Bitcoin Forum
June 30, 2024, 01:22:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 64 »
  Print  
Author Topic: CryptoNote technical discussion and Chess Challenge  (Read 96054 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
boolberry (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 27, 2015, 07:50:57 PM
 #21

I might continue compiling charts for this game as well if it takes off. Smiley


Three more 1.e4 votes came in after this graph.

Right now there are four 1.e4 votes vs two votes for 1.d4

Voting will be finalized at 0:00 UTC time unless Team Monero announces that it has finalized its decision sooner
boolberry (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 12:21:48 AM
 #22

Team Monero (white pieces) vs. Team Boolberry (black pieces)
black to move

1. e4

Based on the votes in this thread Team Monero has chosen to play 1. e4.

Now it is time for Team Boolberry to respond. Votes will be finalized at 0:00 UTC tomorrow.
boolberry (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 12:27:29 AM
 #23

I vote for playing c5 (sicilian defense)
newb4now
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 02:12:25 AM
 #24

I would like to join Team Boolberry

My move choice is e7-e5

Care to make any comments about Zerocash based on the recent tweet of Matthew Green?

https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/648221218773049344

Has the zkSNARK setup (requiring trust to ensure an unlimited number extra coins are not produced in secret) problem been solved?

CryptoNote definitely is the best solution available today.

View key functionality may also future proof its ability to comply with regulatory compliance in a way the competition cannot.
generalizethis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036


Facts are more efficient than fud


View Profile WWW
September 28, 2015, 02:23:11 AM
 #25

I would like to join Team Boolberry

My move choice is e7-e5

Care to make any comments about Zerocash based on the recent tweet of Matthew Green?

https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/648221218773049344

Has the zkSNARK setup (requiring trust to ensure an unlimited number extra coins are not produced in secret) problem been solved?

CryptoNote definitely is the best solution available today.

View key functionality may also future proof its ability to comply with regulatory compliance in a way the competition cannot.

I think the more privacy tools the better. Who wants to play chess with all knights?

newb4now
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 02:37:39 AM
 #26

I would like to hear about not just the potential for bitcoin sidechains, but the privacy implications of the mere knowledge that someone is using a sidechain.

For example could blockchain analysis prevent someone from using a particular sidechain without the knowledge of those observing? The bitcoin transaction used to access the sidechain will always be publicly visible along with its time, date and value. If funds are transferred back to bitcoin from the side chain at some future date, could that transaction be connected to the earlier transaction based on factors such as time and the transaction value?
letsplayagame
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 08:33:05 AM
 #27


Those links were helpful. There are a few questions raised in the whitepaper review that I would like to hear opinions on:
https://downloads.getmonero.org/whitepaper_review.pdf

Quote from Surae Noether on pages 4-5:
My single biggest question after reading the entire paper is the how did they choose their elliptic curve constants?  The protocol appears sound; who chose the constants?  Will there be a plan for choosing new constants in the future if needed?

I know that Monero and Boolberry did not create CryptoNote but have improved on it. Any guesses for the reason the CryptoNote creators selected a relatively new cryptographic hash function?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Hash_Algorithm

I appreciate your thoughts on this and am aware there may not be easy answers to my questions

Chess, Bitcoin, Privacy and Freedom
Code:
 Make BTC Donations via XMR.TO or Shapeshift XMR: 47nMGDMQxEB8CWpWT7QgBLDmTSxgjm9831dVeu24ebCeH8gNPG9RvZAYoPxW2JniKjeq5LXZafwdPWH7AmX2NVji3yYKy76 
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
September 28, 2015, 08:37:20 AM
 #28

Has the zkSNARK setup (requiring trust to ensure an unlimited number extra coins are not produced in secret) problem been solved?

Somewhat. There is a way to do it with multiple participants such that only a single honest participant is required. Still, if you weren't part of the process and you show up later, there is not really any way for you to audit the process or know that it was set up properly. That's unlike most systems where no matter when you show up you can still audit the code and determine that it is secure.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
September 28, 2015, 08:49:38 AM
 #29

My single biggest question after reading the entire paper is the how did they choose their elliptic curve constants?  The protocol appears sound; who chose the constants?  Will there be a plan for choosing new constants in the future if needed?

As I understand it the constants were chosen by Daniel J. Bernstein. I think this is noted in the white paper but may have been missed during that initial review when cryptonote suddenly dropped out of the sky.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EdDSA

I'm not a cryptographer so I may be getting some of this wrong.

