scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1796
Merit: 1028
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:03:27 AM Last edit: November 11, 2016, 01:47:11 PM by scryptr |
|
So is it safe to say the Silent Army miner is better than the last Linux build of Claymore Miner?
I SAVED A COPY OF CLAYMORE'S LINUX MINER (EDIT)-- But, to download it, WGET is not enough. His binaries are posted on Google and Mega. I would have to setup an FTP server on my LAN to distribute Claymore to my Linux boxes. Not having actual data to compare, I think your conclusion is good. The mrb builds are facing stiff competition. As of the last linux Claymore binary, mrb builds were about as good, but Claymore has improved. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
scavern
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:48:10 AM |
|
Sorry, I don't quite understand your response... So is it safe to say the Silent Army miner is better than the last Linux build of Claymore Miner?
I SAVED A COPY-- But, to download it, WGET is not enough. I would have to setup an FTP server on my LAN to distribute it to my Linux boxes. Not having actual data to compare, I think your conclusion is good. The mrb builds are facing stiff competition. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:52:05 AM |
|
So is it safe to say the Silent Army miner is better than the last Linux build of Claymore Miner?
I SAVED A COPY-- But, to download it, WGET is not enough. I would have to setup an FTP server on my LAN to distribute it to my Linux boxes. Not having actual data to compare, I think your conclusion is good. The mrb builds are facing stiff competition. --scryptr Upload source to git and simply clone it to all rigs. If not all have build-essential package installed simply compile 2 different versions for AMD and nVidia and use scp to distribute different builds.
|
|
|
|
lethax
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:04:40 AM |
|
that's what i did. my head system is windows so i used cygwin to scp it to all my rigs. nvidia silentarmy works well!
good work!
|
|
|
|
listoz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 1
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:33:23 AM |
|
when the miner will be generated for windows ??
|
|
|
|
vatusasid
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:52:31 AM |
|
when the miner will be generated for windows ??
There are already windows miners. The Genoil and the Claymore miners are both very good at present.
|
|
|
|
ans34
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:59:27 AM |
|
There are already windows miners. The Genoil and the Claymore miners are both very good at present.
thay both are for AMD
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
November 11, 2016, 08:04:59 AM |
|
There are already windows miners. The Genoil and the Claymore miners are both very good at present.
thay both are for AMD Genoil's uses SA kernel so there is nothing stopping you from testing it on nvidia...
|
|
|
|
eXtremal
|
|
November 11, 2016, 09:54:07 AM |
|
Next optimization will be huge, I already got 60 sols/s on GTX1070: Total 60.2 sol/s [dev0 59.5] 1 share Total 60.8 sol/s [dev0 60.6] 1 share Total 60.9 sol/s [dev0 61.5] 1 share Total 60.5 sol/s [dev0 59.5] 1 share
|
|
|
|
eXtremal
|
|
November 11, 2016, 10:00:53 AM Last edit: November 11, 2016, 10:32:23 AM by eXtremal |
|
And Radeon RX480: Total 74.2 sol/s [dev0 78.5] 4 shares Total 74.6 sol/s [dev0 78.6] 4 shares Total 74.8 sol/s [dev0 78.0] 4 shares Total 74.6 sol/s [dev0 78.6] 4 shares Total 74.2 sol/s [dev0 77.0] 4 shares Total 74.1 sol/s [dev0 75.8] 4 shares
It's only first step, soon will be second. I'll send sources to mrb and genoil in a 30 minutes. Edit: use OPTIM_SIMPLIFY_ROUND gives extra 5% and 80 sols/s on modded RX480 is possible Total 309.0 sol/s [dev0 81.2, dev1 78.3, dev2 68.5, dev3 80.8] 19 shares Total 307.8 sol/s [dev0 78.1, dev1 77.7, dev2 69.7, dev3 80.1] 19 shares Total 307.8 sol/s [dev0 78.3, dev1 79.1, dev2 70.6, dev3 81.4] 19 shares Total 309.2 sol/s [dev0 80.1, dev1 80.5, dev2 70.6, dev3 81.4] 20 shares
|
|
|
|
netaccess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 10:39:22 AM |
|
Could you please share the changes ? How to modify bios fox rx480 (to clock it) is there any linux tool ?
