Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 01:22:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 2636 2637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 2645 2646 2647 2648 2649 2650 2651 2652 2653 2654 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 2661 2662 2663 2664 2665 2666 2667 2668 2669 2670 2671 2672 2673 2674 2675 2676 2677 2678 2679 2680 2681 2682 2683 2684 2685 [2686] 2687 2688 2689 2690 2691 2692 2693 2694 2695 2696 2697 2698 2699 2700 2701 2702 2703 2704 2705 2706 2707 2708 2709 2710 2711 2712 2713 2714 2715 2716 2717 2718 2719 2720 2721 2722 2723 2724 2725 2726 2727 2728 2729 2730 2731 2732 2733 2734 2735 2736 ... 33304 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26368571 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Spaceman_Spiff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001


₪``Campaign Manager´´₪


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 04:13:30 AM
 #53701

Wow, big buy on Gox (17 btc).

Oh, who am I kidding.  It's dead out there..
I thought there was mad action going on, then i realized bitcoinity shows everything in mBTC now  Roll Eyes .
1714224166
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714224166

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714224166
Reply with quote  #2

1714224166
Report to moderator
1714224166
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714224166

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714224166
Reply with quote  #2

1714224166
Report to moderator
1714224166
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714224166

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714224166
Reply with quote  #2

1714224166
Report to moderator
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714224166
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714224166

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714224166
Reply with quote  #2

1714224166
Report to moderator
1714224166
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714224166

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714224166
Reply with quote  #2

1714224166
Report to moderator
I_bitcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 04:13:38 AM
 #53702

Mils have been used in several countries for thousandths of a currency unit



Really thinking Mils will be the "spoken word" term.   It is the shortest that includes reference to the unit.
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 04:23:18 AM
 #53703

Wow, big buy on Gox (17 btc).

Oh, who am I kidding.  It's dead out there..

TIL I'm a whale.  Smiley
JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3990
Merit: 4458


You're never too old to think young.


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 04:30:42 AM
 #53704

Mils have been used in several countries for thousandths of a currency unit



Really thinking Mils will be the "spoken word" term.   It is the shortest that includes reference to the unit.

Mils aren't as common in North America as they were when I was a kid in the 1950s. Even then they were used mainly for taxation.

Inflation made them obsolete long ago. With the deflationary nature of Bitcoin, they'll be necessary again, even if it's just as a stepping-stone until we all use satoshis.
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 2113


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 04:33:28 AM
 #53705

Is the issue that the bitcoin-qt clients simply do not propagate anything below the "minimum" fee, so the miners don't even get to decide whether to include them in blocks? If there are any threads about this I'd be curious to read them.

I've made several zero fee transactions. Am I missing something?
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 04:37:22 AM
 #53706

Is the issue that the bitcoin-qt clients simply do not propagate anything below the "minimum" fee, so the miners don't even get to decide whether to include them in blocks? If there are any threads about this I'd be curious to read them.

I've made several zero fee transactions. Am I missing something?

Yeah, that's because your tx met 3 conditions:

1) smaller than 10,000 bytes
2) All outputs were 0.01 BTC or larger
3) Its priority was large enough (priority = sum(input_value_in_base_units * input_age)/size_in_bytes)

This is basically because you have old coins.
theonewhowaskazu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 04:41:36 AM
 #53707

Mils have been used in several countries for thousandths of a currency unit



Really thinking Mils will be the "spoken word" term.   It is the shortest that includes reference to the unit.


You could just call them bits or bai.
windjc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 04:55:09 AM
 #53708

It's funny. I've been one of the biggest bulls on here the last few weeks.  Now, I look at the poll in this thread and see over 90% bulls.

Am I really one of the few that is feeling a little bearish right now?  

I agree, if we flatline for a few weeks, I will expect an explosion right before heading into the new year.

But I must admit, I don't have full confidence this market doesn't want to try another sell off in the next few days or this coming weekend.

I just can't imagine that we are going to have a better bitcoin news month than the last month for at least a while. I mean Bitcoin was everywhere. But soon Christmas is going to be everywhere. And people are not as likely to hassel about investments going into the holidays.

Of course, maybe the sellers are happy just holding now. Letting the buyers catch their breath before we head north again. But, to me, it kinda feels like this rally might be over.
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 04:56:39 AM
 #53709

It's funny. I've been one of the biggest bulls on here the last few weeks.  Now, I look at the poll in this thread and see over 90% bulls.

Am I really one of the few that is feeling a little bearish right now?  

I agree, if we flatline for a few weeks, I will expect an explosion right before heading into the new year.

But I must admit, I don't have full confidence this market doesn't want to try another sell off in the next few days or this coming weekend.

I just can't imagine that we are going to have a better bitcoin news month than the last month for at least a while. I mean Bitcoin was everywhere. But soon Christmas is going to be everywhere. And people are not as likely to hassel about investments going into the holidays.

Of course, maybe the sellers are happy just holding now. Letting the buyers catch their breath before we head north again. But, to me, it kinda feels like this rally might be over.

The people that wanted out are out, I think. There's no reason they would have kept holding... the past few days would have been very scary to a weak hand.

The rally could be over - although that's too early to call - but the bear case isn't very strong, IMO.
spooderman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022


View Profile WWW
December 04, 2013, 04:57:35 AM
 #53710

Is the issue that the bitcoin-qt clients simply do not propagate anything below the "minimum" fee, so the miners don't even get to decide whether to include them in blocks? If there are any threads about this I'd be curious to read them.

I've made several zero fee transactions. Am I missing something?

