TYGRR.* assets on GLBSE delisted.

[MPOE-PR]

+1

Just because of your ridiculous, petty "PR" forum account, I'm never going near the MPwhatever exchange.

You seem to be discussing some sort of popularity contest. MPEx is not for you. MPEx is for the investors. Do you understand the difference?

Im not saying it to be an asshole. GLBSE needs a serious competitor not a crazy acting one.

Crazy is what crazy does.

[1714719882]

1714719882

[1714719882]

1714719882

[1714719882]

1714719882

[1714719882]

1714719882

[1714719882]

1714719882

[EskimoBob]

Nefario, what do you expect me to do with this code now?

Nefario, is that's how PPT peddlers are removed form the equation?
Goat is down, but what about the rest of the jokers?
If they had any BTC in GLBSE, will this be redistributed to PPT holders?

Are you willing to work with another exchange and figure out how to transfer the delisted shares and user data (name, share balance etc)?

[Ghostofkobra]

Nafario,

I am just a lowly holder of a few Tyggr bonds.

I am not to much of a fan of you kicking out and delisting MY bonds.

Please, put the Tyggr bonds back into the system and return my bonds to me.

I would much rather have a bond on glbse than a claim code.


* This message was NOT sponsored by Goat *


//GoK

[MPOE-PR]

Here's a list of assets that have not been trading (some in over a month) and are still listed on glbse:

RUGATU, PGM, ABSORB.1.4-6.SHORT, ADMINSORTED, FPGA-EU, ARS, BIT.INC, BIF.P2P.LOANS, BIF-AG-INDEX, CHEAPERINBITCOINS-STOCKS, IMPACT, DI.BFLSC.FAIL, MEI.DEEPBIT.A, UBTC, YXWINE-CARR2010, CIUCIU.MINING, MEI.DEEPBIT.B, AA, BTCASS_BOND_A, HEDGE.TYGRR.BOND-B.LONG, HEDGE.GIGA.LONG, HEDGE.TEEK.B.LONG, DI.BFLSC.SUCCEED, BITSPLIT.MINING.1TH, MAR, MINING_B.TAILS.FUT, HEDGE.TYGRR.BOND-B.SHORT, MINING_B.HEADS.FUT, NONVERBA, JTGB, STANDARD.GOLD, STANDARD.FIAT, CIB-SOLUTIONS, MEI.SLUSH.B, MEI.SLUSH.A, CANMINE, HEDGE.GIGA.SHORT, HEDGE.TEEK.B.SHORT, MEI.OZCOIN.B, EN, SLV-BUFFALO, ASIC_RUS.SHA, ANTI-PIRATE, HEDGE, BST, POLY.10.-2, CRYPTOL, JLP, MEI.DEEPBIT.A1, METAL, ENJAN16, BM.

About 50 or so.

[Bitcoin Oz]

Nefario, what do you expect me to do with this code now?

Nefario, is that's how PPT peddlers are removed form the equation?
Goat is down, but what about the rest of the jokers?
If they had any BTC in GLBSE, will this be redistributed to PPT holders?

Are you willing to work with another exchange and figure out how to transfer the delisted shares and user data (name, share balance etc)?

He probably would do that if one offered that isnt MPEX 

[MPOE-PR]

Nefario, what do you expect me to do with this code now?

Nefario, is that's how PPT peddlers are removed form the equation?
Goat is down, but what about the rest of the jokers?
If they had any BTC in GLBSE, will this be redistributed to PPT holders?

Are you willing to work with another exchange and figure out how to transfer the delisted shares and user data (name, share balance etc)?

He probably would do that if one offered that isnt MPEX 

MPEx was never open for the sort of crud GLBSE lists.

[Akka]

Nefario, what do you expect me to do with this code now?

Nefario, is that's how PPT peddlers are removed form the equation?
Goat is down, but what about the rest of the jokers?
If they had any BTC in GLBSE, will this be redistributed to PPT holders?

Are you willing to work with another exchange and figure out how to transfer the delisted shares and user data (name, share balance etc)?

He probably would do that if one offered that isnt MPEX 

MPEx was never open for the sort of crud GLBSE lists.

Please stop bashing at GLBSE: That's no the point of this discussion.

And if you want to be a serious concurrent, work on you site, it's unusable for anyone not suffering from a Savant syndrome.


Back to topic:

Nefario, I can understand you are upset, but please try for a moment to see it from the perspective from Tygrr shareholders. Removing all Tygrr assets instantly, without further notice to the shareholders is like a punch in the face from you to all Tygrr shareholders.

Please reconsider this.

[MPOE-PR]

Nefario, what do you expect me to do with this code now?

Nefario, is that's how PPT peddlers are removed form the equation?
Goat is down, but what about the rest of the jokers?
If they had any BTC in GLBSE, will this be redistributed to PPT holders?

