = 7.24 Miles (38252.42 Feet)
Refracted Drop= 185.19 Feet (2222.28 Inches)
Refracted Hidden= 66.12 Feet (793.4 Inches)
Refracted Dip = 0.090 Degrees, (0.0016 Radians)

source: https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

Ball Earth says the horizon is 7 miles out with 66' missing yet we can see the shore on the other side at 18 miles. Game over man.

So if a youtube video is proof, then these "proofs" should be sufficient to convince you:

https://www.metabunk.org/soundly-proving-the-curvature-of-the-earth-at-lake-pontchartrain.t8939/

if you can't see that video is CGI I feel sorry for you

[Astargath]

How do I know its false?

You take binoculars and spend a nice day at the seaside.

Even a reasonably large lake would work.

You mean like this, here's a video of a day at the lake:



Flat Earth PROOF !! Lake Ponchartrain -- https://youtu.be/d3_umFGu_gc

With Standard Refraction 7/6*r, radius = 4618.83 Miles (24387440 Feet)
Refracted Horizon = 7.24 Miles (38252.42 Feet)
Refracted Drop= 185.19 Feet (2222.28 Inches)
Refracted Hidden= 66.12 Feet (793.4 Inches)
Refracted Dip = 0.090 Degrees, (0.0016 Radians)

source: https://www.metabunk.org/curve/

Ball Earth says the horizon is 7 miles out with 66' missing yet we can see the shore on the other side at 18 miles. Game over man.

So if a youtube video is proof, then these "proofs" should be sufficient to convince you:

https://www.metabunk.org/soundly-proving-the-curvature-of-the-earth-at-lake-pontchartrain.t8939/

if you can't see that video is CGI I feel sorry for you

The video that notbatman linked is the same, is that one CGI too? You idiots would claim anything is CGI and yet none of you are qualified to say what is CGI and what isn't. Wake up already, people knew the earth wasn't flat thousands of years ago, stop this shit.

[JayJuanGee]

What evidence do you have to offer that the world is a globe spinning through "space"

The burden of proof of logic and empirical evidence is for the flat earthers to prove that the earth is flat... not the other way around.  They have to prove and rebutt a vast majority of evidence that is way too broad to go into and seems to have already been beaten to death in the more than 500 pages of this thread.

A more interesting question (or topic) involves whether there has been any manned moon landings...

The flat earth discussion is just a BIG ASS waste of time, and has little connection with actual science, math, logic, common sense and/or empirical evidence.

[Whtwabbit]

What evidence do you have to offer that the world is a globe spinning through "space"

The burden of proof of logic and empirical evidence is for the flat earthers to prove that the earth is flat... not the other way around.  They have to prove and rebutt a vast majority of evidence that is way too broad to go into and seems to have already been beaten to death in the more than 500 pages of this thread.

A more interesting question (or topic) involves whether there has been any manned moon landings...

The flat earth discussion is just a BIG ASS waste of time, and has little connection with actual science, math, logic, common sense and/or empirical evidence.

I thought not

[notbatman]

The Sun is observed to travel across the sky from east to west, therefore the burden of proof rests on those that claim it's at rest with respect to the Earth.



Flat Earth - Gyroscope Trilogy - Earth Is A Stationary Plane -- https://youtu.be/NR6muvuCr1Q

This is a summery video of 3 experiments designed to test the theory that Earth is a spinning ball

If the Earth were moving, as we are taught, then a Gyroscope
spun up & 'rigid in space' on earth, would reflect this
movement by rotating 15 degrees per hour over a 3/6/12 hr
period

These experiments test that theory

This video is not intended to provide proof of anything to
the viewer, It is provided as evidence in order for the viewer
to conduct their own experiments and build on this
knowledge base. ...

[JayJuanGee]

The Sun is observed to travel across the sky from east to west, therefore the burden of proof rests on those that claim it's at rest with respect to the Earth.

What does that have to do with the price of tea in china?

Have you ever noticed seasons in which the sun does not travel the exact same path?  Have you ever noticed the number of hours of daylight differ depending on latitude and time of the year?

Non-flat earthers have no burden to explain these phenomenon because they are already supported with substantial evidence, logic and common sense by the spinning globe theory, including an earth with a tilting axis... Go figure?

[notbatman]

^^^ There goes that cognitive dissonance again...




Literally the price of tea in China.

[tmfp]

Hehehe, 536 pages and still going.

The Sun is observed to travel across the sky from east to west, therefore the burden of proof rests on those that claim it's at rest with respect to the Earth.

Although you are sounding a little tired now.
Or was your question directed at members of the The Sun Is At Rest With Respect To Earth Society?
Sounds an interesting concept, got a link?