When I commented in the thread everyone who asked about the sale of tokens was told not to even ask or talk about the sale.
Looks like you missed the big fat
Sale thread Link in the OP of the main IOTA thread, it can happen.
It was not there when I commented on the thread. Please re read what I said. At that point even asking about the sale was not permitted.
I can't seem to find what you are talking about, can you point me to this discussion? I only see this:
quantum computer proof does sound handy
and I very much like the name.
the next posts of you are from AFTER the sale, so where again were you asking about it?
That's what I'm saying it was after the sale when I came back.
The problem here is that you are trying somehow to focus on me and divert from the point in question did the ico advertise enough or last long enough?
You can't seem to understand that we are discussing the ICO advertising methods in general can you?
This is why it is obvious that you know that theICO was too stealth and too quick.
Go back and re- read the thread.
The smaller the ICO the easier it is to manipulate for the devs. The larger and more advertised it is through sig campaigns, social media, the main board etc....the harder it is to game. If you don't see why then think about it.
So therefore ICO's should not hide in their ann thread then as soon as the ico is over come to the main board and use it to pump the coin whist a few people from the ann thread hold it captive and ransom it off for 3000%
It does not matter at all if 1 person was told 100000x a day about the crowd sale and didn't buy the token. It does not change the fact that a small ICO is easier to game does it. Besides your point that I may have missed a link on the OP when I came back to the thread means nothing. I never check again the OP if i have already read the thread to a certain point.
It is pointless to try to divert the conversation to one about my personal experience with this Ico since it is about the protocol of ICO in general. Was enough done to advertise it and was it long enough considering the lack of advertising compared to other ICO like Nem, Eth, maid or lIsk. no is the answer.
The only people voting no its okay i would buy at 3000% are iota holders and the only people arguing that a stealth ico or one that does not use advertsing methods freely and easily available to them on this board and it;s then okay to pump after ico using those same methods are Iota holders. As they are the only people that will argue that black is white to protect their investment when really they know they are saying anything to get out with 3000% scam profits. There is no logic nor reason to their argument.
If there is reason to why you are saying don't advertise your ICO outside of the ann until
after the ICO is over then please feel free to post your argument so we can assess it.
Poll
