Haik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2017, 06:39:02 AM |
|
Is there any way to mine with two GTX980ti and what will be better to mine? Can i use this card for flypool zcash?
|
|
|
|
sonih
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/sad.gif) |
June 01, 2017, 06:51:51 AM |
|
Hello, I'm starting to mine and I have an nvidia so I want to use the CUDAMINER program but I do not find it in niungua part, the mega link that appears here is fallen and I can not find it, if someone can put the link I would appreciate it a lot.
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 01, 2017, 10:55:44 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Odeyin
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 19, 2017, 05:35:27 PM |
|
I am currently researching qhasm-cudasm ..has anyone done stuff with these ideas? If so, email me. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Lumikor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 28, 2017, 04:18:37 PM |
|
I have a problem:
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti result does not validate on CPU
I'm using two cards, CPU is Ryzen 7 1700, Linux Mint 18.1 (Kernel 4.11.7), the cards are connected with SLI thingy stuff (I don't need it, it's not gaming computer, will remove if it helps)
When I complied it I used nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_61,code=\"sm_61,compute_61\"
I get this on Nvidia drivers 381.22 and 375.66.
Also, couldn't find a way to ask for support in git, am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
xMines
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 29, 2017, 09:50:12 AM |
|
Can I select the devices so I only mine on defined GPUs? If not can you please implement that? BR xMines (cudaminer+ccminer logo by chapmanjw) Here's my new pet project. I started this during the easter holidays in 2013 and this uses CUDA to squeeze up to 200% more performance out of nVidia cards - as compared to OpenCL mining applications. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ccMiner is a collaborative project by me and a co author also named Christian (call us the C&C Hash Factory, if you will). ccMiner is less polished, but often features new coins+algorithms close to launch date (usually with a clear mining advantage for nVidia). More information can be found on our dedicated nVidia mining forum http://www.cudaminers.net/cudaMiner Algorithms: - scrypt
- scrypt-jane
- scrypt-N
- keccak
- blake (github version only)
Installation requirements:- a recent nVidia driver supporting at least CUDA 5.5 - Visual Studio 2010 SP1 redistributable (redist). Install when MSVCR100.DLL is not found. http://www.microsoft.com/de-de/download/details.aspx?id=8328 (x86) http://www.microsoft.com/de-de/download/details.aspx?id=13523 (x64) cudaMiner latest full release: cudaminer-2014-02-28.zip [32+64bit version] (7.0 MB) speed-up for YAC (compute 3.0 or later), keccak (compute 3.5 or later)SHA256 sum: 214df7efa386fa4895bf529e72f26463e5469432e6d8d239ee6653809bf072e5 MAC-OS X compiled binaries are found here: http://www.johnchapman.net/cudaminer/ (a third party site maintained by John Chapman) ccMiner Algorithms: - HeavyCoin
- MjollnirCoin
- Fugue
- Groestl
- Myriad-Groestl
- Diamond-Groestl
- JackpotCoin
- Quark
- AnimeCoin
- TalkCoin
- X11/DarkCoin
- X13/MaruCoin
ccMiner latest releases: https://github.com/cbuchner1/ccminer/releasesHave a look at the Google Docs Spreadsheet for configuration and performance data. Please enter new data using this form. We now also have a spreadsheet for scrypt-jane, e.g. Yacoin and the corresponding Data Entry Form. Performance data for scrypt-jane is preliminary, as the feature is under development! Here is another (somewhat outdated and chaotic) Google Docs spreadsheet with some performance figures and associated configuration settings. Please carefully inspect the README.txt file before use. Usage is pretty much identical to pooler's cpuminer previous cudaMiner releases: cudaminer-2014-02-18.zip [32+64bit version] (7.1 MB) also runs on MaxwellSHA256 sum: 066e8ffff0de6a3a2d814be4e7fb1f9c59ac6d5378f6710912ccdba61eee00bb cudaminer-2014-02-09.zip [32+64bit version] (7.1 MB)SHA256 sum: ef37c97562d98cb95a7a243d8bb378250d9f067b62db239435e6a9975a83a3b8 cudaminer-2014-02-04.zip [32+64bit version] (6.6 MB)SHA256 sum: 