Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 01:44:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 156 »
  Print  
Author Topic: FaucetBOX.com Discussion  (Read 236938 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
mavenraven
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 197
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 09, 2016, 02:45:29 PM
 #1601

Guys, it's irrelevant if captchas can by solved automatically or not. Current protections (captcha, timer per IP address) can be bypassed one way or another, it doesn't really matter how. The only thing that changes is whether we can call abusers bots, human-assisted scripts or rotators with built-in proxy switcher. The effect is the same: drained faucets, and there's only one solution: checking IP addresses.

to this I agree completely.

sorry for flames.
1714873442
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714873442

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714873442
Reply with quote  #2

1714873442
Report to moderator
1714873442
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714873442

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714873442
Reply with quote  #2

1714873442
Report to moderator
1714873442
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714873442

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714873442
Reply with quote  #2

1714873442
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714873442
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714873442

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714873442
Reply with quote  #2

1714873442
Report to moderator
btc4
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 02:45:37 PM
 #1602

i lose 0.2btc less than 15 hours[ 1.5 btc till now] from bot attacks! altough our balance is full for always.

BitBustah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 534



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 02:48:59 PM
 #1603

drained faucets, and there's only one solution: checking IP addresses.


BitBustah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 534



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 02:49:48 PM
 #1604

to this I agree completely.

sorry for flames.


Same here. Sorry for flaming.
Just wanted to help others.
BitBustah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 534



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 02:51:10 PM
 #1605

i lose 0.2btc less than 15 hours[ 1.5 btc till now] from bot attacks! altough our balance is full for always.

Can you go into your database and show some of the IPs that were being used to claim?

If you could provice a few IPs we might be able to help preventing the scammers (or bots) as you call them from coming back.
btc4
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 03:02:14 PM
 #1606

i lose 0.2btc less than 15 hours[ 1.5 btc till now] from bot attacks! altough our balance is full for always.

Can you go into your database and show some of the IPs that were being used to claim?

If you could provice a few IPs we might be able to help preventing the scammers (or bots) as you call them from coming back.
attacker using difference ip`s. i blocked  ip`s via CIDR tool in faucetbox admin panel.but  faucetbox script can not block! i think script dosent work!
i added this code 3 hours ago!
216.189.157.1/32
216.189.157.2/31
216.189.157.4/30
216.189.157.8/29
216.189.157.16/28
216.189.157.32/27
216.189.157.64/26
216.189.157.128/25
216.189.158.0/24
216.189.159.0/25
216.189.159.128/26
216.189.159.192/29
216.189.159.200/32
again this ip claim from my faucet:
.at the screen shot we can see this ip:216.189.157.89
https://i.imgur.com/DbXDGl2.png
also i saw user agents in my cpanel from this address: http://www.qtweb.net/

mavenraven
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 197
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 09, 2016, 03:03:22 PM
 #1607

can we maybe make a centralized service similar to nastyhosts where faucet owners submit bad IPs and other faucet owners can query for it?

it will have problems like false positives, but if we weight it out with more respectable/trusted inputs, I think it can work rather well

edit: let's pull our resources together! Smiley
BitBustah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 534



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 03:12:05 PM
 #1608

can we maybe make a centralized service similar to nastyhosts where faucet owners submit bad IPs and other faucet owners can query for it?

it will have problems like false positives, but if we weight it out with more respectable/trusted inputs, I think it can work rather well

But it will only check against "flagged" IPs.

I have been thinking about the opposite. Something like a members only faucet. IP and wallet will be checked at sign up and at every claim ever after. It would allow the faucet to "bind" a wallet to the ISP of the user.



I found another service like NastyHosts and it is really amazing. I combine it with NastyHosts. I've noticed that NH sometimes passed an obvious VPN while the other service didn't.
BitBustah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 534



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 03:13:47 PM
 #1609


This seems like a screenshot from a traffic report.

You need to give us IPs from the MySQL database. It's in the "Faucetinabox_IPs" table.
btc4
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 03:19:55 PM
 #1610


This seems like a screenshot from a traffic report.

You need to give us IPs from the MySQL database. It's in the "Faucetinabox_IPs" table.
i have more than 100 online real visitot at the moment. i can not share this ip`s.
you can see some ip from this attacker below:
bitcoin addresses:
1JrUwZVAB2xjw7uppDAAg4onCfA5MPcLRW
16yUMgZAUakYQoZsbQRxaFr33WeFUREoKf
1JxRYqpqX9ofG943ryuL6dYxacD47T2LA
15mL8T9PAvea5y3NXiDaQEYkaabeLFhKzw
15EDPGcENqAp7H3FnFwJtBbisEeyjvdzAC
1HfnCkDramdbLdAv7ai9rDMvxKXXka3PcH

