Miracles of Bible...

[u9y42]

Anyone who posts an SMBC comic is all right by me. My favorite cartoonist is Zach Weinersmith.

He has some pretty great comics - easily one of my favorites as well.

Where's Muhammed Zakir?

[Spendulus]

Anyone who posts an SMBC comic is all right by me. My favorite cartoonist is Zach Weinersmith.

He has some pretty great comics - easily one of my favorites as well.

Where's Muhammed Zakir?

My fig tree gives me no fruit.
Squirrels strip all fruit from it.
I eat tasty squirrels.

[Sithara007]

2000+ years and counting...

What miracles you are talking about buddy? Please give us some examples.

Sure "buddy"... Right here.


 

Hahahahaa....nice one. Really liked your reply buddy

[Wilikon]

2000+ years and counting...

What miracles you are talking about buddy? Please give us some examples.

Sure "buddy"... Right here.


 

Hahahahaa....nice one. Really liked your reply buddy

Other buddies will still find my reply funny, even 2000 years from now... Thanks to the miracle of Subspace communication...

 

[BADecker]

Actually, the miracles listed in the Bible are only a tiny fraction of all the miracles that have been done by God working through Judaism and Christianity.

[Muhammed Zakir]

[ center][ img]https://i.imgur.com/EWaYOzp.png[/img][/center]

Me? I will probably change the avatar, don't forget to change in this pic.

=snip=

Where's Muhammed Zakir?

Watching quietly. I don't like to involve in other religious thread especially in this "mocking" thread. No serious discussion, full of hurting comics.

[cryptodevil]

Watching quietly. I don't like to involve in other religious thread especially in this "mocking" thread. No serious discussion, full of hurting comics.

Awwww, are you sad that the religious aren't getting the respect and deference you all believe you're entitled to demand?

Funny how the more educated children are, the less swayed by fairy stories about bronze-age omnipotent super-beings they are. What we are witnessing around the world right now are the dying spasms of theism. There will be more atrocities, no doubt, it is what theists do best to impress their various gods after all, but in time you will all be replaced by minds capable of objective reasoning and critical thinking.

There is no 'serious discussion' to be had about religion, other than that which discusses how it poisons everything.

[Muhammed Zakir]

Watching quietly. I don't like to involve in other religious thread especially in this "mocking" thread. No serious discussion, full of hurting comics.

Awwww, are you sad that the religious aren't getting the respect and deference you all believe you're entitled to demand?

Funny how the more educated children are, the less swayed by fairy stories about bronze-age omnipotent super-beings they are. What we are witnessing around the world right now are the dying spasms of theism. There will be more atrocities, no doubt, it is what theists do best to impress their various gods after all, but in time you will all be replaced by minds capable of objective reasoning and critical thinking.

There is no 'serious discussion' to be had about religion, other than that which discusses how it poisons everything.

Not what you are thinking of. I don't like to involve in these discussions because it hurts many people. You have the right to freedom of speech and is your choice to talk/discuss about religion. This is the same for them. They can believe in that religion and let the live so. Why hurt them with comics? I saw another guy saying how he was offended by looking at these posts. Isn't this spreading more hatred?

[cryptodevil]

I saw another guy saying how he was offended by looking at these posts. Isn't this spreading more hatred?

Nobody has the right to demand to never be offended. Nobody.

Why would ridiculing religion be assumed to be a hateful act, or are you saying that it is the religious who would be filled with hate?

We spread the message of free-thought, releasing people from the shackles of their conditioned minds which are trained to maintain a toxic persistent state of intellectual dishonesty. We are not telling people what to think, we are saying to people they can learn the tools which allow them to objectively think for themselves and feel the release and liberation that intellectual honesty brings.

Mother Theresa, she believed the people she 'cared' for should suffer, that her god wanted them to suffer and that she was performing many righteous deeds by ensuring they did suffer while muttering 'magic' words and making 'magical' gestures with her hands, all the while refusing to permit them medicines or appropriate medical treatment. Intellectual dishonesty doesn't just hurt you, it hurts those who you pretend you are caring for, those who have no idea just how warped your mind is and are tricked into believing what you are doing is actually what is best for them, because you have conditioned them equally to be unable to see the truth of the situation they are in. Surrounded by stupid old ladies who imagine themselves to be 'married' to a mythical super-being.

[Muhammed Zakir]

Making hurting comics and/or teasing is not the way to make others go away from what you hate.

[cryptodevil]

Making hurting comics and/or teasing is not the way to make others go away from what you hate.

