[ANN][BCC] Bitconnect Coin - Decentralized Cryptocurrency

[fortunecrypto]

I agree. We can all see for ourselves in less than a week. Those who believed, invested. Those who doubts the project, naturally wouldn't invest. As for me, I always think, "Nothing ventured, nothing gained."
If it does turn out to be a scam, as some people are loudly saying, then I got no one to be blame but myself. (I'll be waiting to see who'll be the first to say "I told you so!" then. )

If this was released most of those bonus would be dumped and highly likely it will be trading below ICO price but what the heck this wont even launch and you guys got duped big time.. The red flags are raised and you still ventured into something that has a BIG RED SCAM in it.

*edit

Oh wait you are getting paid, you have nothing to lose but helping them to scam people.

If you think this is scam then there is a section for this I challenge you to open for this coin,if you are indeed that serious, I think you are not really serious on this one,you open one for mentrio then do it with this one and let's see,who's going to be in trouble.

I think he will not because he is not an investor,only an investor can do that,he is a trying hard investigator when he first post on this section calling every body idiot,fuck,bitches and other bad names I am tempted to post him on meta section and reputation,at least he is not now but if he does it again let's report this guy,this guy don't have the rights to disrespect anybody here..

[1715179173]

1715179173

[1715179173]

1715179173

[1715179173]

1715179173

[yhlsqj]

I agree. We can all see for ourselves in less than a week. Those who believed, invested. Those who doubts the project, naturally wouldn't invest. As for me, I always think, "Nothing ventured, nothing gained."
If it does turn out to be a scam, as some people are loudly saying, then I got no one to be blame but myself. (I'll be waiting to see who'll be the first to say "I told you so!" then. )

If this was released most of those bonus would be dumped and highly likely it will be trading below ICO price but what the heck this wont even launch and you guys got duped big time.. The red flags are raised and you still ventured into something that has a BIG RED SCAM in it.

*edit

Oh wait you are getting paid, you have nothing to lose but helping them to scam people.

Some people are made to do this. You will ask if they are possessed with the devil or paid to be noisome. Go find out, they either not raised with a father figure or fed by a mother. There are polite ways to handle everything that's why when power gets in their hands, they call it a wrong hand. You will know how infuriating it will be for you to give birth to child that looks exactly like you. In my 4 months of being on this forum, Have seen a better prepared projects failed, so it is not about the preparation. Beside failing is part of life, If  he fails with this he can still do a better but what have you done with insulting existence. You have just turn his thread into unnecessary hot zone. Take your time and be responsible.

Well talking to you is pointless. You are happy getting paid to shill for an obvious scam
Here is a tip though take your time and research something if its a scam or not cos im sure you are not going to take the responsibility when others are getting scammed

It is said that they have run lending platform for 9 months, so I consider it is not a scam. I think they will do long term business. AFAIK, the ICO entends to 28th of this month. I hopt this is a long run and honest project.

[xneoenx]

So to conclude, for those reading this thread and new comers here is a quick summary :-

The below are the points raised by either one or multiple members / investors (Full disclaimer : I am an investor in their lending platform)

1) No escrow account for their claimed 1400 BTC Investment. : Dev's Official Answer : No answer or Escrow is not required. (Read however you like)
2) Earnings from their Bitconnect Lending Platform has been auto converted to BCC coins without consent or option to withdraw from original deal (Used to be BTC withdrawals) : Dev's Official Answer : No Answer.
3) Address / Company Proof of existence : Dev's official answer : No answer.
4) Exchange Listing of BCC Coin : Will be in place by Jan 10th.*
5) ICO was extended by 10 days. Reason quoted officially was "Due to christmas and new year holidays".

Those are the 5 points that I could pick up.
The way I look at it, they are using some of their earnings from members lending platform account and terming those as "investments" which is a part of the 1400 BTC that is claimed (I am speculating). Hence no requirement for escrow.

*Original exchange List date was supposed to be in Dec, however, Bittrex pulled out. No comment from BitTrex on the "Why's".

Some of the ones that are defending BCC, are being paid to do it, via campaign managers as part of their ongoing promotion. Other supporters include investors and onlookers.

Those that are claiming this ICO / BCC is a Scam are onlookers, investors, doomsayers.

Last response from Dev was a few days back.

