Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
October 30, 2014, 01:10:51 PM |
|
mine is like at 10% or even less
Are you running Linux. I get up to 60 % usage on my cpu with a low of 30%. no windows 7 64 3 instances of cudaminer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
October 30, 2014, 01:21:39 PM |
|
mine is like at 10% or even less
Are you running Linux. I get up to 60 % usage on my cpu with a low of 30%. no windows 7 64 3 instances of cudaminer depends on the cpu's you both use. for a fancy 6core intel some ccminer work is quite boring. for a small dual core G3220 its hard work.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 30, 2014, 02:21:21 PM |
|
mine is like at 10% or even less
Are you running Linux. I get up to 60 % usage on my cpu with a low of 30%. no windows 7 64 3 instances of cudaminer depends on the cpu's you both use. for a fancy 6core intel some ccminer work is quite boring. for a small dual core G3220 its hard work. hmmm i7, ccminer (4 cards) 5% or less now obivously if there several instances running at the same time: almost idle + almost idle + almost idle +.... + almost idle = definitely Not Idle (simple math... and independent processes) must be noted it works for any processes. Say if you open enough notepad on your computer you might have problems too...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
Drhiggins
|
|
October 30, 2014, 03:00:40 PM |
|
Can anyone here tell me what kind of hash rates they are getting on Nvidia cards with CCMiner for Monero.
Please tell me what card you have (Example: GeForce GTX 560, 750Ti etc..) Also what the Hash rate per card is. Any power consumption data is also appreciated.
I'm thinking of switching my AMD cards out of my rig for Nvidia cards. I'm having lots of trouble with Claymore 9.1 crashing a lot.
My AMD cards are: Gigabyte 280x with Elpidia (I know these aren't the fastest 280x's out there) Rev 2.0 with Stilt Bios. I get about 490-510 H/s on each card right now and I have 4x in my rig. Pulling 750watts at the wall with this rig.
I have a gaming machine I run the CCminer for Crypto Note XMR at night and I'm getting 170-200H/s on each card. These are older cards. The two cards I have are GTX GeForce 560. This miner has been super stable and not one crash or lock up. I wish i could say the same for the Claymore 9.1. I like the Claymore miner but just having issues with it.
Thanks Drhiggins
|
Monerohash.com U.S. Mining Pool
|
|
|
monoxide
|
|
October 30, 2014, 07:26:41 PM |
|
call me lazy but i just don't want to read 1000+ pages.. What would be best miner to use to mine x11? i got asus gtx 660 OC, i7-4770K and 8gb DDR3 1600mhz. Thanks. Edit: and win 8.1 x64
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 30, 2014, 07:28:49 PM |
|
I optimized the killer groestl kernal by removing the IF / else statements in groestl_functions_quad. The maxwell core doesn't like conditional code.
Happy mining.
|
|
|
|
Namsbreh
|
|
October 30, 2014, 07:50:03 PM |
|
To update the nvidia driver is a pain in the as within linux. But I think jk_14 will make a update soon. If you interested how to do it in kopiemtu, i'll could write a little how to. cudaminerBBR gives 1760hashs per second on a 980 // -l64x256; compiled with compute.50. that means nearly double hashrate in comparison to my 750ti.
Thanks for the kind offer of a 'how to' but its ok. I've used Linux for a few years and can run either linux or windows on my rigs, also got no desire to mine BBR with the 970's at the moment. ...which algo? the system draw depends extremly on the used algo. short test with the EVGA 980 SC ACX 2.0 cards shows that they are not beating the 750ti in hash/watt ratio at the moment. Now it depends on the optimization of our ccminer-dev guys... hooorayh for you all!
To be honest I cannot recall what algo used 380w, prob M7 or scrypt-jane, it was over a month ago. Looking forward to optimizations that may come our way over the next few months.
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 30, 2014, 08:04:47 PM |
|
I optimized the killer groestl kernal by removing the IF / else statements in groestl_functions_quad. The maxwell core doesn't like conditional code. Happy mining.
But christians code was really good. The last X to fall...
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 30, 2014, 08:34:52 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 30, 2014, 08:41:46 PM |
|
I optimized the killer groestl kernal by removing the IF / else statements in groestl_functions_quad. The maxwell core doesn't like conditional code. Happy mining.
But christians code was really good. The last X to fall... The djm34 code was too easy.
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 30, 2014, 08:57:12 PM |
|
I optimized the killer groestl kernal by removing the IF / else statements in groestl_functions_quad. The maxwell core doesn't like conditional code. Happy mining.
But christians code was really good. The last X to fall... I think he's got a better one. Yeah. He doesn't like the Nordic's optimze his work. But remember that ccminer is fucking good! the AMD miner however needs more cores to make the miners happy
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 30, 2014, 09:35:51 PM |
|
I optimized the killer groestl kernal by removing the IF / else statements in groestl_functions_quad. The maxwell core doesn't like conditional code. Happy mining.
