[150TH] [PPLNS 0.5%] Jonny's Mining Emporium (bravo-mining.com)

[jonnybravo0311]

Hey everyone,

In the interest of supporting large hash rate renters, I've opened up port 3334.  Diff starts at 65535.  The lowest it'll go is 8129.  The highest it will go is 1048576.  So, if you want to use that please feel free.

Code:

./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://stratum.bravo-mining.com:3334 -u username.workerName -p workerPassword

Enjoy.

[bctmke]

Hey everyone,

In the interest of supporting large hash rate renters, I've opened up port 3334.  Diff starts at 65535.  The lowest it'll go is 8129.  The highest it will go is 1048576.  So, if you want to use that please feel free.

Code:

./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://stratum.bravo-mining.com:3334 -u username.workerName -p workerPassword

Enjoy.

Sweet thanks

You should update the pool main page.

[underachieved]

Stubborn block!

[jonnybravo0311]

We are only at 53% of expected shares...

[eghigo]

Experiencing right now the 1042 diff issue on a rental of 15TH. All day everything was working perfectly ...

If it continues I will terminate the order and start with the new port setting.

Edit : Seems to be back to normal again ...

[jonnybravo0311]

It's very likely that your rental was either stopped on NH end and then restarted there... or different bridges were established from NH, which the pool would consider a new connection and would start at 1042.

This is supported in the logs...

At 14:45:59 you had a share accepted with diff 9985
At 14:47:50 your worker was authorized (i.e. a new connection)
At 14:47:50 your worker was authorized on another thread (another new connection)
At 14:48:03 your worker was authorized on a third thread (new connection)
At 14:49:13 the first share was accepted at diff 1042.

For some reason, the rental service established new connections for your worker, which caused the pool to default back to the starting diff of 1042, until it was adjusted.

[eghigo]

It's very likely that your rental was either stopped on NH end and then restarted there... or different bridges were established from NH, which the pool would consider a new connection and would start at 1042.

This is supported in the logs...

At 14:45:59 you had a share accepted with diff 9985
At 14:47:50 your worker was authorized (i.e. a new connection)
At 14:47:50 your worker was authorized on another thread (another new connection)
At 14:48:03 your worker was authorized on a third thread (new connection)
At 14:49:13 the first share was accepted at diff 1042.

For some reason, the rental service established new connections for your worker, which caused the pool to default back to the starting diff of 1042, until it was adjusted.

Should there be one or more bridges in a rental (I have three bridges at the moment) ? However, I made another small order on CKPool to test things out, there is only one bridge for that rental and hashing speed is practically the same.

[jonnybravo0311]

That's completely dependent on how the rental site manages it.  Sometimes you'll get one bridge, other times you'll get more.

[bctmke]

It's very likely that your rental was either stopped on NH end and then restarted there... or different bridges were established from NH, which the pool would consider a new connection and would start at 1042.

This is supported in the logs...

At 14:45:59 you had a share accepted with diff 9985
At 14:47:50 your worker was authorized (i.e. a new connection)
At 14:47:50 your worker was authorized on another thread (another new connection)
At 14:48:03 your worker was authorized on a third thread (new connection)
At 14:49:13 the first share was accepted at diff 1042.

For some reason, the rental service established new connections for your worker, which caused the pool to default back to the starting diff of 1042, until it was adjusted.

Should there be one or more bridges in a rental (I have three bridges at the moment) ? However, I made another small order on CKPool to test things out, there is only one bridge for that rental and hashing speed is practically the same.

Even on my lower speed rentals at NH I see new bridges all of the time.

it falls under the "not-so-nice" moniker that kano gave it

[jonnybravo0311]

it falls under the "not-so-nice" moniker that kano gave it

+1 to that

[bctmke]

it falls under the "not-so-nice" moniker that kano gave it

+1 to that

Sadly its one of two reasonable options for us if we wish to rent and play the lottery that way.

[RozoTheMiner]

Well guys I think it's about that time we throw some more horsepower at the pool so we can get the block before the difficulty changes.

Maybe we can try planning a coordinated rental?

any takers?

[philipma1957]

Well guys I think it's about that time we throw some more horsepower at the pool so we can get the block before the difficulty changes.

Maybe we can try planning a coordinated rental?

any takers?

 yes I just pointed  150 th and it does not let me mine

so WTF am I doing wrong.


stratum+tcp://bravo-mining.com:3334

philipma1957.two

x

edit I think I see the problem


stratum+tcp://stratum.bravo-mining.com:3334   this is correct


I had  stratum+tcp://bravo-mining.com:3334

okay I am good for a few hours

[RozoTheMiner]

Sweet, ya took me a few tries to figure that out too

any more takers we can be up to a one PH in no time

[jonnybravo0311]

Sure... let me throw some coin at NH and I'll jump on the block party train

EDIT: and done... 400TH for the next 12 hours or so...

[eghigo]

500TH for the next couple hours Let's get the next one ...

[eghigo]

Stuck at around 150TH. Maybe will get some more hash power later on ...

[bctmke]

I'll get in when I can.  Don't want to take hash from any of you guys

Jonny - just as a heads up the pool verificator at NH shows this for bravo-mining on the "high diff" port

Received mining.set_difficulty... OK: 65535

So well done - NH can validate the higher limit.  Thanks again on that one.

[eghigo]

Rental not kicking in and don't wish to go for a very high price. Guess will have to wait a bit longer Sorry guys ...

[jonnybravo0311]

No problem... My rental is up and down as well.  It's all hash