Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Mitchell]

Might wanna check Bitroulettes campaign out.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=748450.0

It's a bit different, doesn't pay out directly in btc but in shares. First payment in a week will be interesting to see.

I won't add them, because it looks to much like a referral/affiliate thing and I don't not add those to my topic.

bitcoininformation, take note that the OP of the 777Coin ad campaign violates his own rules. Sending you the details through PM.

I have received the details and I will keep a close eye on this campaign. If it happens again I will add an asterisk to their name. I'm afraid that that is all I can do.

[apsvinet]

Might wanna check Bitroulettes campaign out.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=748450.0

It's a bit different, doesn't pay out directly in btc but in shares. First payment in a week will be interesting to see.

I won't add them, because it looks to much like a referral/affiliate thing and I don't not add those to my topic.

bitcoininformation, take note that the OP of the 777Coin ad campaign violates his own rules. Sending you the details through PM.

I have received the details and I will keep a close eye on this campaign. If it happens again I will add an asterisk to their name. I'm afraid that that is all I can do.

It has absolutely nothing to do with affiliates / referrals though? You DO get paid in bitcoins, the only thing that's different is how the individual earnings are calculated.

[Mitchell]

It has absolutely nothing to do with affiliates / referrals though? You DO get paid in bitcoins, the only thing that's different is how the individual earnings are calculated.

It all depends on how much the house gets, if it gets nothing, you won't get anything (except referral earnings). If it earns a little, you get almost nothing, etc. They take a 20% cut as well. I don't think it's worth to be added to the OP.

[ObscureBean]

Any reason why is Lunamine still on the list?

[Mitchell]

Any reason why is Lunamine still on the list?

Any reasons why they shouldn't be? I know that they have payment problems (that's why they have an asterisk), but they still exist as far as I know.

[DiceBitcoin]

Any reason why is Lunamine still on the list?

Any reasons why they shouldn't be? I know that they have payment problems (that's why they have an asterisk), but they still exist as far as I know.

lunamine does not exist

[dbshck]

Any reason why is Lunamine still on the list?

Any reasons why they shouldn't be? I know that they have payment problems (that's why they have an asterisk), but they still exist as far as I know.

lunamine does not exist

Agree with DiceBitcoin.

Name:   lunamine
Posts:   121
Activity:   56
Position:   Jr. Member
Date Registered:   03 July 2014, 04:46:34
Last Active:   13 August 2014, 15:07:50

I think you should remove lunamine from the list.

[Mitchell]

Ah thanks everyone. Removing them now!

[BitCoinDream]

Ah thanks everyone. Removing them now!

I'd like to point out that win88.me has paid some people as evident from their thread. coinpiler is yet to anyone as of yet. So, win88.me needs to be under A and coinpiler needs to be under PNYC

[Mitchell]

Ah thanks everyone. Removing them now!

I'd like to point out that win88.me has paid some people as evident from their thread. coinpiler is yet to anyone as of yet. So, win88.me needs to be under A and coinpiler needs to be under PNYC

Please read a few pages back. First month upfront payments don't get you into Active. And the CoinPiler campaign is full, that is why it has the CLFNP tag. So no, I won't be moving anything, since everything is correct.

[apsvinet]

It has absolutely nothing to do with affiliates / referrals though? You DO get paid in bitcoins, the only thing that's different is how the individual earnings are calculated.

It all depends on how much the house gets, if it gets nothing, you won't get anything (except referral earnings). If it earns a little, you get almost nothing, etc. They take a 20% cut as well. I don't think it's worth to be added to the OP.

Alright it's your call. And you do have a point, also fitting their rules into your table wouldn't be possible as it is.

[BitCoinDream]

Ah thanks everyone. Removing them now!

I'd like to point out that win88.me has paid some people as evident from their thread. coinpiler is yet to anyone as of yet. So, win88.me needs to be under A and coinpiler needs to be under PNYC

Please read a few pages back. First month upfront payments don't get you into Active. And the CoinPiler campaign is full, that is why it has the CLFNP tag. So no, I won't be moving anything, since everything is correct.

Fine for win88. I did not read all the pages.

For CoinPiler, I think PNYC tag needs to be added along with CLFNP.

Anyways, it is your thread... it is your call.

[shorena]

-snip-
Fine for win88. I did not read all the pages.

For CoinPiler, I think PNYC tag needs to be added along with CLFNP.

Anyways, it is your thread... it is your call.

The way I undersand this: its a guide to help you decide which to join. Since you can not join CoinPiler it is not important whether they have paid or not, since those that allready joined apparently took the risk. Thus PNYC is only relevant for a campaign that someone could still join.

[Mitchell]

Fine for win88. I did not read all the pages.

For CoinPiler, I think PNYC tag needs to be added along with CLFNP.

Anyways, it is your thread... it is your call.

Well, I could do that, but I would have check the other campaigns as well, because there are multiple with unconfirmed payments. Will look into it, it isn't a bad idea.

[amacar]

Ah thanks everyone. Removing them now!

I'd like to point out that win88.me has paid some people as evident from their thread. coinpiler is yet to anyone as of yet. So, win88.me needs to be under A and coinpiler needs to be under PNYC

Please read a few pages back. First month upfront payments don't get you into Active. And the CoinPiler campaign is full, that is why it has the CLFNP tag. So no, I won't be moving anything, since everything is correct.

As far as I understand, they will be paying each month upfront not just first, so there is no risk for users and in my opinion can be A.

[Mitchell]

As far as I understand, they will be paying each month upfront not just first, so there is no risk for users and in my opinion can be A.

It's easy to pay the first month and run the second month. I want to be sure (for the people that use this topic) before I put it under Active. Just 8 more days until we know for sure.

[DiceBitcoin]

oh man i cant even imagine what will happen in our sig campaign from start of Sept....

[Mitchell]

oh man i cant even imagine what will happen in our sig campaign from start of Sept....

I can already tell you what will happen: A lot of of people will try to join. I hope you have enough people to handle it.

[shorena]

oh man i cant even imagine what will happen in our sig campaign from start of Sept....

If I were you Id collect applications for a day, check quality of posts for another day and pick the 100 people that you like most. Which would probably take a few hours of additional work.

[kerimk2]

God dammit. Light lord still hasn't pad me for the dog campaign. I'm sorry, but 10 plus days without payment is ridiculous. Bitcoininformation, please put an Asterix next to 777coin. This is ridiculous.