Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 03:22:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 ... 422 »
  Print  
Author Topic: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Buy Chrono.tech TIME on KuCoin.com! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟  (Read 453541 times)
xcajun21
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 252


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 02:22:03 PM
 #1681

I applied for signature campaign,  is it correct layout?  Also I don't see where I can change the avatar.  Any suggestions?
1715268126
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715268126

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715268126
Reply with quote  #2

1715268126
Report to moderator
1715268126
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715268126

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715268126
Reply with quote  #2

1715268126
Report to moderator
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715268126
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715268126

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715268126
Reply with quote  #2

1715268126
Report to moderator
1715268126
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715268126

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715268126
Reply with quote  #2

1715268126
Report to moderator
Chronobank Support
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 19, 2016, 02:34:42 PM
 #1682

I applied for signature campaign,  is it correct layout?  Also I don't see where I can change the avatar.  Any suggestions?

It should be centered and have spaces on the right too, just like it is below:

Quote
                                                  ⏱ Chronobank.io                                                  
You'll have to update your rank to be able to wear avatar.

The Uber Of Time - http://chronobank.io
SpacemanOne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 101

icowidgets.com


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 03:05:54 PM
 #1683

With what sold til now if sale ended today would be 358,907 TIME...total...supply...even if 4000 btc more sell still not 1,000,000 total...supply...

We can't calculate the exact supply now because we don't know the bonuses distribution in the total collected amount of BTC.
Why are the total supply numbers so important for you?

ICOwidgets.com - ICO's and Their Ratings
Hoganye
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 625
Merit: 501


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 03:14:20 PM
 #1684

With what sold til now if sale ended today would be 358,907 TIME...total...supply...even if 4000 btc more sell still not 1,000,000 total...supply...

We can't calculate the exact supply now because we don't know the bonuses distribution in the total collected amount of BTC.
Why are the total supply numbers so important for you?

We know the bonus distribution.
2500 BTC sold at 30% = 325,000
175 BTC sold at 20% so far = 21,000
12% for dev + adoption + bounties = 41,520
Total right now = 387,520

It's important for valuation. Unless a lot more sells this is way under priced.
SpacemanOne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 101

icowidgets.com


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 03:26:32 PM
 #1685

With what sold til now if sale ended today would be 358,907 TIME...total...supply...even if 4000 btc more sell still not 1,000,000 total...supply...

We can't calculate the exact supply now because we don't know the bonuses distribution in the total collected amount of BTC.
Why are the total supply numbers so important for you?

We know the bonus distribution.
2500 BTC sold at 30% = 325,000
175 BTC sold at 20% so far = 21,000
12% for dev + adoption + bounties = 41,520
Total right now = 387,520

It's important for valuation. Unless a lot more sells this is way under priced.


Did you include the unconfirmed transactions with a timestamp before 23:59 to the 2500 BTC? How did you find them? The ICO counter is updated with a delay.

Can you please explain how you measure if it's underpriced or not?

ICOwidgets.com - ICO's and Their Ratings
Hoganye
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 625
Merit: 501


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 03:39:36 PM
 #1686

Did you include the unconfirmed transactions with a timestamp before 23:59 to the 2500 BTC? How did you find them? The ICO counter is updated with a delay.

Can you please explain how you measure if it's underpriced or not?

I included what the dev team said the total was in first 24hrs. Then added what raised since. Supply is a big factor in valuation. This is why doge is worth 26 satoshi because there are 100 billion of them. If doge were 8$ each it would be 67 times bitcoins market cap for example. TIME also earns LH fee and tx fees which will be much larger with such small supply.

Rols
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 636
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 03:41:33 PM
 #1687

This is not legit in australia or most other countries in the world. People that have worked even just one day in their lives knows that.  Grin
someonesomeone
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 933
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 03:42:36 PM
 #1688

Thanks, that was quick! Smiley

@Chronobank_Community I made a mistake and did a double entry for the signature campaign. The first time I clicked the wrong status. I see that they are both listed on the spreadsheet where you can check your approval process so please remove my wrong entry (where it says Legendary status). Thanks!

Got it. Thank you.
rezilient
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 19, 2016, 03:48:54 PM
 #1689

Talk about living under a rock, I've only just seen this, shame I never got the first day bonus though. Looking good on the face of it.

You don't pay enough.
xcajun21
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 252


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 03:55:03 PM
 #1690

I did a similar thing.  Now I am twice on the spreadsheet.  First I opted for avatar,  then I found out I need upgrade of rank.  So I added again my name on the sheet without avatar this time.  

Thanks, that was quick! Smiley

@Chronobank_Community I made a mistake and did a double entry for the signature campaign. The first time I clicked the wrong status. I see that they are both listed on the spreadsheet where you can check your approval process so please remove my wrong entry (where it says Legendary status). Thanks!

Got it. Thank you.
bezbezbez
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 367
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 04:07:19 PM
 #1691

You need to check everything with Ahmed i think.
SpacemanOne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 101

icowidgets.com


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 04:15:53 PM
 #1692


Can you please explain how you measure if it's underpriced or not?

Supply is a big factor in valuation. This is why doge is worth 26 satoshi because there are 100 billion of them. If doge were 8$ each it would be 67 times bitcoins market cap for example. TIME also earns LH fee and tx fees which will be much larger with such small supply.



