mikky5
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2016, 03:15:44 AM |
|
What's new in r6 version?
|
|
|
|
snakey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 13, 2016, 03:32:03 AM |
|
To everyone getting over 500sol/s with the 6x 470 8gb cards I just want to know if they are modded?
Any tips please?
|
|
|
|
mrb (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
|
|
November 13, 2016, 03:33:33 AM |
|
Hi, mrb
Could you implement some very usefull, ccminer-like option: -S --syslog
-S, --syslog use system log for output messages
that would be nice for KopiemTu support, i.e. for monitoring
It's low priority, but I will consider it. In the mean time I am happy to accept patches from contributors.
|
|
|
|
mrb (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
|
|
November 13, 2016, 03:37:05 AM |
|
try different combinations of --use --use 0,1,2,3,4,5 --use 1,2,3,4,5,6 --use 2,3,4,5,6,7
thanks Just use --list to see what IDs are your GPUs.
|
|
|
|
krnlx
|
|
November 13, 2016, 03:38:09 AM |
|
Hi, mrb
Could you implement some very usefull, ccminer-like option: -S --syslog
-S, --syslog use system log for output messages
that would be nice for KopiemTu support, i.e. for monitoring
It's low priority, but I will consider it. In the mean time I am happy to accept patches from contributors. Can you add print("Total %s sol/s [%s] %d share%s" % \ (rate_avg, info_gpus, shares, '' if shares == 1 else 's')) sys.stdout.flush() In python script ? When running with redirecting to log files, nothing recorded for a while.
|
|
|
|
zawawa
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
|
|
November 13, 2016, 03:43:06 AM |
|
What's new in r6 version?
A speedup up to 5%.
|
Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4VBTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
|
|
November 13, 2016, 03:53:56 AM |
|
What's new in r6 version?
A speedup up to 5%. For 1070 I noticed no speedup for r5 -> r6, maybe the speedup was for amd
|
|
|
|
oslak
|
|
November 13, 2016, 04:09:52 AM |
|
Some benchmarks for old cards: system with 3 R9280x idle power consumption 175 watts from the wall including monitor using wattmeter claymore v4: - 236-240 sols/s average 80sols/s with spike to 90 sols/s
power consumption total system 725 watts from wall approx: 183 watts per card card temp. 62C, 67C, 65C Silentarmy version "115 sol/s with one R9 Nano" - 255-275 sols/s average 88sols/s with spike to 102 sols/s
power consumption total system 612 watts from wall approx: 145 watts per card card temp. 57C, 61C, 59C
|
|
|
|
mrb (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
|
|
November 13, 2016, 04:11:35 AM |
|
Can you add print("Total %s sol/s [%s] %d share%s" % \ (rate_avg, info_gpus, shares, '' if shares == 1 else 's')) sys.stdout.flush() In python script ? When running with redirecting to log files, nothing recorded for a while. Done. But http://linuxcommand.org/man_pages/unbuffer1.html is your friend
|
|
|
|
beeboop
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2016, 05:04:10 AM |
|
Silentarmy vs Optiminer results
I'm running ubuntu with 6x rx 470 8GB
With SA I averaged 520 sols/s using 700W With Optiminer I'm averaging 660 sols/s using 740W
That is about a 27% increase in speed and this is all with the 15% dev fee included already.
I'm going to have to stick with Optiminer until SA releases a faster Linux miner.
|
|
|
|
xeridea
|
|
November 13, 2016, 05:14:09 AM |
|
Silentarmy vs Optiminer results
I'm running ubuntu with 6x rx 470 8GB
With SA I averaged 520 sols/s using 700W With Optiminer I'm averaging 660 sols/s using 740W
That is about a 27% increase in speed and this is all with the 15% dev fee included already.
I'm going to have to stick with Optiminer until SA releases a faster Linux miner.
Wow, 15% devfee is insane. And so many whined about Claymore devfee, even when miner was 100% faster. I was assuming the devfee on that miner was crazy high since he wouldn't tell you what it was. Some report Optiminer as unstable, and it is Linux only and harder to set up. Are you comparing solves over time at pool?
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
beeboop
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2016, 05:22:27 AM |
|
Silentarmy vs Optiminer results
I'm running ubuntu with 6x rx 470 8GB
With SA I averaged 520 sols/s using 700W With Optiminer I'm averaging 660 sols/s using 740W
That is about a 27% increase in speed and this is all with the 15% dev fee included already.
I'm going to have to stick with Optiminer until SA releases a faster Linux miner.
Wow, 15% devfee is insane. And so many whined about Claymore devfee, even when miner was 100% faster. I was assuming the devfee on that miner was crazy high since he wouldn't tell you what it was. Some report Optiminer as unstable, and it is Linux only and harder to set up. Are you comparing solves over time at pool? Silentarmy vs Optiminer results
I'm running ubuntu with 6x rx 470 8GB
With SA I averaged 520 sols/s using 700W With Optiminer I'm averaging 660 sols/s using 740W
That is about a 27% increase in speed and this is all with the 15% dev fee included already.