Please feel free to correct the above. But keep answers either concise or in brackets specify if its proved, claimed or speculated.

[cyrixcer]

So to conclude, for those reading this thread and new comers here is a quick summary :-

The below are the points raised by either one or multiple members / investors (Full disclaimer : I am an investor in their lending platform)

1) No escrow account for their claimed 1400 BTC Investment. : Dev's Official Answer : No answer or Escrow is not required. (Read however you like)
2) Earnings from their Bitconnect Lending Platform has been auto converted to BCC coins without consent or option to withdraw from original deal (Used to be BTC withdrawals) : Dev's Official Answer : No Answer.
3) Address / Company Proof of existence : Dev's official answer : No answer.
4) Exchange Listing of BCC Coin : Will be in place by Jan 10th.*
5) ICO was extended by 10 days. Reason quoted officially was "Due to christmas and new year holidays".

Those are the 5 points that I could pick up.
The way I look at it, they are using some of their earnings from members lending platform account and terming those as "investments" which is a part of the 1400 BTC that is claimed (I am speculating). Hence no requirement for escrow.

*Original exchange List date was supposed to be in Dec, however, Bittrex pulled out. No comment from BitTrex on the "Why's".

Some of the ones that are defending BCC, are being paid to do it, via campaign managers as part of their ongoing promotion. Other supporters include investors and onlookers.

Those that are claiming this ICO / BCC is a Scam are onlookers, investors, doomsayers.

Last response from Dev was a few days back.

Please feel free to correct the above. But keep answers either concise or in brackets specify if its proved, claimed or speculated.

The only answer of so many things: scam, pathetic scammer..

[PikachuYou]

So to conclude, for those reading this thread and new comers here is a quick summary :-

The below are the points raised by either one or multiple members / investors (Full disclaimer : I am an investor in their lending platform)

1) No escrow account for their claimed 1400 BTC Investment. : Dev's Official Answer : No answer or Escrow is not required. (Read however you like)
2) Earnings from their Bitconnect Lending Platform has been auto converted to BCC coins without consent or option to withdraw from original deal (Used to be BTC withdrawals) : Dev's Official Answer : No Answer.
3) Address / Company Proof of existence : Dev's official answer : No answer.
4) Exchange Listing of BCC Coin : Will be in place by Jan 10th.*
5) ICO was extended by 10 days. Reason quoted officially was "Due to christmas and new year holidays".

Those are the 5 points that I could pick up.
The way I look at it, they are using some of their earnings from members lending platform account and terming those as "investments" which is a part of the 1400 BTC that is claimed (I am speculating). Hence no requirement for escrow.

*Original exchange List date was supposed to be in Dec, however, Bittrex pulled out. No comment from BitTrex on the "Why's".

Some of the ones that are defending BCC, are being paid to do it, via campaign managers as part of their ongoing promotion. Other supporters include investors and onlookers.

Those that are claiming this ICO / BCC is a Scam are onlookers, investors, doomsayers.

Last response from Dev was a few days back.

Please feel free to correct the above. But keep answers either concise or in brackets specify if its proved, claimed or speculated.

The only answer of so many things: scam, pathetic scammer..

be careful.

don't say it's a scam.

you will be accused of being a hater.

 

[coin-investor]

So to conclude, for those reading this thread and new comers here is a quick summary :-

The below are the points raised by either one or multiple members / investors (Full disclaimer : I am an investor in their lending platform)

1) No escrow account for their claimed 1400 BTC Investment. : Dev's Official Answer : No answer or Escrow is not required. (Read however you like)
2) Earnings from their Bitconnect Lending Platform has been auto converted to BCC coins without consent or option to withdraw from original deal (Used to be BTC withdrawals) : Dev's Official Answer : No Answer.
3) Address / Company Proof of existence : Dev's official answer : No answer.
4) Exchange Listing of BCC Coin : Will be in place by Jan 10th.*
5) ICO was extended by 10 days. Reason quoted officially was "Due to christmas and new year holidays".

Those are the 5 points that I could pick up.
The way I look at it, they are using some of their earnings from members lending platform account and terming those as "investments" which is a part of the 1400 BTC that is claimed (I am speculating). Hence no requirement for escrow.

*Original exchange List date was supposed to be in Dec, however, Bittrex pulled out. No comment from BitTrex on the "Why's".

