Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 10:30:21 PM |
|
I heard noise, right now.![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.todayfm.com%2Fcontent%2F000%2Fimages%2F000097%2F100102_60_news_hub_multi_630x0.gif&t=665&c=38Eyb817XcLijw)
|
|
|
|
Assmaster2000
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 10:32:33 PM |
|
^So French...
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 10:33:44 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
korila
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 10:36:29 PM |
|
who is this gal with sexy b00bs
|
|
|
|
USB-S
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
In XEM we trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 10:57:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
finkelsteinMonster
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 11:17:01 PM |
|
Question: Anyone playing with Lisk? Might actually float up ~30% before heading back down, but what do I know...
![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Lisk (LSK) $0.368027 ( -22.92%)
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 11:25:24 PM |
|
"It can be phased in, like:
if (blocknumber > 115000) maxblocksize = largerlimit
It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete.
When we're near the cutoff block number, I can put an alert to old versions to make sure they know they have to upgrade." - Craig Wright
I see what you did there.
|
|
|
|
albert73
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 11:34:07 PM |
|
"It can be phased in, like:
if (blocknumber > 115000) maxblocksize = largerlimit
It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete.
When we're near the cutoff block number, I can put an alert to old versions to make sure they know they have to upgrade." - Craig Wright
I see what you did there. Craig Wright's a ginormous block size proponent, he would have written something like the below quote, with the proviso that the blockchain moves to a private network for banks controlled solely by him. "It can be phased in, like:
if (blocknumber > 115000) maxblocksize = 200GB
It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete.
When we're near the cutoff block number, I can put an alert to old versions to make sure they know they have to upgrade." - Craig Wright
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 11:36:16 PM |
|
470$ seems to be too strong again.
|
|
|
|
yefi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 11:36:39 PM |
|
What am I looking at? BitTorrent traffic*? Which is not regulated and is perfectly legal? You're telling me that while internet traffic is increasing at exponential rate, the perfectly legal & unregulated BitTorrent traffic is also increasing, albeit at a much lower rate? This is, indeed, amazing ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) P2P traffic. It is mostly a poke at your Gnutella chart, as the preferred method of piracy has obviously shifted. If piracy is consuming a smaller percentage of global bandwidth, I'd suggest this is due to streaming services such as Netflix which reduce the incentive, rather than due to anti-P2P endeavours. Now you're starting to get it. And lower likelihood of getting paid lowers the profitability of your khrymez. Q.E.D., my rebellious friend ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Banning ransom payments isn't going to work because enough people will pay to still make it a profitable venture. This is why it isn't good enough, beside the fact that you're criminalizing the victims who do pay, a fact exploitable by the still-not-discouraged hackers.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 11:39:22 PM |
|
In particular, we have identified seven causes for concern that can cause DAO participants to engage in strategic behaviors. Some of these behaviors can cause honest DAO investors to have their investments hijacked or committed to proposals against their interest and intent. http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/05/27/dao-call-for-moratorium/
|
|
|
|
kehtolo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 11:44:54 PM |
|
Been down so god damn long.. that it looks like up to me...
|
|
|
|
yefi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 11:47:22 PM |
|
In particular, we have identified seven causes for concern that can cause DAO participants to engage in strategic behaviors. Some of these behaviors can cause honest DAO investors to have their investments hijacked or committed to proposals against their interest and intent. http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/05/27/dao-call-for-moratorium/The dump that will commence soon on Polo is going to be epic. Always good for some extra BTC.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3822
Merit: 10730
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 11:51:04 PM |
|
470$ seems to be too strong again.
You are still coming off as a kind of glass half empty sort of dude, and as if nothing is going to be enough for you. The fact of the matter is that we had a nice little 5% rally. And, really, even if many of us pro BTC folks are BTC HODLers and accumulators and we are looking forward to a price explosion, it is not really healthy or even realistic to expect too much too soon. If it happens it happens, and we can count our blessings, but we could be in this sub $500's price territory for several weeks, and the situation remains remarkably bullish... and should even be profitable for a large number of folks. Yeah, there may be a large number of folks that still have average BTC prices between $600 and $800, or even higher, but the fact of the matter is that most of us (including you who has had an account here for more than 3 years) should realize that markets can remain irrational for a very long time.. and we gotta play the markets in order to better our position and actually rejoice that we had a 5% rally in the past 48 hours... which also coincides with nearly a 20% rally over the past couple of months and more than a 100% rally in the past 10 months.... Currently, we are in a good place in bitcoinlandia, even if BTC prices take another 2 years to upwardly explode (which really I don't think that such upward explosion is going to take 2 years, but we should be mentally prepared for such possibility because it could happen).
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2016, 12:02:36 AM |
|
Yeah, you are right. I am just surprised (and a little bit annoyed) that this silly 470$ mark still keeps us back.
|
|
|
|
clopoterian
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2016, 12:20:19 AM Last edit: May 28, 2016, 12:55:41 AM by clopoterian |
|
What am I looking at? BitTorrent traffic*? Which is not regulated and is perfectly legal? You're telling me that while internet traffic is increasing at exponential rate, the perfectly legal & unregulated BitTorrent traffic is also increasing, albeit at a much lower rate? This is, indeed, amazing ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) P2P traffic. It is mostly a poke at your Gnutella chart, Gnutella and Kad network are relatively novel
You give me e.g., I give you chart. as the preferred method of piracy has obviously shifted. If piracy is consuming a smaller percentage of global bandwidth, I'd suggest this is due to streaming services such as Netflix which reduce the incentive, rather than due to anti-P2P endeavours.
You give me an e.g. (file sharing), I explain to you that not only is file sharing legal, but despite of it being legal, it's still getting less popular. And still you complain ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Now you're starting to get it. And lower likelihood of getting paid lowers the profitability of your khrymez. Q.E.D., my rebellious friend ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Banning ransom payments isn't going to work because enough people will pay to still make it a profitable venture. This is why it isn't good enough, beside the fact that you're criminalizing the victims who do pay, a fact exploitable by the still-not-discouraged hackers. I have not suggested "Banning ransom payments," that was you. I did suggest that making beetcoin illegal would make it less attractive to ransomware scumbags disruptive beadcoin entrepreneurs who extort hospitals. Because demanding to be paid in Bleetcoins would assure that the aforementioned paradigm-shifters will not get paid, making their douchebaggery objectively unprofitable, all for naught. Q.E.D. http://s33.postimg.org/ar861551r/anim.gifJeesh ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2016, 12:23:30 AM |
|
Yeah, you are right. I am just surprised (and a little bit annoyed) that this silly 470$ mark still keeps us back.
It's not actually $470 but it was 3000 yuan mark in China, which was close to 470 but changing due to the exchange rate ... and now it is $500 that it is eyeing, so we will set-up a foundation to have a run at that from here somewhere .... or a big wave of new fiat defects and it soon blows through on another $30 busting run higher.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2016, 12:25:13 AM |
|
seems like BTC prices are gonna have to go below $430 or even lower to put me back in the red
Don't think that's gonna happen. Congratulations. Sincerely.
|
|
|
|
Assmaster2000
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2016, 12:52:13 AM |
|
“We were aiming towards the clouds, not on building a mediocre midsize business. We took the big investors and chances spirit. But it has not paid off.” -- Sam "King" Cole https://youtu.be/yJxCdh1Ps48
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 28, 2016, 01:38:31 AM |
|
Stamp is drunk as hell...
|
|
|
|
|