But christians code was really good. The last X to fall... The djm34 code was too easy. which one ? (it is always easy 3 months later to optimize things, but when a coin is released the only thing which matter is to get the upper hand...)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 30, 2014, 09:37:32 PM |
|
I optimized the killer groestl kernal by removing the IF / else statements in groestl_functions_quad. The maxwell core doesn't like conditional code. Happy mining.
But christians code was really good. The last X to fall... I think he's got a better one. Yeah. He doesn't like the Nordic's optimze his work. But remember that ccminer is fucking good! the AMD miner however needs more cores to make the miners happy Ehhh - ccminer is a lot better than the stock AMD miner, no doubt. But the AMD cards are capable of so much more. have you tried the latest driver ? 14.9 Some mad speed increase on rotation (again...)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
ZeroFossilFuel
|
|
October 31, 2014, 01:32:11 AM |
|
I've been running ccminer 1.0 for some time now on a quark based coin with a couple of GT640 (DDR5, CC3.5), CUDA 5.5, driver 331.38. It runs well but I'm wondering if I can expect any performance gains from ccminer 1.2 and the deps that go along with it?
bump Just test it, I know some versions are compiled for old card with compute 2.0. Maybe a Bombadil version or others ? I saw my name o_O GT640 with DDR5 is compute 3.5 https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpusSo any of the newest miners should work (except those only for 5.0 & 5.2 ofc ) No need for my old code ^^ CCminer 1.2 is also getting old ^^" There are newer forks out there running better code. Like the ones from tpruvot and djm34. SP_ is currently very busy with trying to boost the code even more, but IIRC, it's only compute 5.0 and higher for now. This is exactly what I needed. Thank you (and others) for responding. And yes, I do have GDDR5, compute 3.5. I know it's not the greatest but it works and I don't have to spend any more money just play around with it. I'm content to just squeeze it for all it's worth. Again, thank you all. Z
|
|
|
|
Dotcommie
|
|
October 31, 2014, 01:52:38 AM |
|
I still love this stuff When I was a young wannabe "hacker" I used to listen to demoscene stations on Winamp all the time while playing counterstrike. My favorite was called Nectarine Radio or something.
|
|
|
|
monoxide
|
|
October 31, 2014, 07:31:26 AM |
|
call me lazy but i just don't want to read 1000+ pages.. What would be best miner to use to mine x11? i got asus gtx 660 OC, i7-4770K and 8gb DDR3 1600mhz. Thanks. Edit: and win 8.1 x64 Help me with this??
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 31, 2014, 10:54:41 AM |
|
call me lazy but i just don't want to read 1000+ pages.. What would be best miner to use to mine x11? i got asus gtx 660 OC, i7-4770K and 8gb DDR3 1600mhz. Thanks. Edit: and win 8.1 x64 Help me with this?? yes I will call you lazy, because the question pops up every pages, so just need to look at the previous page...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 31, 2014, 03:37:35 PM Last edit: October 31, 2014, 03:57:20 PM by djm34 |
|
new version of coinshield (sk-1024 gpu channel) for nvidia card: http://ge.tt/4dUHeF32/v/0?c(github will be created once it is known to compile on linux out of the box... ) support compute_30 (but pretty bad performance... as far as my gtx660 is concerned)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
Namsbreh
|
|
October 31, 2014, 04:28:38 PM |
|
call me lazy but i just don't want to read 1000+ pages.. What would be best miner to use to mine x11? i got asus gtx 660 OC, i7-4770K and 8gb DDR3 1600mhz. Thanks. Edit: and win 8.1 x64 Help me with this?? FFS do a search like the rest of us had too! There is a huge wealth of info within those 1000+pages, u might learn something!
|
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
October 31, 2014, 06:45:00 PM |
|
call me lazy but i just don't want to read 1000+ pages.. What would be best miner to use to mine x11? i got asus gtx 660 OC, i7-4770K and 8gb DDR3 1600mhz. Thanks. Edit: and win 8.1 x64 I've been running ccminer 1.0 for some time now on a quark based coin with a couple of GT640 (DDR5, CC3.5), CUDA 5.5, driver 331.38. It runs well but I'm wondering if I can expect any performance gains from ccminer 1.2 and the deps that go along with it?
bump Just test it, I know some versions are compiled for old card with compute 2.0. Maybe a Bombadil version or others ? I saw my name o_O GT640 with DDR5 is compute 3.5 https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpusSo any of the newest miners should work (except those only for 5.0 & 5.2 ofc ) No need for my old code ^^ CCminer 1.2 is also getting old ^^" There are newer forks out there running better code. Like the ones from tpruvot and djm34. SP_ is currently very busy with trying to boost the code even more, but IIRC, it's only compute 5.0 and higher for now.
|
|
|
|
|