[ANN] [ZOI] Zoin - Zerocoin based privacy - CPU - No founder's reward - 0.8.7.4

[mrgreen88]

Dev should talk more

as far as I remember he said that the future of this coin is up to community involved in it.

[1715189886]

1715189886

[1715189886]

1715189886

[1715189886]

1715189886

[1715189886]

1715189886

[1715189886]

1715189886

[1715189886]

1715189886

[kamikaza]

Well right now it is killing the coin

[fortunecrypto]

Vote for Zoin at c-cex.com
https://c-cex.com/?id=vote&coin=zoi

I think this coin is better on Yobit,Ccex is very harsh on coin with low volume,people are paying bitcoin to get it listed on Ccex then delist it after a month of low volume,Yobit will not delist it even with low volume.

[matejbilahora]

Well right now it is killing the coin

Well this needed dev team from begining. Now there is only try to save  the coin. But no one knows what will come.

[kamikaza]

Well right now it is killing the coin

Well this needed dev team from begining. Now there is only try to save  the coin. But no one knows what will come.

your are absolutely right, and i think we both mentioned it a couple of times. I dont understand this zoin guy, even if you want a community based coin, you have to create a good structure in which this is possible.

[dfox101]

Well right now it is killing the coin

Well this needed dev team from begining. Now there is only try to save  the coin. But no one knows what will come.

your are absolutely right, and i think we both mentioned it a couple of times. I dont understand this zoin guy, even if you want a community based coin, you have to create a good structure in which this is possible.

The dev is a good guy, but he is alone apparently. We need a team and a roadmap, otherwise this will go nowhere.

Making a roadmap and execute it will encourage the community that this is a viable coin, not a shitcoin like many others.

[matejbilahora]

Well right now it is killing the coin

Well this needed dev team from begining. Now there is only try to save  the coin. But no one knows what will come.

your are absolutely right, and i think we both mentioned it a couple of times. I dont understand this zoin guy, even if you want a community based coin, you have to create a good structure in which this is possible.

The dev is a good guy, but he is alone apparently. We need a team and a roadmap, otherwise this will go nowhere.

Making a roadmap and execute it will encourage the community that this is a viable coin, not a shitcoin like many others.

We are on it, but right now there is huge google outtage in midlle europe. Nothing from google it works. There are some guys working on some updates around zoin. It will take some time.

[matejbilahora]

DeepWeb is our next move. But that is a secret, do not tell anyone..

[imjustsayintho]

DeepWeb is our next move. But that is a secret, do not tell anyone..

Shhhhhh your secret is safe with me.

[AlcatelBravo]

Nice build:

AegisLab    Troj.Bitcoinminer.Cnizw!c    20161120
Avast    Win32:Malware-gen    20161120
Avira (no cloud)    TR/BitCoinMiner.cnizw    20161120
CAT-QuickHeal    Trojan.Ircbot.18078    20161119
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win32/BitCoinMiner.BJ potentially unsafe    20161120
Ikarus    Trojan.BitCoinMiner    20161120
K7AntiVirus    Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 )    20161120
K7GW    Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 )    20161120
McAfee    Artemis!114CF41DAADC    20161120
McAfee-GW-Edition    Artemis    20161120
Sophos    Bitcoin Miner (PUA)    20161120
Symantec    Heur.AdvML.C    20161120

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/2bfe576f96dd485e079c04221b86bca8a5f95ee09561377d12d678b7f96788ab/analysis/1479657309/

Logictense says sometimes the cause is simpler than u can foresee. Wont spend time wrapping my head around this because Im lazy to hop on to linux but I can bet the dreadly reddishness in the virus scan may be reaction to python header or unsigned reference linked to a graphic file somewhere in the code.

I dont think that is it.
I compiled same source and got only 2 bitcoin PUAs.
So dev got it flooded when compiled it.
But still 99% sure all are false.

Name:    castellum
Posts:    2
Activity:    2
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    November 19, 2016, 04:29:16 PM
Last Active:    Today at 06:34:44 AM


Dev been online but no commments..
What the fuck dev is still doing with that account??

Steeling us! 

