Number 1
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 07, 2017, 08:32:06 PM |
|
Per the original direction of Lisk management, it was recommended that those interested in becoming delegates for Lisk solicit votes by offering to use the forging rewards on Lisk related projects. Ark was founded to be able to run as a blockchain which can be bridged to Lisk and operate as a blockchain application with Lisk, so Lisk developers would have access to the blockchains bridged to Ark and Ark developers would have access to the Lisk blockchain applications, so it qualifies as such a project. Since there are very few salaried positions with Ark, and the current budget is under $15,000 USD per month, the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released.
The current operation of Ark is completely within the guidelines originally presented by Lisk management.
..."the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released." Well this sounds like the way forward. Much fairer! But how can this arrangement be formalized to prevent individual profit taking and encourage ARK Crew delegates to use forged Lisk in the ways you have described? |
|
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:38:04 PM |
|
Why are ARK TEC funds being used for ARK crew personal gain. Why can't they be used to up vote an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging?
An ARK delegate with all forged Lisk reinvested in furthering ARK! Developers, marketing, smartbridging.. you name it.
Better that than lining individual's pockets.
Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK!
Okay, let's try this from a different angle. ARK doesn't have the funds to vote up delegates. Currently the minimum entry into 101 is 7m lisk, ARK hold 4.7m not even close to make any delegate active if that delegate doesn't already have a lot of votes. And if an individual delegate already have millions in weight that is because they have been working on gaining in for months now, most 8-10 months. Do you think any of this individual would be willing to say, "I give up" just use my gathered weight to fund ARK. I don't think so. So ARK delegates in Lisk are not happening. Period. Try the flip side of that. An individual doesn't have enough funds to vote themselves up. Therefore you use the ARK TEC funds to do it. Travesty. Instead, Why don't you mandate that any individual who wishes to use ARK TEC for personal gain does it by lended their weight to the ARK TEC delegate and gets a return. Majority used to support ARK project. No? Makes too much sense! Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK! lol mandate like a king? You do know that crypto is about decentralization and people being able to take charge of their own decisions. Not to be dictated like, well a dictator. It's supporting ark, just depends on how you look at it. Weak. bet you 5 bucks you're a bitbanksy sockpuppet lol Would that be 5 bucks you forged using misappropriated ARK TEC funds Canna? Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK.
Here's for an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging!Oh now I know for sure. this is from the german board: Gevotet vom Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676Li can not translate the article.... but it says something like the named persons have been voted from the ark-ico account. Well I guess we are not the only one seeing how unethically the misuse of ICO funds is. haha all it takes is one downvote from max or oliver and you are not forging anymore. Wonder if that has anything to do with constant shilling from bitbanksy?  Per the original direction of Lisk management, it was recommended that those interested in becoming delegates for Lisk solicit votes by offering to use the forging rewards on Lisk related projects. Ark was founded to be able to run as a blockchain which can be bridged to Lisk and operate as a blockchain application with Lisk, so Lisk developers would have access to the blockchains bridged to Ark and Ark developers would have access to the Lisk blockchain applications, so it qualifies as such a project. Since there are very few salaried positions with Ark, and the current budget is under $15,000 USD per month, the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released.
The current operation of Ark is completely within the guidelines originally presented by Lisk management.
..."the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released." Well this sounds like the way forward. Much fairer! But how can this arrangement be formalized to prevent individual profit taking and encourage ARK Crew delegates to use forged Lisk in the ways you have described? we don't have to explain or even do what you are asking. |
|
|
|
|
|
breeze71
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:43:57 PM |
|
Per the original direction of Lisk management, it was recommended that those interested in becoming delegates for Lisk solicit votes by offering to use the forging rewards on Lisk related projects. Ark was founded to be able to run as a blockchain which can be bridged to Lisk and operate as a blockchain application with Lisk, so Lisk developers would have access to the blockchains bridged to Ark and Ark developers would have access to the Lisk blockchain applications, so it qualifies as such a project. Since there are very few salaried positions with Ark, and the current budget is under $15,000 USD per month, the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released.