Are you willing to work with another exchange and figure out how to transfer the delisted shares and user data (name, share balance etc)?

He probably would do that if one offered that isnt MPEX 

MPEx was never open for the sort of crud GLBSE lists.

Please stop bashing at GLBSE: That's no the point of this discussion.

And if you want to be a serious concurrent, work on you site, it's unusable for anyone not suffering from a Savant syndrome.


Back to topic:

Nefario, I can understand you are upset, but please try for a moment to see it from the perspective from Tygrr shareholders. Removing all Tygrr assets instantly, without further notice to the shareholders is like a punch in the face from you to all Tygrr shareholders.

Please reconsider this.

The thing is MPEx owns this market. The other thing is, you're a ridiculous shill. The third thing is, much like honest bob above, the pyraponzi stuff you use in your signature makes you about as irrelevant as roadkill.

[Bitcoin Oz]

Nefario, what do you expect me to do with this code now?

Nefario, is that's how PPT peddlers are removed form the equation?
Goat is down, but what about the rest of the jokers?
If they had any BTC in GLBSE, will this be redistributed to PPT holders?

Are you willing to work with another exchange and figure out how to transfer the delisted shares and user data (name, share balance etc)?

He probably would do that if one offered that isnt MPEX 

MPEx was never open for the sort of crud GLBSE lists.

Please stop bashing at GLBSE: That's no the point of this discussion.

And if you want to be a serious concurrent, work on you site, it's unusable for anyone not suffering from a Savant syndrome.


Back to topic:

Nefario, I can understand you are upset, but please try for a moment to see it from the perspective from Tygrr shareholders. Removing all Tygrr assets instantly, without further notice to the shareholders is like a punch in the face from you to all Tygrr shareholders.

Please reconsider this.

The thing is MPEx owns this market. The other thing is, you're a ridiculous shill. The third thing is, much like honest bob above, the pyraponzi stuff you use in your signature makes you about as irrelevant as roadkill.

I guess thats why your ignore button glows orange. Because people clearly love your service.

[Nefario]

Phrases in contracts like "in case GLBSE is no longer a viable platform" etc seemed to me overcautious... how ingenuous I am.

Cryptostocks seems nice, but, does anyone know if they are any more reliable?

I've spoken to cryptostocks, asking about enabling a method for assets to move from GLBSE easily to there,  he had no interest.

[pyrkne]

I'm sure Nefario will be reasonable and work something out once he cools down. He is just upset I would not trade him the "Fake" GLBSE assets. He is just upset and power tripping right now.

I think it goes beyond that, Goat. I believe that Nefario is in a race against time (understandably) to disassociate GLBSE with "unsavory" securities.

This seems like it's part drama about you, part sweeping GLBSE's history under the rug before they go official.

[Uglux]

Phrases in contracts like "in case GLBSE is no longer a viable platform" etc seemed to me overcautious... how ingenuous I am.

Cryptostocks seems nice, but, does anyone know if they are any more reliable?

I've spoken to cryptostocks, asking about enabling a method for assets to move from GLBSE easily to there,  he had no interest.

Not a wise decision. Networking would not be a bad idea. Have you asked the other  exchanges?

[Nefario]

Phrases in contracts like "in case GLBSE is no longer a viable platform" etc seemed to me overcautious... how ingenuous I am.

Cryptostocks seems nice, but, does anyone know if they are any more reliable?

I've spoken to cryptostocks, asking about enabling a method for assets to move from GLBSE easily to there,  he had no interest.

Not a wise decision. Networking would not be a bad idea. Have asked the other  exchanges?

What other exchanges?

[Nefario]

Phrases in contracts like "in case GLBSE is no longer a viable platform" etc seemed to me overcautious... how ingenuous I am.

Cryptostocks seems nice, but, does anyone know if they are any more reliable?

I've spoken to cryptostocks, asking about enabling a method for assets to move from GLBSE easily to there,  he had no interest.

You're the bottom of the barrel, of course not.  People look up from where you are, not down.

Have you looked at whats on cryptostocks?

[MPOE-PR]

Phrases in contracts like "in case GLBSE is no longer a viable platform" etc seemed to me overcautious... how ingenuous I am.

Cryptostocks seems nice, but, does anyone know if they are any more reliable?

I've spoken to cryptostocks, asking about enabling a method for assets to move from GLBSE easily to there,  he had no interest.

Not a wise decision. Networking would not be a bad idea. Have asked the other  exchanges?

What other exchanges?

