ironhide0991
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 12:08:39 PM |
|
1) 3 BTC 2) Tulip fields 3) Emily Ratajkowski  I'll go with the first option. The other 2 will follow eventually.
|
|
|
|
Arriemoller
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1827
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 12:08:51 PM |
|
Fact: carbon based life forms are poorly equipped to survive the pressures of space.
How can there be pressure in vacuum?
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 12:10:06 PM |
|
Full day without buying bitcoin. Coinbase, get your s*** together already.  Is that why Bitcoin is dying to only ~$10k?
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 12:28:10 PM |
|
thus, the main question from them...with crypto as a 'backstop' was how will I handle it when it goes Tulips?
alas, they are still not on board, getting any....themselves
progress though....by tulips...they see it dumping to 2-3k, so hey I will take what I can get...not going completely to zero
eventually, fomo, will wear everyone down to getting crypto...especially if ETF's ever come to pass...
Funny how all these finance guys keep thinking that you've bought tulips, and that you've always bought them at some high-ish level in a bubble that's clearly going to pop. They think this no matter when you bought bitcoin. Like bitcoins are hot potatoes that if you were stupid enough to buy, you need to dump them fast and make profit before your hands get burned. Then these same guys extol the virtues of having your wealth in the U.S. stock market, which is currently in the most overvalued territory it's ever been in history. I've never seen anything like this in all my years.
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 12:44:24 PM |
|
thus, the main question from them...with crypto as a 'backstop' was how will I handle it when it goes Tulips?
alas, they are still not on board, getting any....themselves
progress though....by tulips...they see it dumping to 2-3k, so hey I will take what I can get...not going completely to zero
eventually, fomo, will wear everyone down to getting crypto...especially if ETF's ever come to pass...
Funny how all these finance guys keep thinking that you've bought tulips, and that you've always bought them at some high-ish level in a bubble that's clearly going to pop. They think this no matter when you bought bitcoin. Like bitcoins are hot potatoes that if you were stupid enough to buy, you need to dump them fast and make profit before your hands get burned. Then these same guys extol the virtues of having your wealth in the U.S. stock market, which is currently in the most overvalued territory it's ever been in history. I've never seen anything like this in all my years. Humanity in a nutshell. I have yet to find any aspect of it which doesn't roughly follow this kind of pattern.
|
|
|
|
vroom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1357
Merit: 2375
a Cray can run an endless loop in under 4 hours
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 12:46:43 PM |
|
thus, the main question from them...with crypto as a 'backstop' was how will I handle it when it goes Tulips?
alas, they are still not on board, getting any....themselves
progress though....by tulips...they see it dumping to 2-3k, so hey I will take what I can get...not going completely to zero
eventually, fomo, will wear everyone down to getting crypto...especially if ETF's ever come to pass...
Funny how all these finance guys keep thinking that you've bought tulips, and that you've always bought them at some high-ish level in a bubble that's clearly going to pop. They think this no matter when you bought bitcoin. Like bitcoins are hot potatoes that if you were stupid enough to buy, you need to dump them fast and make profit before your hands get burned. Then these same guys extol the virtues of having your wealth in the U.S. stock market, which is currently in the most overvalued territory it's ever been in history. I've never seen anything like this in all my years. Bitcoin will be the safe heaven for the next stock market crash. We will witness the first real hyper deflation, the moon is not the limit.
|
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1915
Merit: 3229
All good things to those who wait
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 12:54:58 PM |
|
BFX is 4% behind gdax! Even Bearstamp is 1% ahead of BFX!!! 
|
|
|
|
True Myth
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:03:06 PM |
|
3) Have Emily Ratajkowski as your wife. Put up with her body and her shit for the rest of your life with no option for divorce, ever. 1) 3 BTC 2) Tulip fields 3) Emily Ratajkowski  Google searches for Emily Ratajkowski just spiked. I may or may not have contributed.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 4464
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:17:19 PM Last edit: November 30, 2017, 01:29:04 PM by d_eddie |
|
3) Have Emily Ratajkowski as your wife. Put up with her body and her shit for the rest of your life with no option for divorce, ever. Pretty girl no doubt, but beauty never lasts forever. And even if it did, the average male mammal needs change at least once in a while. Ever felt abnormal desire for a woman, even if she's objectively less attractive than your wife/gf? I know I did. Uh, I mean, I do. So if I had to choose a millionaire's dream, the only choice that would make sense for me in that slot would be 3) be able to pick a woman of the month (or in moderation: of the semester) from a panel of candidates guaranteed to contain at least one or two you consider quite attractive - even if not incredibly so as Emily or Miss Prettybutt (thanks, Lightfoot). EDIT: Here's for posterity and reference.
