[SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version)

[hilariousandco]

Nooo please.  Many of us love to discuss our favorite sports and our bets.

I bet you do. Plenty of gambling/sports forums to do that though.

Here's a tip.  The threads where the spammers are likely to flock into are the less popular sports and leagues threads. 

They're not. They post in the popular threads like football which seemingly has a thread for half the leagues in the world and they're easily abused as evidenced by all those FortuneJack spammers belonging to one person that were posting the same shit just reworded slightly post after post day after day going on for months.

Edit:  Maybe it's a good idea to rename the Gambling Discussion section to 'Betting Discussion', to get rid and avoid dumb threads like these:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1711623.0

I think renaming it 'Trash' would be even better. I wouldn't mind if people were actually having some worthwhile discussion in there but it's largely just illiterate spammers looking to easily get away with hitting their post requirement to the max. Just report nonsense threads like that one and they'll either be locked or trashed (as that one now is). That sub could do with a clean-up to be honest.

[1715555946]

1715555946

[1715555946]

1715555946

[1715555946]

1715555946

[U2]

Fortune jack made a new signature campaign BUT the 25 posts in gambling is still a requirement. Normal users won't be able to join, only people willing to spam the stupid useless boring gambling section. (If this is normal to you this should be an eye opener).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1713944.0

[tokeweed]

Nooo please.  Many of us love to discuss our favorite sports and our bets.

I bet you do. Plenty of gambling/sports forums to do that though.

Here's a tip.  The threads where the spammers are likely to flock into are the less popular sports and leagues threads.  

They're not. They post in the popular threads like football which seemingly has a thread for half the leagues in the world and they're easily abused as evidenced by all those FortuneJack spammers belonging to one person that were posting the same shit just reworded slightly post after post day after day going on for months.

Edit:  Maybe it's a good idea to rename the Gambling Discussion section to 'Betting Discussion', to get rid and avoid dumb threads like these:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1711623.0

I think renaming it 'Trash' would be even better. I wouldn't mind if people were actually having some worthwhile discussion in there but it's largely just illiterate spammers looking to easily get away with hitting their post requirement to the max. Just report nonsense threads like that one and they'll either be locked or trashed (as that one now is). That sub could do with a clean-up to be honest.

In my defense I think I was doing well delivering good content and have made decent discussions in all the sports betting related threads I posted in.

Edit:  And yes I would love to help out cleaning that sub.  I will report more threads here or through your PM, whichever you want.

[hilariousandco]

Fortune jack made a new signature campaign BUT the 25 posts in gambling is still a requirement. Normal users won't be able to join, only people willing to spam the stupid useless boring gambling section. (If this is normal to you this should be an eye opener).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1713944.0

Yeah, that's pretty silly. Just posted in their thread about it. Doubt anything will change if people can still get paid for posts like these:

Total goals option is looking more convenient for AS Roma vs AC Milan tonight. It is offering an odd which has rates at limit @1.53 for this kind of option with 3 goals at least. There will be recorded some good number of goals, The final result for this match can go in either side's favor. I see an equal opportunity based on same chances for both teams.

I will take both matches to make a bet to well balanced option which really to bring me nice profit in return. Fiorentina vs Sassuolo both teams to score yes and next match between As Roma and Ac Milan both teams to score yes as well. I don't think under 2.5 goals is good move on this match. There will be over 2.5 goals to make it result oriented game.

AS Roma still much strong than AC Milan while it will host this match so AS Roma have pretty good chance to take advantage of home ground, I will take AS Roma straight for this fight as I think this will get tough and AS Roma can handle the pressure during match and will get 3 points today.

for match AS Roma vs AC Milan and i know during playing for home matches Roma is pretty strong this season but Milan i think is not weak so i don't think this is will be easy match for home team but rather than pick home or away teams i think both teams to score is good

AC milan is quite bad in away games and AS roma is one of the toughest team to beat at home so only with this comparison you can tell that the winner is going to be as roma however most likely that both team will score in this match so getting both team to score might be a good choice as well instead of AS roma moneyline

All that's going to happen now is the campaign is open up to a fresh new set of spammers.

In my defense I think I was doing well delivering good content and have made decent discussions in all the sports betting related threads I posted in.

Well I barely browse that sub and haven't checked or seen your content in there so can't comment on that but it's the posts quoted above that are the issue as they are only created because of their signature campaign requirements. In fact, that entire Gambling Discussion sub was created because sig spammers were creating so many threads to discuss sports and other crap about whether bitcoin is good or evil etc and those were only being created because certain campaigns insisted you had to have most of your posts in the gambling section.

