CoinWallet.eu Stress Test Cancelled + Bitcoin Giveaway

[btcdrak]

I took ~4BTC from these keys. What do you mean by "useless"? Useless for you?  

You did? Please give us proof and share the knowledge of how you did it.

Do all blockexplorers ban your IP-address?
Aren't you able to walk through the dust addresses and check for withdrawings from them?

Maybe, i would suggest setting up an own block explorer locally:
https://github.com/bitpay/insight

Or better, use addrindex version of bitcoin core which gives the searchrawtransactions API: https://github.com/btcdrak/bitcoin/tree/addrindex-0.11
add txindex=1 and addrindex=1 to bitcoin.conf and start once with -reindex

With this patch you can search any arbitrary address without having to import the key.

[1714903030]

1714903030

[amaclin]

Most of these spikes are me

And what are the results of your efforts? Only spikes on an image?

[basil00]

Here is one of turtlehurricane's recent transactions.

Here is the same transaction (with a few minor "enhancements") confirmed on the blockchain

*** enhancements:
- 14% smaller, so less blockchain bloat.
- Highest possible fee rate for size.
- Provably unspendable output, so no UTXO bloat.

[amaclin]

...(with a few minor "enhancements")...

The only question I am asking myself is: who forced you (me) told him about the shortest signature? 

[basil00]

The only question I am asking myself is: who forced you (me) told him about the shortest signature? 

I'm impressed by that trick.  I also like how you use P2PK so you can spend the swept dust more easily...

[amaclin]

I'm impressed by that trick.  I also like how you use P2PK so you can spend the swept dust more easily...

I am also thinking about p2sh without signature checking in it...
or... with 15 sigops in it... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1166928
and I am afraid of 3J9AGq2aHeqjW13jj1LkaK5kCgZ8EyAjXZ - who knows the inner script? how many sigops are there? why did he chose p2sh?

[amaclin]

3J9AGq2aHeqjW13jj1LkaK5kCgZ8EyAjXZ - who knows the inner script?

Give us a clue, how many bytes?  

This is not my address. I do not know the inner script. May be it is just p2pk.
But it was very inefficient to fill such address with small outputs.
I doubt that the owner reads this topic.

[basil00]

This is not my address.

Yeah sorry I misread.  Collecting dust in those "special" P2SH addresses probably won't do much though.  To be effective the fee still needs to outbid the standard transaction traffic.

[amaclin]

Slowest part is loading in each private key.
I guarantee ill sweep everything within the next day though.

You've made my day  

My program goes so fucking quick that I know they will all be confirmed eventually even if dropped once or multiple times 
I'm dropping transaction bombs on the blockchain every few minutes

You've made my week! 

[amaclin]

I'm impressed by that trick.

The only thing to do is use SIGHASH_NONE | SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY
I've never used it myself.
But this allows miners to concatenate all your transactions into one.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_CHECKSIG

Procedure for Hashtype SIGHASH_NONE
The output of txCopy is set to a vector of zero size.
All other inputs aside from the current input in txCopy have their nSequence index set to zero
Think of this as "sign none of the outputs-- I don't care where the bitcoins go."

Procedure for Hashtype SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY
The txCopy input vector is resized to a length of one.
The subScript (lead in by its length as a var-integer encoded!) is set as the first and only member of this vector.
Think of this as "Let other people add inputs to this transaction, I don't care where the rest of the bitcoins come from."

Do not forget that you should append 0x82 (as 32-bit low-endian) on step 13 http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/3374/how-to-redeem-a-basic-tx instead of 0x01
And 0x82 as byte on step 15

But I am quite sure that no miner today merges transactions  They are too lazy 

[elmad]

Is it possibile to forge a P2PK transaction instead of a P2PKH transaction, using bitcoind rpc reference client? It seems no to me, just asking to be sure.

[yakuza699]

Why would you want to use P2PK instead of P2PKH?P2PKH tx's are smaller for comparison this is P2PKH https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/tx/67986a2484d2880fb7f172bfe992fb6dea0142b98794f0b9706938b006b24ad0/ and this is P2PK https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/tx/657b57238c7e442227f30c40e6f7a621eaed66087cace0ff66394c28bcf4162c/ differs huh?

[amaclin]

Why would you want to use P2PK instead of P2PKH?

Because I have to count the size of withdrawing from it later.

The whole cycle is:
p2pk: <signature> <publickey> OP_CHECKSIG
p2pkh: <signature> <publickey> OP_DUP OP_HASH <address> OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG

So, p2pk are smaller

[elmad]

I'll try a syllogism:

1. 1aajpztNecNzGBDjJhGfkrsUJFgeyhBgY and 1aa5cmqmvQq8YQTEqcTmW7dfBNuFwgdCD and other addresses starting with "1aa" are collecting efficiently the dust with amaclin methods (same 'k' and P2PK outputs) . "1aa5cmqmv...." was reported here from amaclin too as an example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1175321.msg12405319#msg12405319. To me they seem amaclin addresses.

