What do you think about 9/11 mystery?

[tvbcof]

It was claimed that all security cameras were removed days before attack. It was also claimed that men were working in buildings for days for unknown purpose.

Also it is claimed that the bomb-sniffing dogs used for security were pulled out several weeks before the event.

[1714618204]

1714618204

[1714618204]

1714618204

[1714618204]

1714618204

[magnific61]

It was claimed that all security cameras were removed days before attack. It was also claimed that men were working in buildings for days for unknown purpose.

Also it is claimed that the bomb-sniffing dogs used for security were pulled out several weeks before the event.

And claimed that Lary Silverstein  bought WTC in july 2001 for 3.3 billion dollaes  and insured them 6 weeks before event for 3.6 billion dollars. Insurance was included terrorist attacks. After attack he asked from insurance totaly 7,2 billion for double impact. But court decided only 3,6 billion. Smart businessman and augur

[tvbcof]

It was claimed that all security cameras were removed days before attack. It was also claimed that men were working in buildings for days for unknown purpose.

Also it is claimed that the bomb-sniffing dogs used for security were pulled out several weeks before the event.

And claimed that Lary Silverstein  bought WTC in july 2001 for 3.3 billion dollaes  and insured them 6 weeks before event for 3.6 billion dollars. Insurance was included terrorist attacks. After attack he asked from insurance totaly 7,2 billion for double impact. But court decided only 3,6 billion. Smart businessman and augur

Trump was operational as a businessman in the same business and in the same area.  It seems inconcievable to me that he did not at least know the score.  If he stays alive, I suspect it will be be he has more than a personal hunch.  It also might explain why he can publicaly give the big fat middle finger to certain people, groups, and families.  Or a small stumpy middle finger as the case may be.

Trump's speach to the Republican Jewish Coalition forum was shockingly out of ordinary.  I'll be interested to see what he says to AIPAC if it's open to the public.

[Spendulus]

It was claimed that all security cameras were removed days before attack. It was also claimed that men were working in buildings for days for unknown purpose.

Who cares "it was claimed that..."

[Spendulus]

It was claimed that all security cameras were removed days before attack. It was also claimed that men were working in buildings for days for unknown purpose.

Also it is claimed that the bomb-sniffing dogs used for security were pulled out several weeks before the event.

And claimed that Lary Silverstein  bought WTC in july 2001 for 3.3 billion dollaes  and insured them 6 weeks before event for 3.6 billion dollars. Insurance was included terrorist attacks. After attack he asked from insurance totaly 7,2 billion for double impact. But court decided only 3,6 billion. Smart businessman and augur

Duh, duh duh.  Before 911 terrorist events were not excluded from insurance policies.  Acts of war were and several other categories, but not terrorist attacks.

[arbitrage]

No, you do not see "detonation" in this video.

Those are not detonations like classical explosive.
And amount of needed explosive is minimal when you place it on right spots.
This is whole science. Point is to localize explosions and not cause vast destruction.
You clearly can see that building collapsing floor by the floor, this cannot happen without
explosions at some point this would be stopped by itself.

[arbitrage]

Duh, duh duh.  Before 911 terrorist events were not excluded from insurance policies.  Acts of war were and several other categories, but not terrorist attacks.

Do you believe this is actual terrorist act committed by those muslims who are not experts in flying. And whole American system fail to recognize this as an attack? How they are gonna be protected against Russian Satan?
This is story for kids. Same goes for Kennedy assassination, one man job?

[Spendulus]

No, you do not see "detonation" in this video.

Those are not detonations like classical explosive.
And amount of needed explosive is minimal when you place it on right spots.
This is whole science. Point is to localize explosions and not cause vast destruction.
You clearly can see that building collapsing floor by the floor, this cannot happen without
explosions at some point this would be stopped by itself.

Buildings collapsing floor by floor is well understood.  The floor is being torn away from the I beams that surround the outside of the twin towers.  Those outer beams act as sort of a guide to channel all the debris down.

Think about it.

Also, please don't lecture about the science.  Ask about what doesn't seem logical or what seems crystal clear.