Yeah, that's because your tx met 3 conditions:

1) smaller than 10,000 bytes
2) All outputs were 0.01 BTC or larger
3) Its priority was large enough (priority = sum(input_value_in_base_units * input_age)/size_in_bytes)

This is basically because you have old coins.

If my transaction were to not meet all these conditions, and I made the transfer without a fee, would it ever get processed?
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 05:00:00 AM
 #53711

Is the issue that the bitcoin-qt clients simply do not propagate anything below the "minimum" fee, so the miners don't even get to decide whether to include them in blocks? If there are any threads about this I'd be curious to read them.

I've made several zero fee transactions. Am I missing something?

Yeah, that's because your tx met 3 conditions:

1) smaller than 10,000 bytes
2) All outputs were 0.01 BTC or larger
3) Its priority was large enough (priority = sum(input_value_in_base_units * input_age)/size_in_bytes)

This is basically because you have old coins.

If my transaction were to not meet all these conditions, and I made the transfer without a fee, would it ever get processed?

If you issue a non-standard transaction then most network nodes won't relay it. If it manages to work its way through nodes that rebroadcast non-standard tx to a miner that includes non-standard transactions in their blocks, then it might get processed.

If you add Eligius to your node list manually that will pretty much guarantee it gets processed whenever Eligius mines a block.

I'm not really an expert, though, so maybe there's something more to this.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 05:02:30 AM
 #53712

SheHadMANHands
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 05:04:43 AM
 #53713

I think buying pressure, relative to selling pressure, will continue pushing this baby north over the next several weeks, though maybe at a bit of a decreased pace (with more deep-ish corrections, etc.).     Cheesy

We may have some more consolidation now.
Dabs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912


The Concierge of Crypto


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 05:08:12 AM
 #53714

Quote
If your tx doesn't get to a miner it will never be included in a block.

I saw it here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=344405.100

Quote
What specifically happens if you send a transaction without fees blah blah blah?
Quote
It is a very high probability it will simply be dropped (deleted) by all of your peers and nobody on the network will even know about it.


Also:
http://eligius.st/~gateway/faq/following-applies-transactions-being-processed-our-blocks

Quote
Will include transactions in its blocks if the sender pays a fee of at least 0.1 TBC (0.00004096 BTC) per 512 bytes.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 05:09:00 AM
 #53715

i can't believe how stable it's been today.. for the most part, it's been $1,077 at bitstamp.. give or a take a few dollars.
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 05:15:47 AM
 #53716

Quote
If your tx doesn't get to a miner it will never be included in a block.

I saw it here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=344405.100

Quote
What specifically happens if you send a transaction without fees blah blah blah?
Quote
It is a very high probability it will simply be dropped (deleted) by all of your peers and nobody on the network will even know about it.


Also:
http://eligius.st/~gateway/faq/following-applies-transactions-being-processed-our-blocks

Quote
Will include transactions in its blocks if the sender pays a fee of at least 0.1 TBC (0.00004096 BTC) per 512 bytes.

Is Luke-jr still pushing TBC? Wow.

He must be stinking rich though, he can do whatever he likes these days.
TERA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 04, 2013, 05:46:28 AM
 #53717

The low volume might indicate another correction to one of the day emas, perhaps the long one where the choo choo mofo trendline is. There was one of these double corrections to the long ema in March in the 30s. Although the bid depth is looking impressive so I'm not sure. I would prefer not because the last one scared the shit out of me and I lost a couple coins.
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 05:52:27 AM
 #53718

Quote
If your tx doesn't get to a miner it will never be included in a block.

I saw it here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=344405.100

Quote
What specifically happens if you send a transaction without fees blah blah blah?
Quote
It is a very high probability it will simply be dropped (deleted) by all of your peers and nobody on the network will even know about it.


Also:
http://eligius.st/~gateway/faq/following-applies-transactions-being-processed-our-blocks

Quote
Will include transactions in its blocks if the sender pays a fee of at least 0.1 TBC (0.00004096 BTC) per 512 bytes.

Is Luke-jr still pushing TBC? Wow.

He must be stinking rich though, he can do whatever he likes these days.


yeah thats crazy. he told me about that one day on irc...


wonder if he still has the 1337 ltc i gave him.

Of all people to get a huge Litecoin handout, it's Luke-jr...
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 05:56:34 AM
 #53719


wonder if he still has the 1337 ltc i gave him.

Of all people to get a huge Litecoin handout, it's Luke-jr...


i thought it was funny:)      he was a huge ltc hater and now has like $40,000 worth of LTC, hahahhahahaha

It is kind of a conundrum. He can't win: if he destroys the private key, he's shrunk the money supply and increased the value of the other LTC in circulation. If he sells them he's hypocritical. If he sits on them he's a major LTC holder  Cheesy

Why'd he even have an address in the first place?
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 06:02:21 AM
 #53720

Pages: « 1 ... 2636 2637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 2645 2646 2647 2648 2649 2650 2651 2652 2653 2654 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 2661 2662 2663 2664 2665 2666 2667 2668 2669 2670 2671 2672 2673 2674 2675 2676 2677 2678 2679 2680 2681 2682 2683 2684 2685 [2686] 2687 2688 2689 2690 2691 2692 2693 2694 2695 2696 2697 2698 2699 2700 2701 2702 2703 2704 2705 2706 2707 2708 2709 2710 2711 2712 2713 2714 2715 2716 2717 2718 2719 2720 2721 2722 2723 2724 2725 2726 2727 2728 2729 2730 2731 2732 2733 2734 2735 2736 ... 33304 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!