R9 Nano Modded Rom

[RastoMan]

What is the model of the XFX card? Is that the 1015 MHz version or the 1050 Black Edition? How low is the MVDDC?

1015 version.

Still at stock right now.

Do you mean the stock VDDC or the MVDDC? I have the cards. I can undervolt it by -200mV and works well around 950 MHz.

Both

That is great effort. Are you going to release your XFX R9 390 BIOS mod soon? We are looking forward to it.

[1714889201]

1714889201

[1714889201]

1714889201

[agente]

What about your experience with "intensity" in ethereum mining config? 800 core and 300 mem of course...

[Eliovp]

That is great effort. Are you going to release your XFX R9 390 BIOS mod soon? We are looking forward to it.

As soon as i can :p

Got so many things that i still have to do these days. I wouldn't mind a few days with more than 24hrs in it :p

What about your experience with "intensity" in ethereum mining config? 800 core and 300 mem of course...

What exactly do you mean by that agente?

[citronick]

just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...

.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....

134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom

OR

185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem

I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.

Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?

[ldw-com]

just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...

.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....

134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom

OR

185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem

I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.

Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?

Hey Citronick.

Try the lower ones first.
link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150

or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM.
link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100

Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down.

You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock.
The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is.

In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc.

"they're all -100mV Core clock."

Greetings!

[Zitdadast]

That is great effort. Are you going to release your XFX R9 390 BIOS mod soon? We are looking forward to it.

As soon as i can :p

Got so many things that i still have to do these days. I wouldn't mind a few days with more than 24hrs in it :p

What about your experience with "intensity" in ethereum mining config? 800 core and 300 mem of course...

What exactly do you mean by that agente?

In the Claymore miner, there is ethi setting, that determine the intensity of the mining. I think he means that.

[lawrencelyl]

A side question, for the R9 Nano, if I'm running headless, I can't seem to view the core clock/memory clock/temperature/etc.  Only able to see them with monitor attached.
Is there any workaround to view them when running headless?  By the way, I'm on Win10.  Thanks.

[ldw-com]

A side question, for the R9 Nano, if I'm running headless, I can't seem to view the core clock/memory clock/temperature/etc.  Only able to see them with monitor attached.
Is there any workaround to view them when running headless?  By the way, I'm on Win10.  Thanks.

Sounds like a driver issue, all my rigs are headless and i can monitor everything without a problem. Also Windows 10.

Reinstall drivers mate. That'll probably solve it

[lawrencelyl]

A side question, for the R9 Nano, if I'm running headless, I can't seem to view the core clock/memory clock/temperature/etc.  Only able to see them with monitor attached.
Is there any workaround to view them when running headless?  By the way, I'm on Win10.  Thanks.

Sounds like a driver issue, all my rigs are headless and i can monitor everything without a problem. Also Windows 10.

Reinstall drivers mate. That'll probably solve it

That's weird.  I have tried to reinstall driver but still the same.  Using 16.5.1 driver.
I have other Nvidia cards on the same rig but I don't think that has to do with it coz I did try to remove Nvidia cards but still the same.
Maybe I should try other driver versions...

[citronick]

just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...

.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....

134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom

OR

185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem

I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.

Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?

Hey Citronick.

Try the lower ones first.
link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150

or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM.
link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100

Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down.

You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock.
The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is.

In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc.

"they're all -100mV Core clock."

Greetings!

thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it

[Eliovp]

just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...

.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....

134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom

OR

185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem

I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.

Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?

Hey Citronick.

Try the lower ones first.
link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150

or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM.
link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100

Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down.

You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock.
The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is.

In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc.

"they're all -100mV Core clock."

Greetings!

thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it

You'll have to do crazy things to brick one

Again, as i mentioned before, got 100 of those, flashed them all individually more than 3 times They're all still running at max 60 degrees

[citronick]

just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...

.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....

134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom

OR

185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem

I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.

Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?

Hey Citronick.

Try the lower ones first.
link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150

or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM.
link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100

Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down.

You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock.
The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is.

In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc.

"they're all -100mV Core clock."

Greetings!

thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it

Wow 100 of these babies would be sweet..... open rig or hosted DC?

[Eliovp]

just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...

.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....

134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom

OR

185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem

I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.

Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?

Hey Citronick.

Try the lower ones first.
link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150

or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM.
link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100

Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down.

You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock.
The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is.

In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc.

"they're all -100mV Core clock."

Greetings!

thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it

Wow 100 of these babies would be sweet..... open rig or hosted DC?

