Bitcointalk Account price estimator

[Bestwishes745]

From a few minutes I am trying to check the UID of account but it do not show the result and show the message "Request Queuing failed. Please try again."
Is that problem to everyone or only me facing the problem.

Fixed.

Yeah I saw the problem is now fixed and the site is working better like before. But there is another thing happening. When I put the UID and click on the button then immediately the UID disappear and the code appears in the search bar. Is that a problem or it is by the developer as a development in the site?

[achow101]

Yeah I saw the problem is now fixed and the site is working better like before. But there is another thing happening. When I put the UID and click on the button then immediately the UID disappear and the code appears in the search bar. Is that a problem or it is by the developer as a development in the site?

That is intentional. It redirects you to the Permalink so that you can find the estimation in your browser history.

It was me and people need to have special hero accounts not just monkey accounts.  Besides, I'm done for now.  Just for the record .28 btc for a legendary account is a complete joke, this guy's algo needs to be fired.

If you think it is bad, then fix it. It is an open source project and service that I am providing to you free of charge. If you think something is broken, then you can fix it yourself.

Honestly, I don't care about the price estimation anymore so I don't care whether it is accurate or not. The site has much greater utility than just the price estimation

[InvoKing]

It was me and people need to have special hero accounts not just monkey accounts.  Besides, I'm done for now.  Just for the record .28 btc for a legendary account is a complete joke, this guy's algo needs to be fired.

If you think it is bad, then fix it. It is an open source project and service that I am providing to you free of charge. If you think something is broken, then you can fix it yourself.

Honestly, I don't care about the price estimation anymore so I don't care whether it is accurate or not. The site has much greater utility than just the price estimation

Indeed and I think most of the users aren't looking for the price of their accounts when they used it
Back to the start, the site was more accurate than now, i don't know if it is related only to the huge rise of the bitcoin price >2x or other factors have an effect
The accounts prices aren't similar from a seller to another even if we are talking about the same characteristics in theses accounts
So in my opinion to obtain a more accurate price better to have a fix price for every level +/- an interval (for example Jr member 0.001 +/- 0.0005)...then we need to adjust this price with BTC/USD (unfortunately)
I know achow101 that you already said that you don't care about the accuracy of the price from months but I just gave this idea if ever someone is interested

[Bestwishes745]

Yeah I saw the problem is now fixed and the site is working better like before. But there is another thing happening. When I put the UID and click on the button then immediately the UID disappear and the code appears in the search bar. Is that a problem or it is by the developer as a development in the site?

That is intentional. It redirects you to the Permalink so that you can find the estimation in your browser history.

Oh OK. I noticed that the link in my browser. It is then a brilliant development in your pricer. before that it was only the link of index in my browser and due to some reason when I tried to reload everything was not there. But now with that link change in case of any problem if we will reload the page then nothing will go to clear.

[Quickseller]

It looks like the order that addresses are posted in is kinda weird. It looks like the most recent addresses are posted at the top, then addresses are generally grouped together by month (with the months in a weird order), and the months are generally grouped by year, however sometimes there are one or two addresses that are in a seemingly wrong place.

I originally thought this might have something to do with edited posts, but I am not quite sure about this. Maybe it has something to do with when last an address was posted (even though the addresses are displayed as when an address was first posted)?

It might be a good idea to designate some sections as "spam sections" (eg the ponzi section, games/rounds, off topic, possibly some of the local sections) and reduce the value of accounts when a certain percentage of posts are made in these types of sections.

I am tempted to suggest that you do the converse, and designate sections as "high quality" (eg development, technical support), and increase the value of accounts if they make a certain percentage of "very large" posts in these sections, however I don't want to give incentives to people to post useless crap in these sections, as they are generally free from spam now.

[achow101]

It looks like the order that addresses are posted in is kinda weird. It looks like the most recent addresses are posted at the top, then addresses are generally grouped together by month (with the months in a weird order), and the months are generally grouped by year, however sometimes there are one or two addresses that are in a seemingly wrong place.

I originally thought this might have something to do with edited posts, but I am not quite sure about this. Maybe it has something to do with when last an address was posted (even though the addresses are displayed as when an address was first posted)?

They are shown in order of most recent last post with the address. That is because the posts are read in order from most recent to oldest through the show posts page. However the date and link point to the oldest post containing the address.

It might be a good idea to designate some sections as "spam sections" (eg the ponzi section, games/rounds, off topic, possibly some of the local sections) and reduce the value of accounts when a certain percentage of posts are made in these types of sections.

I can make it such that posts in those sections are counted as bad quality posts which will affect the prices with the (now hidden) post quality multiplier.

I am tempted to suggest that you do the converse, and designate sections as "high quality" (eg development, technical support), and increase the value of accounts if they make a certain percentage of "very large" posts in these sections, however I don't want to give incentives to people to post useless crap in these sections, as they are generally free from spam now.

I think that is a bad idea for the same reasons that you said.

