|
CoinLearn
|
 |
December 04, 2016, 10:12:39 PM |
|
If my potential activity is in the range of Legendary, then is there any way to confirm whether I will be a real Legendary once my post count equals my potential activity?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DarkStar_
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2758
Merit: 3282
|
|
December 04, 2016, 10:31:36 PM |
|
If my potential activity is in the range of Legendary, then is there any way to confirm whether I will be a real Legendary once my post count equals my potential activity?
Yes. If your real post count equals your potential activity, and your title appears as "Legendary", than your a legendary! Other than that, there isn't a way to confirm unless you ask theymos or possibly an admin, but I highly doubt they would tell you. It's guaranteed if your potential activity is above the legendary range though. |
taking a break - expect delayed responses
|
|
|
|
royalfestus
|
|
December 06, 2016, 07:47:31 AM |
|
Last 2 weeks I was having a certain period of weeks to get to the next rank, after 2 weeks it remains the same number of weeks, are there no regulators to the counting of days/ weeks?
What can one do to get blacklisted?
|
|
|
|
|
achow101 (OP)
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
December 06, 2016, 01:22:24 PM |
|
Last 2 weeks I was having a certain period of weeks to get to the next rank, after 2 weeks it remains the same number of weeks, are there no regulators to the counting of days/ weeks?
This is very incomprehensible, can you please ask again with proper english? What can one do to get blacklisted?
You don't want to be blacklisted, but looking at your posting history, you're well on your way there. All you need to do is be a sig spammer. |
|
|
|
achow101 (OP)
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
December 06, 2016, 04:44:45 PM |
|
Have you considered adding automatic redirect to the token link when the "estimating" is done?
I've been using it to find some alts recently, and often accidentally close it or close it thinking I won't need it any more, and than when I realize I do, I need to re-estimate as the link with the token that shows the previous estimate isn't in my history. Really small thing, that probably won't affect most so I understand if it isn't added.
Done. It will redirect you to the estimate permalink after you create the request. This will show in your browser history. |
|
|
|
Chris!
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1122
|
|
December 06, 2016, 06:57:22 PM |
|
Have you considered adding automatic redirect to the token link when the "estimating" is done?
I've been using it to find some alts recently, and often accidentally close it or close it thinking I won't need it any more, and than when I realize I do, I need to re-estimate as the link with the token that shows the previous estimate isn't in my history. Really small thing, that probably won't affect most so I understand if it isn't added.
Done. It will redirect you to the estimate permalink after you create the request. This will show in your browser history. Ahhh this is perfect! I'm using it for the exact same purpose. These updates just keep getting better and better. https://blockchain.info/tx/c217a3469cfd76cb9e460040480c98bb3b8beeb711980a742cd02d7fa4c47f3b |
|
|
|
|
|
viziano
|
|
December 07, 2016, 10:02:43 PM |
|
Really like this lol Although people go for extra low price  |
|
|
|
|
royalfestus
|
|
December 09, 2016, 06:00:51 AM |
|
Last 2 weeks I was having a certain period of weeks to get to the next rank, after 2 weeks it remains the same number of weeks, are there no regulators to the counting of days/ weeks?
This is very incomprehensible, can you please ask again with proper english? What can one do to get blacklisted?
You don't want to be blacklisted, but looking at your posting history, you're well on your way there. All you need to do is be a sig spammer. The 2 weeks notice on the estimator that I thought wont be considered had been resolved. Will PM you on what you said on my posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Gunthar
|
|
December 16, 2016, 04:43:31 PM |
|
I understand the posts quality feature coudnt be accurate but it was a start investigating over accounts. I am able to look at the quality by myself if other indicators move up to a good account but i woudnt bother at all if your estimator (for example) tagged it as "Very poor". Can anyone point me at an account with "Very poor" post quality (by achow's estimator) that isnt REALLy "Very poor"? Same would happen for "Excellent" or "Very good": i still have to find someone with "Very good" post quality from your old estimator that wasnt really "Very good" or "Good" at least.
What i'm trying to say: put it back! It isnt accurate...but everyone know that. Someone says your estimator isnt accurate in pricing too: are you going to shut down this great tool because many whiners say "it isnt accurate"?
This is a great tool and it helps a lot, dont take off features, that's a step backward.
~Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Arrakeen
|
|
December 16, 2016, 05:30:32 PM |
|
I understand the posts quality feature coudnt be accurate but it was a start investigating over accounts. I am able to look at the quality by myself if other indicators move up to a good account but i woudnt bother at all if your estimator (for example) tagged it as "Very poor". Can anyone point me at an account with "Very poor" post quality (by achow's estimator) that isnt REALLy "Very poor"? Same would happen for "Excellent" or "Very good": i still have to find someone with "Very good" post quality from your old estimator that wasnt really "Very good" or "Good" at least.
What i'm trying to say: put it back! It isnt accurate...but everyone know that. Someone says your estimator isnt accurate in pricing too: are you going to shut down this great tool because many whiners say "it isnt accurate"?
