xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3990
Merit: 8761
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:26:22 PM |
|
So Bitcoin is dead... what about Bitcoin talk? Should I put the account on the block now ahead of the selloff?
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:28:22 PM |
|
Wow.. what is going on...
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 5286
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:28:27 PM |
|
Not to sound bearish, but looking at the charts it's clear that the pump started in earnest on 11/24 @ ~$8200.
So we could end up revisiting that level at some point. Which would still be healthy and wouldn't end this upward trajectory.
Also, the conspiracist in me says that the pumpers planned to dump ahead of The Big Bang Theory episode. I guess they don't want 3M new Average Joes to jump in to bitcoin. Got to keep them far away. I'm sure the episode will paint Bitcoin in a bad light, like some sort of fly-by-night get rich quick scam...
|
|
|
|
flynn
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:29:49 PM |
|
Yep, we are poor again.
Fun to see BCH not going very well though.
|
|
|
|
pfrtlpfmpf
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:30:53 PM |
|
3) Have Emily Ratajkowski as your wife. Put up with her body and her shit for the rest of your life with no option for divorce, ever. Pretty girl no doubt, but beauty never lasts forever. And even if it did, the average male mammal needs change at least once in a while. Ever felt abnormal desire for a woman, even if she's objectively less attractive than your wife/gf? I know I did. Uh, I mean, I do. So if I had to choose a millionaire's dream, the only choice that would make sense for me in that slot would be 3) be able to pick a woman of the month (or in moderation: of the semester) from a panel of candidates guaranteed to contain at least one or two you consider quite attractive - even if not incredibly so as Emily or Miss Prettybutt (thanks, Lightfoot). To me she looks like she´s got a kick into her face, fat lip and all. No, she´s cool, but this is a beauty contest, no ? And Salma Hayek has to big boobs. Sorry, girls ! To much, is to much.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 3536
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:31:05 PM |
|
3) Have Emily Ratajkowski as your wife. Put up with her body and her shit for the rest of your life with no option for divorce, ever. Pretty girl no doubt, but beauty never lasts forever. And even if it did, the average male mammal needs change at least once in a while. Ever felt abnormal desire for a woman, even if she's objectively less attractive than your wife/gf? I know I did. Uh, I mean, I do. So if I had to choose a millionaire's dream, the only choice that would make sense for me in that slot would be 3) be able to pick a woman of the month (or in moderation: of the semester) from a panel of candidates guaranteed to contain at least one or two you consider quite attractive - even if not incredibly so as Emily or Miss Prettybutt (thanks, Lightfoot). Now you're just being greedy! Some greed is good, confirmed sources tell me.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 3536
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:32:23 PM |
|
Not to sound bearish, but looking at the charts it's clear that the pump started in earnest on 11/24 @ ~$8200.
So we could end up revisiting that level at some point. Which would still be healthy and wouldn't end this upward trajectory.
Also, the conspirator in me says that the pumpers planned to dump ahead of The Big Bang Theory episode. I guess they don't want 3M new Average Joes to jump in to bitcoin. Got to keep them far away.
Got my buy orders ready to roll. Jimbooooo, you woke up yet?
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 3536
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:38:05 PM |
|
We're running into outlandishly OT territory. I hope the mod doesn't mind that much, but I have to remind my good friends of serious issues. To me she looks like she´s got a kick into her face, fat lip and all. No, she´s cool, but this is a beauty contest, no ? And Salma Hayek has to big boobs. Sorry, girls !
Salma Hayek runs in the MILF/GILF category. She's 51. Still quite shapely, don't mean no offense, ma'am, I mean I could make time for you one of these weekends but... sorry, Salma!
|
|
|
|
404Revolution
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 107
Not Found
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:46:12 PM |
|
Is crypto dead? No. It's just really fucking wasted from a hard night of partying and took a bit of a tumble, and passed out. Bitcoin just needs to sleep it off a bit. Like the honey badger... ... will wake up again and not give a fuck. Oh wow so edgy and cool wow how can I be cool like you wow?
|
|
|
|
strawbs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1340
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:48:50 PM |
|
Meanwhile, in India, BTC is trading at $12,378 on Unocoin (INR 799,120)
|
|
|
|
yefi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:51:17 PM Last edit: December 01, 2017, 01:18:04 AM by yefi |
|
Stiglitz gives the Noble price such a bad name. Not only because of these dinosaur remarks on Bitcoin but als his quest to abolish cash. The man sounds like a total aparatsjik.
The *Swedish* National Bank gave the Nobel prize a bad name, I think is the truth. If he weren't a skeleton, poor old Alfred would be turning in his grave. It's a rickroll. Who'd cut off their ball for a bet?
|
|
|
|
EtihadBitcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:53:35 PM |
|
Are we at the correction of what happened this time yesterday less than 24 hours ago? It is below $9275 all the sudden. What happened over night that caused all this loss?
|
|
|
|
1982dre
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:55:37 PM |
|
Are we at the correction of what happened this time yesterday less than 24 hours ago? It is below $9275 all the sudden. What happened over night that caused all this loss? Looks like some whales wanna pick up some cheap coins.
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 5286
|
|
November 30, 2017, 01:59:10 PM |
|
Are we at the correction of what happened this time yesterday less than 24 hours ago? It is below $9275 all the sudden. What happened over night that caused all this loss? Looks like some whales wanna pick up some of their own cheap coins. FTFY
|
|
|
|
arklan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
|
|
November 30, 2017, 02:01:59 PM |
|
Of course it drops by now than 1000 over night... Bloody hell bitcoin
|
|
|
|
philip2000uk
|
|
November 30, 2017, 02:03:29 PM |
|
I can't bear reading the user comments on a certain social network about Bitcoin, so much negative stuff
|
|
|
|
1982dre
|
|
November 30, 2017, 02:04:54 PM |
|
Are we at the correction of what happened this time yesterday less than 24 hours ago? It is below $9275 all the sudden. What happened over night that caused all this loss? Looks like some whales wanna pick up some of their own cheap coins. FTFY And some extra's from the weak handed.
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3990
Merit: 8761
|
|
November 30, 2017, 02:07:23 PM |
|
Wow Much red Such poor Very losses
|
|
|
|
pfrtlpfmpf
|
|
November 30, 2017, 02:11:02 PM |
|
When we are not over 10,000 in Euro, we´re not over. But then i said, i wouldn´t stop before 250k !
Guys, you lough, but it´s perfectly doable.
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 4667
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
|
November 30, 2017, 02:12:36 PM |
|
1) 3 BTC 2) Tulip fields 3) Emily Ratajkowski Easy. #1 because with my 3 BTC I will soon be able to do #2 and #3 (and be left with more than 2 BTC)... #2 you get to buy 2.5 BTC which is only half a BTC short of #1 in the first year alone, which is just about to end. Going to end up with more Bitcoins with #2, especially if you reinvest. Well, 2017 is out, tulip money will come after you sell them. By that time you will barely be able to buy 1 BTC with that money. The following year it will be 0.1 BTC, the one after that 0.01 BTC, ad infinitum. With option #2 you'll end up with exactly 1.111... BTC, according to my calculations. 2017 is almost out, so we're getting 2.5 BTC in the first year and who knows what in the second year. Keep in mind that the tulip field is also real estate which is bound to have quite some value. Might even want to consider just selling it for more Bitcoin than #1 anytime before or after the first round of profits. OK, either #1 or #2 is fine with me. But, for heaven's sake, NOT #3. I find the look of that woman (specifically, her face) ugly as hell!
|
|
|
|
|