IconFirm
|
|
August 20, 2016, 11:54:56 PM |
|
Block height reached. Any issues? Looks good from my end. Difficulty is re-targeting.
All good here merge mining with p2pool
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
August 20, 2016, 11:56:13 PM |
|
Who's mining scrypt? I want to give you my hashrate!
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
August 21, 2016, 12:07:05 AM |
|
List of 2.3 nodes as of now.
addnode=52.58.154.192 addnode=82.176.15.155 addnode=157.161.128.63 addnode=52.50.240.238 addnode=82.29.4.122 addnode=149.210.234.234 addnode=92.3.38.193 addnode=92.3.46.94 addnode=82.29.4.122 addnode=92.3.37.23 addnode=54.246.128.222 addnode=162.255.117.105 addnode=108.61.10.90 addnode=87.98.185.244 addnode=52.50.240.238 addnode=144.76.71.141 addnode=98.115.147.74 addnode=96.236.219.30 addnode=82.29.4.122 addnode=52.58.50.77 addnode=138.201.65.88
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
August 21, 2016, 01:17:59 AM |
|
Current short term goals:
-More pools, lots of pools. Hashrate is good for now, but we need wider distribution.
-Bitsquare.io
-Yobit
*I'll be sending the requests in the coming days/week
Mid to long term:
-Poloniex
-Shapeshift.io
-Bittrex
-Mobile wallets (Coinomi would be perfect)
Long term:
-Payment processor/the ability to exchange goods and services for Argentum.
Please post your suggestions.
|
|
|
|
crackfoo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3556
Merit: 1126
|
|
August 21, 2016, 01:18:57 AM |
|
Hi, We've added ARG to the miners multipool on both SHA & SCRYPT algos: www.zpool.caCheers!
|
ZPOOL - the miners multipool! Support We pay 10 FLUX Parallel Assets (PA) directly to block rewards! Get paid more and faster. No PA fee's or waiting around for them, paid instantly on every block found!
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
August 21, 2016, 01:32:19 AM |
|
Hi, We've added ARG to the miners multipool on both SHA & SCRYPT algos: www.zpool.caCheers! Great news, thank you!
|
|
|
|
IconFirm
|
|
August 21, 2016, 10:32:53 AM |
|
Current short term goals:
-More pools, lots of pools. Hashrate is good for now, but we need wider distribution.
-Bitsquare.io
-Yobit
*I'll be sending the requests in the coming days/week
Please post your suggestions.
I strongly advise you not to approach Yobit, their support is non-existent. I have missing deposits & no access to some of my wallets for the last 6 weeks with all my support tickets being ignored. I am not the only one they have stolen from, check their thread out: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=914975.msg15971600#msg15971600Nothing but trouble & lies with Yobit. Bitsquare is the future.
|
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
August 26, 2016, 03:41:35 AM |
|
New website is up at http://www.argentum.ioA new github organization and repo has been assembled, and I'm getting version 2.3.1 ready that adds checkpoints and disconnects obsolete versions (2.2 and below.) If you have an account at bter.com be sure to vote for Argentum, it's number 9 (it will take a while.) If you have about 30k BTR, you can vote for Argentum 10 times every hour. As always, please let me know if there's any issues with mining or the network in general.
|
|
|
|
|
IconFirm
|
|
August 30, 2016, 09:11:05 PM |
|
Wallets updated & running fine.
It's great to see a dev constantly improving a coin - well done!
|
|
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
August 31, 2016, 05:00:12 AM |
|
I'd like to reach out to the miners and ask for feedback on the MAX_BlOCK_ALGO_COUNT parameter. It's currently set to accept 3 blocks in a row from the same algorithm to help promote even distribution between algorithms. Is anyone seeing too many rejects from this?
What other features would you all like to see?
|
|
|
|
sweet bird
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 31, 2016, 05:30:23 AM |
|
Argentum is most popular among its rivals currencies as it has long term stable investment, and growth based upon your services and the most likely feature is transfer of currency into less
|
|
|
|
Chris Sokolowski
|
|
September 03, 2016, 12:58:39 AM |
|
I'd like to reach out to the miners and ask for feedback on the MAX_BlOCK_ALGO_COUNT parameter. It's currently set to accept 3 blocks in a row from the same algorithm to help promote even distribution between algorithms. Is anyone seeing too many rejects from this? At Prohashing we are losing 5.06% of the blocks we find due to the limit. Since Argentum is merge-mined, there's little reason for us to put code into our mining server that doesn't mine if we find a certain number of consecutive blocks (since the hashes are still valid for the primary coin). We just automatically adjust the number of Argentum we pay miners based upon the success rate of block submission. I can understand your reasoning for implementing the limit, and the network is large enough (or my pool is small enough) that we aren't really affected by it. My experience is with scrypt though; I don't know how the SHA-256D people are doing.
|
Prohashing - Professional Mining Made Simple Visit us at https://prohashing.comOptimized for performance - 15 algorithms - Payouts in 200 coins - PPS, PPLNS, or solo
|
|
|
protonn
|
|
September 03, 2016, 02:00:23 AM |
|
I'd like to reach out to the miners and ask for feedback on the MAX_BlOCK_ALGO_COUNT parameter. It's currently set to accept 3 blocks in a row from the same algorithm to help promote even distribution between algorithms. Is anyone seeing too many rejects from this? At Prohashing we are losing 5.06% of the blocks we find due to the limit. Since Argentum is merge-mined, there's little reason for us to put code into our mining server that doesn't mine if we find a certain number of consecutive blocks (since the hashes are still valid for the primary coin). We just automatically adjust the number of Argentum we pay miners based upon the success rate of block submission. I can understand your reasoning for implementing the limit, and the network is large enough (or my pool is small enough) that we aren't really affected by it. My experience is with scrypt though; I don't know how the SHA-256D people are doing. Thanks for the feedback. I've noticed it happening most often when hash-rates are fluctuating (no surprise there), but I didn't have an idea as to the extent of it. Yesterday morning Cryptcollector noticed the blockchain had stalled for 4-5 hours and it was due to this. Not ideal at all. I have to wonder if it would smooth itself out with more miners/hashrate, but since there will be fluctuation regardless, it might be ideal to raise it to 5 or 6 MAX. On another note, I have a working build of Coinomi with Argentum integration I'm testing right now. Everything is working well, hopefully I can push it out the door soon. If anyone wants to test the Argentum Electrum server, here it is https://github.com/argentumproject/electrum-arg-server. I have a 1000 transaction database I'm going to try have hosted somewhere so I can integrate it with the "Configure" script in Electrum for an easy download since building a DB from scratch takes a long time.
|
|
|
|
|
coinvault.io
|
|
September 05, 2016, 12:26:47 PM |
|
Current short term goals:
-More pools, lots of pools. Hashrate is good for now, but we need wider distribution.
-Bitsquare.io
-Yobit
*I'll be sending the requests in the coming days/week
Mid to long term:
-Poloniex
-Shapeshift.io
-Bittrex
-Mobile wallets (Coinomi would be perfect)
Long term:
-Payment processor/the ability to exchange goods and services for Argentum.
Please post your suggestions.
Hi Argentum community, CoinVault dev wallet here. Would you be interested in adding ARG to https://www.coinvault.io/PM for details
|
|
|
|
|
|
|