The current operation of Ark is completely within the guidelines originally presented by Lisk management.
LOL Lisk investors = big losers. Now they will be food for Lisk developers friends and ARK project. And Lisk price below ICO.  |
|
|
|
|
techbytes (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
|
|
January 07, 2017, 08:49:40 PM
Last edit: January 07, 2017, 09:08:13 PM by techbytes |
|
Why are ARK TEC funds being used for ARK crew personal gain. Why can't they be used to up vote an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging?
An ARK delegate with all forged Lisk reinvested in furthering ARK! Developers, marketing, smartbridging.. you name it.
Better that than lining individual's pockets.
Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK!
Okay, let's try this from a different angle. ARK doesn't have the funds to vote up delegates. Currently the minimum entry into 101 is 7m lisk, ARK hold 4.7m not even close to make any delegate active if that delegate doesn't already have a lot of votes. And if an individual delegate already have millions in weight that is because they have been working on gaining in for months now, most 8-10 months. Do you think any of this individual would be willing to say, "I give up" just use my gathered weight to fund ARK. I don't think so. So ARK delegates in Lisk are not happening. Period. Try the flip side of that. An individual doesn't have enough funds to vote themselves up. Therefore you use the ARK TEC funds to do it. Travesty. Instead, Why don't you mandate that any individual who wishes to use ARK TEC for personal gain does it by lended their weight to the ARK TEC delegate and gets a return. Majority used to support ARK project. No? Makes too much sense! Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK! lol mandate like a king? You do know that crypto is about decentralization and people being able to take charge of their own decisions. Not to be dictated like, well a dictator. It's supporting ark, just depends on how you look at it. Weak. bet you 5 bucks you're a bitbanksy sockpuppet lol Would that be 5 bucks you forged using misappropriated ARK TEC funds Canna? Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK.
Here's for an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging!Oh now I know for sure. this is from the german board: Gevotet vom Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676Li can not translate the article.... but it says something like the named persons have been voted from the ark-ico account. Well I guess we are not the only one seeing how unethically the misuse of ICO funds is. Bitbanksy, you are the only delegate I know who contributes nothing to Lisk and yet have both Max and Oliver votes and are here constantly bashing ARK. Hmmmm... -tb- |
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
January 07, 2017, 09:10:58 PM |
|
Why are ARK TEC funds being used for ARK crew personal gain. Why can't they be used to up vote an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging?
An ARK delegate with all forged Lisk reinvested in furthering ARK! Developers, marketing, smartbridging.. you name it.
Better that than lining individual's pockets.
Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK!
Okay, let's try this from a different angle. ARK doesn't have the funds to vote up delegates. Currently the minimum entry into 101 is 7m lisk, ARK hold 4.7m not even close to make any delegate active if that delegate doesn't already have a lot of votes. And if an individual delegate already have millions in weight that is because they have been working on gaining in for months now, most 8-10 months. Do you think any of this individual would be willing to say, "I give up" just use my gathered weight to fund ARK. I don't think so. So ARK delegates in Lisk are not happening. Period. Try the flip side of that. An individual doesn't have enough funds to vote themselves up. Therefore you use the ARK TEC funds to do it. Travesty. Instead, Why don't you mandate that any individual who wishes to use ARK TEC for personal gain does it by lended their weight to the ARK TEC delegate and gets a return. Majority used to support ARK project. No? Makes too much sense! Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK! lol mandate like a king? You do know that crypto is about decentralization and people being able to take charge of their own decisions. Not to be dictated like, well a dictator. It's supporting ark, just depends on how you look at it. Weak. bet you 5 bucks you're a bitbanksy sockpuppet lol Would that be 5 bucks you forged using misappropriated ARK TEC funds Canna? Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK.