4a38026f662dd06d84f2fe0e5f5098189888de8c0e9947bc24b3cedc4b5f0fdd cudaminer-2014-02-02.zip [32+64bit version] (6.6 MB)SHA256 sum: bad402d908862995ec67fd3dddb48a82883176ac7f20cef1f228462f88b04fbb cudaminer-2013-12-18.zip [32+64bit version] (7.2 MB)SH256 sum: 4d505804c80bd78fa1c661f74cc5d0e39f92a86f0507abc8ff2aa2b50ffba44b ATTENTION! Fermi based devices like GTX 560, 570, 580, 590 seem to run quite hot with this release.cudaminer-2013-12-10.zip [32+64bit version] (10.4 MB)SHA256 sum: f6a9b1cfcd35867978589c2f36aaef45a16d0f57494777cb14a93366222c195a cudaminer-2013-12-07.zip [32+64bit version] (9.5 MB)SHA256 sum: 76dcddcf6d85cbd1ebe4acbb24497bfdae0f3ca9999694c4b152917f4559263a cudaminer-2013-12-01.zip [32+64bit version] (10.4 MB)SHA256 sum: dfb4f3a74e534132d397e45aae2f71933a013f557c3be4299e11759c6590b2be cudaminer-2013-11-20.zip [Update: 32+64bit version] (11.4 MB)SHA256 sum: 2db068884d0d5683e1b379cf8b4808f55a43b2612547757ce98a8bfe8d2fa0d4 cudaminer-2013-11-15.zip (5.1 MB)SHA256 sum: 4d4821b0539c24b8882d00caa388e6f7aa8efb2480206e4c9dc2bc95532e3837 cudaminer-2013-11-14.zip (5.4 MB)SHA256 sum: 5a81f97e183533683373849d73fc30b0b4d287cddb83ef327b0baba006b07c4f cudaminer-2013-11-01.zip (5.0 MB)SHA256 sum: 27564fdbc4c41b9d6994a03f8fd2e0a14a1d4a64f0da216b06e8810b604e4ab9 cudaminer-2013-10-10.zip (4.9 MB)SHA256 sum: 7938965a046b84734daa4332327313b48d198d808a0cf85cb3f0a27e65260c4c cudaminer-2013-07-13.zip (3.0 MB)SHA256 sum: d14792ffc8fb5fc910b442d802c480f4f478fa18e2fc95736f525f97a0a9ad52 cudaminer-2013-04-30.zip (3.2 MB)SHA256 sum: 2d81b52e1051a4f724e75b0e84e231293809437aa060d21b2fd3b8bfc5b711f2 ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) If you find this useful, please donate a little. How about the first litecoin you successfully mine with this app? LKS1WDKGED647msBQfLBHV3Ls8sveGncnm This is my "motivation address". ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Required dependencies for building on Windows: pthreads: http://sourceware.org/pthreads-win32/OpenSSL-Win32: http[Suspicious link removed] curl-7.29.0: http://curl.haxx.se/download/curl-7.29.0.zipor in precompiled form for Visual Studio 2010 SP1 cudaminer_vc2010_prerequisites.7z (49.3 MB)Linux compilation is also possible now: chmod +x configure autogen.sh (.zip does not preserve the x bit) ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make Better grab the sourcecode from github, as the .zip file contains has Windows style line endings in all ASCII files which you would have to convert first. Christian
|
|
|
|
dj--alex
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2017, 09:59:34 AM |
|
someone tell me ccminer users are PRO in Linux theme and can help me with the question Please help i already write here early not get answer Cannot overclock any GPU>0 Screenshot https://pp.userapi.com/c840225/v840225257/1033e/5v2hp7Fs-sI.jpg===================== my xorg https://pastebin.com/rPDe8gLQAMD AM3+ Dual core 3200Mhz, 4Gb ram, 1 GTX 780, 1 GTX 1060, HDD 750Gb Linux Mint 18.1 x64 Kernel 4.10 Nvidia-381 Overclocked only one card. 500mhz mem 2 cannot be overclocked.. i thinking requires monitors on EVERY videocard?Huh Why?Huh maybe emulator monitors? ================= ps. how to export this? in Linux? GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
|
|
|
|
newmz
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 372
Merit: 250
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2017, 11:55:10 AM |
|
I would encourage anyone interested in using a cudaminer for mining ETH with Nvidia cards to have a look at nvOC elsehwere in this forum. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1854250.0It's a cool free Linux based Nvidia mining distro. Can do ETH, ZEC and all the variants of those algos plus some other ccminer stuff. DMD GRS ZPOOL_LYRA2V2 ZPOOL_BLAKE2S ZEC ZCOIN HUSH ZEN ZCL NICE ETH MUSIC ETC EXP DCR PASC MONA VTC DGB SIA FTC LBC DUAL_ETC_DCR DUAL_ETC_PASC DUAL_ETC_LBC DUAL_ETC_SC DUAL_EXP_DCR DUAL_EXP_PASC DUAL_EXP_LBC DUAL_EXP_SC DUAL_ETH_DCR DUAL_ETH_PASC DUAL_ETH_LBC DUAL_ETH_SC DUAL_MUSIC_DCR DUAL_MUSIC_PASC DUAL_MUSIC_LBC DUAL_MUSIC_SC It is now using a genoil ethminer (or claymore if you want to get less hash rate and pay a fee). I have a rig which is 2 x 1070s and 3 x 1060s and I'm getting nearly 140mh/s at about 700W whole rig. The key was working out the memory overclock really. I have mine all core underclocked -200 and memory overclocked +1500
