Bitcoin Forum
November 08, 2024, 05:16:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (0.8%)
7/28 - 11 (8.9%)
8/4 - 16 (12.9%)
8/11 - 8 (6.5%)
8/18 - 6 (4.8%)
8/25 - 8 (6.5%)
After August - 74 (59.7%)
Total Voters: 124

Pages: « 1 ... 16641 16642 16643 16644 16645 16646 16647 16648 16649 16650 16651 16652 16653 16654 16655 16656 16657 16658 16659 16660 16661 16662 16663 16664 16665 16666 16667 16668 16669 16670 16671 16672 16673 16674 16675 16676 16677 16678 16679 16680 16681 16682 16683 16684 16685 16686 16687 16688 16689 16690 [16691] 16692 16693 16694 16695 16696 16697 16698 16699 16700 16701 16702 16703 16704 16705 16706 16707 16708 16709 16710 16711 16712 16713 16714 16715 16716 16717 16718 16719 16720 16721 16722 16723 16724 16725 16726 16727 16728 16729 16730 16731 16732 16733 16734 16735 16736 16737 16738 16739 16740 16741 ... 33897 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26488836 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 02:58:55 AM



Anyway, now that all cards are turned on the table we have a problem here. How to convince Jihan BU to lose that advantage in favor of Segwit.

convince him?
Cut him off, change the pow so something like this NEVER happens again.
If his machines stop working, so be it. I wouldn't mind losing all of mine providing that we have a path forward.
Besides, btc would be 2-3 times higher if not for that guy.

So what you are saying, massive upside eventually. Sounds like an argument to buy.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3892
Merit: 11131


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:03:00 AM

FINALLY segwit will burn and we will have BIGGER BLOCKS



Are you referring to any recent news in particular, or just communicating a pure wish?  hahahahaha
r0ach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:06:08 AM

http://www.trueactivist.com/dutch-media-cancels-dr-phil-show-after-exposing-elite-pedophilia-ring/
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3934
Merit: 4458



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:12:05 AM



Anyway, now that all cards are turned on the table we have a problem here. How to convince Jihan BU to lose that advantage in favor of Segwit.

convince him?
Cut him off, change the pow so something like this NEVER happens again.
If his machines stop working, so be it. I wouldn't mind losing all of mine providing that we have a path forward.
Besides, btc would be 2-3 times higher if not for that guy.

So what you are saying, massive upside eventually. Sounds like an argument to buy.

yeah, sure.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1480


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:12:22 AM


Bullish?
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:23:35 AM

FINALLY segwit will burn and we will have BIGGER BLOCKS

No worries, Jihan can just fork over to a wonderful, closed-source, buggy-as-hell, unlimited blocksize, fully exploitable (er "optimization-able") blockchain called BU-whatever, and mine it exclusively until his heart's content.

Only problem is, the "economic majority" won't be following.  Sorry.

my dream has been realized.
deepcolderwallet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 103



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:29:42 AM

FINALLY segwit will burn and we will have BIGGER BLOCKS

No worries, Jihan can just fork over to a wonderful, closed-source, buggy-as-hell, unlimited blocksize, fully exploitable (er "optimization-able") blockchain called BU-whatever, and mine it exclusively until his heart's content.

Only problem is, the "economic majority" won't be following.  Sorry.

my dream has been realized.

I'm starting to believe Smeagol is Jihan himself...
hulla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 566



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:32:42 AM

Yup. I was wrong. SegWit has cut a deal with BU. We are going to fork. RIP.
everyone hates Segwit2mb

yet there's what, 30% signaling for it?

or am i mistaken?

I assumed what york meant when he said SegWit has cut a deal with BU was the  Segwit SF + 2MB HF (Segwit2MB) being proposed. this will produce a Effective 8MB block weight.

everyone hates it.

20MB everyone hates it.
8MB everyone hates it.
BIP101 everyone hates it.
2MB HF everyone hates it.
Segwit everyone hates it.
BU everyone hates it.
UASF everyone hates it.
Segwit2MB everyone hates it.
I don't know why people hate things like . This shouldn't be a do or die situation and the issue about the block size shouldn't generate something a war I think. What we need is to understand each other if the Chinese miners love the BU so be it. Let's work together to make bitcoin great that's what matter most. We should all be happy cause the price per bitcoin is now $1150. Hopefully it will reach $1200 before the end of this week Smiley
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:38:13 AM

Yup. I was wrong. SegWit has cut a deal with BU. We are going to fork. RIP.
everyone hates Segwit2mb

yet there's what, 30% signaling for it?

or am i mistaken?

