|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3906
Merit: 11176
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:03:40 PM |
|
What happend with all those doom predictions from those banksters, goverments, financial experts and 2 noble price winners? I've seen a lot of FUD this week but somehow they disappeared Welcome back $10.000! They cannot keep up. Currently, they are regrouping in order to figure out a new game plan. Don't worry.. they will be back, when we are crashing down to perhaps $8k, from $15k... and they will be reminding us that they were correct all along.. bitcoin is not going anywhere.. blah blah blah...
|
|
|
|
vroom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1334
Merit: 2112
a Cray can run an endless loop in under 4 hours
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:03:59 PM |
|
bcash @ David48l
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:10:38 PM |
|
Yup, people spamming low-fee transactions.
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:34:44 PM |
|
bcash @ David48l
Looks like maybe r/btc sprung a leak.
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:42:53 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1428
Merit: 2279
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:45:02 PM |
|
Hey David - sell your Bee-crash and join us. It’s not too late but time really is running out.
I gave the same advice to r/BTC at 0.17 but what can you do.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:47:44 PM |
|
They already gave up on Mintchip. I wonder what's different this time.
Good question. Wasn't Mintchip during the Harper regime? I know what a Mintchip is. I don't know what a Harper is. Sounds lovely.
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:50:30 PM |
|
AFAIK most nodes wouldn't relay spam transactions like those, so I'm not certain if this could have any impact in the network.
thanks to BIP148 ... threat.
|
|
|
|
TERA2
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 222
Deb Rah Von Doom
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:52:41 PM |
|
Bye bye default world
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:56:41 PM |
|
It's a weird, weird feeling to be able to do whatever you want after all this time.
|
|
|
|
Real_Ramsey
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
December 01, 2017, 08:56:54 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
December 01, 2017, 09:04:45 PM |
|
Yes, because Bitcoin Core don't enforce SegWit ... now. Tomorrow, perhaps ... it's a miner choice to build SegWit blocks. Network (nodes) are ready to accept SegWit blocks in the local blockchain at 92%. Soon, rules in Bitcoin Core will be tighten ... again (and miners hate that).
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
December 01, 2017, 09:10:28 PM |
|
Yup, people spamming low-fee transactions. But why is there no spam in bitcoin cash? it does not seem logical to me about spam Because they are the ones spamming us.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1428
Merit: 2279
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
December 01, 2017, 09:14:36 PM |
|
$10800 on stamp. Will we see $11k again today?
$11,473 on Bithumb. China just starting to wake. 5.15 am. The futures news came out while they were asleep.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2458
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
|
|
December 01, 2017, 09:16:16 PM |
|
Yup, people spamming low-fee transactions. But why is there no spam in bitcoin cash? it does not seem logical to me about spam Because they are the ones spamming us. I can hardly believe that nobody sends spam to the bitcoin cash network with the amount of attacks that bitcoin cash is receiving in forums and social media. It sounds pretty hypocritical to say that they are attacking the bitwit network when they do not stop attacking bitcon cash. If they could attack the bch network with spam they would do it, there is simply no spam in any chain, it comes out too expensive we don't stoop that low
|
|
|
|
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2458
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
|
|
December 01, 2017, 09:17:29 PM |
|
Yup, people spamming low-fee transactions. But why is there no spam in bitcoin cash? it does not seem logical to me about spam Because they are the ones spamming us. I can hardly believe that nobody sends spam to the bitcoin cash network with the amount of attacks that bitcoin cash is receiving in forums and social media. It sounds pretty hypocritical to say that they are attacking the bitwit network when they do not stop attacking bitcon cash. If they could attack the bch network with spam they would do it, there is simply no spam in any chain, it comes out too expensive we don't stoop that low bugger I took the Troll bait
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4200
Merit: 4887
You're never too old to think young.
|
|
December 01, 2017, 09:19:13 PM |
|
I know what a Mintchip is. I don't know what a Harper is. Sounds lovely.
Stephen Harper, our last prime minister, a total toady to the banks and transnational corporations.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht
|
|
December 01, 2017, 09:19:56 PM |
|
I can hardly believe that nobody sends spam to the bitcoin cash network with the amount of attacks that bitcoin cash is receiving in forums and social media. It sounds pretty hypocritical to say that they are attacking the bitwit network when they do not stop attacking bitcon cash. If they could attack the bch network with spam they would do it, there is simply no spam in any chain, it comes out too expensive
Bitmain and friends is spamming Bitcoin. If the low fee transactions actually go through then they have a more than 50% chance of mining their own fees back. Even if they don't they've driven up everyone else's fees to pay for it. For anyone other than Bitmain to spam Bcash they'd have to buy it and kiss it goodbye forever as no one other than Bitmain is mining it. Who'd want to bother doing that?
|
|
|
|
|