IP:
216.189.157.1/32
216.189.157.2/31
216.189.157.4/30
216.189.157.8/29
216.189.157.16/28
216.189.157.32/27
216.189.157.64/26
216.189.157.128/25
216.189.158.0/24
216.189.159.0/25
216.189.159.128/26
216.189.159.192/29
216.189.159.200/32
192.126.170.1/32
192.126.170.2/31
192.126.170.4/30
192.126.170.8/29
192.126.170.16/28
192.126.170.32/27
192.126.170.64/26
192.126.170.128/26
45.33.145.1/32
45.33.145.2/31
45.33.145.4/30
45.33.145.8/29
45.33.145.16/28
45.33.145.32/27
45.33.145.64/26
45.33.145.128/26
45.33.145.192/27
45.33.145.224/28
45.33.145.240/29
45.33.145.248/31
45.33.145.250/32
192.126.100.1/32
192.126.100.2/31
192.126.100.4/30
192.126.100.8/29
192.126.100.16/28
192.126.100.32/27
192.126.100.64/26
192.126.100.128/25
192.126.101.0/24
192.126.102.0/23
192.126.104.0/21
192.126.112.0/20
192.126.128.0/19
192.126.160.0/20
192.126.176.0/22
192.126.180.0/25
192.126.180.128/26
192.126.180.192/29
192.126.146.1/32
192.126.146.2/31
192.126.146.4/30
192.126.146.8/29
192.126.146.16/28
192.126.146.32/27
192.126.146.64/26
192.126.146.128/26
192.126.146.192/29
104.128.233.1/32
104.128.233.2/31
104.128.233.4/30
104.128.233.8/29
104.128.233.16/28
104.128.233.32/27
104.128.233.64/26
104.128.233.128/26
104.128.233.192/29
168.235.67.1/32
168.235.67.2/31
168.235.67.4/30
168.235.67.8/29
168.235.67.16/28
168.235.67.32/27
168.235.67.64/26
168.235.67.128/26
168.235.67.192/27
168.235.67.224/28
168.235.67.240/29
168.235.67.248/31
168.235.67.250/32
192.126.1.104/29
192.126.1.112/28
192.126.1.128/25
192.126.2.0/23
192.126.4.0/22
192.126.8.0/21
192.126.16.0/20
192.126.32.0/19
192.126.64.0/18
192.126.128.0/19
192.126.160.0/20
192.126.176.0/22
192.126.180.0/25
192.126.180.128/26
192.126.180.192/29
192.126.180.200/32
185.72.178.1/32
185.72.178.2/31
185.72.178.4/30
185.72.178.8/29
185.72.178.16/28
185.72.178.32/27
185.72.178.64/26
185.72.178.128/26
185.72.178.192/27
185.72.178.224/30
185.72.178.228/31
185.72.178.230/32
45.43.26.101/32
45.43.26.102/31
45.43.26.104/29
45.43.26.112/28
45.43.26.128/26
45.43.26.192/29
45.43.26.200/32
192.126.135.1/32
192.126.135.2/31
192.126.135.4/30
192.126.135.8/29
192.126.135.16/28
192.126.135.32/27
192.126.135.64/26
192.126.135.128/26
192.126.135.192/29
192.126.135.200/32
192.126.159.1/32
192.126.159.2/31
192.126.159.4/30
192.126.159.8/29
192.126.159.16/28
192.126.159.32/27
192.126.159.64/26
192.126.159.128/26
192.126.159.192/29
192.126.159.200/32
91.238.114.1/32
91.238.114.2/31
91.238.114.4/30
91.238.114.8/29
91.238.114.16/28
91.238.114.32/27
91.238.114.64/26
91.238.114.128/26
91.238.114.192/27
91.238.114.224/28
91.238.114.240/29
91.238.114.248/31
91.238.114.250/32
46.148.31.1/32
46.148.31.2/31
46.148.31.4/30
46.148.31.8/29
46.148.31.16/28
46.148.31.32/27
46.148.31.64/26
46.148.31.128/26
46.148.31.192/27
46.148.31.224/28
46.148.31.240/29
46.148.31.248/31
46.148.31.250/32
46.148.30.1/32
46.148.30.2/31
46.148.30.4/30
46.148.30.8/29
46.148.30.16/28
46.148.30.32/27
46.148.30.64/26
46.148.30.128/26
46.148.30.192/27
46.148.30.224/28
46.148.30.240/29
46.148.30.248/31
46.148.30.250/32
89.36.216.1/32
89.36.216.2/31
89.36.216.4/30
89.36.216.8/29
89.36.216.16/28
89.36.216.32/27
89.36.216.64/26
89.36.216.128/26
89.36.216.192/29
89.36.216.200/32

mavenraven
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 197
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 09, 2016, 03:20:14 PM
 #1611

can we maybe make a centralized service similar to nastyhosts where faucet owners submit bad IPs and other faucet owners can query for it?

it will have problems like false positives, but if we weight it out with more respectable/trusted inputs, I think it can work rather well

But it will only check against "flagged" IPs.