Some of the ones that are defending BCC, are being paid to do it, via campaign managers as part of their ongoing promotion. Other supporters include investors and onlookers.

Those that are claiming this ICO / BCC is a Scam are onlookers, investors, doomsayers.

Last response from Dev was a few days back.

Please feel free to correct the above. But keep answers either concise or in brackets specify if its proved, claimed or speculated.

I am not paid to post here because I am in another campaign I just made a small investment here,but honestly I  seldom see a coin that is highly advertise,have seen it on google ads on facebook ads and they are getting new members,try to register and check the inside this is a very young coin compare to other coin,that went off this is a much better one..This is a fact you cannot see the two sides without investing if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill..

[nezto77]

So to conclude, for those reading this thread and new comers here is a quick summary :-

The below are the points raised by either one or multiple members / investors (Full disclaimer : I am an investor in their lending platform)

1) No escrow account for their claimed 1400 BTC Investment. : Dev's Official Answer : No answer or Escrow is not required. (Read however you like)
2) Earnings from their Bitconnect Lending Platform has been auto converted to BCC coins without consent or option to withdraw from original deal (Used to be BTC withdrawals) : Dev's Official Answer : No Answer.
3) Address / Company Proof of existence : Dev's official answer : No answer.
4) Exchange Listing of BCC Coin : Will be in place by Jan 10th.*
5) ICO was extended by 10 days. Reason quoted officially was "Due to christmas and new year holidays".

Those are the 5 points that I could pick up.
The way I look at it, they are using some of their earnings from members lending platform account and terming those as "investments" which is a part of the 1400 BTC that is claimed (I am speculating). Hence no requirement for escrow.

*Original exchange List date was supposed to be in Dec, however, Bittrex pulled out. No comment from BitTrex on the "Why's".

Some of the ones that are defending BCC, are being paid to do it, via campaign managers as part of their ongoing promotion. Other supporters include investors and onlookers.

Those that are claiming this ICO / BCC is a Scam are onlookers, investors, doomsayers.

Last response from Dev was a few days back.

Please feel free to correct the above. But keep answers either concise or in brackets specify if its proved, claimed or speculated.

I never asked to be paid on this project, because I have some bcc mining results from the pool. but I would appreciate a project.

[xneoenx]

I am not paid to post here because I am in another campaign I just made a small investment here,but honestly I  seldom see a coin that is highly advertise,have seen it on google ads on facebook ads and they are getting new members,try to register and check the inside this is a very young coin compare to other coin,that went off this is a much better one..This is a fact you cannot see the two sides without investing if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill..

Bub, not sure if that post is for me or not. I am not saying they are a scam or not a scam. I just summarised what was mentioned in the past 28 pages. If you want me to include :-

6) They have a huge marketting budget compared to other coins therefore they may be better than other coins.

^ This is a speculatory / claimed statement. Enron had a pretty good marketting budget. So does Coca Cola / Pepsi / Tesla. Heck even God has a marketting budget. But the best / absolute / ultimate marketting budgets are from Ponzi Schemes. Again, to emphasize, marketting budget to evaluate a coin, may have some merit but its not something that is critical in its survival. If you still feel it must be included, I will include it as a foot note, along with the other speculatory points, as a future post tomorrow.

Also to clarify, I mentioned Some are paid to post positive / neutral messages. "Some" doesn't imply "All", nor does it mean you need to disclose if you are or arent. Again, its based on the summary of the past 28 pages. You / others disclosing it wont make a difference to that statement. As long as there exists a "Some" who are paid to support it, the statement holds true, till EVERYONE supporting the coin, aren't paid to do it. Even then, it will be moved to a historical statement as "Some used to be paid to support this coin".

Finally regarding the if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill.., I was forced to invest without consent just like so many other investors. Read point 2. Which is what raised a few red flags.

Dont mean to offend anyone here. Buts lets be constructive and list questions / answers / red flags / observations as either claims, speculations or proofs. If we intend to bash this coin or support it.

[coin-investor]

I am not paid to post here because I am in another campaign I just made a small investment here,but honestly I  seldom see a coin that is highly advertise,have seen it on google ads on facebook ads and they are getting new members,try to register and check the inside this is a very young coin compare to other coin,that went off this is a much better one..This is a fact you cannot see the two sides without investing if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill..