This is a great tool and it helps a lot, dont take off features, that's a step backward.
~Gun
I don't think it is a step backward. Someone looking into buying an account could easily manage to deduce the quality of posts written by the owner of the account in question; this is just a tool to easier agree on an acceptable price for the account. I would not trust the results of a machine deciding on someone's post quality, but rather decide for myself. |
|
|
|
|
|
Gunthar
|
|
December 16, 2016, 05:37:29 PM |
|
Someone looking into buying an account
Which is deprecable and discouraged tho: lenders use this to see if borrowers are asking loans as a "forced" sale of their accounts I would not trust the results of a machine deciding on someone's post quality, but rather decide for myself.
So you let a machine deciding on someone's account value or do you decide that by yourself too? (i hope you see my point now) ~Gun |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinsummoner
|
|
December 16, 2016, 05:41:37 PM |
|
I understand the posts quality feature coudnt be accurate but it was a start investigating over accounts. I am able to look at the quality by myself if other indicators move up to a good account but i woudnt bother at all if your estimator (for example) tagged it as "Very poor". Can anyone point me at an account with "Very poor" post quality (by achow's estimator) that isnt REALLy "Very poor"? Same would happen for "Excellent" or "Very good": i still have to find someone with "Very good" post quality from your old estimator that wasnt really "Very good" or "Good" at least.
What i'm trying to say: put it back! It isnt accurate...but everyone know that. Someone says your estimator isnt accurate in pricing too: are you going to shut down this great tool because many whiners say "it isnt accurate"?
This is a great tool and it helps a lot, dont take off features, that's a step backward.
~Gun
I don't think it is a step backward. Someone looking into buying an account could easily manage to deduce the quality of posts written by the owner of the account in question; this is just a tool to easier agree on an acceptable price for the account. I would not trust the results of a machine deciding on someone's post quality, but rather decide for myself. This just for estimation and this is a good thing that you can have an idea but you have a point every thing in this machine like length of the post the more words or long your post it can be consider as high quality poster. but the post if it is a great grammar or readable they can not scan it you should check it for your self to prove that the account is high quality and the estimated price is still not a good base price just always check the account post to make sure it is good or not. |
|
|
|
Chris!
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1122
|
|
December 17, 2016, 02:42:41 PM |
|
If i was to sell my account in the future i would like to be able to log it in an account sold thread.
Maybe if an account changes hands and this script can search that thread it would affect price?
That way if an account has been traded many times price should be negatively affected.
... Sure you go ahead and write up that code and I'm sure achow101 will get right on it  . Do you know how much work goes into finding out if one single account is sold? Now multiply that by 100,000. How would this script find out if the accounts were sold? Admins don't just give out IP information to anyone for any arbitrary reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bestwishes745
|
|
December 25, 2016, 07:25:32 PM |
|
From a few minutes I am trying to check the UID of account but it do not show the result and show the message "Request Queuing failed. Please try again."
Is that problem to everyone or only me facing the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
achow101 (OP)
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
December 25, 2016, 07:28:55 PM |
|
From a few minutes I am trying to check the UID of account but it do not show the result and show the message "Request Queuing failed. Please try again."
Is that problem to everyone or only me facing the problem.
Fixed. |
|
|
|
Vlad2Vlad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1530
www.ixcoin.net
|
|
December 26, 2016, 12:03:26 PM |
|
.28 BTC? Bahahahaaa.
Try 100 times that. People were paying 10 BTC for hero accounts last year.
|
iXcoin - Welcome to the F U T U R E! |
|
|
Vadi2323
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1231
|
|
December 26, 2016, 12:23:11 PM |
|
.28 BTC? Bahahahaaa.
Try 100 times that. People were paying 10 BTC for hero accounts last year.
Really? Then buy my hero for 9 BTC. I'm ready for the deal right now. |
|
|
|
|
Vlad2Vlad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1530
www.ixcoin.net
|
|
December 26, 2016, 12:27:32 PM |
|
.28 BTC? Bahahahaaa.
Try 100 times that. People were paying 10 BTC for hero accounts last year.
Really? Then buy my hero for 9 BTC. I'm ready for the deal right now. I wasn't the one buying and I didn't wanna sell mine for only 10 BTC. |
iXcoin - Welcome to the F U T U R E! |
|
|
|
From Above
|
|
December 26, 2016, 12:45:07 PM |
|
.28 BTC? Bahahahaaa.
Try 100 times that. People were paying 10 BTC for hero accounts last year.
Really? Then buy my hero for 9 BTC. I'm ready for the deal right now. I wasn't the one buying and I didn't wanna sell mine for only 10 BTC. It was me and people need to have special hero accounts not just monkey accounts. Besides, I'm done for now. Just for the record .28 btc for a legendary account is a complete joke, this guy's algo needs to be fired. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=728902.0 |
|
|
|
|
