|
luffy
|
 |
July 28, 2011, 06:46:23 AM |
|
i guess some miners still think that this is a prop pool  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
OldChap
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2011, 09:09:06 AM |
|
How is everybody tracking their individual payments with the new system? I know it should average out in the long run but I feel I need to see records to confirm this in maybe a "your history" page
|
|
|
|
|
Stupidpal
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 28, 2011, 10:40:56 AM |
|
How is everybody tracking their individual payments with the new system? I know it should average out in the long run but I feel I need to see records to confirm this in maybe a "your history" page
I'd like that as well. |
|
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 28, 2011, 12:38:52 PM |
|
Thats a great idea!
I will add this high on our priority list. I want you guys to have detailed transition information as well.
|
|
|
|
Stupidpal
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 28, 2011, 03:27:37 PM |
|
The pool has grown a lot suddenly.  |
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
July 29, 2011, 03:45:07 AM |
|
The pool has grown a lot suddenly. that's because it's a good reliable pool and hoppers are using it for backup. That's about an extra 120Ghps for a few minutes a few times a day. Not many other pools can do that without having problems. Now, just need user block history and payment history data and it will be perfect. |
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2011, 04:06:14 AM |
|
The pool has grown a lot suddenly. that's because it's a good reliable pool and hoppers are using it for backup. That's about an extra 120Ghps for a few minutes a few times a day. Not many other pools can do that without having problems. Thanks!  Now, just need user block history and payment history data and it will be perfect.
Working on that right now. |
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2011, 11:41:41 PM |
|
Good job all, another block complete!  |
|
|
|
GenTarkin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 30, 2011, 12:38:53 AM |
|
Hi, I am looking for a PPS type pool too, right now Im on eclipseMC and they offer paypal cashouts....which I love, seems to be the only pool offering this...but love the payment system you have here at bitpit...
Are you considering any sort of paypal cashout option or would you consider?
|
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 30, 2011, 12:56:45 AM |
|
Hi, I am looking for a PPS type pool too, right now Im on eclipseMC and they offer paypal cashouts....which I love, seems to be the only pool offering this...but love the payment system you have here at bitpit...
Are you considering any sort of paypal cashout option or would you consider?
Thanks! I appreciate you taking a look at our pool. PayPal payouts is not something I've really though about before. Though, the other day I was pondering a Dwolla payout system.... same generally idea I'd imagine. Either way, right now we are trying to get some more detailed statistics for everybody, and after that we are going to get back to implementing "premium" features. Optional extras that people can enable in their account settings for a small fee. The idea of PayPal cash outs is something very much in line with a premium feature. I'm not saying we will (or will not) do such a thing, but it's certainly something we'll be talking through more in the coming weeks. Honestly, I am not even sure of what one's legal complications of using PayPal's network would be. |
|
|
|
|
Clipse
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:36:30 AM |
|
So curious, estimated which is showing from previous block (i havnt mined new block yet) will be moved to confirmed once block is confirmed?
This is bit confusing, why not just add an unconfirmed section since estimated is generall related to the current round estimated earnings.
|
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:28:44 AM |
|
So curious, estimated which is showing from previous block (i havnt mined new block yet) will be moved to confirmed once block is confirmed?
Yes, funds are moved from estimated to confirmed on block confirmation. The estimated contains funds from the current round and any previous rounds not yet confirmed. This is bit confusing, why not just add an unconfirmed section since estimated is generall related to the current round estimated earnings.
Yes, I can see how that would be confusing. I've been meaning to re-label those to make it clearer. One reason we removed the unconfirmed section is because, unlike some other payout systems, "unconfirmed" doesn't really make sense. Neither does "confirmed" or "estimated" actually. In ESMPPS you will (eventually) receive full face value for your shares. So, there is really just a concept of "Available" and "Pending". For a short term clarification to the problem, I've renamed them as such. Though, the idea of being able to see how much of your Pending balance was generated this current round isn't a bad idea at all. |
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 31, 2011, 02:01:16 AM
Last edit: July 31, 2011, 02:21:05 AM by 1bitc0inplz |
|
Everybody should check out the updated Phatk kernel (aka Phatk2) http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7964.0I just installed this and my 5830 went from 303 MH/s to 307 MH/s. Well worth it Though, you might want to keep a backup copy of your old kernel, as I did have problems with my 5670.... I've actually got both kernel's side by side. One card using phatk and the other using phatk2. Check it out  |
|
|
|
irosaurus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 31, 2011, 11:02:23 AM |
|
I also recommend the new ati 11.7 drivers - brought me about 2MH/s more with poclbm and sdk2.4 @1bitc0inplz: does the phatk kernel still use a lot of cpu time? or is this fixed now? cheers iro |
|
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 31, 2011, 05:55:53 PM |
|
I also recommend the new ati 11.7 drivers - brought me about 2MH/s more with poclbm and sdk2.4 @1bitc0inplz: does the phatk kernel still use a lot of cpu time? or is this fixed now? cheers iro I've always had the 100% CPU problem, even when using kernels besides phatk. From what I understand it's a bug in Catalyst, not so much a kernel thing. I've tried Catalyst 11.5, 11.6, and 11.7 and and they all do that on my Win7x64 box. |
|
|
|
irosaurus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 31, 2011, 06:40:40 PM |
|
I've always had the 100% CPU problem, even when using kernels besides phatk. From what I understand it's a bug in Catalyst, not so much a kernel thing. I've tried Catalyst 11.5, 11.6, and 11.7 and and they all do that on my Win7x64 box.
I realized, that with the new 11.7 drivers, I now have the cpu bug, too. even with poclbm  so I switched back to 11.6, and now everything works perfect without using the cpu. I wonder, that you always experience that problem, cause I run win7 64x ultimate, too and with the 11.6, sdk 1.4 and poclbm I don't have that problem. the older versions (11.4 and 11.5) worked also without the bug... cheers iro |
|
|
|
|
OldChap
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2011, 10:04:53 AM |
|
Liking the "no activity" label, Much more useful
I seem to have a dying rig and even though I have other spare slots I'm struggling to get AOCLBF to see them. I will get the last card back online soon though.
|
|
|
|
|
irosaurus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2011, 11:29:18 AM |
|
just tried to delete one of my workers. it doesn't work^^ I'll get the following message: "Not yet implemented."
cheers iro
|
|
|
|
|
1bitc0inplz (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 01, 2011, 11:34:39 AM |
|
just tried to delete one of my workers. it doesn't work^^ I'll get the following message: "Not yet implemented."
cheers iro
Sorry about that That is just one of those features we haven't gotten back around to yet. If you'd like, you can contact us (or PM me) which worker(s) it is you'd like to remove, and I can manually assist you. |
|
|
|
irosaurus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2011, 01:26:38 PM |
|
Sorry about that That is just one of those features we haven't gotten back around to yet. If you'd like, you can contact us (or PM me) which worker(s) it is you'd like to remove, and I can manually assist you. Don't bother! It doesn't disturb me, I just noticed it  cheers iro |
|
|
|
|
|
