RichBC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2016, 11:44:51 AM |
|
We are back with latest 16nm ASIC,supported by BITFURY. 1, 10THS/miner, 2,100W/THS, 0.25J/GH on wall 3, 4X 6pin PCI-E 4, Gross weight 5KG 5, size: 350x140x155(adjustable according the design) the price is BTC0.42/THS, fob china. miner ship at end of march or early April.
What the hell!! What is that i am reading? the miner will have 0.25J/GH on wall??? the same eficience than a S7?? ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 100W /THS is 0.1J/GH and would be very good. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Rich Please, look at the first post, they add 0.25J/GH, not me... ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Ok sorry thought you had added that. But if they can't even get that right it just goes to show that they don't know what they are talking about... ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Rich
|
|
|
|
J4bberwock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2016, 12:42:45 PM |
|
We are back with latest 16nm ASIC,supported by BITFURY. 1, 10THS/miner, 2,100W/THS, 0.25J/GH on wall 3, 4X 6pin PCI-E 4, Gross weight 5KG 5, size: 350x140x155(adjustable according the design) the price is BTC0.42/THS, fob china. miner ship at end of march or early April.
What the hell!! What is that i am reading? the miner will have 0.25J/GH on wall??? the same eficience than a S7?? ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 100W /THS is 0.1J/GH and would be very good. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Rich Please, look at the first post, they add 0.25J/GH, not me... ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Ok sorry thought you had added that. But if they can't even get that right it just goes to show that they don't know what they are talking about... ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Rich Even the title of the thread have been updated, so maybe not a typo. from 16nm ASIC, 10THS/MINER,100w/THS on wall. to 16nm ASIC, 10THS/MINER,100w/THS 0.25J/GH on wall. If those new numbers are real, there was no need to go to 16nm, and the price will be barely better than actual S7 pricing
|
|
|
|
generalt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1096
Merit: 1021
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2016, 12:56:12 PM |
|
If those new numbers are real, there was no need to go to 16nm, and the price will be barely better than actual S7 pricing
The price is worse if that's the case since you don't get it until April?
|
BTC: 1GENERALrtBAjEv2Ps5cmEW1FADnXh1bCZ
|
|
|
xleejohnx
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2016, 01:05:41 PM |
|
Even the title of the thread have been updated, so maybe not a typo. from 16nm ASIC, 10THS/MINER,100w/THS on wall. to 16nm ASIC, 10THS/MINER,100w/THS 0.25J/GH on wall. If those new numbers are real, there was no need to go to 16nm, and the price will be barely better than actual S7 pricing yeah those numbers dont add up
|
As I see a super coin as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions. ~philipma1957
|
|
|
64dimensions
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2016, 02:11:31 PM |
|
From another thread this popped up: http://agenda.ge/news/48424/engIt appears from this news that later in '15, Bitfury was still populating it's data centers with 28nm hashing chips.
|
|
|
|
sidehack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1858
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2016, 03:31:26 PM |
|
So they edit the thread title and contents to be self-contradictory? That doesn't make sense.
Also, of course Bitfury was filling their shelves with 28nm. I get no page from that link you posted, but they announced 0.2J/GH 28nm in February and just recently stated they had tested engineering samples of 16nm. Does anyone expect they went from tested engineering samples to complete miners in mass production in zero time?
|
|
|
|
Mitak
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 11, 2016, 11:34:16 PM |
|
Yep they did in NEVER_LANd ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
Brob12321
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 03:13:20 AM |
|
Is there some sort of new technology for the board, its looks to be transparent and glowing blue ? A transparent board would be pretty awesome if there's some material out there that could be used. Honestly looks like the pics are completely fake. Is this thing even real ?
|
|
|
|
Rabinovitch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1076
BTCLife.global participant
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 03:46:51 AM |
|
Is there some sort of new technology for the board, its looks to be transparent and glowing blue ? It's obvious that it's just a nice picture. Just like in case of B-eleven miner.