Here's for an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging!Oh now I know for sure. this is from the german board: Gevotet vom Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676Li can not translate the article.... but it says something like the named persons have been voted from the ark-ico account. Well I guess we are not the only one seeing how unethically the misuse of ICO funds is. haha all it takes is one downvote from max or oliver and you are not forging anymore. Wonder if that has anything to do with constant shilling from bitbanksy? Per the original direction of Lisk management, it was recommended that those interested in becoming delegates for Lisk solicit votes by offering to use the forging rewards on Lisk related projects. Ark was founded to be able to run as a blockchain which can be bridged to Lisk and operate as a blockchain application with Lisk, so Lisk developers would have access to the blockchains bridged to Ark and Ark developers would have access to the Lisk blockchain applications, so it qualifies as such a project. Since there are very few salaried positions with Ark, and the current budget is under $15,000 USD per month, the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released.
The current operation of Ark is completely within the guidelines originally presented by Lisk management.
..."the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released." Well this sounds like the way forward. Much fairer! But how can this arrangement be formalized to prevent individual profit taking and encourage ARK Crew delegates to use forged Lisk in the ways you have described? And that's probably why ARK didn't reached its target Canna... Because guys like you don't want to explain anything and interpret any question or criticism as a personal attack against you. I mean what are you even trying to accomplish here? Nothing, just FUD. You just want to attack me and ARK to try and preserve your vote by max and oliver. It's obvious. |
|
|
|
|
|
BitBanksy
|
|
January 07, 2017, 09:23:14 PM |
|
Nothing, just FUD. You just want to attack me and ARK to try and preserve your vote by max and oliver. It's obvious.
You're becoming paranoid Canna... you know very well how much I enjoy teasing you time to time  |
|
|
|
|
techbytes (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
|
|
January 07, 2017, 10:35:40 PM |
|
Nothing, just FUD. You just want to attack me and ARK to try and preserve your vote by max and oliver. It's obvious.
You're becoming paranoid Canna... you know very well how much I enjoy teasing you time to time In fear of losing max/oliver votes, you stand down. Such a hypocrite... -tb- |
|
|
|
|
bitseedmike
|
|
January 08, 2017, 12:24:45 AM |
|
Bitsyo has explained the situation very well. Ark tokens should not be confused with shares in an equity investment, such as voting shares in a company. They are use tokens to gain access to a network, and the Ark TEC was an exchange for these tokens. This is similar to a crowdfund for the presale of a product, like the Pebble Watch. Those who placed orders for the Pebble did not expect to be able to make demands on how the funds were used to produce the Pebble, or for transparency reports on how the funds were spent. Their sole interest was to receive their Pebbles according to the schedule and design specifications presented during the presale. Likewise, the primary obligation of the Ark Team is to deliver the product, a functioning network, according to the schedule and specifications announced in the exchange. Community updates on how the project is progressing, and even how the funding is used, are very good for public relations and keeping the community engaged, and we are providing them as developments warrant, but they should not be seen as something to be demanded as part of the conditions of the exchange.
|
|
|
|
candrammm
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
research > buy on dip > and HODL
|
|
January 08, 2017, 01:11:07 AM |
|
hello canna i want to ask, it looks like I won a sweeptakes reward,  for my reward claim purposes do I need to create a new tec account with a different email to receive this reward or do I simply put this reward into my tec investment account that already exist? |
|
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
January 08, 2017, 01:13:16 AM |
|
hello canna i want to ask, it looks like I won a sweeptakes reward, for my reward claim purposes do I need to create a new tec account with a different email to receive this reward or do I simply put this reward into my tec investment account that already exist? using the email address you won from, please send me the email address for your TEC account you already have. I will update your account to reflect the bounty amount so you can withdraw it after mainnet launch. winners@ark.io |
|
|
|
|
candrammm
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
research > buy on dip > and HODL
|
|
January 08, 2017, 01:17:58 AM |
|
hello canna i want to ask, it looks like I won a sweeptakes reward, for my reward claim purposes do I need to create a new tec account with a different email to receive this reward or do I simply put this reward into my tec investment account that already exist? using the email address you won from, please send me the email address for your TEC account you already have. I will update your account to reflect the bounty amount so you can withdraw it after mainnet launch. winners@ark.iook, thank you, I'll try to claim my reward, |
|
|
|
|
|
solix
|
|
January 08, 2017, 03:37:08 AM |
|
The last few pages were a rough ride gentlemen. Thanks for the adventure.
