Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 04:57:20 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 [1115] 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426876 times)
smolen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 524
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 16, 2015, 12:10:52 PM
 #22281

What if you have 4 gpu's in your rig and each thread is executed on a seperate gpu. x11 is then reduced to x2+.
Hmm, PCIe 2.0 x16 bandwidth is 8 GB/s, 100 MH/s (desired speed) * 64 bytes (internal state size) = 6.4 GB/s

Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
April 16, 2015, 12:37:55 PM
Last edit: April 16, 2015, 01:36:04 PM by sp_
 #22282

What if you have 4 gpu's in your rig and each thread is executed on a seperate gpu. x11 is then reduced to x2+.
Hmm, PCIe 2.0 x16 bandwidth is 8 GB/s, 100 MH/s (desired speed) * 64 bytes (internal state size) = 6.4 GB/s

x11 with the latest ccminer is currenly hashing at around 3MH/s (on the 750ti)

PCIe 4.0×16 has a 31.5 GB/s bandwidth. (3*4(GPU)) above 12 MH/s (desired speed) * 64 bytes (internal state size) = 0,576 GB/s

with 4 gpu's and 4 threads you need to copy the data 3 times. (the last gpu pass will only need to return the winning nounce.)

The copy process can be done in parallell 0,576 GB/s by dividing the pci-e bus timeline

-----------TimeLine--------------->
GPU1:  --Copy--Calc--calc--Calc
GPU2:  --Calc--Copy--Calc--Calc
GPU3:  --Calc--Calc--Copy--Calc
GPU4:  --Calc--Calc--Calc--Result

A PCIe 2.0 x16 bandwidth is 8 GB/s and this meens that at least 7.2% of the time is wasted with moving memory. So your Kernals needs to run at least 8% faster.


seems slow. Could work for a cryptonite miner since the desired speed is 500h-1KH/s

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2015, 01:45:56 PM
 #22283

What if you have 4 gpu's in your rig and each thread is executed on a seperate gpu. x11 is then reduced to x2+.
Hmm, PCIe 2.0 x16 bandwidth is 8 GB/s, 100 MH/s (desired speed) * 64 bytes (internal state size) = 6.4 GB/s

x11 with the latest ccminer is currenly hashing at around 3MH/s (on the 750ti)

PCIe 4.0×16 has a 31.5 GB/s bandwidth. (3*4(GPU)) above 12 MH/s (desired speed) * 64 bytes (internal state size) = 0,576 GB/s

with 4 gpu's and 4 threads you need to copy the data 3 times. (the last gpu pass will only need to return the winning nounce.)

The copy process can be done in parallell 0,576 GB/s by dividing the pci-e bus timeline

-----------TimeLine--------------->
GPU1:  --Copy--Calc--calc--Calc
GPU2:  --Calc--Copy--Calc--Calc
GPU3:  --Calc--Calc--Copy--Calc
GPU4:  --Calc--Calc--Calc--Result

A PCIe 2.0 x16 bandwidth is 8 GB/s and this meens that at least 7.2% of the time is wasted with moving memory. So your Kernals needs to run at least 8% faster.


seems slow. Could work for a cryptonite miner since the desired speed is 500h-1KH/s
PCIe 4.0 ? (planned to be released late 2016, by that time there will be for sure x11 asic  Grin)
also you never have more than 2 gpu's at x16 (unless you go to the utterly expensive x99 setup, not mining friendly)

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
smolen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 524
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 17, 2015, 12:31:29 AM
 #22284

A PCIe 2.0 x16 bandwidth is 8 GB/s and this meens that at least 7.2% of the time is wasted with moving memory.
IIRC, calculations and bus I/O are independent and can go in parallel. PCIe bus is bidirectional, so the full bandwidth (up+down) should be twice as large.
But this chimerical AMD/NVidia monster going to be quite unstable Smiley

Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
mach123coin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 23, 2015, 06:15:33 AM
 #22285

I am trying to load the cudaminer.sln in visual studio Commmunity 2013.. will this work.
it fails every time so I am guessing not.. or maybe I missed a key step ?

the precompiled dependencies in the OP will only work for VS 2010.

You would have to build all the dependencies with VS 2013 if you want to use this newer IDE version.