I assumed what york meant when he said SegWit has cut a deal with BU was the  Segwit SF + 2MB HF (Segwit2MB) being proposed. this will produce a Effective 8MB block weight.

everyone hates it.

20MB everyone hates it.
8MB everyone hates it.
BIP101 everyone hates it.
2MB HF everyone hates it.
Segwit everyone hates it.
BU everyone hates it.
UASF everyone hates it.
Segwit2MB everyone hates it.
I don't know why people hate things like . This shouldn't be a do or die situation and the issue about the block size shouldn't generate something a war I think. What we need is to understand each other if the Chinese miners love the BU so be it. Let's work together to make bitcoin great that's what matter most. We should all be happy cause the price per bitcoin is now $1150. Hopefully it will reach $1200 before the end of this week Smiley

i've said it many many times

do a simple malleability fix, with simple 2MB Bump
and BU will be compatible with core, for some time.
But nooooo
maybe its because my name is Killerpotleaf, and they are racist!
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:53:09 AM

seeing how a UASF is becoming more of a real posisblty

and ill be hodling  this shit i better get use to talking the talk


we take core's rightful place as bitcoin's overseer to be self evident, and would ask it exercises it mighty power to vanquish those who would oppose us.

am i doing it right?
gembitz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 639


*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 04:04:17 AM



Anyway, now that all cards are turned on the table we have a problem here. How to convince Jihan BU to lose that advantage in favor of Segwit.

convince him?
Cut him off, change the pow so something like this NEVER happens again.
If his machines stop working, so be it. I wouldn't mind losing all of mine providing that we have a path forward.
Besides, btc would be 2-3 times higher if not for that guy.


^demonizing MINERS is just ignorant ~  we need them to process the transactions period , i don't see the problem ! ~ if they start go out of control "painting" coins or singling out transactions and censoring them we will just reset the blockchain ~ no worries! Wink *as per satoshis original ann

I AM a miner, am i demonizing myself? LOL
You seem to be not getting the full picture here.
He has been found cheating and allegedly breaking some patents at that.
In addition, he exposed himself opposing positive technology change for secret reasons that are not aligned with community interest.


^lol looks like they found a more efficient way to mine blocks! ~ what stops anyone else from reverse engineering those chips? haha :-D obsolutely nothing! ..ohh what their patent? ya sure...bwaaa
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3934
Merit: 4458



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 04:41:29 AM

lol looks like they found a more efficient way to mine blocks! ~ what stops anyone else from reverse engineering those chips? haha :-D obsolutely nothing! ..ohh what their patent? ya sure...bwaaa

you re still not getting it fully...
Allegedly, they sold miners (like S9) to Joe Public with a feature under discussion turned OFF, but they turned it ON for themselves.
At least this is one of the suppositions, and a proof of the pudding is in the fact that they produce abnormally high number of empty blocks, which is predicted to happen if they activate the feature.
spooderman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1029


View Profile WWW
April 06, 2017, 04:41:41 AM

seeing how a UASF is becoming more of a real posisblty

and ill be hodling  this shit i better get use to talking the talk


we take core's rightful place as bitcoin's overseer to be self evident, and would ask it exercises it mighty power to vanquish those who would oppose us.

am i doing it right?

whatever you're doing, i'm hoping you're increasingly on your own.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 04:43:51 AM

lol looks like they found a more efficient way to mine blocks! ~ what stops anyone else from reverse engineering those chips? haha :-D obsolutely nothing! ..ohh what their patent? ya sure...bwaaa

you re still not getting it fully...
Allegedly, they sold miners (like S9) to Joe Public with a feature under discussion turned OFF, but they turned it ON for themselves.
At least this is one of the suppositions, and a proof of the puding is in fact that they produce abnormally high number of empty blocks, which is predicted to happen if they activate the feature.

Did they do something illegal?
edgar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 04:49:00 AM

lol looks like they found a more efficient way to mine blocks! ~ what stops anyone else from reverse engineering those chips? haha :-D obsolutely nothing! ..ohh what their patent? ya sure...bwaaa

you re still not getting it fully...
Allegedly, they sold miners (like S9) to Joe Public with a feature under discussion turned OFF, but they turned it ON for themselves.
At least this is one of the suppositions, and a proof of the puding is in fact that they produce abnormally high number of empty blocks, which is predicted to happen if they activate the feature.

