[ANN][LOC]UPDATE V1.4.5 OUT!! LOCO|Quark|PoW/PoS|HiPos|Masternodes|Tor[LOC][ANN]

[Nightz]

My Personal Issue's are now sorted 

I will be fully back tomoz guy's so any and all issues please report them to me either on the thread or pm me.

I will also make a mandatory update for the loco network to ensure we are all on the same client and if you are not you will be rejected by the network

Thanks
Nightz

[Nightz]

yes there's a hard coded seed.

46.233.42.249 it seems

well, i see that node, and i see suprnova,

so explorer probably forked on its own, not sure why, needs full resync from seed

I can report all nodes I have for the source are on the correct chain if a fork has taken place it was not intentional. I will make sure all runs smoothly 

[GREEDYJOHN]

My Personal Issue's are now sorted 

I will be fully back tomoz guy's so any and all issues please report them to me either on the thread or pm me.

I will also make a mandatory update for the loco network to ensure we are all on the same client and if you are not you will be rejected by the network

Thanks
Nightz

CONGRATULATIONZ  

Lets make MERRY   so we can make MONEY          

[ocminer]

Hmm.. So who and what is on the correct chain now ?

[thoth-Atlantian]

yes there's a hard coded seed.

46.233.42.249 it seems

well, i see that node, and i see suprnova,

so explorer probably forked on its own, not sure why, needs full resync from seed

I can report all nodes I have for the source are on the correct chain if a fork has taken place it was not intentional. I will make sure all runs smoothly 

actually new version made it, once i pm'd ocminer about the fork a day+ ago,
he immediately recompiled, resynced and was back on the right chain since then

For A newbie account you sure are all over your shit.

So who is it hiding in there?

 

[bumbacoin]

heh i've wondered the same thing a few times ..

[bumbacoin]

 best=07bfb92040d6e78a5c35dd2d4bf77d0a8b1387248cc42e0fa09b41d5637f8af1  height=32101

it's the simplest way to tell ..


-
sent test coins to nova, they're on same chain it seems .. hmm, unless the transaction was valid on all forks etc etc .. lol

[shimlbit]

best=07bfb92040d6e78a5c35dd2d4bf77d0a8b1387248cc42e0fa09b41d5637f8af1  height=32101

it's the simplest way to tell ..


-
sent test coins to nova, they're on same chain it seems .. hmm, unless the transaction was valid on all forks etc etc .. lol

SetBestChain: new best=07bfb92040d6e78a5c35dd2d4bf77d0a8b1387248cc42e0fa09b41d5637f8af1  height=32101  trust=2928384553056966665  blocktrust=382323863162128


sent coins to me i will sent it all back......NOT

im on it!

[novaexchange]

Novaexchange is running Go 1.2

2016-04-29 11:01:11 SetBestChain: new best=07bfb92040d6e78a5c35dd2d4bf77d0a8b1387248cc42e0fa09b41d5637f8af1  height=32101  trust=2928384553056966665  blocktrust=382323863162128  date=04/29/16 11:01:04

Code:

{
    "version" : "v1.2.0.0-Alpha",
    "protocolversion" : 61401,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 21144.70377108,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 32133,
    "timeoffset" : -1,
    "moneysupply" : 1804518.70994145,
    "connections" : 10,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "x.x.x.x",
    "difficulty" : {
        "proof-of-work" : 3.24113361,
        "proof-of-stake" : 67526.71666431
    },
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1461928758,
    "keypoolsize" : 0,
    "paytxfee" : 0.01000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00000000,
    "unlocked_until" : 0,
    "errors" : ""
}

[bumbacoin]

Incompatiblity with current secp256k1 is one, i had to take measures to have two second versions on the system without them overwriting each other. Using custom commands in the build commands to link to the corresponding libraries. I run the wallets in docker images, so i could solve it that way to force the right libs into the container and run it. But if anyone is running more than one wallet on a machine using the same libs but different versions, than they will run into the same problem.

a-ha.. i am just compiling in ubuntu and working through errors, this is one thing i was was wondering about,
i have found too many incompatible versions of secp256k1 in the wild so i went in assuming problems

build secp256k1 in src/secp256k1 folder , used only the below , did not "make install"
./autogen.sh
./configure
make

then i added the following to the makefile, and commented out (not sure if both addprefix are necessary, but it doesnt hurt the process)
#   -l secp256k1

DEFS += $(addprefix -I,$(CURDIR)/secp256k1) $(addprefix -I,$(CURDIR)/secp256k1/include)
LIBS = $(CURDIR)/secp256k1/src/libsecp256k1_la-secp256k1.o


didn't need to make it static


edit.
just synced to the same block mentioned above

getblockhash 32101
07bfb92040d6e78a5c35dd2d4bf77d0a8b1387248cc42e0fa09b41d5637f8af1

[Nik4691]

Novaexchange is running Go 1.2

So, when it will be online?

