HCLivess (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
|
|
August 05, 2016, 12:57:33 PM |
|
Hello,
looking at the result of "netstat" after leaving the node run for several days now, I notice that I have many connections with 94.113.207.67 Looks like a bug in the communication protocol? I would imagine a normal behavior would be to multiplex communications in 1 or 2 TCP streams?
TCP 10.97.2.9:62086 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62241 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62242 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62244 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62256 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62259 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62262 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62263 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62265 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62267 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62268 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62274 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62278 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62292 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62293 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62294 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62295 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62296 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62350 58.173.246.16:8333 ESTABLISHED 4616 TCP 10.97.2.9:62363 162.243.250.176:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62434 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62437 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62438 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62440 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62445 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62457 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62463 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62466 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62475 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62479 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62500 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62548 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62550 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62551 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988 TCP 10.97.2.9:62564 94.113.207.67:2829 ESTABLISHED 4988
Hi, more like a design flaw, thanks for pointing out. To be honest, this is my first network application. I am using a python TCP server module for active nodes and simple sockets for clients. if threads_count <= threads_limit and str(HOST + ":" + str(PORT)) not in tried and str( HOST + ":" + str(PORT)) not in active_pool and str(HOST) not in banlist: I thought this piece of code was handling it, but it is not so reliable (also conenctions get stuck in consensus pool) I will look into this after finishing work on putting block operations into functions and switching the transaction engine from restrictive to omissive - done today. It will bring some overhead, but performance and reliability will be boosted.
|
|
|
|
HCLivess (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
|
|
August 05, 2016, 01:03:16 PM |
|
HCLivess can the algorithm be more memory hungry to get rid of botnets .... like it uses at least 4 GB or more
Hi, I haven't thought about that yet. How much does the mining algorithm take for you? It seems to take 1 core of my laptop, once a GPU miner is developed (I have no idea how to do that), GPU should be just as demanding as CPU currently (limited by the actual hashrate).
|
|
|
|
|
|
adorid
|
|
August 08, 2016, 06:34:51 AM |
|
still problem with block height? because sometimes when manualy refresh blocks, numbers going up and down, maybe its just gui bag, no idea))
|
|
|
|
HCLivess (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
|
|
August 08, 2016, 07:35:16 AM Last edit: August 08, 2016, 07:58:54 AM by HCLivess |
|
still problem with block height? because sometimes when manualy refresh blocks, numbers going up and down, maybe its just gui bag, no idea))
Next version will have a proper rollback mechanism, current one is quite wild. However, there will still be some rollbacks, I will work on optimizations though. Are you testing version 0.9? Upgrades in 0.9 have major impact on transaction collisions appearing in previous versions.
|
|
|
|
HCLivess (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
|
|
August 08, 2016, 07:50:32 AM |
|
What is Clarity? Clarity is a super stable version of Bismuth, which will be released separately. Clarity to Bismuth is what RedHat is to Fedora. New features will be tested in Bismuth first, and then added to Clarity later. This way, Bismuth will be secured by two networks (tesnet+mainnet) and Clarity will be secured by three (Bismuth testnet+Bismuth mainnet+Clarity mainnet). Clarity will be funded by ICO, and the funds will pour into Bismuth. Using this model, the Bismuth blockchain will not be clouded by funding and people will still have an opportunity to invest to get an instant share in Clarity.
|
|
|
|
110110101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 08, 2016, 08:23:28 AM |
|
start node.py then gui.py and at last miner.py
Hey HCLivess, I hope to find some time to test Bismuth, it's looking more interesting every update that is made. I was hoping to run the test client on a gui less Linux server. Could I perhaps run a node on a server and use a gui wallet on OSX to connect to said server node? Or would it be more feasible to simply run the client in a non-gui mode and try to use command line for testing, sending, receiving etc? Is the gui needed for some functionality or simply being much more user friendly?
