Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[7xminer]

After reading a lot here, at least for me, I can see that the idea behind prefix analysis isn't going to work (sad, I was trying to come with something too). Because the X point is passed through SHA256 and RIPEMD160 and the hash result is very random. So no pattern can be found or a high probability that the key is on that range. If this kind of analysis were effective, why haven't people who solved "higher" puzzles continued to solve subsequent ones? Because it was solved with brute force and a lot of CPU/GPU power using pure brute force / BSGS / Kangaroo.

With puzzle 66, I was very close with a prefix I found. But I also found a lot of others prefixes. How do I know which one to follow? This is the main problem.

But, this is where the fun continues. I will continue to run my scripts. Maybe I'll win the lotto and find the solution. hehehehe!  

[bibilgin]

Basic Mathematics = I have heard this saying in many places.

It is a well-known idea that people who say this generally think verbally, and only apply things they have memorized.

Numerical thoughts are different. They like to examine the details of something. Many scientists are numerical.

"There is no point in telling someone who is color blind that green is red. Because the color he sees has to say it. Even if you tell him why, I see red." he says.

Those who see green and those who see red. lol

Edit;

I saw Bram was going to give $10,000. (Not convincing. Because he knows he can't prove it either. I would say higher. $50,000. lol)

Let's race. You, put the money in the low bit wallet. Let's have the same equipment. Who will find the money?

Greens? Reds? lol

69. The wallet has been solved. Congratulations to the winner. (I guess it's not Bram.)

Hex Code = 101D83275FB2BC7E0C

[nochkin]

People were really happy to defend the theory for free on this thread but as soon as it needs a reality check outside of the script kiddies bubble it’s crickets.

Clearly, crickets are the winners here.

[Bram24732]

You do it, otherwise shut up and leave. You, being the cryptographer here, go ahead, propose it and share it here.
So, start by making a formal post about your reward in the technical area, where ideas are not mixed with interactions from alts accounts.

Again, I have nothing to propose. I simply say prefix theory does not provide a statistical advantage. Some people disagree and say we don't understand the math.
No problem. Those people can have it validated by independent cryptographers and it's an easy 10k for them. The burden of the proof is on the person saying they have a better method, don't you think ?

everyone knows you have no intention of paying.

I'm not sure why you think that. It's public knowledge that I have the funds after 67 and 68.
I'd be glad to use any info about a better method for 69, so it has value to me either way.

[WanderingPhilospher]

69 has fallen!

0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000101d83275fb2bc7e0c

[Denevron]

69 has fallen!

0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000101d83275fb2bc7e0c

Damn, this is only a 57-bit difference from the previous key.  

And I searched in the range of 55-50 through mutagen  

Congratulations to the lucky winner! 

[mcdouglasx]

69 has fallen!

0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000101d83275fb2bc7e0c

RBF??

[bcchanger]

I think it is replaced I hate the RBF option.

[bibilgin]

69 has fallen!

0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000101d83275fb2bc7e0c

RBF??

Yeah, RBF dude. But here's the interesting thing. BinancePool

I guess no one caught it. ThiefBTC . lol

Congratulations to the winner for his courage.

[bcchanger]

Guys Is this 0.72% progress ? or just miss something ?

[kTimesG]

Basic Mathematics = I have heard this saying in many places.

It is a well-known idea that people who say this generally think verbally, and only apply things they have memorized.

Hey bibilgin. I'm still interested whether you learned how to count properly instead of calling people names. Where are the excuses? I am still waiting...

Maybe then you can have some opinion about, like, anything. What do you say?

[bibilgin]

Bla bla bla.. cut..

1- You are the first person I have ever ignored.

2- Why are you pushing yourself so hard? Did you apologize? Yes..

3- I don't use AI all the time like you.

Now if you are expecting an apology for Bit matching. If it will satisfy your EGO, people here know what I will say.  "......  ....." (You can fill in the dotted areas. lol

You need to take care of Bram. He's currently meeting with investors. You can support him.

[kTimesG]

Hey bibilgin. I'm still interested whether you learned how to count properly instead of calling people names. Where are the excuses? I am still waiting...

Maybe then you can have some opinion about, like, anything. What do you say?

Now if you are expecting an apology for Bit matching. If it will satisfy your EGO, people here know what I will say.  "......  ....." (You can fill in the dotted areas. lol

OK. Thanks for re-iterating that you have zero credibility. Now: tell us all about your prefixes. It would mean a lot for everyone. And is it really about my ego, or yours? I'm simply stating facts: you don't know how to count properly, and anyone who can count properly (not you, obviously) is an idiot.

[Denevron]

Create a separate topic for yourself and discuss your prefix theories as much as you like, and prove there as much as you like who is right and who is not, you have already written more than 20 pages about them 

[FrozenThroneGuy]

69 has fallen!

0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000101d83275fb2bc7e0c

Rrrrrrrr!!! 150 thrillions keys to target.
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000101D7D849C924530B1 02FFE0AE1C43AC1535AF17A4F7553BBD7BBD4502D4984E766BE9BB05EC44CBE9CF 61eb8a5005b20ad4b35cadfbbcd3d36ca2b40bfa

[WanderingPhilospher]

On a serious note...congrats to all the sub 1%'ers. You all kicked some azz, especially one of you, this time around! Woop woop! You sub one percenters have made me smile and even, giggle, a little bit

Now, which one of you, or how many of you, crazy fools are going to be in the next, sub one percenters club??

[bcchanger]

On a serious note...congrats to all the sub 1%'ers. You all kicked some azz, especially one of you, this time around! Woop woop! You sub one percenters have made me smile and even, giggle, a little bit

Now, which one of you, or how many of you, crazy fools are going to be in the next, sub one percenters club??

I've tested your software and I must say, excellent work!

I was curious if there's a feature to prevent the reuse of duplicate keys.

In my tests using a small range, keys were often found quickly, but at times it took longer than the total key space, suggesting that some keys might be repeating.

[Menowa*]

I think the puzzles are gonna be solved faster from now on

[bibilgin]

OK. Thanks for re-iterating that you have zero credibility. Now: tell us all about your prefixes. It would mean a lot for everyone. And is it really about my ego, or yours? I'm simply stating facts: you don't know how to count properly, and anyone who can count properly (not you, obviously) is an idiot.

I have never called anyone stupid until today. But if you want to make yourself look like a FOOL so much. You can talk to yourself.

In terms of reliability, I have the person who tested my reliability more than you think. You don't need to belittle yourself any more.

I won't tell you any fairy tales, not even about Öneki. You can't even detect the events there without asking AI.

So now you can go to BRAM to console him. Sorry, his money ran out and you won't be with him anymore? Hahaha... lol

[Bram24732]

...

I solved it using prefixes, and I shared it for anyone's luck here! I don't need to prove anything, nor do I need 0.1 BTC.

Very happy to get some proof of this