This guy username_007 is one of those who was supporting another newly released Trojan ridden shitcoin where there was blatent proof by multiple users of a injected virus yet he was consistent with saying it is perfectly safe
Anything he has to say hereafter is undoubtedly just lies and misconception.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1686142.0

[matejbilahora]

Nice build:

AegisLab    Troj.Bitcoinminer.Cnizw!c    20161120
Avast    Win32:Malware-gen    20161120
Avira (no cloud)    TR/BitCoinMiner.cnizw    20161120
CAT-QuickHeal    Trojan.Ircbot.18078    20161119
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win32/BitCoinMiner.BJ potentially unsafe    20161120
Ikarus    Trojan.BitCoinMiner    20161120
K7AntiVirus    Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 )    20161120
K7GW    Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 )    20161120
McAfee    Artemis!114CF41DAADC    20161120
McAfee-GW-Edition    Artemis    20161120
Sophos    Bitcoin Miner (PUA)    20161120
Symantec    Heur.AdvML.C    20161120

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/2bfe576f96dd485e079c04221b86bca8a5f95ee09561377d12d678b7f96788ab/analysis/1479657309/

Logictense says sometimes the cause is simpler than u can foresee. Wont spend time wrapping my head around this because Im lazy to hop on to linux but I can bet the dreadly reddishness in the virus scan may be reaction to python header or unsigned reference linked to a graphic file somewhere in the code.

I dont think that is it.
I compiled same source and got only 2 bitcoin PUAs.
So dev got it flooded when compiled it.
But still 99% sure all are false.

Name:    castellum
Posts:    2
Activity:    2
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    November 19, 2016, 04:29:16 PM
Last Active:    Today at 06:34:44 AM


Dev been online but no commments..
What the fuck dev is still doing with that account??

Steeling us! 

This guy username_007 is one of those who was supporting another newly released Trojan ridden shitcoin where there was blatent proof by multiple users of a injected virus yet he was consistent with saying it is perfectly safe
Anything he has to say hereafter is undoubtedly just lies and misconception.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1686142.0

Well I have used his own wallet and there was no virus inside. So calm down and stop throwing dirt.

[dfox101]

Nice build:

AegisLab    Troj.Bitcoinminer.Cnizw!c    20161120
Avast    Win32:Malware-gen    20161120
Avira (no cloud)    TR/BitCoinMiner.cnizw    20161120
CAT-QuickHeal    Trojan.Ircbot.18078    20161119
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win32/BitCoinMiner.BJ potentially unsafe    20161120
Ikarus    Trojan.BitCoinMiner    20161120
K7AntiVirus    Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 )    20161120
K7GW    Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 )    20161120
McAfee    Artemis!114CF41DAADC    20161120
McAfee-GW-Edition    Artemis    20161120
Sophos    Bitcoin Miner (PUA)    20161120
Symantec    Heur.AdvML.C    20161120

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/2bfe576f96dd485e079c04221b86bca8a5f95ee09561377d12d678b7f96788ab/analysis/1479657309/

Logictense says sometimes the cause is simpler than u can foresee. Wont spend time wrapping my head around this because Im lazy to hop on to linux but I can bet the dreadly reddishness in the virus scan may be reaction to python header or unsigned reference linked to a graphic file somewhere in the code.

I dont think that is it.
I compiled same source and got only 2 bitcoin PUAs.
So dev got it flooded when compiled it.
But still 99% sure all are false.

Name:    castellum
Posts:    2
Activity:    2
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    November 19, 2016, 04:29:16 PM
Last Active:    Today at 06:34:44 AM


Dev been online but no commments..
What the fuck dev is still doing with that account??

Steeling us! 

This guy username_007 is one of those who was supporting another newly released Trojan ridden shitcoin where there was blatent proof by multiple users of a injected virus yet he was consistent with saying it is perfectly safe
Anything he has to say hereafter is undoubtedly just lies and misconception.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1686142.0

Well I have used his own wallet and there was no virus inside. So calm down and stop throwing dirt.

clearly something is not right with dev's build. When build from source you see only 2 flagged "bitcoin miner" which is fine, but the one which flagged 12 issues including the most trusted ones like Sementec.

[YourMom420]

We could really use a better exchange

[SushiNoTomato]

Nice build:

AegisLab    Troj.Bitcoinminer.Cnizw!c    20161120
Avast    Win32:Malware-gen    20161120
Avira (no cloud)    TR/BitCoinMiner.cnizw    20161120
CAT-QuickHeal    Trojan.Ircbot.18078    20161119
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win32/BitCoinMiner.BJ potentially unsafe    20161120
Ikarus    Trojan.BitCoinMiner    20161120
K7AntiVirus    Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 )    20161120
K7GW    Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 )    20161120
McAfee    Artemis!114CF41DAADC    20161120
McAfee-GW-Edition    Artemis    20161120
Sophos    Bitcoin Miner (PUA)    20161120
Symantec    Heur.AdvML.C    20161120

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/2bfe576f96dd485e079c04221b86bca8a5f95ee09561377d12d678b7f96788ab/analysis/1479657309/

Logictense says sometimes the cause is simpler than u can foresee. Wont spend time wrapping my head around this because Im lazy to hop on to linux but I can bet the dreadly reddishness in the virus scan may be reaction to python header or unsigned reference linked to a graphic file somewhere in the code.

