klondike_bar
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
 |
February 21, 2014, 03:42:58 PM |
|
The mine has consistently performed below the expected hashrate.
That's not true. 500TH/28000TH*6*24*25=64.2BTC/day, or ~2.5 blocks/day. So if we do 3 blocks/day we do better than the expected: 02-20 1 02-19 2 02-18 1 02-17 2 02-16 5 02-15 2 02-14 3 02-13 2 On average 18/8=2.25block/day. Two days were better than expected, so your statement of consistently below the expected is wrong. ^what? Your logic is not very solid. He was stating that the average hashrates (3 and 7 day periods) are both trailing under 500GH, closer to 430-450GH. According to YOUR math, Its actually >2.568 blocks/day that should be found, especially if the mine actually hit the 1GH/share mentioned in a recent update (in which case, closer to 2.59 blocks/day - but lets use your numbers.... ACTUAL/EXPECTED = 2.25/2.568 = 87.62% over the past 18 days, the 500TH mine has been operating at 13% less than the expectations - this is pretty massive seperation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Giray
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
February 21, 2014, 03:59:48 PM |
|
The mine has consistently performed below the expected hashrate.
That's not true. 500TH/28000TH*6*24*25=64.2BTC/day, or ~2.5 blocks/day. So if we do 3 blocks/day we do better than the expected: 02-20 1 02-19 2 02-18 1 02-17 2 02-16 5 02-15 2 02-14 3 02-13 2 On average 18/8=2.25block/day. Two days were better than expected, so your statement of consistently below the expected is wrong. true is 521TH/28000TH*6*24*25=72.3BTC/day, or almost 3 blocks/day. |
|
|
|
|
|
kaerf
|
|
February 21, 2014, 09:06:31 PM |
|
If you use difficulty instead of hashrate, 500TH should yield 80+ coins a day.
Just plug hashrate into a calculator like bitcoinx.
The problem i see is that we have never consistently averaged ~500TH.
|
|
|
|
|
gebir
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
To be or to have
|
|
February 22, 2014, 08:36:35 AM |
|
Hardware is ok (>500Th/s) but software not suitable for this mine.
We're losing a large part of the profit every day because they are afraid to employ a good programmer.
|
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 22, 2014, 08:56:48 AM |
|
Hardware is ok (>500Th/s) but software not suitable for this mine.
We're losing a large part of the profit every day because they are afraid to employ a good programmer.
 |
|
|
|
gebir
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
To be or to have
|
|
February 22, 2014, 11:11:26 AM |
|
Oprogramowanie kopalni nie ma nic wspólnego z oprogramowaniem giełdy - więc argument bezpieczeństwa odpada. W tym tygodniu podobno odbyło się spotkanie Leszka i Dave'a mieli omawiać też sprawy softu kopalni. Nie bawią mnie plany zmiany softu za pół roku bo wtedy kopanie (w tej kopalni)będzie już nieopłacalne. Z moich obserwacji wynika że 500Th/s ma najmniejsze szczęście w całym systemie lub (nie posądzam nikogo) bloki są upłynniane gdzie indziej(?). Dave pisał już dawno temu że pracuje nad statystykami a'la Slush, moim zdaniem wystarczy przerobić istniejące statystyki dodać do każdej linijki adres portfela na którym kopie dany sprzęt i wszystko będzie czytelne. Czekam na aktualny raport ze spotkania. ps. Jeżeli ktoś może to niech przetłumaczy na Angielski. |
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 22, 2014, 11:21:48 AM |
|
...
ps. Jeżeli ktoś może to niech przetłumaczy na Angielski.
Google 'Manglish' But easy enough to understand most of it ... Software mine has nothing to do with the software exchange - so the argument falls security. This week, apparently there was a meeting of Leszek and Dave had also discussed the matter firmware mine. Do not play me plans to change the firmware for half a year because then digging (in the mine) will no longer be viable. From my observation that the 500th / s has the least happiness of the entire system, or (do not suspect anyone) blocks are liquidated elsewhere (?). Dave wrote a long time ago that he was working on statistics la Slush, in my opinion, is sufficient to convert the existing statistics add to each line of the address book in which copies of the hardware and everything will be clear. Waiting for current report from the meeting. |
|
|
|
gebir
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
To be or to have
|
|
February 22, 2014, 11:27:27 AM |
|
thx Kano  firmware = software |
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
|
February 22, 2014, 03:44:16 PM |
|
Oprogramowanie kopalni nie ma nic wspólnego z oprogramowaniem giełdy - więc argument bezpieczeństwa odpada. W tym tygodniu podobno odbyło się spotkanie Leszka i Dave'a mieli omawiać też sprawy softu kopalni. Nie bawią mnie plany zmiany softu za pół roku bo wtedy kopanie (w tej kopalni)będzie już nieopłacalne. Z moich obserwacji wynika że 500Th/s ma najmniejsze szczęście w całym systemie lub (nie posądzam nikogo) bloki są upłynniane gdzie indziej(?). Dave pisał już dawno temu że pracuje nad statystykami a'la Slush, moim zdaniem wystarczy przerobić istniejące statystyki dodać do każdej linijki adres portfela na którym kopie dany sprzęt i wszystko będzie czytelne. Czekam na aktualny raport ze spotkania. ps. Jeżeli ktoś może to niech przetłumaczy na Angielski. I don't understand that much polish - you gotta post english on an english forum |
|
|
|
|
karol
|
|
February 22, 2014, 03:55:52 PM |
|
It was posted with ask to translate to English, and Kano did it.
I believe some important information (about Dave's and Tytus's metting) and interesting opinion was posted in this post.
|
|
|
|
|
lenart_o
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
February 24, 2014, 10:20:11 AM |
|
Today seems to be a good day 3 blocks already found
Hi, I looking for similar hashrate pools and what I see : bitminter "have only" 367 Thps and look at their block income https://bitminter.com/blocks this is lucky pool?? in slush look at stats: https://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/I'm trying to understand what is with this pool bad luck or something else? |
|
|
|
|
|
kaerf
|
|
March 02, 2014, 10:46:38 PM |
|
we finally had a better than average week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
snowdropfore
|
|
March 04, 2014, 07:44:00 AM |
|
are we adding hashrate??
|
|
|
|
|
kaerf
|
|
March 06, 2014, 01:32:55 AM |
|
are we adding hashrate??
i'm guessing it's luck ( http://150.254.111.246/us/ still has us around 522 TH/s), but it's some nice luck...the 7day average is near 1 PH/s. |
|
|
|
|
bulltrap
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
March 06, 2014, 08:54:52 AM |
|
Can we get an update on the progress of private mining pool?
|
|
|
|
|
|
jiefangqian
|
|
March 10, 2014, 02:29:59 AM |
|
no block  |
XBC:B7jR5zX8pBpyjyrcMMiYCQyLVLC6YZjFYh
|
|
|
ocelot
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
March 10, 2014, 05:47:23 AM |
|
no block Is this the reason for no transactions since 2014-03-08? |
|
|
|
|
Sanningcreet25
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 10, 2014, 06:35:54 AM |
|
How do I join this and where can i buy shares?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
southafricadude
|
|
March 10, 2014, 12:41:38 PM |
|
I would also like to do this, but every time I try to register I get the error: Invalid Bitcoin Address [1HgwPFfasUZvYdkw8kKepxKh6hjE7eyPgj] I have tried with multiple addresses, and even generated a new address then immediately tried with that one, but I get the same error every time. Anyone else having problems? Or is picostocks.com having issues? |
|
|
|
|
