1) you can generate transactions without broadcasting them
Answer False
OK, let me stop you there.
If you don't think it is possible to generate a transaction without broadcasting it then you really have no idea how Bitcoin works.
You never heard of offline wallets? Armory? Paper wallets?
This alone proves to me that you either don't have a clue what you are talking about or are deliberately being deceptive.
I'll leave you appropriate feedback as soon as I finish this post.
Now let me try once again to explain in layman's terms for you, we cannot predict when the last second will be, as when each person joins the game it resets back to 10 seconds.
So you're saying each time someone bets, you have 10 seconds to figure out which of your pre-generated transactions would make you win? That's about a thousand times longer than you need.
Only with magic can we be so lucky to have the site use said transaction.
Magic, luck, or cheating. Any of those 3 would work.
This also is all happening within seconds do you think we are super computers who can take the amount of satoshis know exactly when the game is going to end compute all that with in seconds oh and get super lucky with magic and get our transaction on the exact second the game ends?
I don't think you are a super computer. I think you're probably either a child, an idiot, or a scammer. It's hard to say which. Possibly all three I guess.
You know exactly when the game is ending: 10 seconds after the last bet.
You know which transaction will let you win: the one which selects a ticket you bought.
You know how to
push a transaction to blockchain.info in less than a second and pick it.
You sir are a bad troll.
Try making some arguments against me. Writing "false" after my seven valid statements just makes you look silly.
1) you can generate transactions without broadcasting them
Answer False
Why do you believe this is not possible? How do you think cold wallets and offline signing work?
[...]
Wow, thanks for that. You're a lot more patient with this guy than I am. You actually made valid arguments supporting all seven of my statements, even though he probably didn't even read them.
If you cannot understand this simple concept you have no business running a Bitcoin gambling site.
True that.
It is even worse than that: Since unconfirmed transactions are used to calculate each game's outcome, any valid transaction can be broadcast even if it has no chance of ever being confirmed. This effectively makes the attack free provided one has enough dust spread over a sufficient number of addresses.
Well, it has to be accepted by blockchain.info. I think they reject transactions with too-low fees. I'm not sure exactly what their rules are though, so maybe you could find a way of cheating for free. Either way if the 0.0001 BTC fee is the only thing stopping people from cheating I hardly think we can call it 'provably fair'.
Dooglus is obviously just jealous of OPs success and wishes he thought of the raffle idea first so he wouldnt be stuck with a silly clam dice site.
I know you're joking, but do you think mr. raffle is going to have any idea?
OP you should challenge all these idiots to some sort of coding/what is provably fair battle , winner gets the others site. All you need is a judge /escrow and a challenge.
How about a dance off? The one with the freshest moves is right.
@Dooglus & @jlfvr why don't you leave this guy alone with his shitty behavior? let him learn the hard way and also his customers if they will not listen to your warnings
I wanted to make sure he understood how his site wasn't provably fair and give him a chance to fix it before leaving appropriate feedback.
I don't want him to be able to claim that I left it just because I ran a competing site.
But as you can see above, he's just trolling. He won't respond to any technical points, either because he can't or because he is willfully ignoring them.
So now that it's clear that he doesn't want to fix his site I'll leave him the feedback and move on.
I bet they're all freaking out right now because they finally realized that we aren't shooting dice for clams anymore. What good is something thats proveably fair if anyone can simply deny it?
Undeniable Provable Fair or GTFO
I'm not sure even that is strong enough.
I can't wait until they invent super-duper impregnable I-can't-believe-it's-not-rigged undeniable provable fair. With extra timestamps proving we picked a random transaction within 2 seconds of the end of the game to decide the winner. For fuck sake.
