☑ [ANN] ☰ [ ICO 06|04|2017 ] ☰ Humaniq — Discover the unbanked

[X-ray]

Article on Nasdaq.com
Humaniq Aims to Tackle Barriers to Economic Inclusion With Blockchain App

Read more: http://bit.ly/2oqGYod

Humaniq will be best project with very big potential of growth so many people will get benefit by using this system in real life. I hope this will expand their services in many part of the world by achieving their targets.

His idea is not makes a sense for me, it looks like the dev still need give more clarification about that thing is happening on the reddit in this time, I mean about some people are declaring humaniq to be the scam ico.
Can you tell me the advantages from humaniq system? because i can't get it.  Most of the altcoin never touch the real life.

[xrealitycheck]

There is existing open source colaboration of Microsoft, Blockstack and uPort that is going for more than a year. They are working on digital identity for people without one and giving them access to bitcoin, etherium whatever. So pretty much the same without new altcoin... more here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-in/blog/what-does-identity-mean-in-today-s-physical-and-digital-world/

[mellorbo]

When this is going to hit exchanges?

Hello, we will start with SpaceBTC and will hit to other exchanges also after ICO will be finished. More details here: http://www.prunderground.com/fintech-startup-humaniq-announces-agreement-with-spacebtc-cryptocurrency-exchange/0088400/

Wow, it would be great for this project to start hitting the exchanges site but i hope this hit those most known exchange sites such as Yobit and Poloniex. But I've heard a new exchange site that just lauch which is YO-Ex.
By the way, thanks for constantly updating the thread for reports and clarification just like what the previous scam accusation you've just resolved.

[Humaniq.co]

One more day to get the 25% bonus tokens.


Dear all,
Our ICO has been running for a week already!

During the short period of time since Dec. 2016 we have achieved some great results and Humaniq`s team has already revealed an astonishing development speed.

We are happy to be surrounded by the people who really care not only about the world’s economy crisis but also about our planet to become a safer place for all of us.

By now we are going to reach our next Crowdsale goal and you are welcome to join Humaniq ICO. You have one more day to get the 25% bonus tokens.
8-14th of April + 25% HMQ Tokens
15-21th of April + 12.5% HMQ Tokens

http://my.humaniq.co

[misterbones]

Investors just be on your toes ........
This is fishy

[ICOcountdown.com]

Response to the post made by Humaniq today.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/64ufyp/emission_due_diligence_for_humaniq/dg8h32e/

1.) Mathematics on caps must be way more clear as to what your top tier cap is. If you have not already worked this cap out I cannot understand how it's viable firstly as a product and as an ICO - even with a flexible cap you must work out forward caps.

2.) Who holds the address that can deploy more tokens?

3.) Who holds the address that can stop transfer of tokens and otherwise?

4.) Who and what specific definitions are these accounts under - is it one person of multiple people?

5.) Who is auditing this cap scale if there is no scale in the first place. Please break down in simple mathematical terms what are you scales and project scales.

6.) What are the current problems in this smart contract that needs changing apart from the issues that were pointed out? For you to transfer and migrate to a new smart contract.

7.) Does the above create a new level of token issuance?

8.) Knee Jerk reactions are not a part of the due diligence process - what is part of due diligence is processing the smart contract you and your team made.

9.) With regard to offchain transactions how is this verified if you are not using the blockchain technology itself? Again questions must be asked about this.

10.) Why is there a switch in the emission address? What is the rationale for this - this address should be owned by the team or otherwise - that is why who holds it is extremely important.

11.) No-one has framed you as malicious or untrustworthy, the due diligence has been done on code. Code is what you create it is not about personal opinion or otherwise. Personally I really liked the Humaniq project until this issue was brought to me. The reason code is open source is because there should be audits on it to protect the crypto community / your userbase and otherwise.

12.) If you want to go with a centralized distribution model thats fine with complete control of your team and organizational members - but please announce this because that in itself is not decentralization.

13.) Why not use a independant escrow for cap baselines.

14.) Why no 3rd party audit of this smart contract before launching and otherwise?

I am sorry if these questions offend. I love the Ethereum community and what people are building. I am sorry if you had people ask you serious questions about distribution and otherwise - these are fair asks nothing about previous due diligence or users asking questions is unfair in a decentralized community.

[misterbones]

Response to the post made by Humaniq today.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/64ufyp/emission_due_diligence_for_humaniq/dg8h32e/

1.) Mathematics on caps must be way more clear as to what your top tier cap is. If you have not already worked this cap out I cannot understand how it's viable firstly as a product and as an ICO - even with a flexible cap you must work out forward caps.

2.) Who holds the address that can deploy more tokens?