Bub, not sure if that post is for me or not. I am not saying they are a scam or not a scam. I just summarised what was mentioned in the past 28 pages. If you want me to include :-

6) They have a huge marketting budget compared to other coins therefore they may be better than other coins.

^ This is a speculatory / claimed statement. Enron had a pretty good marketting budget. So does Coca Cola / Pepsi / Tesla. Heck even God has a marketting budget. But the best / absolute / ultimate marketting budgets are from Ponzi Schemes. Again, to emphasize, marketting budget to evaluate a coin, may have some merit but its not something that is critical in its survival. If you still feel it must be included, I will include it as a foot note, along with the other speculatory points, as a future post tomorrow.

Also to clarify, I mentioned Some are paid to post positive / neutral messages. "Some" doesn't imply "All", nor does it mean you need to disclose if you are or arent. Again, its based on the summary of the past 28 pages. You / others disclosing it wont make a difference to that statement. As long as there exists a "Some" who are paid to support it, the statement holds true, till EVERYONE supporting the coin, aren't paid to do it. Even then, it will be moved to a historical statement as "Some used to be paid to support this coin".

Finally regarding the if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill.., I was forced to invest without consent just like so many other investors. Read point 2. Which is what raised a few red flags.

Dont mean to offend anyone here. Buts lets be constructive and list questions / answers / red flags / observations as either claims, speculations or proofs. If we intend to bash this coin or support it.

All of these things can be proved once they failed to get into a popular exchanges and the price did not reflect on what showing on their dashboard it boils down to this two,not in your analysis or anyone's claim or assumption,anyway this is a speculative investment we will see their strong point on exchanges.

[xneoenx]

All of these things can be proved once they failed to get into a popular exchanges and the price did not reflect on what showing on their dashboard it boils down to this two,not in your analysis or anyone's claim or assumption,anyway this is a speculative investment we will see their strong point on exchanges.

Thank you for your contribution.

I am not analysing anything. Again, to reiterate, I just documented what was said in the past 28 pages. Nothing more, Nothing less. My posting is not to scare anyone away, or attract people. Its just a summary of why there are 28 pages of discussion. Even after it gets listed on exchanges, I will continue updating as necessary, since again, they are questions that have no answers where answers should be provided to potential investors. Weather people take the questions / or lack of answers in relation to their confidence in the coin or not is up to them. I dont gain or loose anything from it.

Thanks!

[electronicash]

I am not paid to post here because I am in another campaign I just made a small investment here,but honestly I  seldom see a coin that is highly advertise,have seen it on google ads on facebook ads and they are getting new members,try to register and check the inside this is a very young coin compare to other coin,that went off this is a much better one..This is a fact you cannot see the two sides without investing if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill..

Bub, not sure if that post is for me or not. I am not saying they are a scam or not a scam. I just summarised what was mentioned in the past 28 pages. If you want me to include :-

6) They have a huge marketting budget compared to other coins therefore they may be better than other coins.

^ This is a speculatory / claimed statement. Enron had a pretty good marketting budget. So does Coca Cola / Pepsi / Tesla. Heck even God has a marketting budget. But the best / absolute / ultimate marketting budgets are from Ponzi Schemes. Again, to emphasize, marketting budget to evaluate a coin, may have some merit but its not something that is critical in its survival. If you still feel it must be included, I will include it as a foot note, along with the other speculatory points, as a future post tomorrow.

Also to clarify, I mentioned Some are paid to post positive / neutral messages. "Some" doesn't imply "All", nor does it mean you need to disclose if you are or arent. Again, its based on the summary of the past 28 pages. You / others disclosing it wont make a difference to that statement. As long as there exists a "Some" who are paid to support it, the statement holds true, till EVERYONE supporting the coin, aren't paid to do it. Even then, it will be moved to a historical statement as "Some used to be paid to support this coin".

Finally regarding the if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill.., I was forced to invest without consent just like so many other investors. Read point 2. Which is what raised a few red flags.

Dont mean to offend anyone here. Buts lets be constructive and list questions / answers / red flags / observations as either claims, speculations or proofs. If we intend to bash this coin or support it.