[squatz1]

Personally love this site for everything it has helped me do, I'm kinda sad that the post quality thing was removed but I guess it was for the better.


Thanks for developing this man!

[Timelord2067]

I added an indicator for SMAS blacklisting. If the account being priced is on the SMAS blacklist, it will be marked as so for both Normal and Merchant modes.

I have also fixed the posted address scanner so that it gets all posted addresses. Apparently it was not doing this before.

Is there any way to post the number of Wallet Addresses tallied up? I've posted 2,439 Wallet Addresses https://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=6hvubrp8 and occasionally I use the list sorted alpha numerically to see if I've come across similar patterns of wallets eg starting 1BC9x 1Ui5M 1Rfyp 15yMq that sort of thing (all these were randomly generated as examples)

Addresses posted in non-quoted text
(May inclue addresses not actually owned by user)

eg:

Addresses posted in non-quoted text number 2,439
(May include addresses not actually owned by user)

Thanks for reading.

[sportis]

I used some times before and working like a charm. Unfortunately, today this project does not working anymore. I tried 4 or more times, I cleared the cache memory (I am using Firefox last version) but with no success. Does anybody faces same problem or is mine and something I have to do in order to fix it?

[achow101]

I used some times before and working like a charm. Unfortunately, today this project does not working anymore. I tried 4 or more times, I cleared the cache memory (I am using Firefox last version) but with no success. Does anybody faces same problem or is mine and something I have to do in order to fix it?

This is an issue on my server. It seems that it is unable to connect to Bitcointalk as the connection keeps timing out. My server may have been IP banned by the forum accidentally.

[Timelord2067]

I used some times before and working like a charm. Unfortunately, today this project does not working anymore. I tried 4 or more times, I cleared the cache memory (I am using Firefox last version) but with no success. Does anybody faces same problem or is mine and something I have to do in order to fix it?

I get:

Share this estimate: https://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=sdd40obj
Request Failed

[achow101]

I used some times before and working like a charm. Unfortunately, today this project does not working anymore. I tried 4 or more times, I cleared the cache memory (I am using Firefox last version) but with no success. Does anybody faces same problem or is mine and something I have to do in order to fix it?

I get:

Share this estimate: https://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=sdd40obj
Request Failed

This issue should be fixed now.

I added an indicator for SMAS blacklisting. If the account being priced is on the SMAS blacklist, it will be marked as so for both Normal and Merchant modes.

I have also fixed the posted address scanner so that it gets all posted addresses. Apparently it was not doing this before.

Is there any way to post the number of Wallet Addresses tallied up? I've posted 2,439 Wallet Addresses https://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=6hvubrp8 and occasionally I use the list sorted alpha numerically to see if I've come across similar patterns of wallets eg starting 1BC9x 1Ui5M 1Rfyp 15yMq that sort of thing (all these were randomly generated as examples)

Addresses posted in non-quoted text
(May inclue addresses not actually owned by user)

eg:

Addresses posted in non-quoted text number 2,439
(May include addresses not actually owned by user)

Thanks for reading.

Done.

[Mike Mayor]

I noticed ypu have taken away the post quality. Is this because it is misleading ?
The most useful feature to me is checking your potential activity.

[royalfestus]

I love to see review of process behind blacklisting, some use it to attack each other. If 2 witness can be used to confirm any offence before that negative tag.

[achow101]

I love to see review of process behind blacklisting, some use it to attack each other. If 2 witness can be used to confirm any offence before that negative tag.

The SMAS blacklist is not part of this site. I just use it to inform people whether the account is on the blacklist. If you have any issues with it, take it up with the campaign managers running the SMAS blacklist.

[Blawpaw]

This is a great tool. I’m looking to buy an account and this tool can be pretty helpful. I didn’t have any way of understanding the true value of an account. With this tool I’ll be sure to make the best purchase

[mummybtc]

This is a great tool. I’m looking to buy an account and this tool can be pretty helpful. I didn’t have any way of understanding the true value of an account. With this tool I’ll be sure to make the best purchase

I think the pricing is subjective, it is just to help you and analyse the account, guide your valuation of such account. I'm saying this because I have seen some account that I can't pay half of you the seller is looking to sell it.

[Joel_Jantsen]

This is a great tool. I’m looking to buy an account and this tool can be pretty helpful. I didn’t have any way of understanding the true value of an account. With this tool I’ll be sure to make the best purchase

No way! You have it all wrong there! The prices calculated by the algorithms are not to be taken seriously as it doesn't really perform NLP on your posts to decide it's worth.Regardless,they accounts are sold way cheaper on the forum.

[hendra147]

Invalid token
i always get this if i want to check my stats
what happen?

[OmegaStarScream]

Invalid token
i always get this if i want to check my stats
what happen?

You probably used a token which expired ? but I still doubt it since the generated report should expire after 15 days. I was able to generate your stats though : https://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=2imfdbfc and It worked for mine as well.