|
languagehasmeaning
|
 |
October 10, 2015, 01:42:23 AM |
|
I will cast the first vote for Bg7
That's not bad. Bd7 might be more defensive tho. I will vote for Bg7. I see nothing wrong with Bd7 but think there is a chance that bishop might want to move to another square. We can be pretty sure our f8 bishop belongs on g7 now that we have already played g6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
newb4now
|
|
October 10, 2015, 02:38:23 PM |
|
Bg7
|
|
|
|
|
dre1982
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 770
Merit: 284
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
|
|
October 10, 2015, 05:04:10 PM |
|
Bg7.
We played g6 for this move. first let this done. After this we gonna develop some more pieces.
|
|
|
|
|
boolberry (OP)
|
|
October 10, 2015, 11:53:54 PM |
|
Current positionBased on the votes in this thread Team Boolberry has chosen to play Bg7. Now it is time for Team Monero to respond. I will plan to count votes again tomorrow at approximately 0:00 UTC. Team Monero (white pieces) vs. Team Boolberry (black pieces)white to move  1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Qxd4 a6 5.c4 Nc6 6.Qe3 g6 7.Nc3 Bg7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LucyLovesCrypto
|
|
October 11, 2015, 03:51:51 AM |
|
Bd3 then we can castle next move
|
|
|
|
|
8XMR
Member
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
|
|
October 11, 2015, 04:18:05 AM |
|
Be2
|
8xmr.com
|
|
|
ArticMine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
|
|
October 11, 2015, 06:17:37 AM |
|
Be2
|
|
|
|
funnyman21
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
October 11, 2015, 02:46:22 PM |
|
Who is winning so far? About even right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
languagehasmeaning
|
|
October 11, 2015, 07:03:55 PM |
|
Who is winning so far? About even right?
White starts each game with a very small advantage because of the right to moved first. Nothing dramatic has happened yet. Come back in 5-10 moves and things may be more interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
boolberry (OP)
|
|
October 11, 2015, 11:49:09 PM |
|
Current positionBased on the votes in this thread Team Monero has chosen to play Be2. Now it is time for Team Boolberry to respond. I will plan to count votes again tomorrow at approximately 0:00 UTC. Team Monero (white pieces) vs. Team Boolberry (black pieces)black to move  1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Qxd4 a6 5.c4 Nc6 6.Qe3 g6 7.Nc3 Bg7 8.Be2
|
|
|
|
|
|
boolberry (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2015, 12:07:56 AM |
|
I will vote for Nf6 because I think it is the best move here. If the team prefers to liven things up, then f5 is another option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
newb4now
|
|
October 12, 2015, 03:35:44 AM |
|
+1 Nf6
|
|
|
|
|
dre1982
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 770
Merit: 284
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
|
|
October 12, 2015, 06:54:23 AM |
|
Nf6 indeed. Just develop some more pieces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
boolberry (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2015, 11:59:09 PM |
|
Current positionBased on the votes in this thread Team Boolberry has chosen to play Nf6. Now it is time for Team Monero to respond. I will plan to count votes again tomorrow at approximately 0:00 UTC. Team Monero (white pieces) vs. Team Boolberry (black pieces)white to move  1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Qxd4 a6 5.c4 Nc6 6.Qe3 g6 7.Nc3 Bg7 8.Be2 Nf6
|
|
|
|
|
ArticMine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
|
|
October 13, 2015, 12:04:12 AM |
|
O-O
|
|
|
|
|
LucyLovesCrypto
|
|
October 13, 2015, 03:18:14 AM |
|
O-O
Castling is smart. +1 vote Can someone give me some cliff notes for this? https://github.com/ShenNoether/MiniNero/blob/master/RingCT0.1_copy.pdfI assume it is too late for 0.9 but could it be in the next release? Is this as important as it sounds? What are the negatives? Anything we should be worried about from sections 4, 5 or six of the paper (tag linkability, exculpability and unforgeability) still needs to be completed) |
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
October 13, 2015, 03:27:34 AM |
|
O-O
Castling is smart. +1 vote Can someone give me some cliff notes for this? https://github.com/ShenNoether/MiniNero/blob/master/RingCT0.1_copy.pdfI assume it is too late for 0.9 but could it be in the next release? Is this as important as it sounds? What are the negatives? Anything we should be worried about from sections 4, 5 or six of the paper (tag linkability, exculpability and unforgeability) still needs to be completed) 1. Definitely not going to be in 0.9. The math isn't even done yet (as you pointed out). 2. The idea is to still have ring signatures, and allow the amounts to be hidden but cryptographically commit to sum(out)=sum(in). |
|
|
|
|
|
LucyLovesCrypto
|
|
October 13, 2015, 03:31:58 AM |
|
O-O
Castling is smart. +1 vote Can someone give me some cliff notes for this? https://github.com/ShenNoether/MiniNero/blob/master/RingCT0.1_copy.pdfI assume it is too late for 0.9 but could it be in the next release? Is this as important as it sounds? What are the negatives? Anything we should be worried about from sections 4, 5 or six of the paper (tag linkability, exculpability and unforgeability) still needs to be completed) 1. Definitely not going to be in 0.9. The math isn't even done yet (as you pointed out). 2. The idea is to still have ring signatures, and allow the amounts to be hidden but cryptographically commit to sum(out)=sum(in). You are good at giving technical answers that make sense to people like me who are not overly technical. I like the way that sounds. Hopefully it works out and can be implemented eventually. |
|
|
|
|
|