|
|
|
|
|
netaccess
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 10:56:02 AM |
|
gcc -O2 -std=gnu99 -pedantic -Wextra -Wall -ggdb -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-overlength-strings -I"/opt/AMDAPPSDK-3.0/include" -c -o main.o main.c main.c:849:58: fatal error: /data/build/libp2p/src/include/asyncio/timer.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. <builtin>: recipe for target 'main.o' failed make: *** [main.o] Error 1
|
|
|
|
eXtremal
|
|
November 11, 2016, 10:57:24 AM |
|
netaccess Fixed. You can remove this line.
|
|
|
|
krnlx
|
|
November 11, 2016, 10:58:49 AM |
|
is it possible to merge pci-e bandwidth fix ? that one,https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy/commit/146b8dc0b6618852e2f322fab51f3ed3739da07a ??
|
|
|
|
eXtremal
|
|
November 11, 2016, 11:02:42 AM |
|
is it possible to merge pci-e bandwidth fix ? that one,https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy/commit/146b8dc0b6618852e2f322fab51f3ed3739da07a ??
mrb can do it I'll try release next optimization in 12-24 hours with +10-15% performance increase.
|
|
|
|
n1ko
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 11:03:36 AM |
|
gcc -O2 -std=gnu99 -pedantic -Wextra -Wall -ggdb -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-overlength-strings -I"/opt/AMDAPPSDK-3.0/include" -c -o main.o main.c main.c:849:58: fatal error: /data/build/libp2p/src/include/asyncio/timer.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. <builtin>: recipe for target 'main.o' failed make: *** [main.o] Error 1 Tried it out on my testrig with 4x 380 (vanilla bios) 2x 280x (vanilla bios). From ~195sol/s to 288sol/s. This is pretty unbelievable. I'm going to try it out on other rigs too. My environment otherwise is ubuntu 14.04 with fglrx (and 1x pcie risers for those that fear bandwidth is a problem) Edit: two other rigs with 7970,280,280x and 380x show similar bump. Awesome work !
|
|
|
|
adamvp
|
|
November 11, 2016, 11:07:40 AM |
|
any hints to get more sols from older cards: I have 380x and 370 and have only 30sols for now
|
I am looking for signature campaign pm me
|
|
|
krnlx
|
|
November 11, 2016, 11:12:25 AM |
|
is it possible to merge pci-e bandwidth fix ? that one,https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy/commit/146b8dc0b6618852e2f322fab51f3ed3739da07a ??
mrb can do it I'll try release next optimization in 12-24 hours with +10-15% performance increase. I did it, but don't know is all correct... testing on pool Total 463.5 sol/s [dev0 75.4, dev1 74.0, dev2 80.9, dev3 70.2, dev4 80.9, dev5 84.9] 81 shares Total 462.6 sol/s [dev0 75.0, dev1 75.2, dev2 78.9, dev3 71.0, dev4 77.2, dev5 79.8] 81 shares Total 460.1 sol/s [dev0 78.1, dev1 74.8, dev2 76.9, dev3 70.2, dev4 77.3, dev5 79.9] 81 shares Total 458.5 sol/s [dev0 79.5, dev1 72.7, dev2 77.2, dev3 75.1, dev4 77.1, dev5 80.0] 81 shares Total 459.6 sol/s [dev0 79.3, dev1 72.8, dev2 76.3, dev3 76.6, dev4 75.3, dev5 81.2] 82 shares Total 461.8 sol/s [dev0 82.1, dev1 71.9, dev2 77.6, dev3 78.1, dev4 75.2, dev5 82.2] 83 shares 6x1070
|
|
|
|
snk0752
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 11:21:03 AM Last edit: November 11, 2016, 11:39:52 AM by snk0752 |
|
Dear eXtremal, THANK YOU!!! On my test rig with 3 x R9 NANO everything is working like a charm!!!) Total 278.3 sol/s [dev0 95.1, dev1 97.0, dev2 89.2, dev3 0.6] 277 shares Total 278.4 sol/s [dev0 95.4, dev1 96.5, dev2 88.2, dev3 0.6] 294 shares Total 278.8 sol/s [dev0 96.1, dev1 96.4, dev2 88.5, dev3 0.7] 305 shares Total 279.2 sol/s [dev0 96.3, dev1 97.0, dev2 89.2, dev3 0.7] 311 shares Total 278.8 sol/s [dev0 95.9, dev1 96.3, dev2 88.3, dev3 0.8] 322 shares
Waiting for the future updates!) wbr, snk0752
|
|
|
|
|