temmuz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 30, 2017, 03:43:00 PM |
|
The new logo is nicer than before but too plain ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) You have not published a lot of updates, even though the work is intense. Hope will succeed.
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 30, 2017, 03:59:04 PM Last edit: January 30, 2017, 04:10:26 PM by Mooncoin_Foundation |
|
Doing the archive thing for Moonlite, seeing if I got it right. http://archive.is/GMUTAUpdate - I put the archive address into the moonlite explorer and sent the requested 29292632.40392 moon to another address and the transaction has confirmed. Now what? Someone who tried to record the Moonlite command with this MOON address 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ this command was already recorded by CryptoDatabase (see above).
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 30, 2017, 04:05:48 PM |
|
The new logo is nicer than before but too plain ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If you have any idea how to improve it, you're welcome.
|
|
|
|
CryptoDatabase
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1003
https://cryptodatabase.net
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 30, 2017, 04:56:58 PM |
|
http://archive.is/VqEFW has been submitted, TxID: 9deab9d001daa23e3f5dd1d5d726c5fffa46b0a2ce5438487d11ba0e3a63c9f4
|
|
|
|
nico12321
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 16
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 30, 2017, 07:10:45 PM Last edit: January 30, 2017, 07:28:53 PM by nico12321 |
|
Someone who tried to record the Moonlite command with this MOON address 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ this command was already recorded by CryptoDatabase (see above).
I sent 29292632.40392 MOON from address 2SjixsJyViqFYcM92c1PbcFKs2Z2KaWsHh to 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ, but https://bchain.info/MOON/tx/709c1b82cbb3d01ebdbb5ab26b7ab3f2bf064d0a1ac6cb81c8c4b251d21791b1 stated that it was sent 58000000 MOON! What happened? TxID: 709c1b82cbb3d01ebdbb5ab26b7ab3f2bf064d0a1ac6cb81c8c4b251d21791b1
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 30, 2017, 07:53:25 PM Last edit: January 30, 2017, 08:07:32 PM by Mooncoin_Foundation |
|
Someone who tried to record the Moonlite command with this MOON address 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ this command was already recorded by CryptoDatabase (see above).
I sent 29292632.40392 MOON from address 2SjixsJyViqFYcM92c1PbcFKs2Z2KaWsHh to 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ, but https://bchain.info/MOON/tx/709c1b82cbb3d01ebdbb5ab26b7ab3f2bf064d0a1ac6cb81c8c4b251d21791b1 stated that it was sent 58000000 MOON! What happened? TxID: 709c1b82cbb3d01ebdbb5ab26b7ab3f2bf064d0a1ac6cb81c8c4b251d21791b1 It's normal, it is how blockchain works, not only MOON. 58 mil is an output of this transaction, coins sent in one operation 29292632.40392 MOON. Addresses change, but coins are in your wallet. Say you have an address (A) with 5000 coins; and you send 1000 of them to another address (B) you would expect the ledger to show (after the fact): A: 4000 B: 1000 but in fact, it would show: A: 0 C: 4000 (this address is newly created) B: 1000 this is due to the way sends occur - also change addresses. Still if you send from your address to your own address, all 3 addresses A,B,C remain under your control.
|
|
|
|
nico12321
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 16
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 30, 2017, 08:22:42 PM |
|
this is due to the way sends occur - also change addresses. Still if you send from your address to your own address, all 3 addresses A,B,C remain under your control.
Thanks for clarifying!
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 07:32:53 PM |
|
In his 4th report (Case 9:16-cv-80060-KAM Document 99-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017) the Cryptsy Receiver has confirmed that only about 8.42 billion MOON are under his control. The report is available at http://cryptsyreceivership.com.
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 08:27:15 PM Last edit: February 01, 2017, 07:15:58 AM by Mooncoin_Foundation |
|
The exact amount of coins according to the Court report is 8,421,008,915MOON, the balance of 2M5kiseCXp6X5g75ZcWeo3BNsMYJxtDCzq is 8,421,008,915, the last transaction was on 2016-09-20, http://cryptoguru.tk/Address/index.php?Currency=MOON&Address=2M5kiseCXp6X5g75ZcWeo3BNsMYJxtDCzqThus the new report confirms that 2 top rich MOON addresses (Cryptsy-derived) are illegitimate. 2cLG2RzF6rDCtNws6We8o8avXs1grqARHU 2FgWY2MjPn9AG3bhuRLH5mhCKyc17eVHRY Warning: exchanges should not let any deposits from these addresses (they are known and proven to be illegitimate, containing only coins that were illegally obtained), otherwise it can be treated as stolen funds laundering.
|
|
|
|
arcmetal
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 31, 2017, 10:42:42 PM Last edit: January 31, 2017, 11:03:20 PM by arcmetal |
|
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 01, 2017, 07:24:42 AM |
|
The new logo is not crescent like only. It symbolizes an impulse/motion (2 da moon!) and looks like a sail and a spacecraft at the same time. Crescent pictures are not bad, one problem, they are with small details, and when the logo appears in a small size (at exchanges, at Coinmarketcap), the details are not visible and the logo will look like a small picture or small photo, not like a professional logo). All top coins have very simple logos. See them at http://coinmarketcap.com. Waiting for more ideas.
|
|
|
|
CryptoDatabase
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1003
https://cryptodatabase.net
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 01, 2017, 02:14:47 PM |
|
I personally like the current logo better. The proposed new one looks like a kids picture of a hang glider.
