|
killdemon
|
 |
June 24, 2016, 05:17:46 AM
Last edit: June 24, 2016, 05:32:39 AM by killdemon |
|
block 103005 and looks like no changes in PoS. PoS is still stacked?!
It is not Yobit error. It is DEV mistake, bcs he is not capable to fix POS issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
killdemon
|
|
June 24, 2016, 06:25:16 AM |
|
Unfortunately, Block 103022...POS is dead. This coin deserve to be dumped to 0. Wait you can not even deposit to exchange  .So this coin value is already at 0. Good. |
|
|
|
grimdin
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
June 24, 2016, 10:26:02 AM |
|
Hmm, it seems new fix did not work, still no PoS blocks.
Can we just go back to original PoS code that was used before 100k, that worked just fine IMHO.
I vote for old PoS code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
krile (OP)
|
|
June 24, 2016, 11:13:35 PM |
|
Hmm, it seems new fix did not work, still no PoS blocks.
Can we just go back to original PoS code that was used before 100k, that worked just fine IMHO.
I vote for old PoS code.
Tnx for the vote  This is getting really annoying. If anyone wants to help out with the code I would be happy to give a bounty. I have the last exam on my faculty this monday and I have to study like crazy over the weekend. So first thing on monday after my exam I will start rewiewing and retesting the code. But if anyone wants to help in the meantime please do, if you can spot the bug |
|
|
|
grimdin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
June 27, 2016, 09:39:07 PM |
|
I can also give some bounties for fixes.
I like to propose also that block target time could be some faster than current ~100sec, something like 60 seconds would IMHO be better.
If the block target time should be 90sec (looking OP) it seems to be in reality ~100sec, so it definetely needs some fixing too, and for me i dont mind making it more close to 60sec.
Also would like to see more PoS targeted than PoW, as we dont have any good GPU miner software, think none for AMD cards.
Maybe shorten PoW phase or PoW blocks could give smaller rewards? Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
June 27, 2016, 09:51:58 PM |
|
I can also give some bounties for fixes.
I like to propose also that block target time could be some faster than current ~100sec, something like 60 seconds would IMHO be better.
If the block target time should be 90sec (looking OP) it seems to be in reality ~100sec, so it definetely needs some fixing too, and for me i dont mind making it more close to 60sec.
Also would like to see more PoS targeted than PoW, as we dont have any good GPU miner software, think none for AMD cards.
Maybe shorten PoW phase or PoW blocks could give smaller rewards? Any ideas?
I disagree with PoW mods |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
crysx
|
|
June 28, 2016, 02:28:24 AM |
|
I can also give some bounties for fixes.
I like to propose also that block target time could be some faster than current ~100sec, something like 60 seconds would IMHO be better.
If the block target time should be 90sec (looking OP) it seems to be in reality ~100sec, so it definetely needs some fixing too, and for me i dont mind making it more close to 60sec.
Also would like to see more PoS targeted than PoW, as we dont have any good GPU miner software, think none for AMD cards.
Maybe shorten PoW phase or PoW blocks could give smaller rewards? Any ideas?
I disagree with PoW mods i second ocminer ... #crysx |
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 28, 2016, 06:32:50 AM |
|
ehhhm, whats wrong with 50% "faster" time for block and 50% less coins per block?
|
|
|
|
|
|
crysx
|
|
June 28, 2016, 07:37:21 AM |
|
ehhhm, whats wrong with 50% "faster" time for block and 50% less coins per block?
less count is not an issue ... but a real risk of forking on very fast times - with the code already having issues - is not a good way to go ... solidify the base code first - THEN change the timing and test and see if its worth implementing ... #crysx |
|
|
|
grimdin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
June 28, 2016, 10:53:15 AM |
|
ehhhm, whats wrong with 50% "faster" time for block and 50% less coins per block?