**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Aug 17 20:54:30 2012

Aug 17 20:54:30 <nefario>        which reminds me
Aug 17 20:54:38 <nefario>        I wanted to talk to you about options on GLBSE
Aug 17 20:54:48 <mircea_popescu>        aha ?
Aug 17 20:55:12 <nefario>        I'd like to add them ASAP
Aug 17 20:55:46 <nefario>        so would be looking at adding mpex as the options provider
Aug 17 20:55:51 <nefario>        or engine
Aug 17 20:56:01 <mircea_popescu>        rg was saying something about that.
Aug 17 20:56:14 <nefario>        I haven't talked to anyone else about it
Aug 17 20:56:20 <nefario>        just been an idea floating in my head
Aug 17 20:56:23 <mircea_popescu>        really ?! odd.
Aug 17 20:56:49 <nefario>        i've not gone into much detail on the implementation of options
Aug 17 20:57:03 <nefario>        and assume that your platform for it is fairly sound
Aug 17 20:57:11 <mircea_popescu>        it's done okay so far.
Aug 17 20:57:24 <nefario>        well you know what I mean
Aug 17 20:57:28 <mircea_popescu>        but in truth, bitcoin is a very dubious thing, so we don't really know.
Aug 17 20:57:46 <nefario>        its been running as long as GLBSE 2.0 has without any big fuckups
Aug 17 20:57:58 <nefario>        which in this day seems to be a major thing
Aug 17 20:58:00 <mircea_popescu>        actually it's been running since before bitcoinica.
Aug 17 20:59:06 <nefario>        something like that
Aug 17 20:59:13 <mircea_popescu>        yeah.
Aug 17 20:59:15 <nefario>        interested?
Aug 17 20:59:50 <mircea_popescu>        what'd i be interested in ?
Aug 17 21:00:24 <nefario>        having mpex and GLBSE hooked in together to provide options for all assets on GLBSE
Aug 17 21:01:50 <mircea_popescu>        not really.
Aug 17 21:02:36 <nefario>        fair enough
Aug 17 21:02:40 <nefario>        thought you might be
Aug 17 21:02:43 <nefario>        later
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Aug 17 21:54:39 2012

Fuckwit.

[Nefario]

Exactly, what other exchanges.

[reeses]

Phrases in contracts like "in case GLBSE is no longer a viable platform" etc seemed to me overcautious... how ingenuous I am.

Cryptostocks seems nice, but, does anyone know if they are any more reliable?

I've spoken to cryptostocks, asking about enabling a method for assets to move from GLBSE easily to there,  he had no interest.

Not a wise decision. Networking would not be a bad idea. Have asked the other  exchanges?

What other exchanges?

**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Aug 17 20:54:30 2012

Aug 17 20:54:30 <nefario>        which reminds me
Aug 17 20:54:38 <nefario>        I wanted to talk to you about options on GLBSE
Aug 17 20:54:48 <mircea_popescu>        aha ?
Aug 17 20:55:12 <nefario>        I'd like to add them ASAP
Aug 17 20:55:46 <nefario>        so would be looking at adding mpex as the options provider
Aug 17 20:55:51 <nefario>        or engine
Aug 17 20:56:01 <mircea_popescu>        rg was saying something about that.
Aug 17 20:56:14 <nefario>        I haven't talked to anyone else about it
Aug 17 20:56:20 <nefario>        just been an idea floating in my head
Aug 17 20:56:23 <mircea_popescu>        really ?! odd.
Aug 17 20:56:49 <nefario>        i've not gone into much detail on the implementation of options
Aug 17 20:57:03 <nefario>        and assume that your platform for it is fairly sound
Aug 17 20:57:11 <mircea_popescu>        it's done okay so far.
Aug 17 20:57:24 <nefario>        well you know what I mean
Aug 17 20:57:28 <mircea_popescu>        but in truth, bitcoin is a very dubious thing, so we don't really know.
Aug 17 20:57:46 <nefario>        its been running as long as GLBSE 2.0 has without any big fuckups
Aug 17 20:57:58 <nefario>        which in this day seems to be a major thing
Aug 17 20:58:00 <mircea_popescu>        actually it's been running since before bitcoinica.
Aug 17 20:59:06 <nefario>        something like that
Aug 17 20:59:13 <mircea_popescu>        yeah.
Aug 17 20:59:15 <nefario>        interested?
Aug 17 20:59:50 <mircea_popescu>        what'd i be interested in ?
Aug 17 21:00:24 <nefario>        having mpex and GLBSE hooked in together to provide options for all assets on GLBSE
Aug 17 21:01:50 <mircea_popescu>        not really.
Aug 17 21:02:36 <nefario>        fair enough
Aug 17 21:02:40 <nefario>        thought you might be
Aug 17 21:02:43 <nefario>        later
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Aug 17 21:54:39 2012

Fuckwit.

This sort of thing is why I really thought Nefario was 14 until a photo was distributed as part of the London conference agenda.

It's as if there is no concept of consequences or even results of his behavior.

[thatbluedude]

nefario and goat are both acting like children, having a mudfight on the backs of their customers. I'm disappointed in both.

