I was never really putting much stock into lifealerts report, if they were really so concerned about the community it would have been published in full without need for payment. The response from Taas was very well written and professionally addressed the accusations. Also if lifealert plans to be successful in the future, complete reports before or right at the start of ICOs instead of the end.
EDIT: icoalert, not lifealert Lmao
I completely disagree with you guys. At least they made us aware. Seriously guys, this type of work should be encouraged. The analysis by them was very through and they found a connection that TaaS didn't explicitly mention.
Agreed. And a lot of the concerns in the reports were totally legit.
But I feel good about my investment now. As I suspected, the best way for the TaaS team to profit from this, is to get US profit, too. So it's all fine