Did they do something illegal?

is eating excrement illegal??

does the legal status make it more, or less acceptable?



Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 04:51:07 AM

lol looks like they found a more efficient way to mine blocks! ~ what stops anyone else from reverse engineering those chips? haha :-D obsolutely nothing! ..ohh what their patent? ya sure...bwaaa

you re still not getting it fully...
Allegedly, they sold miners (like S9) to Joe Public with a feature under discussion turned OFF, but they turned it ON for themselves.
At least this is one of the suppositions, and a proof of the puding is in fact that they produce abnormally high number of empty blocks, which is predicted to happen if they activate the feature.

Did they do something illegal?

is eating excrement illegal??

does the legal status make it more, or less acceptable?
Moral outrage won't get anything done. That's female thinking. If they did something illegal then let's focus on that and leave the philosophical ponderings at the door. And if not, then the only recourse is to outvote them with hardware and electricity.
harrymmmm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 576
Merit: 503


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 04:58:41 AM

FINALLY segwit will burn and we will have BIGGER BLOCKS



Are you referring to any recent news in particular, or just communicating a pure wish?  hahahahaha
Haha.
'Past Performance Is No Guarantee of Future Results' and 'high volatility' is very applicable to adam's posts. IOW, a real bitcoiner.
 Roll Eyes
gembitz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 639


*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 05:14:31 AM

lol looks like they found a more efficient way to mine blocks! ~ what stops anyone else from reverse engineering those chips? haha :-D obsolutely nothing! ..ohh what their patent? ya sure...bwaaa

you re still not getting it fully...
Allegedly, they sold miners (like S9) to Joe Public with a feature under discussion turned OFF, but they turned it ON for themselves.
At least this is one of the suppositions, and a proof of the pudding is in the fact that they produce abnormally high number of empty blocks, which is predicted to happen if they activate the feature.


^it's a trick to process blocks faster ~ they found the hack and are exploiting it however it's only a matter of time it's reverse engineered or they add an extra layer of processing to bitcoin core code to disincentivize it's use! *:-D keep calm ~
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
April 06, 2017, 05:28:16 AM

I don't really care which upgrade goes through as long as it goes smoothly (though I would really like to see Lightning Network go through) but seeing Litecoin double in price due to the likelihood of Segwit going through makes me want to see the same thing happen to bitcoin's price.

Make it so.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3892
Merit: 11131


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 05:29:46 AM

FINALLY segwit will burn and we will have BIGGER BLOCKS

[http://m.memegen.com/szcxil.jpg[/img]

Are you referring to any recent news in particular, or just communicating a pure wish?  hahahahaha
Haha.
'Past Performance Is No Guarantee of Future Results' and 'high volatility' is very applicable to adam's posts. IOW, a real bitcoiner.
 Roll Eyes



I'm not sure if I understand your post or your position about this whole question regarding the short to medium prognosis for bitcoin?

I personally believe that in the end, some variation of the core's vision is going to prevail, and surely I hope that it includes some kind of incorporation of segwit - but even if seg wit does not get incorporated in the coming years, bitcoin still is in a decent place in terms of storage of value and security and various kinds of ways to control your own wealth from capital controls and even some kinds of abilities to do quasi-anonymous transactions in a pretty secure way.

Pages: « 1 ... 16641 16642 16643 16644 16645 16646 16647 16648 16649 16650 16651 16652 16653 16654 16655 16656 16657 16658 16659 16660 16661 16662 16663 16664 16665 16666 16667 16668 16669 16670 16671 16672 16673 16674 16675 16676 16677 16678 16679 16680 16681 16682 16683 16684 16685 16686 16687 16688 16689 16690 [16691] 16692 16693 16694 16695 16696 16697 16698 16699 16700 16701 16702 16703 16704 16705 16706 16707 16708 16709 16710 16711 16712 16713 16714 16715 16716 16717 16718 16719 16720 16721 16722 16723 16724 16725 16726 16727 16728 16729 16730 16731 16732 16733 16734 16735 16736 16737 16738 16739 16740 16741 ... 33897 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!