I have been thinking about the opposite. Something like a members only faucet. IP and wallet will be checked at sign up and at every claim ever after. It would allow the faucet to "bind" a wallet to the ISP of the user.

yes, but at least the "flagged" IPs coverage will be greater if all faucet owners combine their resources instead of doing it individually.

also, we can do both!

we can have whitelist and blacklist, and faucet owner can then choose to be super strict (only IPs from white list) or be accepting of all IPs except the ones from the blacklist.
BitBustah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 534



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 03:28:06 PM
 #1612

i have more than 100 online real visitot at the moment. i can not share this ip`s.

If you cant share them there's little I can do for you. If you are convinced that people with blocked IPs are still claiming at your faucet then your script might be corrupt.


Could you share your 'error_log' file? It's on your FTP server.
netplus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 175
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 09, 2016, 03:36:36 PM
Last edit: January 09, 2016, 03:53:05 PM by netplus
 #1613

faucetbox is the intermediary between the users and the faucets owner
Why these problems ?
simply do not pay all this satoshi to scamer

.
BitBustah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 534



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 03:47:07 PM
 #1614

Is there update FaucetBox script  Smiley

What do you mean by that? When there's an update of Faucet in a Box script, you can see a notice in your faucet's admin panel Smiley


The script isn't automatically updated, right?
Also, when there's an update, is there a bug fix list?
And, is there an update planned? Smiley
Kazuldur (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 971
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 09, 2016, 04:04:47 PM
 #1615

faucetbox is the intermediary between the users and the faucets owner
Why these problems ?
simply do not pay all this satoshi to scamer

1. FaucetBOX.com doesn't know IPs of users the coins are sent to, only the script itself knows it
2. FaucetBOX.com doesn't have enough information to tell a difference between abuser and just an owner of a faucets list or a rotator with many referrals. It actually happened multiple times here when addresses were being accused of scamming, and later it turned out there were actually legit.
3. FaucetBOX.com is a payment cache. API call to pay to address was made, it's not FaucetBOX.com job to decide whether it's legit or not.

Is there update FaucetBox script  Smiley

What do you mean by that? When there's an update of Faucet in a Box script, you can see a notice in your faucet's admin panel Smiley


The script isn't automatically updated, right?
Also, when there's an update, is there a bug fix list?
And, is there an update planned? Smiley

1. no, it's not automatically updated
2. there's a list of changes that's shown in the admin panel when you're using outdated version
3. yup, there is, but nothing big, just minor tweaks

Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are of my own, not FaucetBOX.com's.
Kazuldur (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 971
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 09, 2016, 04:07:24 PM
 #1616

attacker using difference ip`s. i blocked  ip`s via CIDR tool in faucetbox admin panel.but  faucetbox script can not block! i think script dosent work!

Easy to check. Just provide your own IP address and test if you're blocked. However please note that it'll also lock you out of the admin panel, so have another IP address to revert the change from.

Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are of my own, not FaucetBOX.com's.
BitcoinFuture99
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 09, 2016, 05:47:47 PM
 #1617

Guys, it's irrelevant if captchas can by solved automatically or not. Current protections (captcha, timer per IP address) can be bypassed one way or another, it doesn't really matter how. The only thing that changes is whether we can call abusers bots, human-assisted scripts or rotators with built-in proxy switcher. The effect is the same: drained faucets, and there's only one solution: checking IP addresses.


I totally agree with you. Don't waste energy on captchas improvements and adding my point to it we have to introduce new ways to stop bots.

Now days Captcha is the real enemy for Faucets which never improved to deal with scammers and bots.

Every Captcha service should now verify each user before using captcha through registration or ID or phone number etc
BitBustah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 534



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 06:02:51 PM
 #1618

Every Captcha service should now verify each user before using captcha through registration or ID or phone number etc

True. But I think that people who have access to multiple IPs will also have multiple hosts/domains and probably unlimited email addresses.

Phone numbers are a good option, but I'm one of those people who doesn't want to share his phone number for a few satoshi. I'm sure there are more people like me.
BitcoinFuture99
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 09, 2016, 06:14:05 PM
 #1619

Every Captcha service should now verify each user before using captcha through registration or ID or phone number etc

True. But I think that people who have access to multiple IPs will also have multiple hosts/domains and probably unlimited email addresses.

Phone numbers are a good option, but I'm one of those people who doesn't want to share his phone number for a few satoshi. I'm sure there are more people like me.

Here is another point. Captcha service should not allow any Proxy IP and VPS to use its service. So main problem of visitors blockage will also be solved for faucet owners and revenue will also not be effected so much.

If Captcha Service cannot do this for all they should introduce new feature for blocking Proxy and VPS IPs. by choice of the owners, if owners want it enable it if not disable it
BitBustah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 534



View Profile
January 09, 2016, 06:42:24 PM
 #1620

Here is another point. Captcha service should not allow any Proxy IP and VPS to use its service.


What makes the captcha service better in VPN/proxy detection than another service? Like NH or even a paying service?
Pages: « 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 156 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!