[PASC] PascalCoin: Induplicatable NFT

[maxmad_x]

ok it give me the same error, but there was a guy that found a block with the v3 miner, the v3 miner displayed the same error?

so the error seems to say its mining on an old block and not the next one?
cause when I see Invalid New Block 56770 for example... that is the same block I see in total blocks... so that means its mining one block behind?  or is the error an error and its actually mining on the correct block?

thats where Im confused...

is the error an error and saying there is an error when there is not

or is the error real ?

i don't know but you can try with v3 version and see if there is the same error, we know that v3 version can find block

v3?? link please

[1714928787]

1714928787

[1714928787]

1714928787

[1714928787]

1714928787

[1714928787]

1714928787

[1714928787]

1714928787

[1714928787]

1714928787

[cryptomined]

i don't know but you can try with v3 version and see if there is the same error, we know that v3 version can find block

I just tried and it does produce the exact same error
so you think v4 works if v3 produces that error?
wish someone would confirm if v4 can find a block

[template]

How much i can get with Nvidia GT 740M ?

[zuludrag]

About the error:
as written here: https://github.com/PascalCoin/PascalCoin/blob/master/HOWTO_DEVELOP_GPU_MINER_FOR_PASCALCOIN.txt

Code:

EXAMPLE 4:
Sending a valid timestamp sending this message: (copy/paste)
SEND --> {"method":"miner-submit","params":[{"payload":"546573744A534F4E32","timestamp":1476106050,"nonce":1234}]}
RECEIVE <-- {"result":null,"error":"Error: Proof of work is higher than target","id":null}
This is a valid PoW. So... your payload is good, your timestamp is good, but your nonce is not good

So what this exactly mean? Should we stop mining with CUDA miners?..

P.S. I get the same error too:

Code:

<TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload

[cryptomined]

i don't know but you can try with v3 version and see if there is the same error, we know that v3 version can find block

I just tried and it does produce the exact same error
so you think v4 works if v3 produces that error?
wish someone would confirm if v4 can find a block

v3?? link please

it produces the same error

About the error:
as written here: https://github.com/PascalCoin/PascalCoin/blob/master/HOWTO_DEVELOP_GPU_MINER_FOR_PASCALCOIN.txt

Code:

EXAMPLE 4:
Sending a valid timestamp sending this message: (copy/paste)
SEND --> {"method":"miner-submit","params":[{"payload":"546573744A534F4E32","timestamp":1476106050,"nonce":1234}]}
RECEIVE <-- {"result":null,"error":"Error: Proof of work is higher than target","id":null}
This is a valid PoW. So... your payload is good, your timestamp is good, but your nonce is not good

So what this exactly mean? Should we stop mining with CUDA miners?..

P.S. I get the same error too:

Code:

<TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload

it looks to be the case... seems to be finding invalid blocks  Total increases in miner but no blocks found in wallet - and the5re is no way it can find so many real block so fast... is that right?

the total in the miner is the total blocks found right?

[lockepi]

Buying accounts for 1100 sats pm me

[zuludrag]

it looks to be the case... seems to be finding invalid blocks  Total increases in miner but no blocks found in wallet - and the5re is no way it can find so many real block so fast... is that right?

the total in the miner is the total blocks found right?

So this means that found block is incorrect or just an orphan?

edit:
a littlebit more info from log:

Code:

27-01-2017 00:34:29.910 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56780: Proof of work is higher than target
27-01-2017 00:34:29.918 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:<removed> timestamp:1485470069 nonce:4199329083
27-01-2017 00:34:42.424 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56780: Proof of work is higher than target
27-01-2017 00:34:42.432 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:<removed> timestamp:1485470082 nonce:3260319523
27-01-2017 00:37:14.595 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56780: Proof of work is higher than target
27-01-2017 00:37:14.604 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:<removed> timestamp:1485470234 nonce:841575682

Why the same block is "found" 3 times?..

Also while my miner searches the 56780 block, in the wallet I can see total blocks: 56781(0..56780) ... that should mean, that 56780 is already found. Or am I wrong?..

[smaxz]

Is it normal that 280x 15% faster then 290/390 ?

360-400Mh/s - 290/390
450Mh/s - 280/7950/7970
540Mh/s - 470.4G

i have 290's in the 600's

you are under performing.

try a different bios.

[cryptomined]

it looks to be the case... seems to be finding invalid blocks  Total increases in miner but no blocks found in wallet - and the5re is no way it can find so many real block so fast... is that right?

the total in the miner is the total blocks found right?