|
Crypto currency enthusiast and miner since 2015. Mined approx 200 ETH during 2016 and 2017 and sold it at approximately $US40 each. Then I watched it reach $1000+ each. If anyone bothers to read this stuff pay attention to this: HODL HODL HODL HODL HODL HODL
I started mining with 1 AMD 7950 and 1 R9-280X. Then I gradually built my AMD operation into 12 R9-290s. Awesome ETH hash but ridiculous power consumption and heat. Over the last year I defected to the Nvidia team. I now use GTX 1070s. They were expensive to buy (probably a bargain now) but awesome hash rate vs. power consumption. blah blah blah blah
|
|
|
MrCloudMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 06, 2017, 01:16:44 AM |
|
Although the idea of mining your own bitcoin at home is cool, but with your own PC is really not a good idea, for anyone who is actually interested in making some money mining bitcoin and investing in cryptocurrency I would recommend you check out something like https://www.genesis-mining.com/a/930250 This is easily the best way to mine bitcoin especially as the price and difficulty of bitcoin increases. They also give you a 3.5% discount if you use this code: wLQlf1
|
|
|
|
StuffSneak
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 409
Merit: 250
Strive for Success
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 07, 2017, 06:57:29 AM |
|
Download link is dead in OP.
|
|
|
|
dj--alex
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 07, 2017, 05:57:19 PM |
|
Question still actually. Pytanie jescsze czeka na odpowiedz.
|
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2235
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2017, 10:54:32 AM |
|
I get "virus found" when scanning after downloading from your site: C:\Download\cpuminer-multi-rel1.3.1-x64.zip: Win.Trojan.Agent-5751425-0 FOUND
|
|
|
|
hesdeadjim
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 08, 2017, 06:45:41 PM |
|
hello everyone ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) thanks for the awesome software.. i was wondering if running three instances of ccminer was a limit of the program or of my system. when i run more than three the software locks up and has to be forced to shut down. each instance is one coin, by the way. i've only been mining for about 4 months so i'm still pretty new to thins stuff. thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
Put - Referred By hesdeadjim - In The Box Marked Additional Notes And Receive 1/2 Off Listing Fees From 07/01/18 - 07/07/18
|
|
|
49erminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 27, 2017, 08:43:17 PM Last edit: July 27, 2017, 10:04:33 PM by 49erminer |
|
Hello everyone, I'm looking for suggestions on how to increase acceptance rate and effective hash rate for myriad-groestl mining with ccminer. I have a mining rig with 3 older AMD cards and 2 new GTX 1070s. According to ccminer, the 2 1070s are hashing myriad-groestl at 162.x Mh/s which is 140% of the 115.x hashrate of the 3 AMD cards as reported by sph-sgminer-x11mod running with an updated myriad-groestl kernel. The pool reports that both miners are mining at the same difficulty in the following screenshot, so I would expect to see the 1070s getting somewhere around 140% of the shares of the AMD cards. I'd also expect to see the effective Hashrate reported by the pool for the cuda worker to be closer to 160, I've never seen it go above 60. http://imgur.com/pPivYDhActually, the 1070s are getting less than half of the accepted shares of the amd cards. Here's a screenshot of both miners, started at the same time, after a 14h:42m run: http://imgur.com/0i23gg9I've tried ccminer 2.0 x86, x64, 2.1-tribus, and 811. All exhibit the problem of reporting a high hash rate but finding fewer shares than the slower AMD cards hashing at the same difficulty for the myriad-groestl algorithm. What sort of tuning might be done to ccminer or the cards to increase the effective hashrate in the pool and/or increase the rate of share acceptance in the miner? Or, is this a problem with the pool? I'm only seeing this problem with ccminer/myr-gr. When mining equihash with different mining software (EWBF), the 1070s are also hashing around 140% faster than the AMD cards, and the effective hashrate in the pool and the number of accepted shares reflect the higher hash rate.