Open,

You can see them "here"

greetings

[citronick]

just bought a couple of Nanos for a new ETh rig - cant wait to squeeze the daylights out of this brats with your mods...

.... so which one should I go for? Both looks good - with its own pros-cons....

134 Mh/s @ 2.25A, 495watt (6 Cards) stock settings rom

OR

185 Mh/s @ 4.8A, 1050 watt (6 Cards) 1020 Core, 300 Mem

I think I will go for 185 MH/s on a 1300 PSU.

Anybody have any list of "dos and donts" before I do this ?

Hey Citronick.

Try the lower ones first.
link: Here "-100mV mvddc to -150

or the ones that work on every nano and that have helped a few others that i got messages from in PM.
link: Here "-50mV mvddc & -100

Start flashing with the -106mV mvddc and slightly go down.

You can do a registerdump with AIDA64 and check out the voltage that is needed for your card to achieve 1000 core clock.
The higher that voltage is, the higher your leakage of your card is and the lower the asic quality is.

In other words, if your card doesn't need a lot of voltage to achieve that power. You can go ahead and flash -150, -175mV mvddc.

"they're all -100mV Core clock."

Greetings!

thanks - good points - yes i will go through step by step, these are expensive items so I wouldn't want to brick it

Wow 100 of these babies would be sweet..... open rig or hosted DC?

Open,

You can see them "here"

greetings

$$$ excellent $$$

[citronick]

ellovp - have you tried 8 x GPU setup.

I am thinking of doing this using 3 to 1 PCI riser on the 6th PCI slot.

That should get the MHs above 200MHs per rig.

Thoughts?

I am going using Claymore Dual miner for this rig.

thanks

[Eliovp]

ellovp - have you tried 8 x GPU setup.

I am thinking of doing this using 3 to 1 PCI riser on the 6th PCI slot.

That should get the MHs above 200MHs per rig.

Thoughts?

I am going using Claymore Dual miner for this rig.

thanks

I haven't tried with my nano's, i have tried to use a pci hub/splitter in the past, i still have 2 of them though.

Maybe i'll play with them again sooner or later.

But like it is now, 6 per rig is more than enough

+ i would need an extra PSU.. nahh i'm fine like this :p

[greaterninja]

Impressive power efficiency.

However, at this point I don't see a reason to choose Nano due to its extremely high cost.

If it were cheaper, I'd totally be game.

[lawrencelyl]

A side question, for the R9 Nano, if I'm running headless, I can't seem to view the core clock/memory clock/temperature/etc.  Only able to see them with monitor attached.
Is there any workaround to view them when running headless?  By the way, I'm on Win10.  Thanks.

Sounds like a driver issue, all my rigs are headless and i can monitor everything without a problem. Also Windows 10.

Reinstall drivers mate. That'll probably solve it

I tried latest driver 16.5.2, still the same behavior.  May I know which driver are you using?

[citronick]

ellovp - have you tried 8 x GPU setup.

I am thinking of doing this using 3 to 1 PCI riser on the 6th PCI slot.

That should get the MHs above 200MHs per rig.

Thoughts?

I am going using Claymore Dual miner for this rig.

thanks

I haven't tried with my nano's, i have tried to use a pci hub/splitter in the past, i still have 2 of them though.

Maybe i'll play with them again sooner or later.

But like it is now, 6 per rig is more than enough

+ i would need an extra PSU.. nahh i'm fine like this :p

I have EVGA 1600w G2, and I will work on the 8 x GPU version (246MH/s rig!!!) - I will post results soon.

I am still waiting for DHL to knock on my door...

[ldw-com]

ellovp - have you tried 8 x GPU setup.

I am thinking of doing this using 3 to 1 PCI riser on the 6th PCI slot.

That should get the MHs above 200MHs per rig.

Thoughts?

I am going using Claymore Dual miner for this rig.

thanks

I haven't tried with my nano's, i have tried to use a pci hub/splitter in the past, i still have 2 of them though.

Maybe i'll play with them again sooner or later.

But like it is now, 6 per rig is more than enough

+ i would need an extra PSU.. nahh i'm fine like this :p

I have EVGA 1600w G2, and I will work on the 8 x GPU version (246MH/s rig!!!) - I will post results soon.

I am still waiting for DHL to knock on my door...

I don't think you'll have enough PCI power connectors to connect all 8 Gpu's.... "could be wrong though.."

Anyhow, even if you do, the psu won't be able to bring enough power to all those rails. "again, could be wrong.."

I tried latest driver 16.5.2, still the same behavior.  May I know which driver are you using?

Try to boot with only 1 nano connected to your mobo and see what that gives you