|
Your Ad here! PM us now if you'd like to advertise here.
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
January 08, 2017, 03:50:33 AM |
|
The last few pages were a rough ride gentlemen. Thanks for the adventure.
we do what we can  |
|
|
|
|
|
jamalaezaz
|
|
January 08, 2017, 04:23:01 AM |
|
hello canna i want to ask, it looks like I won a sweeptakes reward, for my reward claim purposes do I need to create a new tec account with a different email to receive this reward or do I simply put this reward into my tec investment account that already exist? using the email address you won from, please send me the email address for your TEC account you already have. I will update your account to reflect the bounty amount so you can withdraw it after mainnet launch. winners@ark.ioit mean my own TEC account won't work to claim my sweepstakes bounties? actually I've joined sweep stakes with facebook and my facebook email is different.. do I need to create a new account? and is there still time to do so? can you please ans me via PM? due to lots of spammy posts. your response may hide in back pages when I come back. |
Available For CM/SMM, Content Writing and Digital Marketing
TG: @jamalaezaz
|
|
|
|
bandarfjb
|
|
January 08, 2017, 05:07:31 AM |
|
I missed so much about this. I have bought some coin when in TEC. What is the news here?
|
|
|
|
|
bittraffic
|
|
January 08, 2017, 08:39:41 AM |
|
I missed so much about this. I have bought some coin when in TEC. What is the news here?
Now so much yet but some flames since early days. We're waiting for the main net to be live and distribution of ARKs. Maybe at the same time we could then trade if its listed on exchange. |
|
|
|
|
|
BoldNinja
|
|
January 08, 2017, 10:38:30 AM |
|
I missed so much about this. I have bought some coin when in TEC. What is the news here?
We are working with full steam to implement all the innovations we wanted before main net launch (new voting system, HD wallets, new algorithm for address generator, optimising core for better TX broadcasting, some changes to SmartBridge implementation for better security, ... ). + if you want to help you can with filling fields here: https://poloniex.com/coinRequest |
|
|
|
kolap
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 301
Merit: 250
In Crypto We Trust
|
|
January 08, 2017, 11:33:21 AM |
|
I missed so much about this. I have bought some coin when in TEC. What is the news here?
We are working with full steam to implement all the innovations we wanted before main net launch (new voting system, HD wallets, new algorithm for address generator, optimising core for better TX broadcasting, some changes to SmartBridge implementation for better security, ... ). + if you want to help you can with filling fields here: https://poloniex.com/coinRequesthere are top volume exchanges; http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hourit would be awesome if ARK could get into bitfinex or kraken. |
|
|
|
|
dbstmddhks
|
|
January 08, 2017, 01:24:26 PM |
|
Keep going ARK!
From wan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
yhlsqj
|
|
January 08, 2017, 01:40:39 PM |
|
I missed so much about this. I have bought some coin when in TEC. What is the news here?
We are working with full steam to implement all the innovations we wanted before main net launch (new voting system, HD wallets, new algorithm for address generator, optimising core for better TX broadcasting, some changes to SmartBridge implementation for better security, ... ). + if you want to help you can with filling fields here: https://poloniex.com/coinRequesthere are top volume exchanges; http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hourit would be awesome if ARK could get into bitfinex or kraken. It is impossible to list there right now. Your target should be poloniex first, poloniex is the best choice for altcoins. |
|
|
|
|