I dont think that is it.
I compiled same source and got only 2 bitcoin PUAs.
So dev got it flooded when compiled it.
But still 99% sure all are false.

Name:    castellum
Posts:    2
Activity:    2
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    November 19, 2016, 04:29:16 PM
Last Active:    Today at 06:34:44 AM


Dev been online but no commments..
What the fuck dev is still doing with that account??

Steeling us!  

This guy username_007 is one of those who was supporting another newly released Trojan ridden shitcoin where there was blatent proof by multiple users of a injected virus yet he was consistent with saying it is perfectly safe
Anything he has to say hereafter is undoubtedly just lies and misconception.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1686142.0

Well I have used his own wallet and there was no virus inside. So calm down and stop throwing dirt.

clearly something is not right with dev's build. When build from source you see only 2 flagged "bitcoin miner" which is fine, but the one which flagged 12 issues including the most trusted ones like Sementec.

There is a still unkown reason for that.
My guess is that zerocoin code has parts that makes virus scanners swing around.

Virustotal seems to have somehow changed.
First time it takes so called quick scan.
Then you see only 2 PUAs.
Try after a day, you will get 4-8 more. All false.
Try after 2-3 days.
Your file is now as clean as it was in the first scan!!

About the coin stealer coin.
No one has no proof about real working virus.
Personally i think that there never was a suchs thing.
If after many days only 1 scanner flags file, then it is more likely that you have false positive.

In the other hand.
When it says coin stealer people who dont know so much about are scared out of shit.
No matter if it was false or not only action is to be paranoid and act as it was the real thing.
(Goooood way to kill a new coin)

I always knew something wasn't right with this coin or even the announcement layout since there is so many newbie coins using the same stuff and putting viruses inside the wallets to steal your BTC or ZEC.

You know what is funny, a few noobs saying it is perfectly safe and then some higher ranked members who have been around for a while coming in and and proving them wrong, it's as if you want people to download it as you try to force feed them & reassure their safety, on another note I suppose our multiple detection programs are stuffed up too when flagging the coinstealer trojan/virus and many more, I guess you will say other coins have the same false positive even when they don't use the same code or part of code as Zoin

I also noticed that you 2 seem to be posting in the same threads after each other quite a lot, coincidence or just random occurrence that keeps happening ?

Oh and again I see you are affiliated with another virus coin with a Remote trojan built in that scans clean but has a hidden trojan inside.

Trust because of this is diminishing and nobody will download altcoin wallets anymore unless big people who are trusted are backing them.

[coin-investor]

This coin will lose it's reputation since no one is addressing the virus that is on the wallet,I have since deleted my zoin wallet and sold all my coins,if this persist it's over for zoincoin.

[Fusix]

No viruses in this wallet. Online antivirus testing is quite untrue. Check out the disassembler and realize that there is no one there. Let's help the developer in raising currency. So if a developer to communicate?

[Vin]

No viruses in this wallet. Online antivirus testing is quite untrue. Check out the disassembler and realize that there is no one there. Let's help the developer in raising currency. So if a developer to communicate?

Nice show.

[valley365]

No viruses in this wallet. Online antivirus testing is quite untrue. Check out the disassembler and realize that there is no one there. Let's help the developer in raising currency. So if a developer to communicate?

My compile from source code and tested with virustotal showed only 2 issues, both of them are Bitcoin miners, which are understanable as it has a miner in QT client. I don't understand where come the 12 issues shown in the virustotal report from dev's build.

[zoin]

No viruses in this wallet. Online antivirus testing is quite untrue. Check out the disassembler and realize that there is no one there. Let's help the developer in raising currency. So if a developer to communicate?

My compile from source code and tested with virustotal showed only 2 issues, both of them are Bitcoin miners, which are understanable as it has a miner in QT client. I don't understand where come the 12 issues shown in the virustotal report from dev's build.

There are so many things that affect the binaries produced (compiler flags, version of linked libraries, etc). It all depends which part of the code the virus apps tries to identify.

Please feel free to share your binaries.

[YourMom420]

How come it's slowly dying. Everything seems to work fine