First you remove the sense of entitlement most theists believe they are due. To continue feigning some sort of respect for their conditioned brain-state is akin to telling someone you respect their racism, or homophobia.

You don't begin a conversation with a racist or a homophobe by reassuringly agreeing that they are entitled to respect for their warped opinion. What is needed is a clear definition from the outset that their dysfunctional psychology is not deserving of respect, but needs to be challenged and shown to be the toxic mindset it is. That it is harming them as much as the choices they make in life, when guided by this dysfunction, which harm others.

[Muhammed Zakir]

Making hurting comics and/or teasing is not the way to make others go away from what you hate.

First you remove the sense of entitlement most theists believe they are due. To continue feigning some sort of respect for their conditioned brain-state is akin to telling someone you respect their racism, or homophobia.

You don't begin a conversation with a racist or a homophobe by reassuringly agreeing that they are entitled to respect for their warped opinion. What is needed is a clear definition from the outset that their dysfunctional psychology is not deserving of respect, but needs to be challenged and shown to be the toxic mindset it is. That it is harming them as much as the choices they make in life, when guided by this dysfunction, which harm others.

They tell the same about atheists but they ain't making hurting comics here.

They tell you are wrong but you tell they are wrong.
They tell you have some problem to find the truth but you tell they have some problem to find the truth.
They tell you can't prove God doesn't exist but you tell you can't prove God does exist.
etc
.
.
.

If you think they are wrong, deal with them peacefully.

Btw, all religious and/or atheists aren't racists. You guys always come up something like this.

[cryptodevil]

They tell the same about atheists but they ain't making hurting comics here.

They tell you are wrong but you tell they are wrong.
They tell you have some problem to find the truth but you tell they have some problem to find the truth.
They tell you can't prove God doesn't exist but you tell you can't prove God does exist.
etc
.
.
.

If you think they are wrong, deal with them peacefully.

We are peaceful, you don't see anybody telling theists they are going to burn in hell etc. The difference is that theism absolutely *requires* one to maintain a state of intellectual dishonesty. The atheist position does not require logical fallacies, the theist argument does.

Btw, all religious and/or atheists aren't racists. You guys always come up something like this.

I didn't say they were, I said that it is the same dysfunctional mindset required for theism as for racism and homophobia.

[Muhammed Zakir]

They tell the same about atheists but they ain't making hurting comics here.

They tell you are wrong but you tell they are wrong.
They tell you have some problem to find the truth but you tell they have some problem to find the truth.
They tell you can't prove God doesn't exist but you tell you can't prove God does exist.
etc
.
.
.

If you think they are wrong, deal with them peacefully.

We are peaceful, you don't see anybody telling theists they are going to burn in hell etc. The difference is that theism absolutely *requires* one to maintain a state of intellectual dishonesty. The atheist position does not require logical fallacies, the theist argument does.
 

We, religious people also prove like in the first scenario. You guys say the same thing in second scenario. This is what racism is.

Btw, all religious and/or atheists aren't racists. You guys always come up something like this.

I didn't say they were, I said that it is the same dysfunctional mindset required for theism as for racism and homophobia.

What you said above is racism when you are telling "dysfunctional mindset". Both scenarios fits for both theists and atheists. Calling yourself functional mindset because they believe in God, means you are superior which is racism. You can't prove God doesn't exists and what we show isn't enough proof to make you believe God exists but still you say God doesn't exist and we are "abnormal".

[cryptodevil]

What you said above is racism when you are telling "dysfunctional mindset". Both scenarios fits for both theists and atheists. Calling yourself functional mindset because they believe in God, means you are superior which is racism.

See, typically dishonest theism statement.

Atheism is not about asserting our lack of belief to be superior to your belief system. Atheism is simply the assertion that your belief system requires logical fallacy and loss of intellectual integrity in order to be maintained, which is an erroneous mindset.

You can't prove God doesn't exists and what we show isn't enough proof to make you believe God exists but still you say God doesn't exist and we are "abnormal".

Again, no, Atheism is simply an assertion based on the recognition that Theism is erroneous and intellectually dishonest.

Theists tell you what to think, because they say it is the truth.

Atheists tell you not to listen to somebody who tells you to simply believe what they say, atheists assert that theists can learn the psychological tools to more honestly define reality. We don't have to tell you what that reality is, you are, after all, living your own reality. Unfortunately, however, as a theist you define reality erroneously and dishonestly.