|
|
|
|
True Myth
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:18:50 PM |
|
3) Have Emily Ratajkowski as your wife. Put up with her body and her shit for the rest of your life with no option for divorce, ever. Pretty girl no doubt, but beauty never lasts forever. And even if it did, the average male mammal needs change at least once in a while. Ever felt abnormal desire for a woman, even if she's objectively less attractive than your wife/gf? I know I did. Uh, I mean, I do. So if I had to choose a millionaire's dream, the only choice that would make sense for me in that slot would be 3) be able to pick a woman of the month (or in moderation: of the semester) from a panel of candidates guaranteed to contain at least one or two you consider quite attractive - even if not incredibly so as Emily or Miss Prettybutt (thanks, Lightfoot). Now you're just being greedy!
|
|
|
|
Bapt07
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 1
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:20:37 PM Last edit: November 30, 2017, 01:39:53 PM by Bapt07 |
|
H&S + inverted cup&handle + (bearish) flag. Down to 9500$, 9250$.
8500$, eventually.
Same vision here, we've completed the H&S, maybe experience the pullback and then the drop. Heading to 8300-8500 seems plausible. My 2 sats TA 
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:21:10 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4256
Merit: 9911
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:26:22 PM |
|
So Bitcoin is dead... what about Bitcoin talk? Should I put the account on the block now ahead of the selloff?
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:28:22 PM |
|
Wow.. what is going on...
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:28:27 PM |
|
Not to sound bearish, but looking at the charts it's clear that the pump started in earnest on 11/24 @ ~$8200.
So we could end up revisiting that level at some point. Which would still be healthy and wouldn't end this upward trajectory.
Also, the conspiracist in me says that the pumpers planned to dump ahead of The Big Bang Theory episode. I guess they don't want 3M new Average Joes to jump in to bitcoin. Got to keep them far away. I'm sure the episode will paint Bitcoin in a bad light, like some sort of fly-by-night get rich quick scam...
|
|
|
|
flynn
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:29:49 PM |
|
Yep, we are poor again.
Fun to see BCH not going very well though.
|
|
|
|
pfrtlpfmpf
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:30:53 PM |
|
3) Have Emily Ratajkowski as your wife. Put up with her body and her shit for the rest of your life with no option for divorce, ever. Pretty girl no doubt, but beauty never lasts forever. And even if it did, the average male mammal needs change at least once in a while. Ever felt abnormal desire for a woman, even if she's objectively less attractive than your wife/gf? I know I did. Uh, I mean, I do. So if I had to choose a millionaire's dream, the only choice that would make sense for me in that slot would be 3) be able to pick a woman of the month (or in moderation: of the semester) from a panel of candidates guaranteed to contain at least one or two you consider quite attractive - even if not incredibly so as Emily or Miss Prettybutt (thanks, Lightfoot). To me she looks like she´s got a kick into her face, fat lip and all. No, she´s cool, but this is a beauty contest, no ? And Salma Hayek has to big boobs. Sorry, girls ! To much, is to much.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 4464
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:31:05 PM |
|
3) Have Emily Ratajkowski as your wife. Put up with her body and her shit for the rest of your life with no option for divorce, ever. Pretty girl no doubt, but beauty never lasts forever. And even if it did, the average male mammal needs change at least once in a while. Ever felt abnormal desire for a woman, even if she's objectively less attractive than your wife/gf? I know I did. Uh, I mean, I do. So if I had to choose a millionaire's dream, the only choice that would make sense for me in that slot would be 3) be able to pick a woman of the month (or in moderation: of the semester) from a panel of candidates guaranteed to contain at least one or two you consider quite attractive - even if not incredibly so as Emily or Miss Prettybutt (thanks, Lightfoot). Now you're just being greedy! Some greed is good, confirmed sources tell me.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 4464
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:32:23 PM |
|
Not to sound bearish, but looking at the charts it's clear that the pump started in earnest on 11/24 @ ~$8200.
So we could end up revisiting that level at some point. Which would still be healthy and wouldn't end this upward trajectory.
Also, the conspirator in me says that the pumpers planned to dump ahead of The Big Bang Theory episode. I guess they don't want 3M new Average Joes to jump in to bitcoin. Got to keep them far away.
Got my buy orders ready to roll. Jimbooooo, you woke up yet? 
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 4464
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 01:38:05 PM |
|
We're running into outlandishly OT territory. I hope the mod doesn't mind that much, but I have to remind my good friends of serious issues. To me she looks like she´s got a kick into her face, fat lip and all. No, she´s cool, but this is a beauty contest, no ? And Salma Hayek has to big boobs. Sorry, girls !
Salma Hayek runs in the MILF/GILF category. She's 51. Still quite shapely, don't mean no offense, ma'am, I mean I could make time for you one of these weekends but... sorry, Salma!
|
|
|
|
|