Ocip
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 07:50:08 AM |
|
Anyone got an account to give away? 3GhhboswgLjbs6u7QgXfBrQpYmB81LRBVU5UbAGbkDE1ihZKzipQ47emAFCvQsMaSs9HbcZv6oJAtxt mf4RPyyX9qPJEhiJHksCfGJ ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
|
john1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 07:53:11 AM |
|
Found 4 blocks when I started on suprnova 2hrs ago.. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs28.postimg.org%2F6t1faf4gt%2FSPRNOVE_BLOCK.png&t=665&c=QV3Eh2dpVndKJw)
|
|
|
|
Norfolk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 07:57:52 AM |
|
For those that are wondering.... this is what happens when you plug in a Antminer to mine PASC. Look at the rejects. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi65.tinypic.com%2F256wymf.png&t=665&c=e-GUd7cx371x2A) so algo SHA256D (not SHA256 like in btc) works as been told for gpu only, great.
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 09:14:38 AM |
|
SHA256D should mean "double sha256", exactly what bitcoin uses. Could the devs please clarify what's the difference? If it's just how the block header is setup, it may be possible for ASICs to be adapted.
|
|
|
|
Elun
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 09:16:43 AM |
|
gtx 1070 (366MHASH) 3x gtx 970 (270-300 MHASH) 100% cpu load. Unusable. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2Fepouxg.png&t=665&c=Y2_x8k1lurt8QQ) About 100% cpu load: say thx to nvidia that they don't give a shit about opencl support and bug fixes.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 09:18:36 AM |
|
SHA256D should mean "double sha256", exactly what bitcoin uses. Could the devs please clarify what's the difference? If it's just how the block header is setup, it may be possible for ASICs to be adapted.
Header is longer and nonce at different place, just have a look at the miners source and you'll see the difference. ASICs can't be used because they use a fixed length of the hash.
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
Supercomputing
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 09:21:27 AM |
|
For those that are wondering.... this is what happens when you plug in a Antminer to mine PASC. Look at the rejects. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi65.tinypic.com%2F256wymf.png&t=665&c=e-GUd7cx371x2A) so algo SHA256D (not SHA256 like in btc) works as been told for gpu only, great. GPUs and FPGAs Exactly the same mining algorithm used in Bitcoin and you can use existing Bitcoin mining software with trivial modifications. To be more specific, a one bit change to the second SHA256 chunk's padding (h0280 -> h0680). You will also need to modify the host/controller software to pass the difficulty and optionally increment the time stamp. Bitcoin SHA256d data: 80 byes fixed. Pascal SHA256d data: 208 byes fixed - but variable. FPGA: Ztex 1.15y hash rate 890 MH/s @ 45 Watts from the outlet.
|
|
|
|
mitache365
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 09:35:18 AM |
|
Last block on nova long time ago!
|
BTC
|
|
|
Supercomputing
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 09:38:25 AM |
|
SHA256D should mean "double sha256", exactly what bitcoin uses. Could the devs please clarify what's the difference? If it's just how the block header is setup, it may be possible for ASICs to be adapted.
Yes, it is as simple as flipping on a single bit. But you will also need to modify the controller software.
|
|
|
|
baykan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 09:52:56 AM |
|
SHA256D should mean "double sha256", exactly what bitcoin uses. Could the devs please clarify what's the difference? If it's just how the block header is setup, it may be possible for ASICs to be adapted.
Yes, it is as simple as flipping on a single bit. But you will also need to modify the controller software. After some calculations, I can say that, people has to mine ZEC ETH and PASC with appropriate GPUs. for ex: for PASC, RX 480 for ZEC R9 290X for ETH R9 390 are faster. So I mine PASC (with RX 480s) and ZEC for now. After some days/weeks PASC price lowers and we will see if still profitable. Don't forget, when you go to WhattoMine site, select Coins, Select Pascal, the calculator is shit. Not showing correct values. Cryptocompare is showing the correct values. Whattomine made my calculations false and so I trusted Nanopool, later I switched back to Solo 10 hours ago to Suprnova. The truth is Suprnova, thanks to Ocminer. I get 755 MHs with a single RX 480. No overclock no mods.
|
|
|
|
mmo_online_1981
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 10:16:55 AM |
|
Better dont mine. The Price will fall Changing prices, up, down, depending on yourself
|
|
|
|
cpuwar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 10:51:22 AM |
|
SHA256D should mean "double sha256", exactly what bitcoin uses. Could the devs please clarify what's the difference? If it's just how the block header is setup, it may be possible for ASICs to be adapted.
