BREAKING NEWS: EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS REQUIRE EXTRAORDINARY PROOF

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I have heard this phrase ad infinitum peeping at conspiracy theory websites, specifically 9/11 deniers.  So the whole Satoshi thing is just a steaming load of BS I take it.  Ah well.

[Boosterious]

http://www.drcraigwright.net/extraordinary-claims-require-extraordinary-proof/

correct! its never thought by me before,yes i'm agree with you,Craig must be have more proof to proven that he was satoshi nakamoto,i think signed message is not enough for extraordinary claim that he was satoshi. great suggestion dude!

[Lauda]

You should just drop the ban hammer on everyone who posts anything about CSW from now on, new thread or any old post.

That is a bit extreme. However, the staff is definitely being too soft here. Everything could have been discussed within a maximum of 2-3 threads, and there are certainly more than 10 open ATM.

So the whole Satoshi thing is just a steaming load of BS I take it.  Ah well.

Did you not hear that (apparently) CW bought Bitcoins at the peak on Mt.Gox (there's information on reddit)? This is definitely something that someone who owns so much Bitcoin would do.
Apparently some people think that signing 1 message from a known Satoshi is conclusive proof; sorry to break it to you, but it isn't.