[3worlduser]

I put 800 LOC on the faucet last night. now that I changed the daemon they are gone and it just have 100 in the faucet that I put when I was doing the setup,
so I think that I'm in the right block chain, can somebody confirm these please?

www.loco-explorer.tk

[novaexchange]

Novaexchange is running Go 1.2

So, when it will be online?

Hi,

It is back online, just wanted to verify that it actually is on the correct chain before allowing deposits and withdrawals again.

Thanks for your patience.

[3worlduser]

I put 800 LOC on the faucet last night. now that I changed the daemon they are gone and it just have 100 in the faucet that I put when I was doing the setup,
so I think that I'm in the right block chain, can somebody confirm these please?

]www.loco-[Suspicious link removed]

affirmative, BUT why txid instead of block hash ??
and it gives me empty page for any url like http://198.50.229.39:3001/block/***********

e.g. block 33113 wallet output (compare to explorer):

{
"hash" : "6f0ccf77b41c1e97347658a0aee3d6f6c03674331ba70f23848207737bdfead7",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 446,
"height" : 33113,
"version" : 7,
"merkleroot" : "6a8dd5ab51e9a8ca8412c0846922513f2c38b82a9b342d9c5b47f38aa05fac20",
"mint" : 9.97282830,
"time" : 1461960704,
"nonce" : 0,
"bits" : "1b00ce32",
"difficulty" : 81364.41026030,
"blocktrust" : "13dd5a6dc7877",
"chaintrust" : "2b5a8d9ae8d9298a",
"previousblockhash" : "2b7c953d791cece92bde9a248c6aaaf67bc2b7517ab4b786b4af1cb080c66ca7",
"flags" : "proof-of-stake",
"proofhash" : "000b355744b9e432a87b6954e41adcc338fd28243cabcfd8324af5887c8063b0",
"entropybit" : 1,
"modifier" : "a58aef6fc49b734f",
"modifierv2" : "c5285d9219749b20626ab14a7192e721308009d2b2d500677ede08ac1cf1c9cc",
"tx" : [
{
"txid" : "699a49afaceece51cfd066467892d2b25d76a5266ffb3b4e4bc1581c71385b19",
"txid" : "699a49afaceece51cfd066467892d2b25d76a5266ffb3b4e4bc1581c71385b19",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1461960704,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "03598100",
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "",
"hex" : "",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
}
]
},
{
"txid" : "0b18bb200452d087eaefdbc0771838831353b98e7252bd81762eacbdc81e1837",
"txid" : "0b18bb200452d087eaefdbc0771838831353b98e7252bd81762eacbdc81e1837",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1461960704,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "f6a980f6c9ef1ebad5d7a51562136e4035c91fc534d469843e7cc7ef0dffb6b5",
"vout" : 1,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502210095bb65674936935c116416209771493472052e606c3937aff02084df6bc4d7da02206 f067fe5391125f31811dbac19ed4fb6c4e9b893f4c3039fa6490d41f4f2c17801",
"hex" : "48304502210095bb65674936935c116416209771493472052e606c3937aff02084df6bc4d7da022 06f067fe5391125f31811dbac19ed4fb6c4e9b893f4c3039fa6490d41f4f2c17801"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "",
"hex" : "",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
},
{
"value" : 2072.73000000,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "029fb1e5e35fdc732a474c38a8b7582ef25146ef44067bb0b297398075556aad40 OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "21029fb1e5e35fdc732a474c38a8b7582ef25146ef44067bb0b297398075556aad40ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkey",
"addresses" : [
"5uRHLJgnsQUc6YM7rZBpPUds7k1dBVp1te"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 2072.73282830,
"n" : 2,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "029fb1e5e35fdc732a474c38a8b7582ef25146ef44067bb0b297398075556aad40 OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "21029fb1e5e35fdc732a474c38a8b7582ef25146ef44067bb0b297398075556aad40ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkey",
"addresses" : [
"5uRHLJgnsQUc6YM7rZBpPUds7k1dBVp1te"
]
}
}
]
}
],
"signature" : "3045022100a60b6738764927854f4b38f9fa2e07d9e4d5b3926dfbf9d66b85aecf9c379bed02204 a4b348fc16d644cc68df43414f83bf3f9df00bf845613704341503a81e8ee18"
}

Thanks at least now I know I'm on the correct blockchain, sincerely it is my fist block-explorer. I don't know why it show "txid" instead of "hash", maybe because I synchronize with txindex=1 in de conf file, but that is just a guess.