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 28, 2017, 12:50:29 AM |
|
Hello everyone, I'm looking for suggestions on how to increase acceptance rate and effective hash rate for myriad-groestl mining with ccminer. I have a mining rig with 3 older AMD cards and 2 new GTX 1070s. According to ccminer, the 2 1070s are hashing myriad-groestl at 162.x Mh/s which is 140% of the 115.x hashrate of the 3 AMD cards as reported by sph-sgminer-x11mod running with an updated myriad-groestl kernel. The pool reports that both miners are mining at the same difficulty in the following screenshot, so I would expect to see the 1070s getting somewhere around 140% of the shares of the AMD cards. I'd also expect to see the effective Hashrate reported by the pool for the cuda worker to be closer to 160, I've never seen it go above 60. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimgur.com%2FpPivYDh&t=665&c=vg8sa2uncnRqPA) Actually, the 1070s are getting less than half of the accepted shares of the amd cards. Here's a screenshot of both miners, started at the same time, after a 14h:42m run: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimgur.com%2F0i23gg9&t=665&c=eSS1aeWQR0dkHg) I've tried ccminer 2.0 x86, x64, 2.1-tribus, and 811. All exhibit the problem of reporting a high hash rate but finding fewer shares than the slower AMD cards hashing at the same difficulty for the myriad-groestl algorithm. What sort of tuning might be done to ccminer or the cards to increase the effective hashrate in the pool and/or increase the rate of share acceptance in the miner? Or, is this a problem with the pool? I'm only seeing this problem with ccminer/myr-gr. When mining equihash with different mining software (EWBF), the 1070s are also hashing around 140% faster than the AMD cards, and the effective hashrate in the pool and the number of accepted shares reflect the higher hash rate. Hi, try adding -f 2 to your ccminer bat file or check another pool.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
49erminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 28, 2017, 03:20:22 AM |
|
Hello everyone, I'm looking for suggestions on how to increase acceptance rate and effective hash rate for myriad-groestl mining with ccminer. I have a mining rig with 3 older AMD cards and 2 new GTX 1070s. According to ccminer, the 2 1070s are hashing myriad-groestl at 162.x Mh/s which is 140% of the 115.x hashrate of the 3 AMD cards as reported by sph-sgminer-x11mod running with an updated myriad-groestl kernel. The pool reports that both miners are mining at the same difficulty in the following screenshot, so I would expect to see the 1070s getting somewhere around 140% of the shares of the AMD cards. I'd also expect to see the effective Hashrate reported by the pool for the cuda worker to be closer to 160, I've never seen it go above 60. http://imgur.com/pPivYDhActually, the 1070s are getting less than half of the accepted shares of the amd cards. Here's a screenshot of both miners, started at the same time, after a 14h:42m run: http://imgur.com/0i23gg9I've tried ccminer 2.0 x86, x64, 2.1-tribus, and 811. All exhibit the problem of reporting a high hash rate but finding fewer shares than the slower AMD cards hashing at the same difficulty for the myriad-groestl algorithm. What sort of tuning might be done to ccminer or the cards to increase the effective hashrate in the pool and/or increase the rate of share acceptance in the miner? Or, is this a problem with the pool? I'm only seeing this problem with ccminer/myr-gr. When mining equihash with different mining software (EWBF), the 1070s are also hashing around 140% faster than the AMD cards, and the effective hashrate in the pool and the number of accepted shares reflect the higher hash rate. Hi, try adding -f 2 to your ccminer bat file or check another pool. Thanks for the response. Added "diff-factor" : "2" to the config file and gave it a try. 8.11-Klaus-T quickly found 1 share which was rejected with a reason of "reject reason: low difficulty share of 0.23825932042784703" after which it apparently died. That is, it did nothing for the next 12 minutes, with task manager showing 0 CPU activity for the ccminer task. The 2.1-tribus version ran with "diff-factor" : "2" in the config, and the effective hashrate in the pool was close to the 151.x hashrate shown by the miner. The problem with 2.1-tribus and