2. 1aaf64VJGMuYuRBMmM9y2s2pPADFpuqDE started to collect dust before priv keys were announced on internet. It stopped 1 hour before to release the keys. An example, 8 september: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/e198f3608705e1654a3d0d2ce56bdc5b81f0bfc9e1597a268eebcd124881773b

3. "1aa5cmq..." is an input for a transaction to "1aaf64...." here: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/b80ca4aa385f2a0a91b7625eab05df6e8e20fd81c53ba4c3fd1a1efc2fe056fd

4. "1aajpz..." is an input TOGETHER a "1aaf64...." input for a transaction here: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/ca0447b99a1fd68fc157b9cd45343f4793ec9d47818d0375d51675113110d99a

5. Supposed result: these addresses belongs to amaclin and amaclin is behind coinwallet.eu stress-test/giveaway.


EDIT: point five was just a bad joke. A right 5 could be:

5. "1aaf64..." started to collect dust before priv keys were publicly announced and it is probably an amaclin vanity address.

[amaclin]

@elmad

I am Oz, the Great and Terrible! But don't strike me - please don't - and I'll do anything you want me to.
 

[steveds]

i personally didnt participate in this bullshit 200btc giveaway but ive kept up with the thread a bit. how many of you actually got something from this?

[EternalWingsofGod]

Finally got it working and fully automated!!! Took long enough. Let's see how much BTC I can make

https://blockexplorer.com/address/1AyRmvqe99mRWU69w8Hbaeej8twMpdeiKm
https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/address/1AyRmvqe99mRWU69w8Hbaeej8twMpdeiKm

Slowest part is loading in each private key. I guarantee ill sweep everything within the next day though.

That is quite an amount of inputs

Total Received 2391.33012313 BTC
Total Sent 2387.45339118 BTC
Final Balance 3.87673195 BTC

Lot of recieved amounts for a few Bitcoins.

[sAt0sHiFanClub]

Finally got it working and fully automated!!! Took long enough. Let's see how much BTC I can make

https://blockexplorer.com/address/1AyRmvqe99mRWU69w8Hbaeej8twMpdeiKm
https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/address/1AyRmvqe99mRWU69w8Hbaeej8twMpdeiKm

Slowest part is loading in each private key. I guarantee ill sweep everything within the next day though.

That is quite an amount of inputs

Total Received 2391.33012313 BTC
Total Sent 2387.45339118 BTC
Final Balance 3.87673195 BTC

Lot of recieved amounts for a few Bitcoins.

   Don't think its even that. Theres no more than 0.00061342btc there. They're all double spends

[amaclin]

Theres no more than 0.00061342btc there. They're all double spends

That is strange... But there is more there.  
blockchain.info shows 0.00073887 btc on confirmed outputs  
(no outputs from coinwallet spam confirmed, as expected)
https://blockchain.info/address/1AyRmvqe99mRWU69w8Hbaeej8twMpdeiKm

[johoe]

I'll try a syllogism:

1. 1aajpztNecNzGBDjJhGfkrsUJFgeyhBgY and 1aa5cmqmvQq8YQTEqcTmW7dfBNuFwgdCD and other addresses starting with "1aa" are collecting efficiently the dust with amaclin methods (same 'k' and P2PK outputs) . "1aa5cmqmv...." was reported here from amaclin too as an example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1175321.msg12405319#msg12405319. To me they seem amaclin addresses.

2. 1aaf64VJGMuYuRBMmM9y2s2pPADFpuqDE started to collect dust before priv keys were announced on internet. It stopped 1 hour before to release the keys. An example, 8 september: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/e198f3608705e1654a3d0d2ce56bdc5b81f0bfc9e1597a268eebcd124881773b

3. "1aa5cmq..." is an input for a transaction to "1aaf64...." here: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/b80ca4aa385f2a0a91b7625eab05df6e8e20fd81c53ba4c3fd1a1efc2fe056fd

4. "1aajpz..." is an input TOGETHER a "1aaf64...." input for a transaction here: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/ca0447b99a1fd68fc157b9cd45343f4793ec9d47818d0375d51675113110d99a

5. Supposed result: these addresses belongs to amaclin and amaclin is behind coinwallet.eu stress-test/giveaway.

I agree that most 1aa.. addresses probably belong to amaclin (he has been using vanity addresses like this since December last year).  However I doubt that 5. is a correct conclusion unless you can show me a transaction where one of the 1aa addresses is used as input for the original high-fee dust creating spam transactions.

That he "started early" could easily be explained if these addresses were weak brainwallets (coinwallet.eu used brainwallets in their first stress test).  Also amaclin has the programs and the knowledge how to sweep these addresses.  This is why he got a big part of the "Bitcoin Giveaway".  There is nothing wrong with that, of course.

BTW, are there 791 published private keys now or have I been missing a post?  I count about 6.5 BTC left in 650k coins (all are probably already triple- or quadruple-spent but still unconfirmed).