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 07:36:19 AM |
|
Probably a typo. Because 4 PCIE plugs will already have some trouble for 1000w, but drawing 600w on each of them is impossible. Even if it's a typo, I hope they will at least use 6 PCIE plugs for 1000w
It would be nice if they would resolve their new inconsistancy - 100W/TH is 0.1 J/GH not 0.25 On the other hand, just makes me more inclined to think "SCAM" when they can't even be consistant on basic specs. 250 watts per PCI-E 6-pin connector is within the connector specs - the SP20E runs up to 288 watts/connector quite reliably. It's the morons at KnC that were trying to push over 300 watts/connector EXCEEDING the connector specs that had meltdown issues.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
asiabtc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 986
Merit: 1000
Crypto Currency , Mining, Exchange ATM, Wallet!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 07:45:01 AM |
|
We are back with latest 16nm ASIC,supported by BITFURY. 1, 10THS/miner, 2,100W/THS, 0.25J/GH on wall 3, 4X 6pin PCI-E 4, Gross weight 5KG 5, size: 350x140x155(adjustable according the design) the price is BTC0.42/THS, fob china. miner ship at end of march or early April.
What the hell!! What is that i am reading? the miner will have 0.25J/GH on wall??? the same eficience than a S7?? ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 100W /THS is 0.1J/GH and would be very good. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Rich Please, look at the first post, they add 0.25J/GH, not me... ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Ok sorry thought you had added that. But if they can't even get that right it just goes to show that they don't know what they are talking about... ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Rich Even the title of the thread have been updated, so maybe not a typo. from 16nm ASIC, 10THS/MINER,100w/THS on wall. to 16nm ASIC, 10THS/MINER,100w/THS 0.25J/GH on wall. If those new numbers are real, there was no need to go to 16nm, and the price will be barely better than actual S7 pricing its mistake. has be corrected to 0.1J/GHS
|
www.lightningasic.com. ASIC GPU矿机,ATM, 硬件钱包,挖矿。ALTCOIN,BTC,LTC,Dogecoin research, Producing BTC LTC Dogecoin Mining Machine, Exchange market policy study.Skype: altcoin Twitter: @realSatoshi_ii Co-Founder of LIGHTNINGASIC 关注微博: @比特币矿机 TWITTER: @realSatoshi_ii, 获得最新资讯。
|
|
|
asiabtc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 986
Merit: 1000
Crypto Currency , Mining, Exchange ATM, Wallet!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 07:52:02 AM |
|
We are back with latest 16nm ASIC,supported by BITFURY. 1, 10THS/miner, 2,100W/THS, 0.25J/GH on wall 3, 4X 6pin PCI-E 4, Gross weight 5KG 5, size: 350x140x155(adjustable according the design) the price is BTC0.42/THS, fob china. miner ship at end of march or early April.
What the hell!! What is that i am reading? the miner will have 0.25J/GH on wall??? the same eficience than a S7?? ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) its mistake. has been corrected to 0.1J/GH
|
www.lightningasic.com. ASIC GPU矿机,ATM, 硬件钱包,挖矿。ALTCOIN,BTC,LTC,Dogecoin research, Producing BTC LTC Dogecoin Mining Machine, Exchange market policy study.Skype: altcoin Twitter: @realSatoshi_ii Co-Founder of LIGHTNINGASIC 关注微博: @比特币矿机 TWITTER: @realSatoshi_ii, 获得最新资讯。
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:15:55 PM |
|
250 watts per PCI-E 6-pin connector is within the connector specs
Its crazy how short everyone's memory is. When I suggested you could run the S7 off 4 PCI-E (~275W) everyone shit their pants, even though that's exactly what they'd already been doing for years.
|
|
|
|
sidehack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1858
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 03:33:30 PM |
|
If you've got good 16AWG cables, sure. 18 gauge, forget about it. And when you get up close to capacity for your cables you want to check them evey now and then because if one pin isn't connecting properly you're overloading the other two which can cause heat, which can cause contact oxidation, which increases resistance which causes more heat. Bitmain likes to play it safe with power, which is why they put 4 connectors on the S3 (less than 100W each) - which makes the KFC Neptune hilarious in context with its single connector for an equal or larger power draw. A miner requesting more than about 250W per connector is a questionable design, and they darn better let you know what is and isn't an acceptable wire size to use on it.
|
|
|
|
Finksy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 07:55:44 PM |
|
Its crazy how short everyone's memory is. When I suggested you could run the S7 off 4 PCI-E (~275W) everyone shit their pants, even though that's exactly what they'd already been doing for years.