You, like most theists, want to claim we are two sides of the same argument, which is false. You are one side of an erroneously-based assertion. We simply explain that you are asserting your position by way of fallacious reasoning and encourage you to learn critical thinking skills, instead of being told what to think by a system of theism which is based on dogma, not reasoning.

[Muhammed Zakir]

I have researched about difference, similarity and contradictions in different religions and atheims. I found Islam is better and I chose it. Reading Qur'an also gave me good knowledge.

This will be different for differen people. I think you are Islamaphobia, so when you read it, you will always think in a biased way which will always make you feel you are right.* If you think something is wrong/right, it is good to tell wrongdoers they are wrong in a peaceful way. You can always come up with a biased statement just like many theists because you are theistophobia. Happy debating!

* I am not telling what you think isn't right or wrong.

[cryptodevil]

* I am not telling what you think isn't right or wrong.

Well I am telling you that in order for you to believe that *any* religious book contains truthful answers to the questions of life you have opted to employ fallacious reasoning or, for that matter, you are insufficiently able to practice objective reasoning or critical thinking.

For you to 'choose' the Islamic version of 'truth' is no difference to any other theism. Your book contains statements which purport to be true, yet common sense would tell you, for instance, that if I were to say to you that I had a vision of a god speaking to me while I was having an epileptic fit, chances are pretty damn likely the experience I had was caused by neurological misfiring taking place.

But because your book is chock full of 'mystical' woo and magic, which you again fail to question sufficiently, you choose to believe that your 'prophet' was, indeed, a messenger spoken to regularly by a god.

Because, you know, he said so.

Your failure to recognise that him saying so is no different, IN ANY WAY, from me saying so, is why your erroneously believing you have a worthwhile investment in that particular brand of intellectual dishonesty, continues to deceive the one small part of your mind that is capable of acknowledging that you're not being particularly honest about how you choose to look at your theism-of-choice.

I get that everybody wants answers to the deep, meaningful, questions. What I don't get is the willingness most show towards simply accepting when one person, or a group of people, profess to have those answers and that all you have to do is accept their word for it. In any other aspect of your life you would not accept that, but when it comes to theism, you give it a 'special' pass on looking too closely at it for fear of seeing all the cracks and flaws it is riddled with.

Here's something for you, to keep this post on topic, most American Christians profess their love of the Bible, particularly the King James Version, which is full of 'thee' and 'thou' and much in the way of olde-worlde English terms and phrases. Except that at the time King James commissioned it, most people didn't actually speak that way anymore, but he specifically required his version of the Bible maintain the old-fashioned-even-for-back-then style of language because he felt, quite rightly it turned out, that people would be more inclined to feel it had gravitas and deep meaning.

So, today, we see the Xtian yanks citing Bible quote after Bible quote with their hearts aflutter at the use of 'thee' and 'thou' etc. etc. completely oblivious to the fact that it is an artificial spin on the original texts.

[Wilikon]

[ center][ img]https://i.imgur.com/EWaYOzp.png[/img][/center]

Me? I will probably change the avatar, don't forget to change in this pic.

=snip=

Where's Muhammed Zakir?

Watching quietly. I don't like to involve in other religious thread especially in this "mocking" thread. No serious discussion, full of hurting comics.

You can change your avatar anytime. I have already put a contingency plan in place...


I only care about ideas shared in this forum. "Imam bruce lee" represents a set of ideas. It is you now, but we had plenty before you and plenty after you.

I understand the feeling though. When someone makes a joke about sending a car bomb to my neighborhood when I wasn't even involved in a back and forth discussion, it was a little bit disconcerting to say the least...

[Snail2]

The guy who wrote that book were on shrooms for sure! Fun-shrooms give a new perspective in a good way

it was written by more than one person.

Well, then we discovered a whole network of drug abusers

[Muhammed Zakir]

You can change your avatar anytime. I have already put a contingency plan in place...

Looks good. +10.

I only care about ideas shared in this forum. "Imam bruce lee" represents a set of ideas. It is you now, but we had plenty before you and plenty after you.

I ain't Imam.

I understand the feeling though. When someone makes a joke about sending a car bomb to my neighborhood when I wasn't even involved in a back and forth discussion, it was a little bit disconcerting to say the least...

Uh! I had no intention to hurt you. You posted a meme about a car to tease me amd BADecker spread some lie or something(I don't remember correctly), so I took that car into what I said. I apologize if I had offended you. However, posting a meme there made you involve*!in the discussion.

* Cause to experience or participate in an activity or discussion.