less count is not an issue ... but a real risk of forking on very fast times - with the code already having issues - is not a good way to go ... solidify the base code first - THEN change the timing and test and see if its worth implementing ... #crysx I Agree, PoS needs to be 1. priority to get fixed so it works again. Then we can discuss whats next. I would like to see faster block times, atleast moving towards original 90 sec time, but i would prefer even faster times. Regarding PoW vs PoS, IMHO i would like to see more PoS rewards in future, less from PoW. We dont have ATM good miner software(s) for Neva, ocminer is CPU miner? those are dead for me current NVidia miner works, i use that but it still has some issues and there is no AFAIK AMD miner for Neva (?) |
|
|
|
|
|
krile (OP)
|
|
June 28, 2016, 01:55:58 PM |
|
I am not touching PoW code in this situation. Without pow the network would die right now. So after pos is fixed we can discuss this further. Regarding the timing, I would not like to decrease it, it could cause problems down the road, when the whole world is using nevacoin (I am very optimistic  ) and blocks get bigger, block propagation can be problematic because of the increased latency. Anyway, fixing pos now, other stuff later |
|
|
|
|
krile (OP)
|
|
June 28, 2016, 02:03:59 PM |
|
Regarding PoW vs PoS, IMHO i would like to see more PoS rewards in future, less from PoW. We dont have ATM good miner software(s) for Neva, ocminer is CPU miner? those are dead for me current NVidia miner works, i use that but it still has some issues and there is no AFAIK AMD miner for Neva (?) Well that is already achieved, after the second halving there is no more PoW. Decreasing the reward before that does not seem fair to me since PoW is more energy intensive than PoS. If anythig it should be the other way around. But nevacoin was desinged this way for a reason, to make all blocks equal, with fixed rewards. I think it is still a good idea and it differs from tha majority of PoS altcoins... |
|
|
|
|
killdemon
|
|
June 30, 2016, 04:13:44 AM |
|
And when will fix be ready? Who knows, DEV does not know? Go back to earlier release and than work on fix, it is simple as that...
|
|
|
|
|
krile (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2016, 12:28:36 PM |
|
And when will fix be ready? Who knows, DEV does not know? Go back to earlier release and than work on fix, it is simple as that...
Soon, I think a few days. |
|
|
|
grimdin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
June 30, 2016, 02:26:46 PM |
|
yobit's wallet down?
I did send some Nevacoins to yobits wallet and tx went ok, but i dont see those in my balance.
Is there any news about yobit's situation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
krile (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2016, 03:02:31 PM |
|
yobit's wallet down?
I did send some Nevacoins to yobits wallet and tx went ok, but i dont see those in my balance.
Is there any news about yobit's situation?
I have a support ticket open with them, but it feels like talking to a wall... 2016-06-23 20:00:37 matveevka
In the near future. Now make a list of all updates for coin maintenance.
2016-06-23 18:41:07 krile
Can you please let me know when you make it run again?
Thanks It will be online in the "near future", whatever that means  |
|
|
|
|
killdemon
|
|
July 04, 2016, 02:07:18 PM |
|
No fix yet?
|
|
|
|
grimdin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2016, 06:52:19 PM |
|
yobit's wallet down?
I did send some Nevacoins to yobits wallet and tx went ok, but i dont see those in my balance.
Is there any news about yobit's situation?
I have a support ticket open with them, but it feels like talking to a wall... 2016-06-23 20:00:37 matveevka
In the near future. Now make a list of all updates for coin maintenance.
2016-06-23 18:41:07 krile
Can you please let me know when you make it run again?
Thanks It will be online in the "near future", whatever that means OMG, now it shows in yobit balance. Maybe yobit has fixed their wallet. Any news on fix yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
mirador17
|
|
July 04, 2016, 07:30:07 PM |
|
yobit is a shit exchange. This is no new knowledge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
killdemon
|
|
July 04, 2016, 09:31:39 PM
Last edit: July 05, 2016, 05:34:44 AM by killdemon |
|
Yes, yobit wallet is online. I predict that huge Dump is incoming. Actually it has already started. Update: Yes it is happening  For 3 weeks so called DEV is not capable to fix POS, great idea for the coin but very poor implementation. With that attitude this coin is finished. I will mine it than dump it every day just to bring it out of misery and crypto world existence. |
|
|
|
|
Poll
