BTC-BTC-BTC
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1001
www.neutroncoin.com
|
 |
March 30, 2016, 12:28:03 AM |
|
Signature added.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
lordglorius
|
|
March 30, 2016, 12:57:33 AM |
|
Signature added
|
|
|
|
|
azwccc
|
|
March 30, 2016, 01:46:48 AM |
|
Will waves use DPOS, like LISK?
|
Bitrated user: azwccc.
|
|
|
|
realrover
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:12:19 AM |
|
Can you clarify the below please?
2) All members need to post at least 50 posts by the time the ICO ends to be eligible for a reward. This means that members participating today have 9 weeks to meet the criteria, while last week ones have only one week.
Does it mean we have to post at least 50 times in this thread alone?
as I read we need 50 post/week. no? No, 50 posts from registration to the end of ico (9 weeks). Guys, why do you want to flood BTCTalk with useless messages with this policy? It's really annoying to read hundreds of messages like "me too", "great", "to the moon" and such - just because people want to post 50 times during your campaign. Please re-consider. It's kind of unprofessional. I'm here since 2013 and we have 1000s more useless messages today than then... Don't make BTT worse that it deserves. Thank you. Totally agree.Everyday I see pages of replies with no real content and I have stopped reading them all now. Dev, could you please react to our opinion? What is the reasoning behind this "minimum 50 posts" thing? |
|
|
|
|
|
sotisoti
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:51:05 AM |
|
|
Bitrated user: sotisoti.
|
|
|
|
AhmedAshraf
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:00:06 AM |
|
Can you clarify the below please?
2) All members need to post at least 50 posts by the time the ICO ends to be eligible for a reward. This means that members participating today have 9 weeks to meet the criteria, while last week ones have only one week.
Does it mean we have to post at least 50 times in this thread alone?
as I read we need 50 post/week. no? No, 50 posts from registration to the end of ico (9 weeks). Guys, why do you want to flood BTCTalk with useless messages with this policy? It's really annoying to read hundreds of messages like "me too", "great", "to the moon" and such - just because people want to post 50 times during your campaign. Please re-consider. It's kind of unprofessional. I'm here since 2013 and we have 1000s more useless messages today than then... Don't make BTT worse that it deserves. Thank you. Totally agree.Everyday I see pages of replies with no real content and I have stopped reading them all now. Dev, could you please react to our opinion? What is the reasoning behind this "minimum 50 posts" thing? Hello The signature campaign is could be thought of as a banner advertising one. In order for a user to get a share of the bounty pool, it is only logical to make sure that he has contributed through some length to the outreach of the campaign, and it is illogical to reward users for placing the code in their signature area when they haven't helped in spreading the word. Moreover, 50 posts over a period of 9 weeks (63 days!) requires the user to only post once daily. As such, I don't see why this will put pressure on users to contribute with "filler" posts when it very possible to post a constructive ones once a day. The issue of filler posts isn't one this campaign will effect greatly, as we aren't a pay-per-post campaign. As such, users are not tempted to post a ton of useless posts daily in order to gain more coins. |
|
|
|
|
RATM69
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:07:15 AM |
|
Can you clarify the below please?
2) All members need to post at least 50 posts by the time the ICO ends to be eligible for a reward. This means that members participating today have 9 weeks to meet the criteria, while last week ones have only one week.
Does it mean we have to post at least 50 times in this thread alone?
as I read we need 50 post/week. no? No, 50 posts from registration to the end of ico (9 weeks). Guys, why do you want to flood BTCTalk with useless messages with this policy? It's really annoying to read hundreds of messages like "me too", "great", "to the moon" and such - just because people want to post 50 times during your campaign. Please re-consider. It's kind of unprofessional. I'm here since 2013 and we have 1000s more useless messages today than then... Don't make BTT worse that it deserves. Thank you. Totally agree.Everyday I see pages of replies with no real content and I have stopped reading them all now. Dev, could you please react to our opinion? What is the reasoning behind this "minimum 50 posts" thing? It's for spreading FUD and destrying a perfectly good and infomative thread. See the LISK thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1346646.6860 for and an example of this kind of behavior. 10-15 pages a day of nonsense BS. It's hard to keep up with real things developing in that thread because there's so much BS in it. It takes a lot of time to catch up and and your still not anymore informed than before you started reading it because of all the nonsense in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Digital_Currency_LTD
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:14:42 AM |
|
Can you clarify the below please?
2) All members need to post at least 50 posts by the time the ICO ends to be eligible for a reward. This means that members participating today have 9 weeks to meet the criteria, while last week ones have only one week.
