Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Shogen]

why campains with max 50 posts don't pay more than primedice?

each campaign has its conditions

It really depends on how many constructive post you can make a month, and so people join the sig campaign appropriate for them.

If I am going to take a vacation for weeks, I should join Bitmixer.
If I am going to make 50 constructive posts a month, I would get more in LB (0.1 btc) then in PD (0.05 btc).
If I am going to make 400 constructive posts a month, I should join PD to get 0.4 btc.

[polynesia]

It really depends on how many constructive post you can make a month, and so people join the sig campaign appropriate for them.

If I am going to take a vacation for weeks, I should join Bitmixer.
If I am going to make 50 constructive posts a month, I would get more in LB (0.1 btc) then in PD (0.05 btc).
If I am going to make 400 constructive posts a month, I should join PD to get 0.4 btc.

And also factor in which campaign is more stable.
You wouldn't want your signature campaign to suddenly close down, and find out the others are closed for new entrants.   

[Mitchell]

I have added the PocketRocketsCasino campaign as requested. CodyAlfaridzi, thanks a lot for posting the information with the correct format. Makes it a lot easier for me.
Regarding an Altcoin Overview
If someone wants to make one, please do. However, if you want to use any elements from my topic, please thank me somewhere (since I put a lot of work into it).

[PRC_May]

Thanks @bitcoininformation!

[capoeira]

I have added the PocketRocketsCasino campaign as requested. CodyAlfaridzi, thanks a lot for posting the information with the correct format. Makes it a lot easier for me.
Regarding an Altcoin Overview
If someone wants to make one, please do. However, if you want to use any elements from my topic, please thank me somewhere (since I put a lot of work into it).

I am not seeing demand for it

[faiza1990]

I have added the PocketRocketsCasino campaign as requested. CodyAlfaridzi, thanks a lot for posting the information with the correct format. Makes it a lot easier for me.
Regarding an Altcoin Overview
If someone wants to make one, please do. However, if you want to use any elements from my topic, please thank me somewhere (since I put a lot of work into it).

I am not seeing demand for it

Yes In last one year we have just 2 or 3 campaigns for this but they fail and then never back here on this forum

[freedomno1]

I have added the PocketRocketsCasino campaign as requested. CodyAlfaridzi, thanks a lot for posting the information with the correct format. Makes it a lot easier for me.
Regarding an Altcoin Overview
If someone wants to make one, please do. However, if you want to use any elements from my topic, please thank me somewhere (since I put a lot of work into it).

I am not seeing demand for it

Yes In last one year we have just 2 or 3 campaigns for this but they fail and then never back here on this forum

Well if a decent set of altcoins with trading value show up perhaps but your right I don't see a demand for it, a possible case would be something like Darkcointalk making a sig campaign on bitcointalk but until then I doubt their would be much demand anyways keep enjoying your Vacay resist the stick XD.
Edit: I guess a special qualification might possibly increase that list for example if on an altcoins forums or their sites they had a sig campaign going for their altcoin but I don't track each altcoins messaging board, would be an external reference though.
Kind of if litecointalk ever made a litecoin sig campaign in their services section.

[capoeira]

so you guys think payment is correct? should they pay more? pay less?

[polynesia]

so you guys think payment is correct? should they pay more? pay less?

Depends on the competition.
If there is only one signature campaign, it could get away with paying almost nothing.

[capoeira]

so you guys think payment is correct? should they pay more? pay less?

Depends on the competition.
If there is only one signature campaign, it could get away with paying almost nothing.

I mean form the user's point of view

[u9y42]

so you guys think payment is correct? should they pay more? pay less?

Depends on the competition.
If there is only one signature campaign, it could get away with paying almost nothing.

I'm not sure that's true. I mean, having a paid signature these days will ensure you receive greater attention from mods here, as well as some users/subs ignoring you altogether; I'm not sure most people would go through it, if the rates weren't worth it - at least, I know I wouldn't.