Christian

Still seems to work with VS2010. Donated .01 LTC - transaction fee for what I mined for 5 days. Cudaminer on a EVGA GTX570/Q6600.  Wish I had the faster cards. Best of luck and keep optimizing the code!
Bitice
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10



View Profile
April 23, 2015, 12:15:11 PM
 #22286

Apologies if this has been covered before but what is the status on mining Blake algo with Nvidia vs AMD? AMD still much faster?

Thank you.
reorder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 23, 2015, 04:56:33 PM
 #22287

Apologies if this has been covered before but what is the status on mining Blake algo with Nvidia vs AMD? AMD still much faster?

Thank you.
Titan X might beat 290X on this one.
uplodex
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 13


View Profile
April 26, 2015, 01:02:10 AM
 #22288

Hi,

there is not a solution of CPU mining "windows 7" for CACHeCoin?
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
April 26, 2015, 12:36:43 PM
Last edit: April 29, 2015, 07:06:29 PM by Amph
 #22289

What if you have 4 gpu's in your rig and each thread is executed on a seperate gpu. x11 is then reduced to x2+.
Hmm, PCIe 2.0 x16 bandwidth is 8 GB/s, 100 MH/s (desired speed) * 64 bytes (internal state size) = 6.4 GB/s

x11 with the latest ccminer is currenly hashing at around 3MH/s (on the 750ti)

PCIe 4.0×16 has a 31.5 GB/s bandwidth. (3*4(GPU)) above 12 MH/s (desired speed) * 64 bytes (internal state size) = 0,576 GB/s

with 4 gpu's and 4 threads you need to copy the data 3 times. (the last gpu pass will only need to return the winning nounce.)

The copy process can be done in parallell 0,576 GB/s by dividing the pci-e bus timeline

-----------TimeLine--------------->
GPU1:  --Copy--Calc--calc--Calc
GPU2:  --Calc--Copy--Calc--Calc
GPU3:  --Calc--Calc--Copy--Calc
GPU4:  --Calc--Calc--Calc--Result

A PCIe 2.0 x16 bandwidth is 8 GB/s and this meens that at least 7.2% of the time is wasted with moving memory. So your Kernals needs to run at least 8% faster.


seems slow. Could work for a cryptonite miner since the desired speed is 500h-1KH/s
PCIe 4.0 ? (planned to be released late 2016, by that time there will be for sure x11 asic  Grin)
also you never have more than 2 gpu's at x16 (unless you go to the utterly expensive x99 setup, not mining friendly)

oh pcie 4 is planned for 2016, did not know that, interesting, but isn't pci-e 3.0 still not completely saturated?
Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
April 29, 2015, 08:46:44 AM
 #22290

New gen can also reduce ports size... actually the socket 2011 cpus have more pcie/usb3 lanes than 115x.

I think next ones will have more than ever... even the sata/sata express ports tend to move to M2 pci express system

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
Houndirno
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 474
Merit: 263


View Profile
April 29, 2015, 05:13:44 PM
Last edit: April 29, 2015, 05:24:48 PM by Houndirno
 #22291

Can someone help me, I'm just testing a GTX 750 no ti card and I keep getting either accepted 0/soso or when startum has found a new block
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
April 29, 2015, 07:07:18 PM
 #22292

Can someone help me, I'm just testing a GTX 750 no ti card and I keep getting either accepted 0/soso or when startum has found a new block

cudaminer is for scrypt, while ccminer for the rest, search for the sp_ version, also you need to run a ccminer_52 version
Houndirno
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 474
Merit: 263


View Profile
April 29, 2015, 10:40:12 PM
 #22293

Can someone help me, I'm just testing a GTX 750 no ti card and I keep getting either accepted 0/soso or when startum has found a new block

cudaminer is for scrypt, while ccminer for the rest, search for the sp_ version, also you need to run a ccminer_52 version

I'm still getting now where with 52 version ;c
myagui
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 29, 2015, 10:54:56 PM
Last edit: July 14, 2015, 04:17:12 PM by myagui
 #22294

I'm still getting now where with 52 version ;c

You have a better shot at someone helping you, if you post:
- What coin it is that you are mining,
- What your miner launch command, (omit password if you care, but otherwise be accurate)
- What ccminer release you are using (2 recommendations below)

by tpruvot
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

by SP_
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/

Good Luck!

o00o
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 11


View Profile
May 01, 2015, 06:52:20 PM
 #22295

It would be much appreciated if someone can confirm as to which algorithms/miners are supported by my Compute Capability 1.1 GPUs such as 9800GTX+/GTS250.  I've tried mining x11 w/ Cudaminer& ccminer on 340.52, the latest driver w/ support for my GPUs but unfortunately, GPU utilization is ~ 1%, making Scrypt my only viable yet unprofitable option. 