3.) Who holds the address that can stop transfer of tokens and otherwise?

4.) Who and what specific definitions are these accounts under - is it one person of multiple people?

5.) Who is auditing this cap scale if there is no scale in the first place. Please break down in simple mathematical terms what are you scales and project scales.

6.) What are the current problems in this smart contract that needs changing apart from the issues that were pointed out? For you to transfer and migrate to a new smart contract.

7.) Does the above create a new level of token issuance?

8.) Knee Jerk reactions are not a part of the due diligence process - what is part of due diligence is processing the smart contract you and your team made.

9.) With regard to offchain transactions how is this verified if you are not using the blockchain technology itself? Again questions must be asked about this.

10.) Why is there a switch in the emission address? What is the rationale for this - this address should be owned by the team or otherwise - that is why who holds it is extremely important.

11.) No-one has framed you as malicious or untrustworthy, the due diligence has been done on code. Code is what you create it is not about personal opinion or otherwise. Personally I really liked the Humaniq project until this issue was brought to me. The reason code is open source is because there should be audits on it to protect the crypto community / your userbase and otherwise.

12.) If you want to go with a centralized distribution model thats fine with complete control of your team and organizational members - but please announce this because that in itself is not decentralization.

13.) Why not use a independant escrow for cap baselines.

14.) Why no 3rd party audit of this smart contract before launching and otherwise?

I am sorry if these questions offend. I love the Ethereum community and what people are building. I am sorry if you had people ask you serious questions about distribution and otherwise - these are fair asks nothing about previous due diligence or users asking questions is unfair in a decentralized community.

HUMANIQ answer these allegations and what you ICOcountdown.com are doing is much appreciated effort .

We need to save our bitcoin community from these scams and scam artists

[graviteta]

I think, this project is not realistic. It wont work on real world. Sorry  Its like a dream

[farosa]

Why This project dont present on other lang? Maybe you need translation bounty campaing?

[Vagnavs]

I believe this is a scam. There was some chat log leaked and talk about scamming.

https://twitter.com/ActualAdviceBTC/status/847767099741057024

[attwoods]

I believe this is a scam. There was some chat log leaked and talk about scamming.

https://twitter.com/ActualAdviceBTC/status/847767099741057024

why you think it is A scam.

[ikm]

The 4k BTC barrage was low. We go very well

[ikm]

It's ridiculous. Let's say scam, do you think idiot enough to make such a conversation on twitter?

Note: every ICO can scam. There is.

[Vagnavs]

It's ridiculous. Let's say scam, do you think idiot enough to make such a conversation on twitter?

Note: every ICO can scam. There is.

The conversation wasn't on twitter. If you look at the screenshots, you can see some of the members from this team discuss the project. But to each their own.. Not touching it after reading that..

Also Icocountdown.com came to a similar conclusion https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/64ufyp/emission_due_diligence_for_humaniq/

[Vagnavs]

It's ridiculous. Let's say scam, do you think idiot enough to make such a conversation on twitter?

Note: every ICO can scam. There is.

Every one is a scam? Okay... Ethereum was an ICO...There's many more, just don't have time to name them all. Good luck with your project

[4emily]

Given that Microsoft etc are already on the case  (https://azure.microsoft.com/en-in/blog/what-does-identity-mean-in-today-s-physical-and-digital-world/) what exactly is Humaniq's "Unique Selling Proposition"?

[JungleOnion]

So can someone explain me how this would actually work. The idea seems very cool and all, but how will you bank the unbanked if the unbanked don't have access to internet, maybe to cellphones, but that is low-tier cellphones of course. I live in Central america, and the target audience for the project, people that live under 2 dollar a day, live in remote places where there's barely any electricity. Ok if the technicalities would be already a struggle, what about the education this people need? In a first world perspective you could think "this project is revolutionary" but in their perspective "I don't trust a phone because I don't know how to use it". How are they even gonna learn and trust your project?

[Humaniq.co]

Humaniq Contest: Best Alternative Slogan (10,000 HMQ)

Humaniq is having a contest for the best alternative slogan
that you don't want to miss out on.

We want everyone participate if you share
our mission and vision as close as we do.

To Join the contest: https://www.facebook.com/humaniq.co/photos/a.541905029351968.1073741828.536426589899812/594085037467300/?type=3&permPage=1

[wolverinex1282]

I think, this project is not realistic. It wont work on real world. Sorry  Its like a dream

wont work? are you certain? you dont even put 1sat and you talk a lot of shit..just go away if you dont believe in this project

[Muro]

They can say everything they want if it is a scam and more but there are 8100 investors and I like the project, I am inside.  

https://richtopia.com/top-lists/top-100-blockchain?utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=post