|
|
|
|
adorid
|
|
August 08, 2016, 08:26:12 AM |
|
still problem with block height? because sometimes when manualy refresh blocks, numbers going up and down, maybe its just gui bag, no idea))
Next version will have a proper rollback mechanism, current one is quite wild. However, there will still be some rollbacks, I will work on optimizations though. Are you testing version 0.9? Upgrades in 0.9 have major impact on transaction collisions appearing in previous versions. jap, tested on 0.9. And when i launch node then there shows some invalid transactions and only then starting download blocks. sry if im repeating and you know already problem, then just ignore me I as a tester report about everything that looks strange ))
|
|
|
|
kahir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 08, 2016, 08:51:40 AM Last edit: August 08, 2016, 10:32:17 AM by kahir |
|
HCLivess can the algorithm be more memory hungry to get rid of botnets .... like it uses at least 4 GB or more
Hi, I haven't thought about that yet. How much does the mining algorithm take for you? It seems to take 1 core of my laptop, once a GPU miner is developed (I have no idea how to do that), GPU should be just as demanding as CPU currently (limited by the actual hashrate). i did not mange to try the testnet ... what would be the distribution model for first phase i wish it could be the 1 core cpu and limited mining per IP like early day on vanilla coin aka Vcash now the distribution was really fair at first and everyone hold their vanilla really dear .. would we see something similiar on bismuth at first ?
|
|
|
|
ALATAY2K16
|
|
August 08, 2016, 09:32:15 AM |
|
hello can people still participate in the testnet ?
|
|
|
|
|
HCLivess (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
|
|
August 08, 2016, 11:00:24 AM |
|
Hello guys, if you want to join, just download the latest client from https://github.com/hclivess/Bismuth/releasesAnd try mining some. I can also send you some test coins. Make sure to "Run as administrator" in case you run into any problems Also download framework from page 1 of this thread (red fat letters) I see someone else is also running the spammer now, so we have a little variation in timestamp progression, which is interesting
|
|
|
|
HCLivess (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
|
|
August 08, 2016, 11:02:32 AM |
|
HCLivess can the algorithm be more memory hungry to get rid of botnets .... like it uses at least 4 GB or more
Hi, I haven't thought about that yet. How much does the mining algorithm take for you? It seems to take 1 core of my laptop, once a GPU miner is developed (I have no idea how to do that), GPU should be just as demanding as CPU currently (limited by the actual hashrate). i did not mange to try the testnet ... what would be the distribution model for first phase i wish it could be the 1 core cpu and limited mining per IP like early day on vanilla coin aka Vcash now the distribution was really fair at first and everyone hold their vanilla really dear .. would we see something similiar on bismuth at first ? Wow, I had no clue vanillacoin had something like this, thanks. In fact, mining is now single core CPU (unless you run it multiple times and re-assign affinity), although there are no limits on IPs. It would require an entirely new backend. So far, the mining is relatively fair on the testnet. 94.113.207.67:5492
|
|
|
|
ALATAY2K16
|
|
August 08, 2016, 11:18:16 AM Last edit: August 08, 2016, 04:49:42 PM by ALATAY2K16 |
|
Hello guys, if you want to join, just download the latest client from https://github.com/hclivess/Bismuth/releasesAnd try mining some. I can also send you some test coins. Make sure to "Run as administrator" in case you run into any problems Also download framework from page 1 of this thread (red fat letters) I see someone else is also running the spammer now, so we have a little variation in timestamp progression, which is interesting hello :-) I've downloaded the client and its syncing the blockchain just now :-) so just waiting to see if it mines ok after that :-) but so far been straight forward to do and no problems. my address for some test coins is 451acb4e88e515c407cb8c3bcea9b95a746389ef64cfacea2b083403 :-)
|
|
|
|
casper77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1035
|
|
August 08, 2016, 11:19:46 AM |
|
send me too please i registered in googleform under casper77 but still not received testcoins
|
|
|
|
HCLivess (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
|
|
August 08, 2016, 06:28:31 PM |
|
I am an anarchist. My age is 32. I want a new society. I cannot be stopped. I will not be stopped. I won't stop until I destroy all corporations and set everyone free
|
|
|
|
ALATAY2K16
|
|
August 08, 2016, 07:40:53 PM |
|
is anyone else jumping between block 11503 - 11505 then back to 11503 ?
|
|
|
|
frobley
|
|
August 08, 2016, 07:56:25 PM |
|
is anyone else jumping between block 11503 - 11505 then back to 11503 ? mine was going from 11506-11508 just now and then resolved to 11507
|
|
|
|
ALATAY2K16
|
|
August 08, 2016, 07:59:57 PM |
|
is anyone else jumping between block 11503 - 11505 then back to 11503 ? mine was going from 11506-11508 just now and then resolved to 11507 yeah mines just done the same, at least I know its not just me then :-)
|
|
|
|
|