All of these things can be proved once they failed to get into a popular exchanges and the price did not reflect on what showing on their dashboard it boils down to this two,not in your analysis or anyone's claim or assumption,anyway this is a speculative investment we will see their strong point on exchanges.

and you want people to first be a victim before they realize their money were sent as donation instead of an investment?
we're all making this hard for anyone here for you are not making this forum any better. ITS AN OBVIOUS SCAM LIKE THE REST of the DEV TEAM that runs after ICO.

if they don't run, they list the coin on exchange, dump how much they got and run. its the same thing as scamming still.

if they turn out to be scam, these signature campaign participants won't be paid as well. if the rest of you guys joined this campaign since the start, well, i'm sorry to say. this is a scam.

[Fobos2017]

Net hash 5,711.49 MH/s , 3 users mining with 5 G .Question for these 3 persons why you overpaid your mining costs ? Mine all with 200 300 MH/s and you will get same amount of coins ,but cheaper.Why you race with eachother that makes no sense.

[Potent]

I want to mine but i am not sure how can exchange it?

[malcovixeffect]

I agree. We can all see for ourselves in less than a week. Those who believed, invested. Those who doubts the project, naturally wouldn't invest. As for me, I always think, "Nothing ventured, nothing gained."
If it does turn out to be a scam, as some people are loudly saying, then I got no one to be blame but myself. (I'll be waiting to see who'll be the first to say "I told you so!" then. )

If this was released most of those bonus would be dumped and highly likely it will be trading below ICO price but what the heck this wont even launch and you guys got duped big time.. The red flags are raised and you still ventured into something that has a BIG RED SCAM in it.

*edit

Oh wait you are getting paid, you have nothing to lose but helping them to scam people.

Some people are made to do this. You will ask if they are possessed with the devil or paid to be noisome. Go find out, they either not raised with a father figure or fed by a mother. There are polite ways to handle everything that's why when power gets in their hands, they call it a wrong hand. You will know how infuriating it will be for you to give birth to child that looks exactly like you. In my 4 months of being on this forum, Have seen a better prepared projects failed, so it is not about the preparation. Beside failing is part of life, If  he fails with this he can still do a better but what have you done with insulting existence. You have just turn his thread into unnecessary hot zone. Take your time and be responsible.

Well talking to you is pointless. You are happy getting paid to shill for an obvious scam
Here is a tip though take your time and research something if its a scam or not cos im sure you are not going to take the responsibility when others are getting scammed

It is said that they have run lending platform for 9 months, so I consider it is not a scam. I think they will do long term business. AFAIK, the ICO entends to 28th of this month. I hopt this is a long run and honest project.

Can you post proof that they have been in the lending business? No, proof? Do you really believe that 9 mos bullshit?

[fortunecrypto]

I am not paid to post here because I am in another campaign I just made a small investment here,but honestly I  seldom see a coin that is highly advertise,have seen it on google ads on facebook ads and they are getting new members,try to register and check the inside this is a very young coin compare to other coin,that went off this is a much better one..This is a fact you cannot see the two sides without investing if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill..

Bub, not sure if that post is for me or not. I am not saying they are a scam or not a scam. I just summarised what was mentioned in the past 28 pages. If you want me to include :-

6) They have a huge marketting budget compared to other coins therefore they may be better than other coins.

^ This is a speculatory / claimed statement. Enron had a pretty good marketting budget. So does Coca Cola / Pepsi / Tesla. Heck even God has a marketting budget. But the best / absolute / ultimate marketting budgets are from Ponzi Schemes. Again, to emphasize, marketting budget to evaluate a coin, may have some merit but its not something that is critical in its survival. If you still feel it must be included, I will include it as a foot note, along with the other speculatory points, as a future post tomorrow.

Also to clarify, I mentioned Some are paid to post positive / neutral messages. "Some" doesn't imply "All", nor does it mean you need to disclose if you are or arent. Again, its based on the summary of the past 28 pages. You / others disclosing it wont make a difference to that statement. As long as there exists a "Some" who are paid to support it, the statement holds true, till EVERYONE supporting the coin, aren't paid to do it. Even then, it will be moved to a historical statement as "Some used to be paid to support this coin".

Finally regarding the if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill.., I was forced to invest without consent just like so many other investors. Read point 2. Which is what raised a few red flags.

Dont mean to offend anyone here. Buts lets be constructive and list questions / answers / red flags / observations as either claims, speculations or proofs. If we intend to bash this coin or support it.

