Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[HeXaN]

Don't worry guys, Gemini volume's picking up! 19 bitcoins traded in the last hour alone
Bullish!

brothers are working, take it easy

the superpowers are money and friends

[crairezx20]

I saw the article from news about the flow of buyers from china... you can read it here..
http://bitcoinist.net/china-turning-bitcoin-yuan-devalues/

[yolalanda]

I saw the article from news about the flow of buyers from china... you can read it here..
http://bitcoinist.net/china-turning-bitcoin-yuan-devalues/

Remember the last Litecoin pump? Same thing.
https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/mmm-global-republic-of-bitcoin-cryptos-next-scandal

[Elwar]

so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.

Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.

[ChartBuddy]

Coin

Explanation

[muyuu]

so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.

Oh man.

[hdbuck]

so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.

Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.

no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

[TReano]

so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.

Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.

there is no prove if it really was an hacker... We only know the real account was used from the real Satoshi in the past.

[Richy_T]

Paper being kept wet with some pcp piping.

The undeniable link between Bitcoin and the drug trade...

[dreamspark]

Yawn, wake me up below $200 or above $350

[--Encrypted--]

dang, it's pretty stable. here I thought it'll go all the way down to $250.

Yawn, wake me up below $200 or above $350

see you next year.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Yawn, wake me up below $200 or above $350

Above $350 rather than the former please.

[HeXaN]

Yawn, wake me up below $200 or above $350

halving is your date

[Suntouri]

Yawn, wake me up below $200 or above $350

FBI auction... btr from mtgox... 200$ are coming

[Fatman3001]

Paper being kept wet with some pcp piping.

The undeniable link between Bitcoin and the drug trade...

Guess that should say pvc

[billyjoeallen]

so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.

Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.

no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

It was fucking bullshit. The language and syntax were completely different from anything we know Satoshi wrote.  The argument was bogus too.  The blocksize limit does not improve security. It does not stop spam. It makes the network less vulnerable to one type of spam and more vulnerable to another type.  The other argument was equally bad. Core devs are not gods. Consensus is not only not always possible. It's not always even desirable.

It should be clear by now that we are the victims of a Rough Consensus Attack.  Satoshi designed an electronic cash system, not some bulletproof digital settlement system.  Bitcoin cannot give power to the people if it is inaccessible to the people.  Security is an important feature, but so is usability. If it doesn't scale, then it can't remain distributed and decentralized.  We can't take on the banks with a network that is only useful to banks. These are disingenuous arguments used by people arguing in bad faith. 

[gentlemand]

FBI auction... btr from mtgox... 200$ are coming

Gox, who knows? FBI auction, fuck all happened with the other ones. I predict super intense fuck allness for that one.

[hdbuck]

so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.

Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.

no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

It was fucking bullshit. The language and syntax were completely different from anything we know Satoshi wrote.  The argument was bogus too.  The blocksize limit does not improve security. It does not stop spam. It makes the network less vulnerable to one type of spam and more vulnerable to another type.  The other argument was equally bad. Core devs are not gods. Consensus is not only not always possible. It's not always even desirable.

It should be clear by now that we are the victims of a Rough Consensus Attack.  Satoshi designed an electronic cash system, not some bulletproof digital settlement system.  Bitcoin cannot give power to the people if it is inaccessible to the people.  Security is an important feature, but so is usability. If it doesn't scale, then it can't remain distributed and decentralized.  We can't take on the banks with a network that is only useful to banks. These are disingenuous arguments used by people arguing in bad faith.  

heh, thx for yet again sharing the light as to what a total brain damaged victimized whatnot would say.

how's your XTurd doing btw?

[crairezx20]

I saw the article from news about the flow of buyers from china... you can read it here..
http://bitcoinist.net/china-turning-bitcoin-yuan-devalues/

Remember the last Litecoin pump? Same thing.
https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/mmm-global-republic-of-bitcoin-cryptos-next-scandal

Yea but i think bitcoin will still stay in 260$ until this january... maybe it will rise. I have no rights to change the speculation...

[ChartBuddy]

Coin

Explanation