To your second question, I guess that is problem with the database and the resync after the fork, in fact, I feel there is no database saving the old blocks, because beside the 100 blocks being show there is no record of past transaction 
I'l be over this in the night.
I have see your comments, at least in this treath, and you seem to know a lot. A little advise for were to begin to fix this issues would be much appreciated

[jc12345]

It seems that coins withdrawn from Nova during the fork are lost. I would have thought that since the coins were withdrawn on an incorrect chain that they will just be available again on the exchange side after the exchange re-synced to the correct chain since in effect they were not really withdrawn. Apparently it is not the case according to Nova. It seems that there are other people that lost coins too?

Any views?

[GREEDYJOHN]

I recommend CHAINZ block explorer for this coin.

[3worlduser]

To your second question, I guess that is problem with the database and the resync after the fork, in fact, I feel there is no database saving the old blocks, because beside the 100 blocks being show there is no record of past transaction 
I'l be over this in the night.
I have see your comments, at least in this treath, and you seem to know a lot. A little advise for were to begin to fix this issues would be much appreciated

i checked old and new blocks, ANY /block/ url gives me empty page.
so i guess it's not the second question, there are no records for block hashes at all.
i don't know how explorer obtains hashes but when i program rpc calls,
in getblock output tx data are at least one level deeper in json than mint and blockhash,
no chance to get it wrong

Not quite get it (noob), but I'll look for a solution, I bet in the way I'll understand your answer    thanks for the feedback

[brosky0428]

My Personal Issue's are now sorted  

I will be fully back tomoz guy's so any and all issues please report them to me either on the thread or pm me.

I will also make a mandatory update for the loco network to ensure we are all on the same client and if you are not you will be rejected by the network

Thanks
Nightz

CONGRATULATIONZ  

Lets make MERRY   so we can make MONEY          

Alright!.. Go Dev!  

[bumbacoin]

for some strange reason the insight explorers put one of the block tx hashs on the main page , rather than using the block hash

it's kind of annoying , and disturbing at first cos it looks like the wrong chain until you realise how annoying it is


i've never looked at it enough to know whether its simply changeable or not,  i am quite interested to know though .


--

http://198.50.229.39:3001/tx/cf774b7ecbb2d9b01e5155d06ce890252c0fdb28235cc8a533400ec1f58ae268
http://198.50.229.39:3001/address/66vNgX7iTJGi2a9QycKntJ5xrGcvb5uPJi
http://198.50.229.39:3001/block/6c437ac2a8ebe6b1bdcc6100d4ceae27257b117a08563553bbc3ec0281425330

all work for me, they're all from block 100
if it's an incorrect hash it seems to take me to the main page.

[3worlduser]

To your second question, I guess that is problem with the database and the resync after the fork, in fact, I feel there is no database saving the old blocks, because beside the 100 blocks being show there is no record of past transaction 
I'l be over this in the night.
I have see your comments, at least in this treath, and you seem to know a lot. A little advise for were to begin to fix this issues would be much appreciated

i checked old and new blocks, ANY /block/ url gives me empty page.
so i guess it's not the second question, there are no records for block hashes at all.
i don't know how explorer obtains hashes but when i program rpc calls,
in getblock output tx data are at least one level deeper in json than mint and blockhash,
no chance to get it wrong

Not quite get it (noob), but I'll look for a solution, I bet in the way I'll understand your answer    thanks for the feedback

for some strange reason the insight explorers put one of the block tx hashs on the main page , rather than using the block hash

it's kind of annoying , and disturbing at first cos it looks like the wrong chain until you realise how annoying it is


i've never looked at it enough to know whether its simply changeable or not,  i am quite interested to know though .


--

http://198.50.229.39:3001/tx/cf774b7ecbb2d9b01e5155d06ce890252c0fdb28235cc8a533400ec1f58ae268
http://198.50.229.39:3001/address/66vNgX7iTJGi2a9QycKntJ5xrGcvb5uPJi
http://198.50.229.39:3001/block/6c437ac2a8ebe6b1bdcc6100d4ceae27257b117a08563553bbc3ec0281425330

all work for me, they're all from block 100
if it's an incorrect hash it seems to take me to the main page.

OK guys I really need some help here
Sintoms
- I take a random ID transaction from my wallet and put on the search bar of the explorer, and it show me the details of that transaction, perfect BUT sometimes it shows
"Error! : Search found no results for:xxxxxxxxxxxxxx".
Now I select a random hash from the  screen click it, got to address bar and paste my transaction ID after "http://198.50.229.39:3001/tx/PASTE_YOUR _ID_HERE"
It actually show the the details of the transaction
Now the weir thing is that if now I come back to block-explorer homepage and put my transaction ID in the search bar it also show me the details the the transaction and no more errors.

Really I don't know how to fix this, I was planning to wipe out the database of the explorer and erase the .loco folder (except the wallet and conf file) and build again from scratch but if any of you have any idea about this issue, I'll be much greatfull (I'm not asking a magic solution, just put me in the right way)