[quote author=TwitchySeal link=topic=1236667.msg14414635#msg14414635 A perfect example is back in october, I had a serious issue involving over $1k USD worth of BTC missing. Betcoin makes a statement, about a policy never mentioned or practiced by other sites I say something about it, and immediately hopenotelate jumps to defend Betcoin with a 100% lie. Then just ignores any question of why he said that.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=386266.msg12699686#msg12699686[/quote]
Your statement above is partially false as well:
there are pokerrooms where you dont get awarded VIP points if you join tournaments by winning satellites.
Why are you stating the false then?
I played several ipoker skins that used (at least when I was playing there) that practice (if its that one the practice you are referring to) and incerely thought the whole ipoker network was doing the same (prove me I'm wrong on Ipoker please because I still sincerely think so).
I live in a gaming regulated country where player of my nationality are compelled to play on our country pokerrooms against players of my same nationality and most of them still do that practice.
You are a great selective quoter: you could also quote a post of mine following by few posts the one you quoted where I adimit I was wrong when stating that stars and iPoker are the first two in poker industry for numbers of players but instead are first and fourth: so what I wrote wasnt completely false but only partially (stars is the first) and two position wrong about ipoker (fourth instead of second).
So I kept on answering your post and didnt "just ignore any question" and you stated.
Why are you stating the false then?
Then, one or two page after, there is another post of mine where I wrote I asked a friend of mine who plays on partypoker and he told me I was wrong about the vippoints/satellites policy and at the end of my post I clearly wrote I was wrong and it was my bad.
But of course you have been careful not to quote it to make me appear an inveterate liar.
So it was the second post from me answering to the one you just quoted here.
Why again you stating the false saying I completely ignored you? Who is the liar?
Also everyone reading take in consideration I was not wearing betcoin signature when this took place: I had no personal interest but was genuinely thinking what I posted (and was wrong in some of them and also admitted) and it is clearly inferable if you read the thread in its whole: but quotemaster here knows very well that 99.9% people here is not going to do that and take advantage of his skills.
My problem with answering you is that it's evident you have a lot of free time and go digging back and forth between these forum threads to skillfully quote what serves to your purpose (discrediting me in this case) and instead I like to spend my freetime differently.
So I'm an easy win for you.
Good luck with your digging.
@roslinpl: sorry for this long offtopic but I was called out and had to provide my point of view.