[Spendulus]

Duh, duh duh.  Before 911 terrorist events were not excluded from insurance policies.  Acts of war were and several other categories, but not terrorist attacks.

Do you believe this is actual terrorist act committed by those muslims who are not experts in flying. And whole American system fail to recognize this as an attack? How they are gonna be protected against Russian Satan?
This is story for kids. Same goes for Kennedy assassination, one man job?

The muslim terrorists who flew the four hijacked jets paid to learn to fly the 757 in American flight schools.  They asked for lessons only in flying the jets, not in taking off or landing.  In other words, they were competent at what they did - flying the jets into targets.

Russia is a great nation and I am glad that the Cold War is over.  We should side with Russia in the Middle East against mutual threats.

The Kennedy thing was most likely two riflemen in my opinion.  But I don't think there was a massive cover up, just that it was never figured out.  Then of course the powers that be want to make it look like they figured it all out.

[Spendulus]

It was claimed that all security cameras were removed days before attack. It was also claimed that men were working in buildings for days for unknown purpose.

Also it is claimed that the bomb-sniffing dogs used for security were pulled out several weeks before the event.

It was claimed that giant spaggetti monsters came from outer space, and played a game of soccer with meatballs, on the Wimbleton tennis courts.

[magnific61]

It was claimed that all security cameras were removed days before attack. It was also claimed that men were working in buildings for days for unknown purpose.

Also it is claimed that the bomb-sniffing dogs used for security were pulled out several weeks before the event.

It was claimed that giant spaggetti monsters came from outer space, and played a game of soccer with meatballs, on the Wimbleton tennis courts.

Maybe but we don't believe that because of we are not American

[criptix]

I didnt see any mathematical or physical evidence or explanation.
Can you please stick to that instead of opinions, hearsay or whatever you think might be true?

So far i didnt see one poster archieving that.

[pr0d1gy]

wish i could embed this, but cant... https://i.imgur.com/VUeFY1u.webm
 

[magnific61]

wish i could embed this, but cant... https://i.imgur.com/VUeFY1u.webm
 

He might thrown it from window for proving "we did"

[Spendulus]

I didnt see any mathematical or physical evidence or explanation.
Can you please stick to that instead of opinions, hearsay or whatever you think might be true?

So far i didnt see one poster archieving that.

For what, exactly?

[criptix]

I didnt see any mathematical or physical evidence or explanation.
Can you please stick to that instead of opinions, hearsay or whatever you think might be true?

So far i didnt see one poster archieving that.

For what, exactly?

 

[Spendulus]

I didnt see any mathematical or physical evidence or explanation.
Can you please stick to that instead of opinions, hearsay or whatever you think might be true?

So far i didnt see one poster archieving that.

For what, exactly?

 

You asked.  What specific phenomena do you want an explanation for?

[criptix]

I didnt see any mathematical or physical evidence or explanation.
Can you please stick to that instead of opinions, hearsay or whatever you think might be true?

So far i didnt see one poster archieving that.

For what, exactly?

 

You asked.  What specific phenomena do you want an explanation for?

Ah nvm my bad. I understood it wrong.

How about we start at the possible heat energy of jet fuel (kerosine) and stability of steel(frames)?

[mikehersh2]

I don't let these conspiracy theories get to my head. When there is a mystery, or any sense of doubt, people always jump to the easiest conclusion, and in this case it sparked a major conspiracy theory. I do believe it was a terrorist attack, not our own government.

[Spendulus]

I don't let these conspiracy theories get to my head. When there is a mystery, or any sense of doubt, people always jump to the easiest conclusion, and in this case it sparked a major conspiracy theory. I do believe it was a terrorist attack, not our own government.

Although I have repeatedly asked believers to produce credible conspiracy theories about 911, they do not, perhaps because they cannot.

The ideas about controlled detonation for example.  Run airliners into buidlings and then do controlled detonation.

Really?  

That's a bit like cutting someone's head off and then shooting them a couple times.  Then just to be sure, stuff poison down the mouth of the decapitated head.