It's crazy how poor your reading comprehension can be. Nobody was shitting their pants. You suggested something that - although is within the guidelines for the wiring and connector- clearly violates Bitmain's warranty policy, and effectively voids it. Something you have been very sure to inform others not to do (and to include disclaimers when they suggest doing such things to others) in the past. The hypocrisy was the issue, not the specs. And, your response to that was "Bitmain is wrong" in this case. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Tell me, do you think Bitmain would hear the reasoning on PCIe and wiring specs if these boards would have only had 2x PCIe plugs melted to them instead of 3, regardless of whether or not it would have made a difference? (Hint: I'm aware it wouldn't have made a difference, except in the denial of warranty) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi63.tinypic.com%2F69nh9d.jpg&t=663&c=LpVdJvLBp42u4Q)
|
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183
dogiecoin.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 08:22:08 PM |
|
Tell me, do you think Bitmain would hear the reasoning on PCIe and wiring specs if these boards would have only had 2x PCIe plugs melted to them instead of 3, regardless of whether or not it would have made a difference? (Hint: I'm aware it wouldn't have made a difference, except in the denial of warranty)
What you've posted was clearly not caused by the PCI-E connectors so.................................................................. Yeah now I remember it was mostly you that was flipping your shit, because you wanted to sell more of your $60 breakout boards and $4 PCI-E cables. Anyway, back to the actual topic of the thread.... Its crazy how short everyone's memory is. When I suggested you could run the S7 off 4 PCI-E (~275W) everyone shit their pants, even though that's exactly what they'd already been doing for years.
|
|
|
|
sidehack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1858
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 08:29:23 PM |
|
The point that it voids Bitmain's warranty is still a valid concern. Not exactly valid for the actual topic of the thread, which is "16nm ASIC, 10THS/MINER,100w/THS 0.1J/GH on wall".
It would be nice to see at least six connectors on a 1KW miner. SP20s made me a bit leery when some clockings were asking for around 300W per connector. None of my hosted machines smoked out, but I did see one or two connectors starting to brown a bit.
|
|
|
|
Finksy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 08:45:33 PM |
|
What you've posted was clearly not caused by the PCI-E connectors so.................................................................. Yeah now I remember it was mostly you that was flipping your shit, because you wanted to sell more of your $60 breakout boards and $4 PCI-E cables.
Good god you are truly helpless. You should really work on your reading comprehension if you still plan to go to University one of these days. Yes, back to the topic at hand, dogie looking for re-assuring pats on the head to feel important. Good dogie, you were right about something that absolutely nobody was questioning and is completely self-evident given published data. Have a cookie. I'm not comfortable with over 250W on a PCIe cable personally. I ran many S5's with single 1.35mm^2 PCIe cables per board (closer to 15awg cabling) and they all turned the connectors brown over time, and that is only about 275W. If it's 1000W at the wall after PSU efficiency, it would probably be fine. But if they want to leave room for over-clocking, or that is DC wattage then they would definitely be better off w/ 6 connectors.
|
|
|
|
tutorialevideo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1161
Merit: 1001
Don`t invest more than you can afford to lose
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 08:58:21 PM |
|
Its crazy how short everyone's memory is. When I suggested you could run the S7 off 4 PCI-E (~275W) everyone shit their pants, even though that's exactly what they'd already been doing for years.
It's crazy how poor your reading comprehension can be. Nobody was shitting their pants. You suggested something that - although is within the guidelines for the wiring and connector- clearly violates Bitmain's warranty policy, and effectively voids it. Something you have been very sure to inform others not to do (and to include disclaimers when they suggest doing such things to others) in the past. The hypocrisy was the issue, not the specs. And, your response to that was "Bitmain is wrong" in this case. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Tell me, do you think Bitmain would hear the reasoning on PCIe and wiring specs if these boards would have only had 2x PCIe plugs melted to them instead of 3, regardless of whether or not it would have made a difference? (Hint: I'm aware it wouldn't have made a difference, except in the denial of warranty) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi63.tinypic.com%2F69nh9d.jpg&t=663&c=LpVdJvLBp42u4Q) This is crazy man is the first s7 on fire that i seen what is the main couse?
|
|
|
|
0bit
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 11:08:40 PM |
|
I would definitely need to see a demo or a review of this before I would even think to consider it. That price alone is a huge turn off for me on this product. Caveat emptor indeed.
|
|
|
|
|