All of these things can be proved once they failed to get into a popular exchanges and the price did not reflect on what showing on their dashboard it boils down to this two,not in your analysis or anyone's claim or assumption,anyway this is a speculative investment we will see their strong point on exchanges.

and you want people to first be a victim before they realize their money were sent as donation instead of an investment?
we're all making this hard for anyone here for you are not making this forum any better. ITS AN OBVIOUS SCAM LIKE THE REST of the DEV TEAM that runs after ICO.

if they don't run, they list the coin on exchange, dump how much they got and run. its the same thing as scamming still.

if they turn out to be scam, these signature campaign participants won't be paid as well. if the rest of you guys joined this campaign since the start, well, i'm sorry to say. this is a scam.

No please don't spread lies I just got my payment yesterday and everybody who participated in this campaign,payment is always on time and and the dev is generous this is to me one of the highest sig campaign of any coin,I invest half of my earnings from buying Bitconnectcoin,I'm supporting my investment .

[electronicash]

I am not paid to post here because I am in another campaign I just made a small investment here,but honestly I  seldom see a coin that is highly advertise,have seen it on google ads on facebook ads and they are getting new members,try to register and check the inside this is a very young coin compare to other coin,that went off this is a much better one..This is a fact you cannot see the two sides without investing if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill..

Bub, not sure if that post is for me or not. I am not saying they are a scam or not a scam. I just summarised what was mentioned in the past 28 pages. If you want me to include :-

6) They have a huge marketting budget compared to other coins therefore they may be better than other coins.

^ This is a speculatory / claimed statement. Enron had a pretty good marketting budget. So does Coca Cola / Pepsi / Tesla. Heck even God has a marketting budget. But the best / absolute / ultimate marketting budgets are from Ponzi Schemes. Again, to emphasize, marketting budget to evaluate a coin, may have some merit but its not something that is critical in its survival. If you still feel it must be included, I will include it as a foot note, along with the other speculatory points, as a future post tomorrow.

Also to clarify, I mentioned Some are paid to post positive / neutral messages. "Some" doesn't imply "All", nor does it mean you need to disclose if you are or arent. Again, its based on the summary of the past 28 pages. You / others disclosing it wont make a difference to that statement. As long as there exists a "Some" who are paid to support it, the statement holds true, till EVERYONE supporting the coin, aren't paid to do it. Even then, it will be moved to a historical statement as "Some used to be paid to support this coin".

Finally regarding the if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill.., I was forced to invest without consent just like so many other investors. Read point 2. Which is what raised a few red flags.

Dont mean to offend anyone here. Buts lets be constructive and list questions / answers / red flags / observations as either claims, speculations or proofs. If we intend to bash this coin or support it.

All of these things can be proved once they failed to get into a popular exchanges and the price did not reflect on what showing on their dashboard it boils down to this two,not in your analysis or anyone's claim or assumption,anyway this is a speculative investment we will see their strong point on exchanges.

and you want people to first be a victim before they realize their money were sent as donation instead of an investment?
we're all making this hard for anyone here for you are not making this forum any better. ITS AN OBVIOUS SCAM LIKE THE REST of the DEV TEAM that runs after ICO.

if they don't run, they list the coin on exchange, dump how much they got and run. its the same thing as scamming still.

if they turn out to be scam, these signature campaign participants won't be paid as well. if the rest of you guys joined this campaign since the start, well, i'm sorry to say. this is a scam.

No please don't spread lies I just got my payment yesterday and everybody who participated in this campaign,payment is always on time and and the dev is generous this is to me one of the highest sig campaign of any coin,I invest half of my earnings from buying Bitconnectcoin,I'm supporting my investment .

of course they'd pay these days just to prove they aren't scam. you can even demand for an upfront fee for a week right now and they'd grant it just to prove they won't be scamming you.  its those investors that aren't getting anything  in the end.  there had been a lot of lies on OP itself but this you can believe!

[fortunecrypto]

I am not paid to post here because I am in another campaign I just made a small investment here,but honestly I  seldom see a coin that is highly advertise,have seen it on google ads on facebook ads and they are getting new members,try to register and check the inside this is a very young coin compare to other coin,that went off this is a much better one..This is a fact you cannot see the two sides without investing if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill..