Why does it matter doge costs 26 satoshi each? 100 doges cost 2600 satoshi, 100 mln. doges cost 27 BTC. I can call 100 mln doges 'superdoge' and say 1 superdoge costs 27 BTC. WOW! Is 1 superdoge overpriced?

The TIME tokens are divisible units. So I can say 0.000001 TIME = 1 microTIME, for example. So the total supply will be about 360,000,000,000 microTIMEs. Is it underpriced or overpriced? And there are much more digits in 1 TIME than 6, at least 18, i.e. one can transfer as much as 0.000000000000000001 TIME.


ICOwidgets.com - ICO's and Their Ratings
yhlsqj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 04:19:04 PM
 #1693


Can you please explain how you measure if it's underpriced or not?

Supply is a big factor in valuation. This is why doge is worth 26 satoshi because there are 100 billion of them. If doge were 8$ each it would be 67 times bitcoins market cap for example. TIME also earns LH fee and tx fees which will be much larger with such small supply.



Why does it matter doge costs 26 satoshi each? 100 doges cost 2600 satoshi, 100 mln. doges cost 27 BTC. I can call 100 mln doges 'superdoge' and say 1 superdoge costs 27 BTC. WOW! Is 1 superdoge overpriced?

The TIME tokens are divisible units. So I can say 0.000001 TIME = 1 microTIME, for example. So the total supply will be about 360,000,000,000 microTIMEs. Is it underpriced or overpriced? And there are much more digits in 1 TIME than 6, at least 18, i.e. one can transfer as much as 0.000000000000000001 TIME.



Crypto is not like your way, people will be scared by 0.01 btc after hitting on exchanges, I prefer TIME has 100M total suppley and each is worth 50k sat(50k btc market cap), 0.01 btc is too expensive and hardly be profitable, high price scares people to trade.

                                  ▄▄
                                ▄████▄
                              ▄████████▄
              ▄             ▄████████████▄
            ▄███▄         ▄████████████████▄
          ▄███████▄     ▄████████████████████▄
        ▄███████████▄ ▄████████████████████████▄
      ▄██████████████████████████████████████████▄
    ▄██████████████████████████████████████████████▄
  ▄██████████████████████████████████████████████████▄
▄██████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄
▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀
  ▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████▀
    ▀██████████████████████████████████████████████▀
      ▀██████████████████████████████████████████▀
        ▀███████████▀ ▀████████████████████████▀
          ▀███████▀     ▀████████████████████▀
            ▀███▀         ▀████████████████▀
              ▀             ▀████████████▀
                              ▀████████▀
                                ▀████▀
                                  ▀▀




MICROMONEY

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██


MicroMoney for People & Big Data for Business

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██


Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn


Reddit
Medium
Telegram
SpacemanOne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 101

icowidgets.com


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 04:30:39 PM
 #1694


Can you please explain how you measure if it's underpriced or not?

Supply is a big factor in valuation. This is why doge is worth 26 satoshi because there are 100 billion of them. If doge were 8$ each it would be 67 times bitcoins market cap for example. TIME also earns LH fee and tx fees which will be much larger with such small supply.



Why does it matter doge costs 26 satoshi each? 100 doges cost 2600 satoshi, 100 mln. doges cost 27 BTC. I can call 100 mln doges 'superdoge' and say 1 superdoge costs 27 BTC. WOW! Is 1 superdoge overpriced?

The TIME tokens are divisible units. So I can say 0.000001 TIME = 1 microTIME, for example. So the total supply will be about 360,000,000,000 microTIMEs. Is it underpriced or overpriced? And there are much more digits in 1 TIME than 6, at least 18, i.e. one can transfer as much as 0.000000000000000001 TIME.



Crypto is not like your way, people will be scared by 0.01 btc after hitting on exchanges, I prefer TIME has 100M total suppley and each is worth 50k sat(50k btc market cap), 0.01 btc is too expensive and hardly be profitable, high price scares people to trade.

Still don't understand why people should be scared to by 1 TIME for 0.01 BTC. The total supply is about $2.1 mln now. What's wrong with purchasing 0.01 or 0.00001 TIME?
What do you mean by 'profitable'?
Strange but people are not afraid to buy 1 BTC for about $800 or 1 DASH for $10 or even 1 zcash for $33. Why?

ICOwidgets.com - ICO's and Their Ratings
Chronobank (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1081
Merit: 251


Formerly known as Chronobank, now Chrono.tech


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 05:43:30 PM
 #1695

Visit our youtube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTo65YisnLqmbDcCoWyktnQ?view_as=public



Cassius
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 05:48:06 PM
 #1696

Yes, strange that people have this approach that a higher-valued crypto in BTC is less desirable, even if market cap is still low.
bezbezbez
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 367
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 05:55:10 PM
 #1697

Yes, strange that people have this approach that a higher-valued crypto in BTC is less desirable, even if market cap is still low.

Hello, Cassius!
Nice to meet you here!
Chronobank (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1081
Merit: 251


Formerly known as Chronobank, now Chrono.tech


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 06:00:05 PM
 #1698

Yes, strange that people have this approach that a higher-valued crypto in BTC is less desirable, even if market cap is still low.

For me, it was a mystery too

Chronobank (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1081
Merit: 251


Formerly known as Chronobank, now Chrono.tech


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 06:06:40 PM
 #1699

We have 1000 ICO participants!


bezbezbez
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 367
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 06:17:48 PM
 #1700

We have 1000 ICO participants!



Great start!
Pages: « 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 ... 422 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!