Yes, it is as simple as flipping on a single bit. But you will also need to modify the controller software. After some calculations, I can say that, people has to mine ZEC ETH and PASC with appropriate GPUs. for ex: for PASC, RX 480 for ZEC R9 290X for ETH R9 390 are faster. So I mine PASC (with RX 480s) and ZEC for now. After some days/weeks PASC price lowers and we will see if still profitable. Don't forget, when you go to WhattoMine site, select Coins, Select Pascal, the calculator is shit. Not showing correct values. Cryptocompare is showing the correct values. Whattomine made my calculations false and so I trusted Nanopool, later I switched back to Solo 10 hours ago to Suprnova. The truth is Suprnova, thanks to Ocminer. I get 755 MHs with a single RX 480. No overclock no mods. What is the power consumption from wall per rx480@755Mhs or rig?
|
|
|
|
zorogaber
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 10:55:53 AM |
|
Need help. i have different 5 GPU, cpu amd fx 5380. drivers crimson 16.4.1. my sgminer not run, show black screen, in suprnova writes !!! WARNING !!! You seem to be sending a large amount of INVALID shares ! Check your rigs, you might be mining the wrong algo and your hashrate could be displayed wrong! !!! WARNING !!!
sgminer.exe -k pascal -o stratum+tcp://pasc.suprnova.cc:5279 -u Olzhasj.05 -p x -I 21 -w 64 -g2 my bat file. any help pls.
try this sgminer.exe -k pascal -o stratum+tcp://pasc.suprnova.cc:5279 -u Olzhasj.05 -p x -I 21 -w 64 -g2 --gpu-platform 1
|
|
|
|
botmanside
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 11:05:29 AM |
|
I want to leave with nanopool where to download miner optiminer? You can send in PM. Thank you
what optiminer do you mean?
|
RTFF && RTFM...
|
|
|
DeCrypterManiac
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 11:10:36 AM |
|
Hmm something cannot be right, I made the same amount on supernova in 6h what I make in 24h on nano ??
when can payment ? to polo ?
|
|
|
|
botmanside
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 11:12:59 AM |
|
Found 4 blocks when I started on suprnova 2hrs ago.. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs28.postimg.org%2F6t1faf4gt%2FSPRNOVE_BLOCK.png&t=665&c=QV3Eh2dpVndKJw) you didnt found anything, sgminer's buggy though
|
RTFF && RTFM...
|
|
|
Norfolk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 11:14:10 AM |
|
Better dont mine. The Price will fall Changing prices, up, down, depending on yourself on polo someone trade bot, buying back pasc, in 24h price recovers, why all this FUD? when big dump happen, bot still set small buy orders, so its normal situation.
|
|
|
|
baykan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 11:17:03 AM |
|
SHA256D should mean "double sha256", exactly what bitcoin uses. Could the devs please clarify what's the difference? If it's just how the block header is setup, it may be possible for ASICs to be adapted.
Yes, it is as simple as flipping on a single bit. But you will also need to modify the controller software. After some calculations, I can say that, people has to mine ZEC ETH and PASC with appropriate GPUs. for ex: for PASC, RX 480 for ZEC R9 290X for ETH R9 390 are faster. So I mine PASC (with RX 480s) and ZEC for now. After some days/weeks PASC price lowers and we will see if still profitable. Don't forget, when you go to WhattoMine site, select Coins, Select Pascal, the calculator is shit. Not showing correct values. Cryptocompare is showing the correct values. Whattomine made my calculations false and so I trusted Nanopool, later I switched back to Solo 10 hours ago to Suprnova. The truth is Suprnova, thanks to Ocminer. I get 755 MHs with a single RX 480. No overclock no mods. What is the power consumption from wall per rx480@755Mhs or rig? Well I'm not next to the rig at the moment, but I can guess that, according to the fan speeds, with nano miner, it was louder, and powered off once, but with Zec and Pasc system is working just fine. I may measure after 10 hours when I'm next to rig. But for sure I'm earning x3-x5 more now with ocminer/suprnova than Nanopool, although a couple of days ago difficulty was lower.
|
|
|
|
HellSong
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 11:26:10 AM |
|
Hmm something cannot be right, I made the same amount on supernova in 6h what I make in 24h on nano ??
when can payment ? to polo ?
almost the same for me . same amonut 20h on nano vs 12 h on supernova
|
|
|
|
DeCrypterManiac
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 11:27:12 AM |
|
Hmm something cannot be right, I made the same amount on supernova in 6h what I make in 24h on nano ??
when can payment ? to polo ?
almost the same for me . same amonut 20h on nano vs 12 h on supernova How is this possible ? I mined on nano from the start, maybe I would get twice the payment ??
|
|
|
|
|