[tokeweed]

Attention hilariousandco.  Here are the suggested threads that are potentially dumb and made for spamming.  Lock at your own discretion.  

If you were rich, would you still gamble?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1408235.0

I mean really?  What kind of a question is that?  And what is it really trying to achieve.

Is their any safe methods to gamble?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1232896.0

Just laughable.  The thread starter probably took a while to come up with that one.

Is Bitcoin the future of online gambling?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1177050.0

It's a fine topic.  But not something that should reach 41 pages of spam.

do you can control your self when playing gambling?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1595920.0

This could be a good psychology topic for gambling.  But the thread starter is suspect.  Looks like a farmed account that started a thread for other farmed accounts to join in.

How to stay away from gambling? suggestions ?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1249010.0

Another topic that shouldn't reach 50 pages of mostly spam.

Can I use my small amount for GAMBLING?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1576153.0

The thread starter's thought process:  'Another day, another thread.'

What would the Casino of your dreams look like?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1711940.0

Arguably could be placed in the Off Topic sub.  But the premise is overall not really good.  But good for all sorts of spam.

Dice Games Are So Much Fun
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1546143.0

Yay for you, OP!  Yup, they are so much fun.  There's no need to start a thread about it and invite all sorts of spam though.

If you want to become Rich you need to Put Higher bets
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1517188.0

No sh*t, Sherlock.  Oh wait...  the thread reached 43 pages!

Putting money in lottery is gambling too?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1568660.0

Le sigh.

This is just the first page of the Gambling Discussion sub.  Will follow up with more this week.

To my campaign manager, Boxx, you don't have to pay me for this post if you think it doesn't serve the needs of BitDice.

[Lauda]

Why is this being discussed in the SMAS thread? Split it. FYI: I'd trash almost all of those right now.
It's been a quick week over here.

[win win win]

I just found this thread, I would love to see the guys with fortunejack signatures banned to hell. I actually post in the gambling section mostly, It's the most frustrating thing to get responses that don't mean anything and the author has no idea what he is actually posting about.
Fortunejack doesn't reply anymore to the thread, they just rely on their shills to post some garbage.

Sorry if that is a rant, Bitcoin and gambling are my two favorite things, I would post ten times more here if there was intellectual unbiased conversation.

Thank you for this development

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I just found this thread, I would love to see the guys with fortunejack signatures banned to hell. I actually post in the gambling section mostly, It's the most frustrating thing to get responses that don't mean anything and the author has no idea what he is actually posting about.
Fortunejack doesn't reply anymore to the thread, they just rely on their shills to post some garbage.

Sorry if that is a rant, Bitcoin and gambling are my two favorite things, I would post ten times more here if there was intellectual unbiased conversation.

Thank you for this development

Yep.  That's one of the reasons why I left the 777 campaign.   There's a bonus for posting in the gambling section,  and I found myself trying to post there, and it's an absolute shit show.   Nobody reads, and what gets written is complete crapola.  And you are right, the fortune jack shitposting squad are some of the worst offenders.  I get the feeling that there are a lot of alts all enrolled in that campaign.

[Lutpin]

I get the feeling that there are a lot of alts all enrolled in that campaign.

There's already been a big group being weeded out right before they had to restart their campaign.
I don't think much changed though, so there is quite possibly another group (or further alts from the same person) still taking advantage of that campaign.

And you are right, the fortune jack shitposting squad are some of the worst offenders.

They've been the first campaign/advertiser to be warned by Staff (hilarious in this case) about what they are doing.

That's one of the reasons why I left the 777 campaign.   There's a bonus for posting in the gambling section,  and I found myself trying to post there, and it's an absolute shit show.

Being in charge of the 777Coin campaign, I'd like to comment here, this is my personal opinion, and not representing SMAS/the other members.
I didn't set up the campaign and the rules were made like that when I took over. I however accepted the rules like that and am running the campaign in this way right now.
I think a bonus payment system is way better than systems like FortuneJack or others, which require a certain amount of posts in the gambling subsection.
It's indeed giving an additional incentive to post in gambling sections (which obviously is the goal of it), but unlike the others, it still gives the users the option not to.
You're free to disagree on this.

Thank you for this development

Thanks for the support.


Been some time since the last update, laudas new list came out yesterday and yahoo should have an updated version available aswell,
I'll update the thread tomorrow morning and create the combined list.

[Have_good_times]

Dear Lutpin,

Inactivity is a kind of spam ?

Yahoo manages a list of inactive users and merging it into spammers list and finally you are adding them into blacklist.
He is a manager he has all the rights to have his own list.

I just want to confirm whether SMAS covers inactivity ?