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoDatabase
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1003
https://cryptodatabase.net
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 01, 2017, 04:58:13 PM |
|
I personally like the current logo better. The proposed new one looks like a kids picture of a hang glider.
The current one is not bad. There is only one problem with it: it's more like a picture than like a logo. Logos are very simple, very often a logo is just a symbol, not a full-sized picture/photo etc. The purpose of a logo is to create a recognizable brand for a company or product. I'm just saying that the proposed new one doesn't do that. It looks like something I would expect in a kids coloring book or shape set.
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 01, 2017, 06:04:36 PM Last edit: February 01, 2017, 06:47:28 PM by Mooncoin_Foundation |
|
I personally like the current logo better. The proposed new one looks like a kids picture of a hang glider.
The current one is not bad. There is only one problem with it: it's more like a picture than like a logo. Logos are very simple, very often a logo is just a symbol, not a full-sized picture/photo etc. The purpose of a logo is to create a recognizable brand for a company or product. I'm just saying that the proposed new one doesn't do that. It looks like something I would expect in a kids coloring book or shape set. And what about this one ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmooncoin.com%2Ftwitter.png&t=665&c=n44YLF7IgTVmsA) ? It even better fits a kids coloring book and still belongs to a billion dollar company. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmooncoin.com%2Fmoon_new.png&t=665&c=6bJ_fpNzjVsbFQ) it can be easily Moon recognizable (unlike the original logo), but your really have a point, the logo is too plain, people are welcome to improve it.
|
|
|
|
CryptoDatabase
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1003
https://cryptodatabase.net
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 01, 2017, 07:12:35 PM |
|
I personally like the current logo better. The proposed new one looks like a kids picture of a hang glider.
The current one is not bad. There is only one problem with it: it's more like a picture than like a logo. Logos are very simple, very often a logo is just a symbol, not a full-sized picture/photo etc. The purpose of a logo is to create a recognizable brand for a company or product. I'm just saying that the proposed new one doesn't do that. It looks like something I would expect in a kids coloring book or shape set. And what about this one ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmooncoin.com%2Ftwitter.png&t=665&c=n44YLF7IgTVmsA) ? It even better fits a kids coloring book and still belongs to a billion dollar company. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmooncoin.com%2Fmoon_new.png&t=665&c=6bJ_fpNzjVsbFQ) it can be easily Moon recognizable (unlike the original logo), but your really have a point, the logo is too plain, people are welcome to improve it. Twitter is a website where people tweet, it is fitting that a small bird would be their logo. Mooncoin having a moon inside of a coin for a logo is also fitting as that is what it is. However, an abstract image that doesn't resemble a moon in any aspect isn't very fitting to what Mooncoin is. What works for other companies/projects doesn't always work for everyone else. Google is by far the largest of the large and check out their logo. It changes every single day and is far from simple.
|
|
|
|
arcmetal
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2017, 12:55:41 AM |
|
The new logo is not crescent like only. It symbolizes an impulse/motion (2 da moon!) and looks like a sail and a spacecraft at the same time. Crescent pictures are not bad, one problem, they are with small details, and when the logo appears in a small size ... Yep, that's a good point there. The crescent is a good start, so I'm not knocking it. To add to your pile of new ideas for this I started to think along the lines of maybe something that looks like tycho crater. Since that is another "moon" like icon. Then I found this sight with some spacey looking icons at the bottom of the page. I figure something basic, something spacey, something simple is what you may be driving at. https://astrogeology.usgs.gov/search/map/RPIF/Moon/Ranger7/Moon%20Tycho%20Crater%20Rays?open=true... or, any of the outerspace nasa moon logos might offer some interesting ideas: http://pics-about-space.com/nasa-moon-logo?p=1
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2017, 10:46:17 AM |
|
This one looks better, what do you think? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmooncoin.com%2Fmooncoin_new_logo.png&t=665&c=MLwJObLmbpEEGw)
|
|
|
|
polemarhos888
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 499
Merit: 250
To The Moon !
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2017, 11:29:46 AM |
|
This one looks better, what do you think? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmooncoin.com%2Fmooncoin_new_logo.png&t=665&c=MLwJObLmbpEEGw) Good morning from Greece. I think that it's perfect !
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2017, 02:21:46 PM Last edit: February 03, 2017, 11:19:15 AM by Mooncoin_Foundation |
|
And here is a Mooncoin emblem proposal, not for exchanges/coinmarketcap, just for us: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmooncoin.com%2Fin_name_of_peace_and_progress.png&t=665&c=dLZ0Cwgm-A9VGQ) It's not ideal, of course, if someone is a professional designer and can improve it, would be great.
|
|
|
|
|