Thanks to anyone in advance for offering their help!

BTC:1Gk3p6KbCKiVhJYksaYPeAGL948rAsjmUS
tbearhere
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003



View Profile
May 01, 2015, 10:11:42 PM
 #22296

It would be much appreciated if someone can confirm as to which algorithms/miners are supported by my Compute Capability 1.1 GPUs such as 9800GTX+/GTS250.  I've tried mining x11 w/ Cudaminer& ccminer on 340.52, the latest driver w/ support for my GPUs but unfortunately, GPU utilization is ~ 1%, making Scrypt my only viable yet unprofitable option. 

Thanks to anyone in advance for offering their help!
Goto OP and download 
cudaminer-2014-02-18.zip [32+64bit version] (7.1 MB) also runs on Maxwell
And read the readme file it will show some coins that are mineable.
And goto this thread for ccminer   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=826901.0
But I don't think ccminer will work on Compute 1.1 not sure .. ask there.
CPUcoins
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 02, 2015, 07:55:06 AM
Last edit: May 02, 2015, 08:21:32 AM by CPUcoins
 #22297

Hello.  I am trying this new GPU instance to mine Yescrypt.  I am new to mining with a GPU and was hoping I could get some assistance on setting it up.

https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-tpsp/tree/windows

I have an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Driver Version 9.18.13.4752

Here is the post about the release.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775289.msg11252741#msg11252741

Edit:  Here is the string I am using for my bat file.  I also tried the below with -a yescrypt, and I get the same as below.

Code:
ccminer.exe --algo=yescrypt -d 1 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coin-miners.info:3575 -u user.1 -p pass -i 0

I also have ccminer.exe in the folder C:\ccminer-tpsp-windows

Not sure what I am doing wrong.

https://i.imgur.com/76yAhNO.png
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
May 02, 2015, 09:10:46 AM
Last edit: May 02, 2015, 11:26:50 AM by djm34
 #22298

Hello.  I am trying this new GPU instance to mine Yescrypt.  I am new to mining with a GPU and was hoping I could get some assistance on setting it up.

https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-tpsp/tree/windows

I have an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Driver Version 9.18.13.4752

Here is the post about the release.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775289.msg11252741#msg11252741

Edit:  Here is the string I am using for my bat file.  I also tried the below with -a yescrypt, and I get the same as below.

Code:
ccminer.exe --algo=yescrypt -d 1 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coin-miners.info:3575 -u user.1 -p pass -i 0

I also have ccminer.exe in the folder C:\ccminer-tpsp-windows

Not sure what I am doing wrong.


doesn't look like the version I released... but rather a version released by sp

edit: the link is correct, but the screenshot is from sp version
here the windows binaries: https://mega.co.nz/#!dR1mwTIb!22mH7em1FX2F81-C5vl9Wbb7o4RG57e82bNVfvFwInE

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
May 02, 2015, 01:52:58 PM
 #22299

for yescrypt and compute 5.0 and higher cards (750ti and newer) use sgminer ( Grin )

github/djm34/sgminer

with these parameters: (tested on gtx980, 750ti)
sgminer.exe --no-submit-stale --kernel yescrypt-multi -o stratum+tcp://mine2.bsty.nonce-pool.com:4095 -u djm34.1 -p password  --gpu-platform 0 -w 4   -g 2

(may-be it is due to the fact that nvidia now support opencl 1.2... don't know or cuda doesn't like at all sha256... at least not how I write it  Grin)

it is significantly faster for the 900's 1.5kh/s versus 1.2kh/s
Don't use it for compute 3.5 cards, works like shit... Grin  ccminer works a lot better for the older cards...

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
tbearhere
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003



View Profile
May 02, 2015, 03:05:29 PM
 #22300

Info on the 980ti... could be out in weeks.
http://www.techpowerup.com/mobile/212205/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti-silicon-marked-gm200-310.html
Pages: « 1 ... 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 [1115] 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!