[Lauda]

Inactivity is a kind of spam ?

Your actions don't have to be labeled 'spam' for you to get blacklisted from a campaign.

I just want to confirm whether SMAS covers inactivity ?

I've just checked, and it seems that Lutpin took the full list instead of the list with people that got banned for spamming. The people that were personally banned by Yahoo shouldn't be in the SMAS list, similarly the people that I've banned for breaking the rules in Bitmixer shouldn't (and aren't) either.

[botany]

Dear Lutpin,

Inactivity is a kind of spam ?

Yahoo manages a list of inactive users and merging it into spammers list and finally you are adding them into blacklist.
He is a manager he has all the rights to have his own list.

I just want to confirm whether SMAS covers inactivity ?

Inactivity might be construed as account farming, especially if care is taken to ensure that potential activity points aren't lost.
Even if it were not so, campaign managers may be reluctant to block a slot for a person who might not make sufficient posts.

[oblivi]

My account got added on that list for no reason, since my posts are good enough. Now it's pretty much useless since most sig campaings are using the stupid centralized lists instead of taking the time to look for good members for themselves.

Honestly this forum is becoming a chore to use. You can't no longer have fun. You are always paranoid about how your account will be trashed because you posted a reply that was too short, or you posted a couple of messages in a row... ridiculous. We should be able to shitpost a bit and have fun even when wearing a signature campaing, just let the admins fo the signature campaings decide if they will pay us or not for the posts individually. Sometimes I was in a campaing and I felt like replying a really short answer or posting a funny gif as a reply or shit like that, but I was too paranoid that I would end up getting banned. Somehow I still ended up on that list.

Let's just hope there are still sig managers willing to select members for themselves instead of blindly trusting a list made by other people.

[Lauda]

My account got added on that list for no reason, since my posts are good enough.

People don't get added for 'no reason', and your own assessment (which is obviously cognitively biased) of yourself is pointless.

Honestly this forum is becoming a chore to use. You can't no longer have fun. You are always paranoid about how your account will be trashed because you posted a reply that was too short, or you posted a couple of messages in a row... ridiculous. Let's just hope there are still sig managers willing to select members for themselves instead of blindly trusting a list made by other people.

If you are here to genuinely just have fun, or contribute in one way or another, you wouldn't care whether you could get into some signature campaign or not. You can do whatever you want (as long as you follow the forum rules) without being a signature campaign participant.

Now it's pretty much useless since most sig campaings are using the stupid centralized lists instead of taking the time to look for good members for themselves.

What campaigns are you talking about? Most of the campaigns that use the SMAS list are run by the members of SMAS anyways.

[oblivi]

My account got added on that list for no reason, since my posts are good enough.

People don't get added for 'no reason', and your own assessment (which is obviously cognitively biased) of yourself is pointless.

Wrong, my posts are good enough, never had a single complain by 0 managers and I have been in endless campaing, but now im blindly rejected on campaings that use the list because of the mere reason of me being on the list.

Honestly this forum is becoming a chore to use. You can't no longer have fun. You are always paranoid about how your account will be trashed because you posted a reply that was too short, or you posted a couple of messages in a row... ridiculous. Let's just hope there are still sig managers willing to select members for themselves instead of blindly trusting a list made by other people.

If you are here to genuinely just have fun, or contribute in one way or another, you wouldn't care whether you could get into some signature campaign or not. You can do whatever you want (as long as you follow the forum rules) without being a signature campaign participant.

What im saying is that you should not be forced to post in a certain way just because you are wearing a signature campaing. Sometimes I feel like replying a really short reply or posting something less serious but you can't do this because you were wearing a signature campaing, im ok with it, don't pay me for those posts, but that should be up to the manager to decide. I would still be making money with the more serious replies and the manager is still getting his link out there which is all that he wants (proof is, they don't even care to look for themselves, they just blindly follow the list)

Now it's pretty much useless since most sig campaings are using the stupid centralized lists instead of taking the time to look for good members for themselves.

What campaigns are you talking about? Most of the campaigns that use the SMAS list are run by the members of SMAS anyways.


All campaings that pay decently use SMAS except betcoin.ag which actually take the time to select members for themselves.

[Quickseller]

My account got added on that list for no reason, since my posts are good enough. Now it's pretty much useless since most sig campaings are using the stupid centralized lists instead of taking the time to look for good members for themselves.

If you disagree with being placed on SMAS, then I would recommend that you open a thread critical of the companies that employ SMAS if you are being treated unfairly by someone who is an agent of those companies.

[oblivi]

Dear Lutpin,

Inactivity is a kind of spam ?