Does it mean we have to post at least 50 times in this thread alone?
as I read we need 50 post/week. no? No, 50 posts from registration to the end of ico (9 weeks). Guys, why do you want to flood BTCTalk with useless messages with this policy? It's really annoying to read hundreds of messages like "me too", "great", "to the moon" and such - just because people want to post 50 times during your campaign. Please re-consider. It's kind of unprofessional. I'm here since 2013 and we have 1000s more useless messages today than then... Don't make BTT worse that it deserves. Thank you. Totally agree.Everyday I see pages of replies with no real content and I have stopped reading them all now. Dev, could you please react to our opinion? What is the reasoning behind this "minimum 50 posts" thing? It's for spreading FUD and destrying a perfectly good and infomative thread. See the LISK thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1346646.6860 for and an example of this kind of behavior. 10-15 pages a day of nonsense BS. It's hard to keep up with real things developing in that thread because there's so much BS in it. It takes a lot of time to catch up and and your still not anymore informed than before you started reading it because of all the nonsense in it. Sorry this is not true, because LISK don't have signature campaign already. |
|
|
|
|
|
RATM69
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:32:47 AM |
|
Sorry this is not true, because LISK don't have signature campaign already.
[/quote]
They did have a signature campaign and it's over now. It ended the other day. Which day I can't remember but i'm sure you can find out if you read through 300+ pages of BS. There's no other reason a thread should have that many post in it because the real information probably is only about 50 pages or so which a person can easily catch up and stay upto date fairly easily.
Edit: Think of it this way. If there's 1000 people following the thread in the signature campaign at 50 post minimum each. That's 5000 post just by those people alone. I can't tell you how many "to the moon" "to Mars" etc... post i've read in there just so people can get there post count up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arkh
|
|
March 30, 2016, 05:15:11 AM |
|
From my understanding the 50 post are to be anywhere on the forum and not specifically limited to this thread. The goal is to inform people on other threads of the existance of Waves.
It's pointless to write a non-relevant post here in the Waves official thread, in order to get stakes with the WAVES signature because if you are on this thread then obviously you know about Waves and it kill the marketing objective.
I see the 50 posts as an icentive for people to post in other threads and give visibility to the Waves project in order to attract more potential investors.
If there is to be pointless "for the stakes" posts on this thread, I'd suggest to get this thread moderated to get rid of those posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prix
|
|
March 30, 2016, 07:07:20 AM |
|
It's for spreading FUD and destrying a perfectly good and infomative thread. See the LISK thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1346646.6860 for and an example of this kind of behavior. 10-15 pages a day of nonsense BS. It's hard to keep up with real things developing in that thread because there's so much BS in it. It takes a lot of time to catch up and and your still not anymore informed than before you started reading it because of all the nonsense in it. You are not correct about LISK. Lisk signature campaign didn't has any post count restriction. Moreover, you didn't need write even a single post, just send a PM to the LiskHQ with participation confirmation. All useless post in LISK thread makes for free or for other paid signature campaigns. And Lisk has a blog, reddit, twitter and official forum if you want get a clear news and communication. |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptoheadd
|
|
March 30, 2016, 08:12:58 AM |
|
Is the signature campaign valid for Jr Members as well?
|
|
|
|
|
|
JanDzban
|
|
March 30, 2016, 08:17:42 AM |
|
Is the signature campaign valid for Jr Members as well?
No, Member at least. Here if its helpfull: Brand New: 0 posts, gets 1 gold coin under his name. Newbie: (none), gets 1 gold coin under his name. Jr. Member: Activity: 30, gets 1 gold coin under his name. Member: Activity: 60, gets 2 gold coins under his name. Full Member: Activity: 120, gets 3 gold coins under his name. Sr. Member: Activity: 240, gets 4 gold coins under his name. Hero Member: Activity: 480, gets 5 gold coins under his name. |
|
|
|
|
-aleco-
|
|
March 30, 2016, 08:25:11 AM |
|
Making WAVES part 2Q: You’ve got a pretty tight release schedule, which means that the WAVES platform will be up and running by the end of the summer. Where do you see things by this point in 2017? A: We want to have dozens of successful campaigns taking place on the WAVES platform, established payment providers working on the WAVES blockchain, and the reputation system effectively preventing abuse and fraud. And a market cap of around $100 million 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ghoom
|
|
March 30, 2016, 08:53:45 AM |
|
60 Activity to become "Member" ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
bezbezbez
|
|
March 30, 2016, 08:58:55 AM |
|
60 Activity to become "Member" ?
yes! |
|
|
|
|
|
sandiman
|
|
March 30, 2016, 09:26:42 AM |
|
Followed on Facebook, twitter and subscribed to the newsletter.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Coinr88
|
|
March 30, 2016, 09:41:10 AM |
|
Could someone please give a better explanation of how the reputation system would work? I read somewhere that it will use karma points or something. How do you plan to realize such a system that would not be able to be manipulated? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
colombuszka
|
|
March 30, 2016, 09:47:43 AM |
|
So as I completed the Hungarian version of WAVES announcement, it became clear I cannot post it in the Hungarian sub-topic. "Translated coin announcements are off-topic in the Other languages section." So I put it on the Hungarian altcoin thread of bitcoin community. Here it is: https://bitcoin.hu/forum/index.php/topic,2281.0.htmlI hope this will be stay there now..  |
.
| .
| .
▬◇
▬◇▬◆
▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| .
◇▬
◆▬◇▬
◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
|