So this means that found block is incorrect or just an orphan?

edit:
a littlebit more info from log:

Code:

27-01-2017 00:34:29.910 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56780: Proof of work is higher than target
27-01-2017 00:34:29.918 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:<removed> timestamp:1485470069 nonce:4199329083
27-01-2017 00:34:42.424 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56780: Proof of work is higher than target
27-01-2017 00:34:42.432 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:<removed> timestamp:1485470082 nonce:3260319523
27-01-2017 00:37:14.595 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 56780: Proof of work is higher than target
27-01-2017 00:37:14.604 TID:00003AEC [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload:<removed> timestamp:1485470234 nonce:841575682

Why the same block is "found" 3 times?..

im not sure, i wish pascalcoin could let us know

at the bottom of the example it says

"This is a valid PoW. So... your payload is good, your timestamp is good, but your nonce is not good"

so its working or its not?  im not an expert on all these terms and what they mean to each other...

where are adaseb or wolf when we need them LOL

Howwwlllll Howwwlllll Howwwllll... maybe wolf will hear that

[carlo_0000]

thanks for the miner tuto

but do we have to use the same miner name on each ring? or we can change ?

[iscal]

Hi there PASCAL community,what a run so far.Gratz to all of you who believed in this coin.
I'm writing this message as i'd like to know if anyone's progressing with the pool.I have donated 10k Pascal and in case we can't get a pool until first week of February i'd like to have my coins back.Also if ocminer provides a pool i would also like to withdraw my bounty.He could look to our coin back then,but at that time it's price was "peanuts".We must get a a pool asap to gain the support of small miners also.If i get my coins back i promise that by the creation of a pool i will reward the creator.I leave it up to community and dev to decide.

[Dumgi]

Greetings,

Just started mining pascal today, how will I know that it is working?

Thanks in advance

Jon

[pokeytex]

Hell All.  So I downloaded the new cudaminer from klaus and I cannot seem to get the (5) gpus to run at all.  No matter how many instances or devices a mark.  Is there a trick I am missing?

[YIz]

Had this coin's wallet installed inside a VMWare I deleted a week ago, thought it had no value. Had a few hundreds. FML

[salecz]

Hi there PASCAL community,what a run so far.Gratz to all of you who believed in this coin.
I'm writing this message as i'd like to know if anyone's progressing with the pool.I have donated 10k Pascal and in case we can't get a pool until first week of February i'd like to have my coins back.Also if ocminer provides a pool i would also like to withdraw my bounty.He could look to our coin back then,but at that time it's price was "peanuts".We must get a a pool asap to gain the support of small miners also.If i get my coins back i promise that by the creation of a pool i will reward the creator.I leave it up to community to decide.

is totally irrelevant whether you are big or small miner we have 10000+ gpu's and still dont have block after 24 hours ... something is not ok there

[dlx]

Do you see blocks coming?  Mine stoped at 56762, almost 3 hours ago..

[cryptomined]

thanks for the miner tuto

but do we have to use the same miner name on each ring? or we can change ?

you dont have to, you can use different wallets, one for each rig if you really want to.

[maxmad_x]

Do you see blocks coming?  Mine stoped at 56762, almost 3 hours ago..

current 56786

[D8V1D]

Hi there PASCAL community,what a run so far.Gratz to all of you who believed in this coin.
I'm writing this message as i'd like to know if anyone's progressing with the pool.I have donated 10k Pascal and in case we can't get a pool until first week of February i'd like to have my coins back.Also if ocminer provides a pool i would also like to withdraw my bounty.He could look to our coin back then,but at that time it's price was "peanuts".We must get a a pool asap to gain the support of small miners also.If i get my coins back i promise that by the creation of a pool i will reward the creator.I leave it up to community to decide.

is totally irrelevant whether you are big or small miner we have 10000+ gpu's and still dont have block after 24 hours ... something is not ok there

Are you just joking, 10000 GPUs and can't find a block?

[cryptomined]

Hell All.  So I downloaded the new cudaminer from klaus and I cannot seem to get the (5) gpus to run at all.  No matter how many instances or devices a mark.  Is there a trick I am missing?

well i can make a tutorial if you want, but im worried about that error
can you get one to run?

I can get all 3 of mine to run... but the error bothers me... i dont want to show people how to waste electricity if thats all thats happening