Yahoo manages a list of inactive users and merging it into spammers list and finally you are adding them into blacklist.
He is a manager he has all the rights to have his own list.

I just want to confirm whether SMAS covers inactivity ?

Inactivity might be construed as account farming, especially if care is taken to ensure that potential activity points aren't lost.
Even if it were not so, campaign managers may be reluctant to block a slot for a person who might not make sufficient posts.

Another ridiculous thing. People take breaks, sometimes they don't post for months, who cares about how long the person's break is as long as they do a good job when they are actually posting within the campaign term.
You are going to raise standards so high that you'll end up banning like 99% of people from campaigns.

[pawel7777]

My account got added on that list for no reason, since my posts are good enough. Now it's pretty much useless since most sig campaings are using the stupid centralized lists instead of taking the time to look for good members for themselves.

There always are/will be few campaigns with less competitive rates that will struggle to fill all the spots, apply there. Plus, you can always approach managers and politely ask to evaluate your post quality themselves. Plus, you can ask the manager who blacklisted you to reconsider.

Honestly this forum is becoming a chore to use. You can't no longer have fun. You are always paranoid about how your account will be trashed because you posted a reply that was too short, or you posted a couple of messages in a row... ridiculous.

You can't have fun on the forum without wearing paid-for signature? One would think now you're finally free to post whatever/whenever you want. You're giving yourself away for being solely for-profit poster.

... Let's just hope there are still sig managers willing to select members for themselves instead of blindly trusting a list made by other people.

Sure, if SMAS team gets overzealous and bans valuable posters, then, eventually, the other managers will face a choice of:
- ignoring SMAS list, or
- compete with ridiculous rates for the very few quality posters that are not yet blacklisted.

It all will balance out in the end.

[Lauda]

Wrong, my posts are good enough, never had a single complain by 0 managers and I have been in endless campaing, but now im blindly rejected on campaings that use the list because of the mere reason of me being on the list.

You're blacklisted by 2 managers, yet you claim that no manager ever complained about you?

What im saying is that you should not be forced to post in a certain way just because you are wearing a signature campaing.

Tl;dr: I should be allowed to spew out garbage while I'm participating in a signature campaign. How about no?

All campaings that pay decently use SMAS except betcoin.ag which actually take the time to select members for themselves.

I was not aware of this, source?

Inactivity might be construed as account farming, especially if care is taken to ensure that potential activity points aren't lost. Even if it were not so, campaign managers may be reluctant to block a slot for a person who might not make sufficient posts.

Correct. That is also likely going to get you banned depending on your posting quality. This is why we give people a chance for review, 1 month after your ban. (@oblivi).

You are going to raise standards so high that you'll end up banning like 99% of people from campaigns.

~18% of the total users (normal list + special list + banned list) are currently enrolled in Bitmixer. I've actually had a small *spike* of very constructive users lately, thus your argument is invalid.

[oblivi]

Wrong, my posts are good enough, never had a single complain by 0 managers and I have been in endless campaing, but now im blindly rejected on campaings that use the list because of the mere reason of me being on the list.

You're blacklisted by 2 managers, yet you claim that no manager ever complained about you?

Yahoo just copies whatever people you add on your list.

What im saying is that you should not be forced to post in a certain way just because you are wearing a signature campaing.

Tl;dr: I should be allowed to spew out garbage while I'm participating in a signature campaign. How about no?

Cool, even then, I never spewed garbage while participating in a signature campaign. Im just saying because you post a couple shitposts while wearing a signature is not the end of the world, but I was cautious about it and still ended up there.

All campaings that pay decently use SMAS except betcoin.ag which actually take the time to select members for themselves.

I was not aware of this, source?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0

Inactivity might be construed as account farming, especially if care is taken to ensure that potential activity points aren't lost. Even if it were not so, campaign managers may be reluctant to block a slot for a person who might not make sufficient posts.

Correct. That is also likely going to get you banned depending on your posting quality. This is why we give people a chance for review, 1 month after your ban. (@oblivi).

When was my bitmixer ban? I would like a review.

You are going to raise standards so high that you'll end up banning like 99% of people from campaigns.

~18% of the total users (normal list + special list + banned list) are currently enrolled in Bitmixer. I've actually had a small *spike* of very constructive users lately, thus your argument is invalid.

I never had a single problem in the endless sig campaigns i've participated at, always told that I did a good job. It's only after the SMAS thing started that I get insta rejected because all managers do is copy+c on your nickname and ctrl+f on this thread, if you are there then you are fucked, it's as simple as that, and it's unfair. Im sure I would have been able to participate in all those campaigns managed by yahoo in a pre-SMAS environment.