I'm going to have to stick with Optiminer until SA releases a faster Linux miner.
Wow, 15% devfee is insane. And so many whined about Claymore devfee, even when miner was 100% faster. I was assuming the devfee on that miner was crazy high since he wouldn't tell you what it was. Some report Optiminer as unstable, and it is Linux only and harder to set up. Are you comparing solves over time at pool? The dev fee is a bit ridiculous but still not bad enough to not use his miner. I have been running the miner for about 4hrs now with with no issues. And I am using flypool to compare the two.
|
|
|
|
Tmdz
|
|
November 13, 2016, 05:32:01 AM |
|
I think mrb is right in saying that things should be OK as long as the reported and effective speeds match, and that has been the case with my Windows builds. I'm running some tests just to be on the safe side, though.
Thanks very much. I also want to find out more. There is no notable discrepancies so far between speeds reported by miners and effective speeds on the pool side. I will continue testing for the next 24 hours just in case. Wow your win build works great! Power usage (on 290s) has taken a nice dump, running about 4 c cooler over claymore
|
|
|
|
xeridea
|
|
November 13, 2016, 05:41:32 AM |
|
Silentarmy vs Optiminer results
I'm running ubuntu with 6x rx 470 8GB
With SA I averaged 520 sols/s using 700W With Optiminer I'm averaging 660 sols/s using 740W
That is about a 27% increase in speed and this is all with the 15% dev fee included already.
I'm going to have to stick with Optiminer until SA releases a faster Linux miner.
Wow, 15% devfee is insane. And so many whined about Claymore devfee, even when miner was 100% faster. I was assuming the devfee on that miner was crazy high since he wouldn't tell you what it was. Some report Optiminer as unstable, and it is Linux only and harder to set up. Are you comparing solves over time at pool? Silentarmy vs Optiminer results
I'm running ubuntu with 6x rx 470 8GB
With SA I averaged 520 sols/s using 700W With Optiminer I'm averaging 660 sols/s using 740W
That is about a 27% increase in speed and this is all with the 15% dev fee included already.
I'm going to have to stick with Optiminer until SA releases a faster Linux miner.
Wow, 15% devfee is insane. And so many whined about Claymore devfee, even when miner was 100% faster. I was assuming the devfee on that miner was crazy high since he wouldn't tell you what it was. Some report Optiminer as unstable, and it is Linux only and harder to set up. Are you comparing solves over time at pool? The dev fee is a bit ridiculous but still not bad enough to not use his miner. I have been running the miner for about 4hrs now with with no issues. And I am using flypool to compare the two. If it works, then go ahead and use it, if you get more profit after devfee, its better for you. I would try it if it were on Windows. I am just observing no one has complained about the 15% devfee, yet everyone complained about 2.5% when there were a ton of slow, unstable, and/or pool locked miners at the time.
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
hashing4jesus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2016, 05:52:13 AM |
|
So windows support?
|
|
|
|
agis6
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2016, 06:12:08 AM Last edit: November 13, 2016, 06:23:44 AM by agis6 |
|
So windows support?
When I stop seeing this every 5 other posts, I'll start thinking I'm reading another thread...
|
|
|
|
TheRider
|
|
November 13, 2016, 06:18:35 AM |
|
SA5 has no more easy optimizations left; the current version maxes out the memory bandwidth of the card. Does it also max out the PCI-E bus bandwidth? I'm trying to understand why my Nitro+ RX470 (at 75~80 Sol/s) is finding as many shares as my R9 295x2 (2 x 90 Sol/s)... Any idea?
|
|
|
|
xeridea
|
|
November 13, 2016, 06:19:08 AM |
|
So windows support?
When I stop seeing this every other 5 posts, I'll start thinking I'm reading another thread... zawawa made a port, look back through thread to find it, and instructions.
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
hashing4jesus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2016, 06:43:33 AM |
|
maybe there should be an official silentarmy thread? v5 says they were gonna go for windows support but between the bullshit of claymore jackin for beats and im sure getting bugs and improvements + windows support it will take a minute. just trollin
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
November 13, 2016, 06:54:22 AM |
|
6 rx470 8GB yeah 1070 is clearly not optimized btw what is your consumption, mine is 580w 580W for 500 sol, that is almost 1.1W/Sol/s. That is already more efficient than some CPU miners and GPU miners.. actually is 580 for the whole system with 3 140mm fan, so i guess i'm very near the 1:1 ratio between wattage and sol That is more efficient than my R9 390 system. It has about 520 Sol, but the power consumption is 1160W. value were unstable with 580w, too much swings between low and high, i rised a bit to 628 waatt with 55% tdp and now it remain at 510 sol or so
|
|
|
|
|