[Shadow383]

Nefario, what do you expect me to do with this code now?

Nefario, is that's how PPT peddlers are removed form the equation?
Goat is down, but what about the rest of the jokers?
If they had any BTC in GLBSE, will this be redistributed to PPT holders?

Are you willing to work with another exchange and figure out how to transfer the delisted shares and user data (name, share balance etc)?

He probably would do that if one offered that isnt MPEX 

MPEx was never open for the sort of crud GLBSE lists.

Please stop bashing at GLBSE: That's no the point of this discussion.

And if you want to be a serious concurrent, work on you site, it's unusable for anyone not suffering from a Savant syndrome.


Back to topic:

Nefario, I can understand you are upset, but please try for a moment to see it from the perspective from Tygrr shareholders. Removing all Tygrr assets instantly, without further notice to the shareholders is like a punch in the face from you to all Tygrr shareholders.

Please reconsider this.

The thing is MPEx owns this market. The other thing is, you're a ridiculous shill. The third thing is, much like honest bob above, the pyraponzi stuff you use in your signature makes you about as irrelevant as roadkill.

Yeah, how often do you see people who run legit exchanges (y'know, ones that have their own domain names that don't also host a porn site etc) posting comments like that to customers?
Exactly.

[Uglux]

Phrases in contracts like "in case GLBSE is no longer a viable platform" etc seemed to me overcautious... how ingenuous I am.

Cryptostocks seems nice, but, does anyone know if they are any more reliable?

I've spoken to cryptostocks, asking about enabling a method for assets to move from GLBSE easily to there,  he had no interest.

Not a wise decision. Networking would not be a bad idea. Have asked the other  exchanges?

What other exchanges?

**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Aug 17 20:54:30 2012

Aug 17 20:54:30 <nefario>        which reminds me
Aug 17 20:54:38 <nefario>        I wanted to talk to you about options on GLBSE
Aug 17 20:54:48 <mircea_popescu>        aha ?
Aug 17 20:55:12 <nefario>        I'd like to add them ASAP
Aug 17 20:55:46 <nefario>        so would be looking at adding mpex as the options provider
Aug 17 20:55:51 <nefario>        or engine
Aug 17 20:56:01 <mircea_popescu>        rg was saying something about that.
Aug 17 20:56:14 <nefario>        I haven't talked to anyone else about it
Aug 17 20:56:20 <nefario>        just been an idea floating in my head
Aug 17 20:56:23 <mircea_popescu>        really ?! odd.
Aug 17 20:56:49 <nefario>        i've not gone into much detail on the implementation of options
Aug 17 20:57:03 <nefario>        and assume that your platform for it is fairly sound
Aug 17 20:57:11 <mircea_popescu>        it's done okay so far.
Aug 17 20:57:24 <nefario>        well you know what I mean
Aug 17 20:57:28 <mircea_popescu>        but in truth, bitcoin is a very dubious thing, so we don't really know.
Aug 17 20:57:46 <nefario>        its been running as long as GLBSE 2.0 has without any big fuckups
Aug 17 20:57:58 <nefario>        which in this day seems to be a major thing
Aug 17 20:58:00 <mircea_popescu>        actually it's been running since before bitcoinica.
Aug 17 20:59:06 <nefario>        something like that
Aug 17 20:59:13 <mircea_popescu>        yeah.
Aug 17 20:59:15 <nefario>        interested?
Aug 17 20:59:50 <mircea_popescu>        what'd i be interested in ?
Aug 17 21:00:24 <nefario>        having mpex and GLBSE hooked in together to provide options for all assets on GLBSE
Aug 17 21:01:50 <mircea_popescu>        not really.
Aug 17 21:02:36 <nefario>        fair enough
Aug 17 21:02:40 <nefario>        thought you might be
Aug 17 21:02:43 <nefario>        later
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Aug 17 21:54:39 2012

Fuckwit.

Quite arrogant, mr. mircea_popescu.

A lot of drama on the forum recently, and I'm out of popcorn now . But at some point, some people have to realize, that they made mistakes. Those who can admit that, show at least the will to learn from it and deserve some respect. Otherwise, you are just a nasty stubborn goat (we call it "sturer Bock" here in germany). I think it is a good sign, that nefario is open to new ideas and connections. It would be even better to show some good will, even now, by giving that stubborn goat some time to react or at least a warning. People will notice quickly, who is the uncooperative party in that matter. Although I don't know the full background of that hasty delisting in detail, especially not how urgent this "cleaning" was. But the way nefario treated that goatstory was not very elegant. On the other hand, sometimes people need a warning shot...

Besides, I'm very disappointed, that no other exchange wants to connect with GLBSE. Okay, not a suprise with MPOE, because of his behavior around here. But still, disappointing.
Come on. It is the internet. It is all about connecting people...Putting walls of ignorance around you, will only lead to isolation.