the suggested option is the almost 50% rejection rate. After 1h 24m, tribus found 839 shares of which only 437 were accepted, the other 402 shares were rejected with the same "low difficulty share" message. During the same time, the amd cards had 548 accepted and 5 rejected shares. The suggested option fixes the problem of the pool showing a very low effective hashrate for the nvidia worker, and increases the shares ccminer solves to a level that actually exceeds the % difference in hashrates reported by the two miners, but only at the cost of an unacceptably high rate of rejects. I'll try a different pool tomorrow, and maybe the 2.0 x86 and x64 versions of ccminer if the pool switch doesn't help. Just out of curiosity, which version of ccminer would you recommend for mining myriad-groestl? I like the fact that 8.11-Klaus-T shows a 10Mh/s higher hashrate than the other miners, but that is only useful if the higher hashrate translates into more shares. I'll post what I find tomorrow after the pool switch.
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 28, 2017, 03:45:54 AM |
|
Thanks for the response. Added "diff-factor" : "2" to the config file and gave it a try.
8.11-Klaus-T quickly found 1 share which was rejected with a reason of "reject reason: low difficulty share of 0.23825932042784703" after which it apparently died. That is, it did nothing for the next 12 minutes, with task manager showing 0 CPU activity for the ccminer task.
The 2.1-tribus version ran with "diff-factor" : "2" in the config, and the effective hashrate in the pool was close to the 151.x hashrate shown by the miner. The problem with 2.1-tribus and the suggested option is the almost 50% rejection rate. After 1h 24m, tribus found 839 shares of which only 437 were accepted, the other 402 shares were rejected with the same "low difficulty share" message. During the same time, the amd cards had 548 accepted and 5 rejected shares.
The suggested option fixes the problem of the pool showing a very low effective hashrate for the nvidia worker, and increases the shares ccminer solves to a level that actually exceeds the % difference in hashrates reported by the two miners, but only at the cost of an unacceptably high rate of rejects.
I'll try a different pool tomorrow, and maybe the 2.0 x86 and x64 versions of ccminer if the pool switch doesn't help. Just out of curiosity, which version of ccminer would you recommend for mining myriad-groestl? I like the fact that 8.11-Klaus-T shows a 10Mh/s higher hashrate than the other miners, but that is only useful if the higher hashrate translates into more shares.
I'll post what I find tomorrow after the pool switch.
If you have half the hashrate on a pool, or too many low difficulty share rejects then it's usually caused by the pool and the miner not being on the same page regarding what they consider the same amount of work (difficulty) due ton how they were configured. With -F 2 the miner also submits work to the pool that is half of what the pool tells the miner is required. If you have too many rejects with -F 2, then you should lower it (1.5 or something) until you figure out the correct number which hopefully gets you your hashrate reported on the pool without rejects.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
ra6e
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 28, 2017, 06:25:15 PM |
|
Guys, is there any miner for cuda's for xevan / xevan-mod algo.
|
|
|
|
ferdiberkmoes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 28, 2017, 06:35:34 PM |
|
dear all, i am looking for the latest cuda miner installation software. to mine artbyte.
all hyperlinks to mega.nz are dead. And please I do not need ccminer. But looking for CUDAMINER.EXE and installation in particular.
Anybody can help ?
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 28, 2017, 07:21:02 PM |
|
dear all, i am looking for the latest cuda miner installation software. to mine artbyte.
all hyperlinks to mega.nz are dead. And please I do not need ccminer. But looking for CUDAMINER.EXE and installation in particular.
Anybody can help ?
Artbyte is using Scrypt algo. That is mined with super efficient ASICs meaning that mining with GPUs are a completely waste of electricity. Even if you spend the amount of money you'd spend for electricity and buy Artbyte, you'll earn more.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
|