ocminer
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
 |
January 27, 2017, 08:09:01 AM |
|
suprnova private pool-server ? ip 37.187.146.34 port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work  That's definately not a pool since the block target is exactly equal to the difficulty, if it was a pool it would be lower. lol you people should stop sniffing ports, it's not ready for deployment yet, but yes, that will be the pool. (It's not finding blocks yet) Target is lower when you submit shares, what you see there is only the update (new block notification) - the miner would ignore that target_pow field. |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:12:38 AM |
|
suprnova private pool-server ? ip 37.187.146.34 port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work That's definately not a pool since the block target is exactly equal to the difficulty, if it was a pool it would be lower. lol you people should stop sniffing ports, it's not ready for deployment yet, but yes, that will be the pool. (It's not finding blocks yet) Target is lower when you submit shares, what you see there is only the update (new block notification) - the miner would ignore that target_pow field. You are going to be a VERY VERY rich man once this pool is launched. |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:13:33 AM |
|
can someone confirm to have found a block with this miner? |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:18:31 AM |
|
suprnova private pool-server ? ip 37.187.146.34 port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work That's definately not a pool since the block target is exactly equal to the difficulty, if it was a pool it would be lower. lol you people should stop sniffing ports, it's not ready for deployment yet, but yes, that will be the pool. (It's not finding blocks yet) Target is lower when you submit shares, what you see there is only the update (new block notification) - the miner would ignore that target_pow field.  With the amount of money OCMINER will make with his pool he will be able to buy that E46 M3 and get that hot girl. Imagine he launches the pool with a 10% pool fee... |
|
|
|
|
|
kirilvvbg
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:20:03 AM |
|
Don't use that 0.2 Pascalminer for AMD or use any of the CUDA miners.
I think the issue with the 0.2 miner is there is some bug and it keeps doing the same work over and over again with the same nonce. So your speed might be 2000 MH/s per rig but if it does the same work over and over again your effective hashrate might be 1000 MH/s.
It might be good if you only have 2 GPUs per rig but if you got like 6-7x RX 480s it becomes ineffective. Been noticing this behaviour because my crappy 270x OR 3 GPU mini rigs have been finding blocks but my 6 GPUs rigs with R9 290s and RX 480 haven't found a single block.
I don't think its bad luck or variance because when 0.2 Pascalminer was first released last week the difficulty was low and I had a similar issue back then.
So, what miner we should use - those of us with AMD cards? |
|
|
|
|
scam_exposer
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Keeping People Honest - Don't Get Scammed
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:20:16 AM |
|
suprnova private pool-server ? ip 37.187.146.34 port 4276 / 4277 / 4278 / 4279 work That's definately not a pool since the block target is exactly equal to the difficulty, if it was a pool it would be lower. lol you people should stop sniffing ports, it's not ready for deployment yet, but yes, that will be the pool. (It's not finding blocks yet) Target is lower when you submit shares, what you see there is only the update (new block notification) - the miner would ignore that target_pow field. Ha ha Told you there was a pool |
99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of all ICO's are SCAMS
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:20:55 AM |
|
@adaseb I have seen you present calculations before.
Any idea how to get from target on that screenshot "815367771" (or "3099865b", the hex target given by wallet) to proper target_pow?
Following nbits wiki I thought you just have to build a 48(for 30 first bit) long hex of zeroes, then insert each two bits instead of first three zeroes.
This would result in "00000000000099865b000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", but the target_pow on the screenshot is different.
Any help appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
D8V1D
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:21:15 AM |
|
Don't use PascalMiner 0.2 !!!!!! With the ProxyMiner v1, would I have to open 28 instances of the miner for my 28 GPUs? |
|
|
|
|
|
ol92
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:27:00 AM |
|
Don't use PascalMiner 0.2 !!!!!! With the ProxyMiner v1, would I have to open 28 instances of the miner for my 28 GPUs? Yes! |
|
|
|
|
scam_exposer
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Keeping People Honest - Don't Get Scammed
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:27:16 AM |
|
suprnova private pool-server ?
You are going to be a VERY VERY rich man once this pool is launched.
Money's already been made. |
99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of all ICO's are SCAMS
|
|
|
|
D8V1D
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:28:44 AM |
|
Don't use PascalMiner 0.2 !!!!!! With the ProxyMiner v1, would I have to open 28 instances of the miner for my 28 GPUs? Yes! OMG why do they have to make it that difficult. |
|
|
|
|
|
john1010
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:32:30 AM |
|
Thanks man for the effort u made.. I think im not very specif in my post.. I mean do you have the latest version of pascal miner for amd cards? Thanks a lot! |
|
|
|
|
ihong154
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:37:11 AM |
|
Found 2 blocks for the past 24hrs with pascalminer 0.2.
|
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:39:05 AM |
|
Where I can download standalone GPU AMD miner for solo via RPC?
|
|
|
|
|
IIpeBeD_MeDBeD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:43:12 AM |
|
DONT use PASCALminer 0.2
It work incorrect and decrease your efficient hashrate in 3-4 time
|
|
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:44:56 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7enuke
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
REDDCoin - Great return
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:47:48 AM |
|
|
REDD-ID: Identify yourself!
|
|
|
kilo17
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:52:56 AM |
|
Could you post a link to it for us....there has been ample time to have a working miner for this coin and, well there isn't one. Maybe this is like Dash - a few with a bunch of coins  -hehe |
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
January 27, 2017, 08:55:42 AM |
|
@adaseb I have seen you present calculations before.
Any idea how to get from target on that screenshot "815367771" (or "3099865b", the hex target given by wallet) to proper target_pow?
Following nbits wiki I thought you just have to build a 48(for 30 first bit) long hex of zeroes, then insert each two bits instead of first three zeroes.
This would result in "00000000000099865b000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", but the target_pow on the screenshot is different.
Any help appreciated.
The difficulty is a little higher than 2^48 hence the target_pow is going to be showing a lower result. Look at the 3rd hex bit |
|
|
|
|
|