Bub, not sure if that post is for me or not. I am not saying they are a scam or not a scam. I just summarised what was mentioned in the past 28 pages. If you want me to include :-

6) They have a huge marketting budget compared to other coins therefore they may be better than other coins.

^ This is a speculatory / claimed statement. Enron had a pretty good marketting budget. So does Coca Cola / Pepsi / Tesla. Heck even God has a marketting budget. But the best / absolute / ultimate marketting budgets are from Ponzi Schemes. Again, to emphasize, marketting budget to evaluate a coin, may have some merit but its not something that is critical in its survival. If you still feel it must be included, I will include it as a foot note, along with the other speculatory points, as a future post tomorrow.

Also to clarify, I mentioned Some are paid to post positive / neutral messages. "Some" doesn't imply "All", nor does it mean you need to disclose if you are or arent. Again, its based on the summary of the past 28 pages. You / others disclosing it wont make a difference to that statement. As long as there exists a "Some" who are paid to support it, the statement holds true, till EVERYONE supporting the coin, aren't paid to do it. Even then, it will be moved to a historical statement as "Some used to be paid to support this coin".

Finally regarding the if you think this is a scam then don't invest you have your money,your milk is not yet spill.., I was forced to invest without consent just like so many other investors. Read point 2. Which is what raised a few red flags.

Dont mean to offend anyone here. Buts lets be constructive and list questions / answers / red flags / observations as either claims, speculations or proofs. If we intend to bash this coin or support it.

All of these things can be proved once they failed to get into a popular exchanges and the price did not reflect on what showing on their dashboard it boils down to this two,not in your analysis or anyone's claim or assumption,anyway this is a speculative investment we will see their strong point on exchanges.

and you want people to first be a victim before they realize their money were sent as donation instead of an investment?
we're all making this hard for anyone here for you are not making this forum any better. ITS AN OBVIOUS SCAM LIKE THE REST of the DEV TEAM that runs after ICO.

if they don't run, they list the coin on exchange, dump how much they got and run. its the same thing as scamming still.

if they turn out to be scam, these signature campaign participants won't be paid as well. if the rest of you guys joined this campaign since the start, well, i'm sorry to say. this is a scam.

No please don't spread lies I just got my payment yesterday and everybody who participated in this campaign,payment is always on time and and the dev is generous this is to me one of the highest sig campaign of any coin,I invest half of my earnings from buying Bitconnectcoin,I'm supporting my investment .

of course they'd pay these days just to prove they aren't scam. you can even demand for an upfront fee for a week right now and they'd grant it just to prove they won't be scamming you.  its those investors that aren't getting anything  in the end.  there had been a lot of lies on OP itself but this you can believe!

I'm trying to prove that they are paying you just posted that all those who are into campaign will not get paid,this is one of your lies assumption so far only one investor who complain about the plan and he gets hi sinvestment back upon request..

[malcovixeffect]

I cant wait for this ICO scam to end.

[electronicash]

I'm trying to prove that they are paying you just posted that all those who are into campaign will not get paid,this is one of your lies assumption so far only one investor who complain about the plan and he gets hi sinvestment back upon request..

yeah and i just want to prove they would do anything just to make people think they aren't going to scam. of course you can always support this coin. i will even support you for that so you can earn btc. good thing for you. now go ahead request a fee for a week ahead while they want to prove they aren't scamming you.

we've been accusing OP for being scam and where the hell is he?  you defend them while them laughing, you think them hiding aren't something suspicious?

[xneoenx]

I'm trying to prove that they are paying you just posted that all those who are into campaign will not get paid,this is one of your lies assumption so far only one investor who complain about the plan and he gets hi sinvestment back upon request..

Bud, I am the other investor who invested in the plan, I complained and didnt even get a response. But to be fair, they did pay daily interest as per variance in BTC prices in BTC. The moment they changed to BCC is when I have a problem, that too without prior notice / warning / terms of service changes. Read point 2. Dont you think that is unfair? Had they been transparent and gotten consent from member base and then proceeded, then Point 2 would be invalid. But as it stands, no matter how hard you try to claim otherwise. Fact is fact.

We can spin it all we want, any way we want, all day and night long. But untill those 5 points are addressed, I leave it up to the reader to decide whats going on. I think others should too. No point arguing until we get answers, right? I mean the only person who has the authority ultimately is the dev himself.

Thanks!