[polynesia]

so you guys think payment is correct? should they pay more? pay less?

Depends on the competition.
If there is only one signature campaign, it could get away with paying almost nothing.

I'm not sure that's true. I mean, having a paid signature these days will ensure you receive greater attention from mods here, as well as some users/subs ignoring you altogether; I'm not sure most people would go through it, if the rates weren't worth it - at least, I know I wouldn't.

Yes, that is true. Some users might think it is not worth their time.
There would be others who think something is better than nothing.

Still, I think new signature campaigns look at what the existing campaigns pay, and then accordingly benchmark their rates.

[jambola2]

It really depends on how many constructive post you can make a month, and so people join the sig campaign appropriate for them.

If I am going to take a vacation for weeks, I should join Bitmixer.
If I am going to make 50 constructive posts a month, I would get more in LB (0.1 btc) then in PD (0.05 btc).
If I am going to make 400 constructive posts a month, I should join PD to get 0.4 btc.

And also factor in which campaign is more stable.
You wouldn't want your signature campaign to suddenly close down, and find out the others are closed for new entrants.   

A lot of campaigns are very stable.
Bitmixer has minimal payments , so I don't see them shutting theirs down anytime soon , the same can be said for Bitcoin-Scratchticket and 777coin.
Most of the closed campaigns like Luckybit have chosen number of participants based on their need , so it is unlikely they will shut down.

Primedice seems the least stable in my mind, with upto 0.48 BTC per person per month and a huge amount of participants.
But they have a reputation for being the longest lived campaign , so it is unlikely they will shut it down. (I'd see further reductions soon though)

[ReBoRn]

It really depends on how many constructive post you can make a month, and so people join the sig campaign appropriate for them.

If I am going to take a vacation for weeks, I should join Bitmixer.
If I am going to make 50 constructive posts a month, I would get more in LB (0.1 btc) then in PD (0.05 btc).
If I am going to make 400 constructive posts a month, I should join PD to get 0.4 btc.

And also factor in which campaign is more stable.
You wouldn't want your signature campaign to suddenly close down, and find out the others are closed for new entrants.   

A lot of campaigns are very stable.
Bitmixer has minimal payments , so I don't see them shutting theirs down anytime soon , the same can be said for Bitcoin-Scratchticket and 777coin.
Most of the closed campaigns like Luckybit have chosen number of participants based on their need , so it is unlikely they will shut down.

Primedice seems the least stable in my mind, with upto 0.48 BTC per person per month and a huge amount of participants.
But they have a reputation for being the longest lived campaign , so it is unlikely they will shut it down. (I'd see further reductions soon though)

If PD is going to reduce its much better then close currently Stunna paying nearly 30 to 35 BTC monthly which is too much and I believe I have never seen any campaign paying like this

[polynesia]

Primedice seems the least stable in my mind, with upto 0.48 BTC per person per month and a huge amount of participants.
But they have a reputation for being the longest lived campaign , so it is unlikely they will shut it down. (I'd see further reductions soon though)

Well, a couple of months ago the maximum was 2.4 BTC per person per month. So to that extent, it has reduced.
However, the number of participants has ballooned.

[capoeira]

BTC 2,4? damn.....i came too late

[williamj2543]

BTC 2,4? damn.....i came too late

2.4 means you have to post 5x more posts than the current limit of 0.48 BTC, meaning you have to posts 2000 posts a month.

[capoeira]

BTC 2,4? damn.....i came too late

2.4 means you have to post 5x more posts than the current limit of 0.48 BTC, meaning you have to posts 2000 posts a month.

hahaha a fulltime-job. i'm glad we have 400 now as limit

[williamj2543]

Maybe 1000 would be nice, but that would just bring a lot of spammers.

[faiza1990]

Maybe 1000 would be nice, but that would just bring a lot of spammers.

Now he is reducing more in near future as bringing pay per activity which give some more tough time for spammers