Quote
I know that Monero and Boolberry did not create CryptoNote but have improved on it. Any guesses for the reason the CryptoNote creators selected a relatively new cryptographic hash function?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Hash_Algorithm

I've not seen any answer to this, though you could try asking on their forum. That can be hit or miss. Some of the people posting there on behalf of "cryptonote" obviously have technical knowledge but others are just clueless.

languagehasmeaning
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 28, 2015, 10:36:13 AM
 #30

I vote for playing c5 (sicilian defense)

Same choice for me.

1.e4  c5
boolberry (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 29, 2015, 12:24:23 AM
 #31

I vote for playing c5 (sicilian defense)

Same choice for me.

1.e4  c5

Team Boolberry c5 voters win by a 2-1 margin as of 0:00 UTC

Now it is time for white (Team Monero) to respond. I will count votes again at 0:00 UTC tomorrow

smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
September 29, 2015, 12:32:51 AM
 #32

One of the few lines I even know is Nf3

But the better chess players on our team probably have other input.

LucyLovesCrypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 414
Merit: 251


View Profile
September 29, 2015, 04:13:27 AM
 #33

One of the few lines I even know is Nf3

But the better chess players on our team probably have other input.



Make that two votes for Nf3
XMRpromotions
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 29, 2015, 04:52:06 AM
 #34

One of the few lines I even know is Nf3

But the better chess players on our team probably have other input.



Make that two votes for Nf3


3 votes!

Nf3 is a good developing move and it helps to prepare d4 and a fight for the center of the board.

Don't buy Monero: https://twitter.com/MoneroPromotion/status/746006420508729344

XMR: 43hPTYyKarCTWyh4ZnMVn8AtFeEmtzTXo3Y6TGGMV26BWonJ4tpR7eP9RkUDYQbvg6LbrnMXWfghddE NGtvKxr7B5oML4qd
ArticMine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050


Monero Core Team


View Profile
September 29, 2015, 04:45:26 PM
 #35

Nf3 That is now 4 votes

Concerned that blockchain bloat will lead to centralization? Storing less than 4 GB of data once required the budget of a superpower and a warehouse full of punched cards. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/IBM_card_storage.NARA.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punched_card
ArticMine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050


Monero Core Team


View Profile
September 29, 2015, 04:47:41 PM
 #36

...

Nf3 is a good developing move and it helps to prepare d4 and a fight for the center of the board.

We can vote on open vs closed Sicilian defence at the appropriate time.

Concerned that blockchain bloat will lead to centralization? Storing less than 4 GB of data once required the budget of a superpower and a warehouse full of punched cards. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/IBM_card_storage.NARA.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punched_card
boolberry (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 30, 2015, 12:27:46 AM
 #37

100% of Team Monero voters have chosen Nf3 as of 0:00 UTC

Now it is time for black (Team Boolberry) to respond. I will count votes again at 0:00 UTC tomorrow



1. e4  c5
2. Nf3
boolberry (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 30, 2015, 12:53:09 AM
 #38

I will make the first vote for d6.

If you like chess this thread is worth a look:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1148538.0

Anyone can join Team Bitcointalk and challenge our anonymous opponent. Right now we are on move 18.

newb4now
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 30, 2015, 03:14:23 AM
 #39

I vote Nc6
letsplayagame
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 30, 2015, 05:50:34 AM
 #40

My single biggest question after reading the entire paper is the how did they choose their elliptic curve constants?  The protocol appears sound; who chose the constants?  Will there be a plan for choosing new constants in the future if needed?

As I understand it the constants were chosen by Daniel J. Bernstein. I think this is noted in the white paper but may have been missed during that initial review when cryptonote suddenly dropped out of the sky.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EdDSA

I'm not a cryptographer so I may be getting some of this wrong.

Quote
I know that Monero and Boolberry did not create CryptoNote but have improved on it. Any guesses for the reason the CryptoNote creators selected a relatively new cryptographic hash function?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Hash_Algorithm

I've not seen any answer to this, though you could try asking on their forum. That can be hit or miss. Some of the people posting there on behalf of "cryptonote" obviously have technical knowledge but others are just clueless.



Daniel Bernstein seems well qualified to make that decision. Maybe he will share his thoughts with us. Is he on bitcointalk?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_J._Bernstein

The second question may or may not even matter (I have no reason to assume there is something wrong with the chosen hash function).  Only because of the importance of the decision am I wondering about the selection.  I have not registered on the CryptoNote forums but may do so at some point.

Thank you for your time.

Chess, Bitcoin, Privacy and Freedom
Code:
 Make BTC Donations via XMR.TO or Shapeshift XMR: 47nMGDMQxEB8CWpWT7QgBLDmTSxgjm9831dVeu24ebCeH8gNPG9RvZAYoPxW2JniKjeq5LXZafwdPWH7AmX2NVji3yYKy76 
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 64 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!